N00164_16T0043_Non-Comp.pdf

NONCOMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT JUSTIFICATION

(Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAPs) Micropurchase Threshold to $1 SOK)

I he ... crv1cc or produci( ... l h~tcd on rcqu1 ... 111on(s) bclm\ 1.;farc precluded from comrclilio11 lbr rc.l.)on~ md11 atcd hclO\\

SWXPlt>7434

There arc no i.11i1ablc subl>titute~ available.

Restricted to the lo I lowing source. Provide onginul m111111faNuTer's n::11nl'. (If a 'Ok source manulaclurcr d1!:tnbute~ "1a deJlcr-.. ~pro\ 1dc dealer mforma11on.)

Manufacturer: .

Manufacturer's Dealer'Rep:

Description of the product or service'> required. lhe estimated cost, and required delivery date (product'>) or Period of Perfonnance (scrv1cci.) PN: now. with options lirst delivery of

Remaining QTY to be received up to 3 years.

Specific characteristics of the matcrrnl or service 1hat limit the availability to a sole source (unique features. function of the llcm;

unique capabilities; facihttcs or i.pec1al equipment. etc.). Describe 111 detail why onl) this suggested sour\;e can furnish the requirements 101he exclus1un of other ~ources. This specific part i" called out on the procedure Item and must be utthzed \\-hen replacing parts on the . Previous!), this part has been a non mandatOr) replacement part. but are now showing age. and a reduction in performance. l'he engineering group is drafting a change request to l:hange thi~ part from a non-mandatory part to a mandatory replacement part. The

Radar is tested and appro\led to be shock and environmental qualtficd to meet Ml L-STD-90 ID standards. A new vendor would have to be evaluated. qualified and approved. 1 he scheduling and testing itself rnuld cause a delny of 6-12 months. and cost in excess of $166,000.00. If the new vendor did not pass qualificauon, both the time and money would be lost Without the the Fleet would be at risk of not ha"ing its primary t~o-dimensional, long range air search radar.

I-or non-pe1sonal services indicate the h1ghl)' tech11ical or <;pecrnli.tcd expeni~c requ ired. Describe the contractor's workforce, method~. materials or unique management or operating systems If it 1:. unique because of knowledge of key individuals. what 1s the basis of the 1..nowledgc that <mother firm could not obtain the ~amc or equiv:ilent expertise? Could another firm obtain the necessar> highly specialized C\pericnce or technical capability in time to perfom1 the requirement?

[81Thc required product(s) or sen.ice(~} 1epresent(s) the minimum requirements of the Government and no other product(s) or service(s) can satisf> the need.

FILL IN ALL APf>l.ICABI £ BLANKS BELOW

0The producl(s) must be ~ompat1blc in all aspcc1o; (!Orm. lit, and function) with existing srtem!. pre~entl)r installed Ocscnbc 1he equipment )'OU have now and how the new item service must coordinate. connect, or in1erfacc with the existing system

[81Patent right~. cop)righ1s. trade secrets. technical data. secret processes. or 01her propriety data essential for contract pcrfonnance limits competition The proprietar> data 1s·

181Thei.e are "direct replacements parts/components for existing equipment . Shock Absorbers. PN as referenced in the procedure

OOthcr infonnation to support a sole-source buy

I CERTIFY THAT STATEMENTS CHECKED, ANO INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVf:, ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLF.OGE. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE PROCESSING OF THIS SOU:

ritle j,.,~ ., k:.i Date 12/14/ 15 .• - - -· .. l!l!t... - -·- - . - . - - - - - - - .... - - .. - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .

na!>cd on re\ 1C\\ o/ih~ above statement~ :incl 111fomia11on. I .:onrnr \\uh pr°'-C:"-'lllS th1~ procurement on a noncompetiti\c b,1,.,i'

ContractingOmcerS1gnarure ~ ~ Date l/J:::;//(,