1022-04_(SAP_19-007)_-_DRS_Hardware__Software___JA_Redacted.pdf
PDF 315 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DRS Software (SW) & Hardware (HW) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0017819R2604
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
DAHLGREN DIVISION
6149 WELSH ROAD SUITE 203
DAHLGREN VIRGINIA 22448-5130
IN REPLY REFER TO
J&A Number: 14116
Code: 026
24 January 2019
JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL
FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
JUSTIFICATION
1. Contracting Activity
The Naval Sea Systems Command, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD), Contracts Department
2. Description of the Action Being Approved
Award of a firm fixed priced contract on a sole source basis for critical equipment manufactured by DRS Laurel
Technologies.
3. Description of Supplies/Services
DRS Laurel Technologies will be providing the following equipment:
Part Number Description Quantity
LT-2000372-14 IRIS Processor, VP B12 11
LT-2000372-15 IRIS Processor, VP B12 10
LT-2000450-04
IRIS VDAD2 VME Circuit
Card Assembly (CCA)
Delivery is required 26 weeks after receipt of the order, sooner, if available. The Government's minimum needs have been verified by the certifying technical and requirements personnel.
J&A Number: 14116
2 NCH
53.6-2
The estimated cost of the proposed contract action is $623,779.00.
The following funding will be utilized for this procurement:
FY18 FY19 Totals
SCN $74,842.00 $74,842.00 $149,684.00
OPN $474,095.00 $0.00 $474,095.00
Total $548,937.00 $74,842.00 $623,779.00
4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open
Competition
The procedures in FAR subpart 13.5 were used in accordance with 41
U.S.C. 1901.
5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Statutory Authority
The IRIS Processors and IRIS VDAD2 VME CCAs are
These specific components have been identified as the sole pieces of hardware possessing the form, fit, and function to match joint capabilities that the national mission operators have been trained to perform the mission with. The procurement of the hardware and software selected to support the
DRS Laurel Technologies is the original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) of these proprietary components with no authorized resellers available, therefore, proprietary data limits competition.
6. Description of Efforts Made to Solicit Offers from as Many
Offerors as Practicable
Market research included contacting the OEM, DRS, to determine if authorized resellers were available for these proprietary products. That market research has confirmed that DRS possesses the proprietary design drawings, manufacturing processes and integration/test procedures necessary to produce these items with no authorized resellers available.
3 NCH
The proposed contract was synopsized on the Federal Business
Opportunities (FEDBIZOPPS) website on 14 Dec 2018 and only DRS
Laurel Technologies expressed interest in this requirement. No additional market research was conducted because it is not practicable, for the reasons discussed in paragraph 5 above, for any company other than DRS Laurel Technologies to provide the required equipment.
7. Determination of Fair and Reasonable Costs
The Contracting Officer has determined that the anticipated cost to the Government for the equipment covered by the J&A will be fair and reasonable.
8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Competition
For the reasons set forth in Paragraph 5, Dahlgren Contract
Department has no plans at this time to compete future contracts for the type of equipment covered by this document, due to the fact that the components are proprietary, military focused catalog items. DRS is not willing to sell the requisite data rights to the government for these catalog items that would enable competitive procurement. If another potential source emerges, Dahlgren Contract Department will assess whether competition for future requirements is feasible.
4 NCH
CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL
TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION (FAR 6.303-2(b))
I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance, which are included in this justification and its supporting data, are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (NMCARS 5206.303(90))
I have determined this justification is legally sufficient.
CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION (FAR 6.303-2(a)(12))
I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Angela Bowling, Contracting Officer, 026, Phone No., Date
13 Feb 19
File details come from the government source that posted it.