N4523A-17-Q-0007.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

N4523A17Q0007 21-Sep-2017

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

360-535-2976

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

09:00 AM 02 Oct 2017

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

N4523A9. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

MARTY L. SAMPSON

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

N4523A18RC0488H

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD CODE 400

1400 FARRAGUT

CONTRACTING CODE 440

BREMERTON WA 98314

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE N4523A 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD

FRANK WELCH C1121.8

BLDG 514 RECEIVING OFFICER PSNS

1400 FARRAGUT AVE

BREMERTON WA 98314

TEL: 360-447-8101 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$15,000,000

NAICS:

611519

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF26

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

N4523A17Q0007

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

STATEMENT OF WORK

Statement of Work

Engagement Simulation System (ESS)

Tactical Training

1. Background: Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PSNS & IMF), Bremerton, Washington is required to provide training to military and civilian security forces supporting refueling operations within the Controlled Industrial Area (CIA) per NAVSEA Instruction C9210.22E - "Requirements for Security and

Safety of Nuclear Reactor Plants and Special Nuclear Material.” PSNS & IMF does not possess the organic capability to provide this training, hence the need for contractual support.

2. Scope: The contractor shall develop and provide:

2.1 Engagement Simulation System (ESS) Tactical Training plan for military and civilian Naval Security Force

(NSF) assigned to stand posts or serve as a response force in support of refueling operations within the CIA of PSNS

& IMF; and

2.2 Conduct 5 training sessions of 8 ½ hours per session in accordance with the developed ESS Tactical Training plan.

3. Objective: The objective of the ESS Tactical Training plan and training evolution includes:

3.1 Provide the NSF with the tactics and skills necessary to neutralize an armed force intent on doing harm to the

PSNS & IMF facilities;

3.2 Improve security force tactics, techniques, and procedures for: confronting an aggressor’s intent on doing harm to the facility during a refueling mission; ensuring the highest probability of neutralizing threats with the best likelihood of NSF personnel survival.

4. Tasks:

Tasks as follows:

4.1 ESS Tactical Training Plan. The contractor shall provide a training plan outline with the offer/proposal which will be included in the evaluation. The outline shall briefly describe the overall objective, the day-to-day training scenarios (and associated objectives), knowledge requirements, Range Safety Procedures for ESS Tactical Training, Timelines, and examples of Course and Facade Layouts.

The Training Plan shall address the following:

4.1.1 Individual phase – Self Defense/Weapons Retention, Weapons Primary to Secondary Transitions, Tactical and

Combat Reload, Shooting While Moving, and Utilizing and Moving to Cover Positions.

4.1.2 Multiple Responders – Small Team Tactical Movements, Communications, Field of Fire.

4.1.3 Hostage Situations and Containment of Intruders.

4.1.4 Improvised Explosive Device (IED) recognition.

In addition, the training plan shall be developed within the following parameters:

4.1.5 Shall be designed to accommodate 100 students with approximate number of 20 students per day for 5 consecutive days;

4.1.6 The ratio of students to trainers shall be 2 to 1;

4.1.7 All ESS Training Plan daily objectives and requirements shall be accomplished within an 8.5 hour day;

4.1.8 Training shall be scenario based;

4.1.9 Scenarios shall be performed using Engagement Simulation System (ESS) exercises using General Dynamics

Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GD-OTS) Simunition® and the non-lethal FX® Marking Cartridges or equivalent;

and

4.1.10 Incorporate the daily delivery of safety instruction to the students before the training evolution begins.

4.2 ESS Tactical Training Delivery/Performance. Contractor shall provide the ESS Tactical Training to NSF personnel in accordance with the developed ESS Tactical Training Plan and this SOW.

4.3 Training Site Set-Up: The contractor shall be responsible for setting up and establishing the training site. A day before the training begins, following needs to be accomplished:

4.3.1 Contractor picks up the training equipment; drives to training site and set-up the training course;

4.3.2 Inspect and assemble General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GD-OTS) Simunition® and the non-lethal FX® Marking Cartridge;

4.3.3 Review personnel assignments;

4.3.4 Conduct safety walk through with PSNS & IMF team leaders;

4.3.5 Establish lanes, review scenarios, and secures equipment.

4.4 Training Site clean-up and tear down. The contractor shall secure training weapons and remove spent cartridges from the training site at the end of each training day. At the last day of training the contractor shall: break down the training site; perform clean-up of the site; return the training weapons to secured area; and store the training equipment to the location prescribed by the Technical Point of Contact (TPOC).

4.5 Evaluation and Reports.

4.5.1 Evaluation. Every end of each day of training, the contractor shall provide the students with an evaluation form that evaluates the contractor’s ability to provide tactical/ scenario based training which shall be forwarded to the TPOC daily. The evaluation form shall have 3 ratings of Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, and Outstanding that students can choose from for each training objective accomplished that day. It shall also have a section where student can provide written feedback on specific instructor performance, and likes and dislikes and improvement on the training received.

4.5.2 Contractor shall provide a training certificate to all NSF trainees who completed the training.

4.5.3 Contractor shall provide ESS Tactical Training Completion report to TPOC at the end of the last day of training which will, at a minimum, include: contract number and contract title; period of performance; location;

participants’ names – completed/ not-completed; lessons learned; safety issues and/or casualty encountered; and improvement recommendation.

5. Contractor Furnished Material:

The contractor shall provide the following items:

5.1 Training Weapons: The training shall be performed using Engagement Simulation System (ESS) exercises using

General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GD-OTS) Simunition® and the non-lethal FX® Marking

Cartridges. FX marking cartridge is a key component of this effective close-range combat training system.

Contractor shall provide the following weapons and ammunition:

▪ SIMUNITION® type M16s/ M4

▪ SIMUNITION® type M9 semi-auto hand guns

▪ SIMUNITION® type M870 slide action shotguns

▪ Appropriate SIMUNITION ammunition of each weapon

Note: Contractor may ship all equipment to training site prior to training start date with coordination from TPOC.

The contractor shall transport all equipment to a designated location prescribed by the TPOC for overnight storage at the end of each training day.

5.2 Training guides, targets, props or any other materials needed to complete the training.

5.3 ANSI Z87.1 safety equipment for all training staff and students; including full face mask, throat protector, and groin protection. Other PPE to be provided includes elbow and kneepads, hearing protection, and safety glasses.

6. Government Furnished Items/Responsibilities:

The Government will provide the following items:

6.1 Training area complete with facades, barriers, toilet facilities and classroom (tents or weather protection) area complete with tables and chairs to accommodate up to 20 people daily;

6.2 Certification that all PSNS & IMF personnel participating in the training are in good health and eligible to participate;

6.3 On-site access to Emergency Medical Responders;

6.4 Receipt and storage of all weapons and ammunitions if shipped prior to the contractor arrival.

7. Safety:

The contractor shall:

7.1 Have a designated SIMUNITION® system Certified Safety Officer and all Lead Instructors must be

SIMUNITION® system Safety Certified;

7.2 Conduct safety inspection of the entire training facility prior to commencement of the training.

7.3 Provide a certified Range Safety Officer.

Note: Range Safety Officer (RSO) is responsible for pre-scenario safety, scenario safety, and post-scenario safety.

7.4 Provide a daily safety briefing.

8. Training Staff:

Training Staff shall consist of the following 10 positions:

8.1 Officer in Charge (OIC)

8.2 Range Safety Officer SIMUNITION® system Safety Certified (RSO)

8.3 Lead Tactical Instructor and Firearms/Equipment Controller

8.4 Tactical Instructor and Weapons Instructor

8.5 Tactical Instructor and Weapons Instructor

8.6 Tactical Instructor

8.7 Tactical Instructor

8.8 Tactical Instructor

8.9 Aggressor / Instructor

8.10 Aggressor / Instructor

9. Contractor Training Experience: See Additional Instruction to Offeror

10. Security Requirements:

10.1 The training is UNCLASSIFIED.

10.2 Base Pass. Contractors will need access to NBK Bangor upper base to conduct training. No later than 1400 hours, 27 October 2017, contractors will need to arrive at NBK to be issued DBIDS entry credentials. Location:

NAVAL BASE KITSAP, BANGOR, PASS AND ID, SILVERDALE, WA; Visitor Control Center (VCC) Bldg.

1035(Pass &ID) Trident Blvd, Main Gate, Silverdale, WA 98315-0000.

10.3 Submission of badging requirements is required NO LESS THAN FIVE (5) FULL WORKING DAYS

PRIOR TO THE REQUESTED START DATE (8-10 calendar days prior is recommended)

10.3.1 Badging Requirements. See Badging Access Information.

11. Place of Performance:

The contractor’s training exercises shall take place on a grass training field of pre-determined dimensions

(approximately 400ft by 700ft) equipped with plywood facades to simulate real world situations; i.e. clearing an enclosure, securing a pier, and protecting special nuclear material. The training field is located on Bangor

Submarine upper Base. The Visitor Control Center (VCC) is located at 1035 Trident Blvd Naval Base Kitsap –

Bangor Main Gate Silverdale, WA 98315.

12. Period of Performance:

12.1 Contractors shall arrive 27 October 2017 at NBK to get issued entry credentials.

12.2 Contractors shall set up training site October 28 th and 29th as needed.

12.3 October 30, 2017 to November 3, 2017 training will be conducted daily from 0730 to 1600 hours with a 30 minute lunch break.

13. Technical Point of Contact and invoice certifier:

13.1 Mr. Frank Welch shall act as the site Technical Point of Contact and Government Surveillance Officer.

Telephone: 360-447-8101 e-mail: frank.welch@navy.mil

13.2 Mr. Charles D. Phillips will be the government official responsible for certification of invoices in WAWF.

Telephone: 360-476-8406 e-mail: charles.d.phillips3@navy.mil

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS

mailto:frank

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

An Offeror’s proposal is presumed to represent the Offeror’s best efforts to comply with the solicitation requirements. Clarity and completeness of the proposal are of the utmost importance. The proposal must be written in a practical, clear, and concise manner. It must use quantitative terms whenever possible and must avoid qualitative adjectives to the maximum extent possible. Proposal volumes must be internally consistent or the proposal may be considered unrealistic, precluding further consideration for award. The offer should be complete as submitted and not include references to data or information previously submitted. Data previously submitted to the

Navy, if any, will not be incorporated “by reference” into the offer and will not be considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

The proposal must demonstrate that the Offeror understands all RFQ and SOW requirements and their interrelationships. It must demonstrate the Offeror’s familiarity with the detailed aspects of the requirements, and clearly show that the Offeror correctly interpreted all of the requirements. Offerors are cautioned against restating

SOW requirements in their proposal, particularly with regard to technical requirements and must state how all RFQ and SOW requirements will be met. Statements such as "the Offeror understands" and "the Offeror shall/can comply" along with responses that paraphrase the RFQ, are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) does not indicate that an Offeror understands the requirements and will likely result in a diminished evaluation rating.

At the Government’s discretion, the Contractor’s proposal may be incorporated into the final contract, either in whole or in part.

All questions related to the solicitation must be submitted via email to the purchasing agent email

Marty.sampson@navy.mil. The Government will make every attempt to answer all questions in a timely manner.

All questions must be submitted by 12:00 pm (noon) 27SEP2017 Pacific Standard Time (PST).

Proposal Format and Content: All offers must be submitted in three (3) volumes as follows:

Volume I -Technical Capability (Do Not Include Pricing Info)

Volume II - Past Performance (Do Not Include Pricing Info)

Volume III - Price

All copies must be able to be printed out single-sided, on either an 8.5” by 11” paper or 11’ by 17’ paper for diagrams, charts, or graphic materials. Type size 10, Times New Roman font. Pages of each volume must be numbered consecutively.

All offers must be received by 12:00 P.M. 2 October 2017 PST. This posted closing date and time applies to all electronic copy submissions.

Each volume must include the following information:

Cover Sheet – The cover sheet shall include:

Title – N4532A17Q0007 ESS Tactical Training

Volume Name (Technical, Past Performance, or Price)

Volume Number

Name and address of the offeror, point-of-contact (POC), title, telephone number, fax number, email address, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS), Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code.

Table of Contents – The table of contents shall provide enough detail to easily locate all important elements of the proposal.

mailto:Isabelito.cabana@navy.mil

Data submitted directly to the Government by subcontractors in support of the prime offeror’s cost proposal shall follow the above format. In addition, the prime offeror shall be prominently identified. All submissions are subject to the posted submission requirements including the posted closing date and time.

2.0 Specific Volume Instructions

Volume I –Technical Capability

Volume I of the written proposal is the Technical Volume and shall consist of the following sections: Technical

Capability. No cost or pricing information shall be included in any part of the Technical Volume. The Government requires the information described below in order to evaluate the offeror’s ability to perform. Failure to adequately address any of the required information may constitute a “material omission,” precluding further consideration for award.

The Offeror’s Technical Proposal (Volume I) should be organized in a manner to permit evaluation of each of the factors and subfactors as prescribed in 52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS.

Offerors must demonstrate the ability to meet all of the requirements set forth in the solicitation. Technical

Capability will consist of four (4) sub-factors: Technical Approach, Key-Personnel Resume, Staffing Plan, and

Quality Control Plan.

Sub-Factor (1) Technical Approach. Technical Approach shall be submitted with the proposal addressing ALL items in the Statement of Work (SOW). This includes submission of a training plan outline/schedule. The outline shall include a 5 day timeline, with brief description of each event/item during a time period, instructor/s, and other information that may help show the offeror’s understanding of the requirement, thereby affording a meaningful evaluation of the criteria.

Sub-Factor (2) Resume. Resume shall be submitted for one key personnel – Lead Tactical Instructor and

Firearms/Equipment Controller. Resume shall provide the following: name, present place of employment, education and experience, and a narrative on how the qualifications make the proposed personnel the best candidate for the requirement. Failure to confirm employment status and/or employment intent will preclude further consideration and result in the assignment of an “Unacceptable” rating for this sub-factor. The Personnel Resume is limited to two (2) pages.

Personnel Requirements. Due to the nature of this solicitation, special attention shall be paid to the skills, qualifications, and experience levels of the personnel that will be employed by the successful Offeror. All

Contractor personnel shall meet the required experience, education, and other background requirements as set forth below and be fully capable of performing their work in an efficient and reliable manner.

Key Personnel. The Offeror shall provide resume in Volume I, Technical Capability, for the key personnel identified as the Lead Tactical Instructor and Firearms/Equipment Controller. The resume will be evaluated by the

Government against the required personnel qualifications listed below. The proposed personnel qualifications, as set forth in their resumes, shall establish the required qualifications for key personnel for the term of the contract. The successful Offeror shall not replace key personnel with personnel who do not have the qualifications that meet or exceed those proposed by the Offeror and accepted by the Government. Any changes in key personnel, during contract performance, shall be subject to approval by the Contracting Officer and subject to a formal bilateral contract modification to recognize those changes. Offerors are reminded that if the proposed employee is not a present employee of the Offeror, a letter of intent shall be attached to the resume. Failure to confirm employment status/employment intent will preclude further consideration of the resume.

Qualifications for Key Personnel are listed below:

Lead Tactical Instructor and Firearms/Equipment Controller minimum qualifications:

a. Master Training Specialist/ Instructor certification or equivalent issued by USN, USMC or other agencies or police units.

b. Combat Tactics Instructor or experience in Special Forces, SWAT, or other relevant small unit combat experience.

c. Small Arms Range Safety Officer certification or equivalent training.

Note: If the proposed employee is not a current employee of the Offeror, a letter of intent shall be attached to the resume. Failure to confirm employment status /employment intent, will preclude further consideration and result in the assignment of an "Unacceptable" rating for this sub-factor.

Sub-Factor (3) Staffing Plan. Staffing Plan will describe how the Offeror will assign personnel to meet the SOW requirements. Staffing Plan will address the following areas: reporting chain of command; methods for overall supervision and immediate supervision at the work areas; how positions and skill-sets will support tasks identified in

SOW and the training plan. Staffing plan shall include a summary table in the following format:

Staffing Plan

# Position Name Name Qualifications/ Certifications

Role Description (in relation to SOW)

Letter of Intent

Attached (if not contractor employee)

Officer In Charge*

Range Safety Officer **

(RSO)

Lead Tactical Instructor and

Firearms/Equipment Controller

Tactical Instructor and

Weapons Instructor

4. Tactical Instructor and

Weapons Instructor

Tactical Instructor

Aggressor / Instructor

Aggressor / Instructor

*OIC can be one of the instructors.

**RSO shall be SIMUNITION® system Safety Certified

Sub-Factor (4) Quality Control Plan. The Quality Control Plan (QCP) will describe the contractor’s self-monitoring plan, safety/emergency plan, and discrepancy resolution (i.e. the ability to incorporate and address unplanned events and circumstances).

The Technical Proposal shall consist of no more than 10 pages, excluding resumes, employment agreements, specific Quality Control Plan, copies of certificates and licenses, title page and table of contents. Except as otherwise noted in this solicitation, resumes may not exceed two pages per individual. Offerors are cautioned that no more than the first 10 pages of their Technical Proposals will be evaluated. If any offer is not in compliance with the page limitation on Technical Proposals, the extra pages will be removed and not evaluated.

Volume II – Past Performance

(a) Past Performance shall be evaluated based on the submission of past performance data supplied by the Offeror, the Government’s verification of that data (including information separately provided), and review of any other pertinent information.

The government shall evaluate the Offeror’s past performance performed within the past five years which is similar in scope, magnitude, and complexity to that detailed in the Statement of Work. Offerors who present similar contracts should provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the relevance of the contracts or efforts to the requirements of the solicitation. Offerors may submit performance data regarding current contract performance as long as a minimum of one year of performance has been completed as of the closing date of this solicitation.

If the Offeror possesses no relevant (see note) past performance, it must affirmatively state this fact in the Past

Performance Information Form. Each Offeror shall demonstrate relevant past performance or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant past performance. If the Offeror does neither of the foregoing, the proposal may not be eligible for award.

Note: “Relevant past performance” is defined as successfully completed contract of similar nature (i.e. providing tactical training for security force in security protection of nuclear material) and value.

Volume III – Price.

The offeror shall submit one price proposal for the entire training evolution to include expenses necessary for shipping of equipment, and set-up and tear-down activities. This one final price will be the basis for price evaluation.

BADGING ACCESS INFORMATION

1. NAVAL BASE KITSAP (NBK) and/or PSNS & IMF CONTROLLED INDUSTRIAL AREA (CIA)

ACCESS:

2. Contractor personnel shall comply with all current badging and security procedure requirements for gaining access to Department of Defense (DoD) Installations/Government Sites. Access to Navy

Installations or Sites may only be gained by obtaining a badge (either permanent or temporary) from theVisitor Control Center (VCC) in building 981 (Pass & ID). It is the contractor’s responsibility to check for, and obtain changes and updated information from the VCC on a continual basis.

3. The following Identification Cards (ID) are authorized by Naval Base Kitsap and Naval Station

Everett to be used by visitors 12 years old or greater, while being escorted by a Civil Servant or Military member holding a current CAC Card, effective 2 February 2016:

• Drivers licenses from states other than Washington, Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri and New

Mexico (unless WA, IL, MN, MI and NM licenses are the “Enhanced” version)

• U.S. passport

• U.S. passport card

• DHS trusted traveler cards ( Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)

• Permanent resident card

• Border crossing card

• DHS-designated enhanced driver’s license

• Federally recognized, tribal-issued photo ID

• HSPD-12 PIV card

• Foreign government-issued passport

• Canadian provincial driver’s license or Indian and Northern Affairs-Canada card

• Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)

4. Contractor employees are required to have an individual identification badge as well as one (1) of the four (4) credentials listed below in their possession to gain access to job sites:

5. Common Access Card (CAC): Contractors who have a need to access a government computer system may be eligible for a contractor CAC; most contractors are not eligible for a CAC. Contact the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or

Contracting Officer’s Security Officer for assistance as needed.

6. Single Day Pass: Visiting vendors/contractors requiring infrequent access may obtain daily passes directly from the individual Navy Installation by submitting identification credentials for verification and undergoing a criminal screening/background check. A new pass is required to gain access each day. Passes are issued by Naval Base Kitsap (NBK). The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI)

National Crime Information Center (NCIC) criminal database and FBI Terrorist Watch

List will be checked daily prior to entry. In addition, NBK must check the Navy’s

Consolidated Law Enforcement Operations Center (CLEOC) database to ensure an unescorted visitor has no objectionable criminal record, is not on the Terrorist Watch List and has not been previously debarred from entry onto any Navy Installation.

7. Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) Program: Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) has established the Defense Biometric

Identification System (DBIDS) for access control to CNIC Installations via Entry Control

Points (ECP). DBIDS is an enterprise identity management and perimeter installation access control solution in which Contractor personnel who enroll, and are approved, are subsequently granted access to the installation for a period up to three years, or the length of the contract, whichever is less, and are not required to obtain a new pass from the Base

Pass and Identification Office for each visit. There are no fees associated with obtaining a DBIDS credential.

8. The Government performs background screening and credentialing.

Throughout the year the Contractor employee must continue to meet background screening standards. Periodic background screenings are conducted to verify continued DBIDS participation and installation access privileges. DBIDS access privileges will be immediately suspended or revoked if at any time a Contractor employee becomes ineligible.

9. Access to Installation. All Contractor personnel shall obtain access to the installation through enrollment and registration into the Defense

Biometric Identification System (DBIDS). The Contractor shall provide the

Contracting Officer with the name of their designated Service Contractor

Administrator (SCA) for enrollment in DBIDS. Contact the Contracting

Officer’s Representative (COR) or Contracting Officer’s Security Officer for assistance as needed. Once enrolled, the Contractor must provide the DBIDS

Registrar with an approved employee list and then direct their employees to register into DBIDS.

10. DBIDS Credentials. Contractor employees shall furnish a completed copy of the SECNAV 5512/1 form to obtain the required background check and visit the local Navy Installation Visitor Control Center to obtain a

DBIDS credential once approved. The SECNAV 5512/1 form and additional information about DBIDS can be found at:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/om/dbids.html.

11. The Contractor may initiate the adjudication process when a https://www.cnic.navy.mil/om/dbids.html background screen failure results in disqualification from participation in

DBIDS and the Contractor employees do not agree with the reason for disqualification. The Contractor may also apply for a waiver when a background screening failure results in disqualification from participation in

DBIDS. The Commanding Officer will be the final waiver determination authority.

12. The Contractor shall immediately collect employee DBIDS credentials and notify the Contracting Officer in writing:

13. That an employee has departed the company without having properly returned or surrendered their DBIDS credentials.

14. That there is a reasonable basis to conclude that an employee, or former employee, might pose a risk, compromise, or threat to the safety or security of the installation or anyone therein.

15. DBIDS Paper Passes. In the event that a visitor, vendor, or

Contractor employee elects not to participate in DBIDS, the individual will be issued DBIDS paper pass from the Base Pass and Identification Office in order to access to the installation. The time standard for the validity of a pass to access an installation will be not more than thirty (30) days and may be further restricted based on local policy or by Federal, DOD, Navy, and CNIC guidance.

The Government will not be responsible for any cost or lost time associated with obtaining paper passes or added vetting or inspections incurred by nonparticipants in the DBIDS credentialing process.

16. Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC):

17. Trucking and Longshoremen industry, to include Military Sealift

Command (MSC) personnel are authorized to use this credential for unescorted access so long as the holder also has in his/her possession an original Bill Of

Lading indicating that the delivery of goods is within the perimeter of the host installation, or in the case of

MSC personnel, the holder has in his/her possession, a current Merchant Mariner identification card.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

ESS Tactical Training

FFP

1 Job

Engagement Simulations Systems (ESS) Tactical Training

For Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Personnel IAW the Statement of Work (SOW).

Training will take place Naval Base Kitsap, Bangor, Washington.

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: N4523A18RC0488H

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N4523A18RC0488H

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 27-OCT-2017 TO

03-NOV-2017

N/A PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD

FRANK WELCH C1121.8

BLDG 514 RECEIVING OFFICER PSNS

1400 FARRAGUT AVE

BREMERTON WA 98314

360-447-8101

FOB: Destination

N4523A

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016

52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic

Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items JAN 2017

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items JAN 2017

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7005 Oral Attestation of Security Responsibilities NOV 2001

252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7009 Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party

Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information

OCT 2016

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation

Support

MAY 2016

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-2 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (AUG 1996)

(a) This clause applies to the extent that this contract involves access to information classified "Confidential,"

"Secret," or "Top Secret."

(b) The Contractor shall comply with (1) the Security Agreement (DD Form 441), including the National Industrial

Security Program Operating Manual (DOD 5220.22-M); and (2) any revisions to that manual, notice of which has been furnished to the Contractor.

(c) If, subsequent to the date of this contract, the security classification or security requirements under this contract are changed by the Government and if the changes cause an increase or decrease in security costs or otherwise affect any other term or condition of this contract, the contract shall be subject to an equitable adjustment as if the changes were directed under the Changes clause of this contract.

(d) The Contractor agrees to insert terms that conform substantially to the language of this clause, including this paragraph (d) but excluding any reference to the Changes clause of this contract, in all subcontracts under this contract that involve access to classified information.

(End of clause)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

This solicitation is 100% Set Aside for Small Business concerns only following FAR 13 methodology. Proposals by other contractors will NOT be considered. The award resulting from this solicitation will be a single Firm Fixed Price contract type. The contract will be for 1 training session with period of performance 30 October 2017 – 3

November 2017. The Contracting Officer intends to conduct evaluation of proposals using the Lowest Price

Technically Acceptable source selection process.

To be eligible for award, the Offeror must fully comply with the instructions included in Additional Instruction to Offeror, and sufficiently address all solicitation requirements. As such, offers that take exception to any of the terms and conditions of this RFQ, propose any additional term or condition, or omit any required information, may not be considered for award. Alternate proposals are NOT authorized and will be rejected.

A single Firm Fixed Price contract will be awarded without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later deems it to be necessary. Offeror that takes exception to the Government’s technical requirements in the technical volume will not be considered for award; therefore, any exception to the Government’s technical requirements must be resolved prior to the solicitation closing date.

To be considered eligible for award, each Offeror must submit a single proposal that contains a complete and accurate response to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will accept only one offer. No multiple awards will be made.

Any inconsistency, within the price proposal or between the technical or price proposals, should be fully explained, or it may be considered a discrepancy within the offer and a risk in the Offeror’s ability to perform, thereby making the offer to be unacceptable. The proposal shall be in the format prescribed herein, and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified in “Additional Instruction to Offeror.”

Offers will be evaluated on each of the following evaluation factors, listed in descending order of importance:

Factor I - Technical Capability

Factor II - Past Performance

Factor III - Price

Factor I - Technical Capability, will be evaluated based on four (4) sub-factors as follows:

1. Technical Approach

2. Key-Personnel Resume

3. Staffing Plan

4. Quality Control Plan

Factor I - Technical Capability Grading Criteria:

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY, Factor I, represents MINIMUM acceptable criteria. Offerors’ technical information will be used to determine whether the services proposed meet the specifications included in this solicitation.

Services offered, as provided in Offerors’ technical information, will be evaluated as technically acceptable or technically unacceptable. Offers which are determined to be technically unacceptable will not be considered further for award. The narrative description of each grade follows, as appropriate for Factor I, Technical Capability and its sub-factors. Offerors must be rated technically “Acceptable” for each sub-factor listed above to receive an overall technically “Acceptable” and in order to be evaluated for Past Performance (Factor II). Failure to meet technically acceptable standards in any subfactor will result in a finding of technically “Unacceptable” and will not be considered for award.

Technical. The term “technical,” as used herein, refers to non-cost factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the offeror’s proposal will satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. The Technical Evaluation Team shall evaluate the offeror’s proposal against these requirements to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined in Table

M-1.

TABLE M-1 COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATING

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is un-awardable.

Factor II: Past Performance Ratings

Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in Table M-2.

TABLE M-2 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.” However, offers that are rated “acceptable” but without record of relevant past performance may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government when compared to offerors with relevant past performance, and thus, may not be considered further for award.

Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant shall be unique to each LPTA source selection. Therefore, the solicitation shall establish the criteria for recency and relevancy in relation to the specific requirement being procured. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the current procurement.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:

Past performance information may be provided by the offeror, as solicited.

Past performance information may be obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition.

Past performance information shall be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee

Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining

Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

The evaluation team will review the past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance competence assessment.

Factor III – Price

A single firm fixed-price contract shall be awarded to the lowest price offer that is rated acceptable in Factors I and

II.

Although solicitation is full and open competition after exclusion of sources, competition result may prove inadequate to satisfy requirement to perform price analysis. In this situation, cost analysis maybe required to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful offeror’s price.

The burden of proof for price credibility rests with the Offeror. Offerors are cautioned that, to the extent proposed price appear unrealistic, the Government may infer either a lack of understanding of the requirements, increased risk of performance, or lack of credibility on the part of the offeror.

(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR

EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items:

(1) 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements (JAN 2017)

(section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L.

113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions)).

(2) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (Nov 2015).

(3) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553).

(4) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004) (Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78 (19

U.S.C. 3805 note)).

(b) The Contractor shall comply with the FAR clauses in this paragraph (b) that the Contracting Officer has indicated as being incorporated in this contract by reference to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items: (Contracting Officer check as appropriate.)

___ (1) 52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government (Sept 2006), with Alternate I (Oct 1995)

(41 U.S.C. 4704 and 10 U.S.C. 2402).

____ (2) 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (Oct 2015) (41 U.S.C. 3509).

____ (3) 52.203-15, Whistleblower Protections under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (June

2010) (Section 1553 of Pub. L. 111-5). (Applies to contracts funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment

Act of 2009.)

___ (4) 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Oct 2016) (Pub. L. 109-

282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).

___ (5) [Reserved]

___ (6) 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements (Oct 2016) (Pub. L. 111-117, section 743 of Div.

C).

___ (7) 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (Oct 2016) (Pub.

L. 111-117, section 743 of Div. C).

XXX (8) 52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Oct 2015) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).

____ (9) 52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (July 2013) (41

U.S.C. 2313).

____ (10) [Reserved]

____ (11)(i) 52.219-3, Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole-Source Award (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657a).

____ (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2011) of 52.219-3.

(12) (i) 52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns (OCT 2014)

(if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer) (15 U.S.C. 657a).

____ (ii) Alternate I (JAN 2011) of 52.219-4.

____ (13) [Reserved]

XXX (14)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644).

____ (ii) Alternate I (NOV 2011).

____ (iii) Alternate II (NOV 2011).

____ (15)(i) 52.219-7, Notice of Partial Small Business Set-Aside (June 2003) (15 U.S.C. 644).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Oct 1995) of 52.219-7.

____ (iii) Alternate II (Mar 2004) of 52.219-7.

____ (16) 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Nov 2016) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)).

____ (17)(i) 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Jan 2017) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)).

____ (ii) Alternate I (Nov 2016) of 52.219-9.

____ (iii) Alternate II (Nov 2016) of 52.219-9.

____ (iv) Alternate III (Nov 2016) of 52.219-9.

____ (v) Alternate IV (Nov 2016) of 52.219-9.

____ (18) 52.219-13, Notice of Set-Aside of Orders (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644(r)).

____ (19) 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (JAN 2017) (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(14)).

____ (20) 52.219-16, Liquidated Damages—Subcon-tracting Plan (Jan 1999) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(F)(i)).

____ (21) 52.219-27, Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C.

657f).

____ (22) 52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (July 2013) (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)).

____ (23) 52.219-29, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women-

Owned Small Business Concerns (Dec 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).

____(24) 52.219-30, Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns

Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program (Dec 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637(m)).

XXX (25) 52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755).

XXX (26) 52.222-19, Child Labor--Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Oct 2016) (E.O. 13126).

XXX (27) 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Apr 2015).

XXX (28) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Sept 2016) (E.O. 11246).

(29) 52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Oct 2015) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

XXX (30) 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities (July 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793).

(31) 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans (FEB 2016) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

____ (32) 52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec 2010) (E.O.

13496).

XXX (33)(i) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (March 2, 2015) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).

____ (ii) Alternate I (March 2, 2015) of…