Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation of Commercial Items;

The Government will award a single award Firm Fixed Price contract resulting from this solicitation on a technically acceptable, lowest price basis to responsible offerors whose offer conforming to the solicitation are evaluated and determined technically acceptable to the Government.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate an offerors proposal:

(A) Technical

(B) Past Performance;

(C) Price;

Quotations will be evaluated first under factor (A) which represents the minimum acceptable criteria.

(A) Technical Capability:

The Government has a requirement for Cable Television and Internet Services. The technical capability of an offeror will be evaluated on the offeror’s ability to provide qualified technicians to perform the services in accordance with the statement of work (SOW) for the base period and four (4) option years.

Technical Data/supporting documentation shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(a)(4). Offerors shall provide documentation in the form of product pamphlets, flyers, and/or channel listing

Offerors submitting data/supporting documentation under (A) will be evaluated and if the data/documentation is determined acceptable the offeror will be further evaluated under factors (B) and (C).

(B) Past Performance:

Offeror’s are required to provide prior sale/performance history (within the last three years) for the type of services and parts required by the Government.

SEE PAST PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET (LAST PAGE)

The Contracting Officer will evaluate Offeror's PAST PERFORMANCE as follows:

Acceptable: Vendor has relevant past performance, no monetary assessment for non-conforming services, no related terminations for default, met all related performance schedules within contract scope.

Unacceptable: Monetary assessment for non-conforming services, related terminations for default or cause, poor performance and continued miss delivery schedules to related contract efforts;

Neutral: No relevant past performance data available for evaluation.

Offerors are reminded that an offer that receives a Neutral on Past Performance may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government and, thus, may be an unsuccessful proposal. Accordingly, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that a higher-priced proposal with an Acceptable rating on Past Performance may be more advantageous to the Government than a lower-priced proposal with a Neutral rating on Past Performance.

(C) Pricing: Offeror’s are to provide Unit Pricing for each Line Item listed under this solicitation, total cost for each Line Item, total cost for each period of performance and a overall total cost for the entire proposal.

Published Price Listings:

Offeror’s are to provide commercially published (electronic or paper) price lists for their labor rates, regular time and emergency call in labor rates (if available).

Available: Yes _____ No______

Offeror’s are to provide parts catalog price listings or similar pricing information that would reflect parts pricing.

Available: Yes______ No ______

Parts Pricing – Provide % of markup to be applied per year (provide if there is a markup established).

(D) Options:

The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

As stated the two twelve (12) month option periods are “Unilateral Options” at the discretion of the Government.

(E) At the discretion of the Contracting Officer the Government intends to evaluate quotations and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Each initial offer should therefore contain the contractors best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than low offeror if the determination of the Contracting Officer is that the low priced vendor is not considered the best value to the Government.

RATINGS:

Offerors that provide the documentation requested under Factor (A) and found acceptable will be given an “Acceptable” rating. These offerors will have their Past Performance and Pricing evaluated. Offerors that receive an Unacceptable rating for the Technical Capability will not be further evaluated.

RFQ: N00244-19-R-0011

PAST PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET

Contractor Performance Data:

1. The performance data provided will be used to evaluate your Company’s past performance contract cost/price, technical and delivery objectives.

2. List performance data on your three most recently completed Federal Government contracts (not to exceed three years since completion) for like or similar items required by this solicitation. If you do not have three Federal Government contracts, then list commercial, state or local contracts, in that order, to complete this report.

3. Contract Number for reference #1:

a. Awarded by:

b. Address:

c. City/State/Zip:

d. Contact name:

e. telephone/fax/email:

f. Contract type/contract number:

g. Item or service description:

h. Quantity:

i. Hourly rate / Contract cost:

j. ___ Yes* ____ No - Was consideration or a monetary withhold assessed against this contract for non-conforming supplies/services?

k. ___ Yes* ____ No - Was, or is, any part of this contract terminated for default or involved in litigation?

l. ___ Yes* ____ No - Was any warranty work completed on delivered items?

m. ___ Yes* ____ No - Were all items delivered within the original contract schedule?

n. ___ Yes* ____ No - Has your Company received any quality awards in the past three year?

o. For all answers with an asterisk, please provide an explanation. Describe any corrective actions initiated to solve any of the above-described problems/deficiencies on this contract. Discuss the success of the corrective actions taken.