16RJQ16_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The follow ing is the reason for this amendment:

(1) Extend proposal response time.

(2) Clarify line item 0004 delivery schedule.

(3) Revise Exhibit A (CDRL), Exhibit B (Statement of Work (SOW) Rev1), and Exhibit C (Performance Specification (PS) Rev 1).

(4) Revise clause CNIN-L-0002.

See summary changes for additional information. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Dec-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00164-16-R-JQ16

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Oct-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Dec-2015

CODE

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

J. DICKINSON (812-854-5417)

BLDG 3373

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

N00164 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N00164-16-R-JQ16

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES (REVISED)

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Dec-2015 02:00 PM to 30-Dec-2015 02:00 PM.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following delivery information (Line Item 0004) has been revised TO:

DELIVERY INFORMATION:

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 The required delivery schedule under line item 0001 is not later than 12 months after contract award.

A proposed accelerated delivery schedule is advantageous to the

Government.

1 Lot NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

CRANE DIV

M/F: SCOTT ARTHUR (BDLG 3291)

BLDG 3291

300 HWY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

812-854-6650 FOB: Destination

N00164

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0004 The required delivery schedule under line item 0004 is not later than 90 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order and completion of CDR.

advantageous to the

Government.

6 Each Same as above, CLIN 0001. N00164

0005 The required delivery schedule under line item 0005 is 30 Each not later than 90 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order with 30 Each not later than every 30 calendar days thereafter until complete.

advantageous to the

Government.

Not to exceed 1,000 Each

Same as above, CLIN 0001. N00164

0006 15 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order.

* Same as above, CLIN 0001. N00164

0007 30 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order.

* Same as above, CLIN 0001. N00164

0008 60 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order.

* Same as above, CLIN 0001. N00164

0009 In accordance with the CDRLs.

1 Lot In accordance with the CDRLs. N00164

* Line Item 0006, 0007, 0008 has an estimated combined ordering maximum not to exceed value of $2,500,000.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following documents (Exhibit A, B, and C) has been revised TO:

HQ J-2-0002 CONTRACT LANGUAGE FOR SECTION J

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this contract:

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) A001

Engineering Drawings, Developmental Design Drawings/Models and Associated Lists – Phase I & II

1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A002 Contractor's Progress Status and Management Report – Phase I & II

1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A003 EMD Test Plan – Phase I 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A004 EMD Test Procedures – Phase I 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A005 EMD Test/Inspection Report – Phase I 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A006 LRIP Test Plan – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A007 LRIP Test Procedures – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A008 LRIP Test/Inspection Report – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A009 PAT Test Plan – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A010 PAT Test Procedures – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A011 PAT Test/Inspection Report – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A012 Configuration Status Accounting Information –

Phase I & II

1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A013 Notice of Revision (NOR) – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A014 Request for Variance(RFV) – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A015 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A016 Proposed Spare Parts List – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A017 Safety Assessment Report (SAR) – Phase I & II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A018 Report, Record of Meetings/Minutes – Phase I & II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A019 Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) –

Phase I & II

1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A020 Risk Management-Mitigation Plan – Phase I & II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A021 Reliability Program Plan – Phase I & II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A022 Integrated Master Schedule – Phase I & II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A023 Failure Summary and Analysis Report – Phase II 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 A024 Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Manual and

Assoc Supp Data – Phase II

1 - 3 01 DEC 2015

A025 Data Accession List 1 - 3 01 DEC 2015 Exhibit B Statement of Work (SOW) Rev 1 1 - 24 30 NOV 2015 Exhibit C Performance Specification (PS) Rev 1 1 - 20 30 NOV 2015 Exhibit D Requisitioned Government Furnished Property (RGFP) TBD TBD Attachment 01 Small Business Participation Data Form 1 - 1 16 OCT 2015 Attachment 02 Past Performance Matrix 1 - 3 16 OCT 2015 Attachment 03 Contractor Performance Questionnaire 1 - 3 16 OCT 2015 Note: Exhibit D RGFP will be completed and provided as required on individual delivery orders. Attachment 01, 02, and 03 form a part of this solicitation only.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following clause (Volume II—Technical/Risk Capability & Management Approach (Factor II Paragraph (B)(2)), Volume III—Past Performance Summaries & Matrix (Parapgrah (d)), and VOLUME IV – Factor IV – Price (Paragraph (c)) has been revised TO:

CNIN-L-0002 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS – BEST VALUE (Jun 2014)

Note: This provision addresses proposal requirements for Phase I of the acquisition.

Proposal requirements for a potential Phase II down-select award are at the solicitation’s Section H.

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

A complete proposal will include the following:

Document / Information Volume Number / Page Limits

Signed RFP with Amendments, a cover letter a cover letter, and Subcontracting Plan in accordance with clause 52.219-9.

(1 hard copy or 1 CD-ROM if not submitting electronically)

Volume I (Cover Letter 2 pages limit)

Technical/Risk Capability (5 hard copies or 8 CD-ROMs if not submitting electronically)

Volume II (30 page limit)

Management Approach (5 hard copies or 8 CD-ROMs if not submitting electronically)

Volume II (15 page limit)

Past Performance Summaries & Matrix (2 hard copies or 2 CD- ROM if not submitting electronically)

Volume III (Min 3, Max 5 references)

(15 page limit) Pricing/Cost Proposal (2 copy or 2 CD-ROM if not submitting electronically)

Volume IV (No page limit)

General Information:

a) For proposal purposes, the estimated date of contract award is 30 April 2016.

b) COVER LETTER: The proposal shall include a cover letter signed by an individual authorized to commit the company to the proposal. The cover letter shall be submitted with Volume I. The cover letter shall identify all enclosures being transmitted as part of the proposal. The letter shall reference the solicitation number and acknowledge that it transmits an offer in response to the solicitation. The cover letter required by this paragraph supersedes and replaces the “First Page” requirements referred to in FAR 52.215-1, Subsection (c)(2). It shall state

Solicitation Number (N00164-16-R-JQ16) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number, Duns Number, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant DCMA Office (can be found at http://www.dcma.mil/ ) Proposal validity through 30 April 2016.

Names, telephone numbers and email addresses of persons authorized to conduct negotiations, as well as the names of the official authorized to bind the offeror’s organization shall be clearly identified, Any exceptions taken to any requirements of the solicitation, to include but not be limited to technical exceptions, clauses and or provisions. The cover letter shall indicate in which volume and on what page of the offeror’s proposal the exception is addressed.

A copy of the offerors SAM registration information from the SAM website. This does not count towards the page limitation of the cover letter.

c) Proposals shall not contain classified information.

d) Offerors may submit only one proposal as a prime contractor, but may be listed as a subcontractor in one or more competing proposals.

e) Solicitation information and amendments will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov. Offerors may e-mail written questions requesting clarification of the RFP to the Government via the Contract Specialist, Jonathan Dickinson, at: jonathan.dickinson@navy.mil. The Government will answer questions received up to 14 days prior to the closing date of the RFP and will provide responses to interested parties via an amendment to the solicitation. Questions received after this date may not be answered.

f) Delivery& Submission Method

1) Mailed or Commercial Delivery of Proposals. Mailed or commercially delivered hard or soft copy proposals shall be sent to the address:

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER CRANE DIV

J. DICKINSON (812-854-5417)

BLDG 3373 ROOM 223C140

300 HIGHWAY 361

CRANE IN 47522-5001

Proposals are due by the date and time in Block 9 on Page 1 of the solicitation.

Please notify the Contract Specialist at jonathan.dickinson@navy.mil if a hard copy is being sent and provide a copy of the shipping label.

2) If a hard copy proposal is submitted, an electronic copy of the proposal must also be provided on CD-ROMs/DVDs, read-only memory. Microsoft Office, word, presentation and spreadsheet products are preferred. Changes, as a result of negotiations, will be conformed on CD-ROMs/DVDs and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the left margin.

3) Electronic Delivery of Proposals. Electronic submission to jonathan.dickinson@navy.mil is acceptable. Timeliness of proposals will be determined IAW 52.212-1(f) or 52.215-1(c)(3)(ii)(A), Be advised that large electronic files are problematic due to limitations on Government email inbox. In addition .zip file are stripped from e-mails and cannot be submitted. Utilization of AMRDEC SAFE at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx AMRDEC SAFE supports file sizes up to 2GB. If offers are submitted to AMRDEC SAFE instead of directly to the contracting officer, AMRDEC SAFE will send an email to the contracting officer once the offer files are uploaded notifying the contracting officer that the files have been received. For an offer to be timely that is uploaded to AMRDEC SAFE, the notification email must be received by the contracting officer by the due date/time set for receipt of offers. Offerors who upload their offers to AMRDEC SAFE are encouraged to do so in sufficient time to allow for verification with the contracting officer that notice of receipt of the proposal has been received.

4) The electronic files shall be submitted on CD-ROMs formatted for Microsoft® Windows Office 2010™; text shall be prepared using Microsoft® Word ™ compatible applications; and spreadsheets, worksheets, or workbooks shall be prepared using Microsoft® Excel ™ compatible applications. All schedules shall be in Microsoft Project 2010™. The outside of the CD-ROM shall be clearly marked with the following:

Solicitation number Offeror’s name Contents of disk (Volume #).

All files shall conform to DOS™ naming conventions (e.g., no more than eight characters and a four character extensions); only the following extensions shall be used:

.docx for Microsoft® Word 2010™ files

.xlsx for Microsoft® Excel 2010™ files

.pdf for Adobe® Acrobat™ 6.0 files

.mpx for Microsoft® Project 2010™ files

Offeror shall not embed sound or video files into the electronic files. The disks shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number, date of submission, appropriate security classification markings, and associated volume number.

Graphics, tables, photographs, and other data beyond the capability of Microsoft® Word ™, Microsoft® PowerPoint ™, Microsoft® Excel ™, or not in currently NMCI- supported applications may be submitted in Adobe Acrobat format.

Electronic cost data must be submitted in Excel™ with formulas.

When submitting a proposal on electronic media, the offeror must ensure that the submission is readable, in the format specified in the solicitation, and has been verified as free of computer viruses. Prior to any evaluation, the Government will check all files for viruses and ensure that all information is readable. In the event that any files are defective (unreadable), the Government may only evaluate the readable electronic files. Further, if defective (unreadable) media results in a significant deficiency in the offeror's proposal, the Government may consider the proposal incomplete and not consider such proposal for further evaluation.

The offeror must ensure that:

(i) The electronic and paper copies of its proposal submitted in response to the solicitation are identical;

(ii) It has verified that its electronic proposal is readable on the hardware and software operating system format specified below:

Windows 7 Enterprise

(iii) It has verified that the electronic proposals are free of computer viruses using standard commercial anti-virus software.

A proposal that fails to conform to the requirements above may be subject to interception or delay at Governmental electronic communications portals. This interception or delay may result in the proposal being lost, deleted, destroyed, or forwarded in such a manner that the proposal arrives at the target destination past the time and date of the deadline for submission established in the solicitation. In the event that a proposal is lost, deleted, or destroyed due to the offeror's failure to conform to the requirements above, such proposal will be considered to have never been delivered to the Government. In the event that a proposal is delayed due to the offeror's failure to conform to the requirements above, the proposal will be treated as late in accordance with the provision of this solicitation entitled Late Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Proposals.

5) NSWC Crane will NOT accept facsimile proposals or proposals submitted via Navy

Electronic Business Opportunities via Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO).

6) Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted. All offers must be mailed via USPS or by overnight courier. If using an overnight courier, it is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the courier service has access to NSWC Crane. Only approved couriers will be given access to the base to make delivery.

g) Restriction of Disclosure/Proprietary Information

1) If the offeror wishes to restrict the disclosure or use of its proposal, use the legend permitted by FAR 52.215-1(e). Individual subcontractor/vendor proprietary information may be submitted via separate binders/CDs. The information contained in these binders/CDs must be referenced (by binder title, page and section number as appropriate) within the main proposal where the information would have been included if it were not subcontractor/vendor proprietary. The information in these separate binders/CDs is subject to all other requirements of the RFP and must be well-marked to clearly indicate any special handling instructions.

h) Proposal Format

1) Format of the proposal volumes shall be as follows:

i. Text size shall be no smaller than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times

New Roman, 10 point, uncompressed font.

ii. Pages shall be single sided, one and one half spaced, with a minimum of one inch margins on all sides. Pages shall be dated and numbered sequentially by volume.

A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, “original” or copy number, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name. The cover sheet will NOT be included in the page count for each volume.

iii. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used with an explanation for each that will NOT be included in the page count for each volume.

iv. Elaborate format, color representations, and bindings are not desirable. Three-ring binders are preferred. The pages in the binders shall be easily removed and replaced to facilitate page changes. Any pages that are changed (as the result of negotiations) should be of a different color (as specified by the Contracting Officer) and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page and/or circling if changing data in a chart. The offeror shall indicate the new date on revised pages.

v. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used when necessary to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as one page.

Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics; not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs, and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8 point, Times New Roman. These items WILL be included in the page count for each volume.

i) Use of Navy Support Contractors

1) Government support contractors may assist the Source Selection Organization with administrative support only. The Source Selection Advisory Council (SSAC), the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Cost/Price Analysis Team (CPAT) will be composed of Government employees.

The following firm(s) may provide administrative support to the source selection process, but will not evaluate proposals or have voting authority:

Design to Delivery/ The Mayvin Consulting Group / G5S / LLC, Logistics Support, Inc.

The Navy has both hardware and information exclusion clauses as well as proprietary data protection clauses in Navy contracts with the above listed firms. Offeror shall provide written notification to the PCO no later than ten (10) days after issuance of the RFP if Offeror does not consent to the use of any firm listed above in the proposal evaluation process. Otherwise, submission of a proposal will be considered consent to use of any firm listed above.

j) Proposal General Guidance

1) Offerors should assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offerors' proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to consider other information as part of the evaluation of the past performance factor. The Contractor should not presume that data previously submitted, or presumed to be known (e.g., data or services previously submitted or performed for the Government), will be considered as part of the evaluation if it is not submitted in the proposal. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. Failure to conform to requirements of this solicitation may form the basis for rejection of the proposal.

General statements such as “the Offeror understands the method for performing the Systems Engineering efforts (or any portion thereof) and can or will comply with the requirements of the solicitation” will not be considered sufficient. Generic statements such as "straight forward engineering techniques" and the "highest quality control procedures” will not be considered to be sufficient to demonstrate that the proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

The Offeror’s proposal must contain a precise description of all terms and conditions of the services and supplies offered and must address all topics described below. The information provided in the proposal shall appear in the same order as outlined herein.

In the event that any portion of the proposal is written by anyone who is not a bona fide employee of the firm submitting the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be furnished which must be signed by an authorized official of the Offeror and shall indicate the person’s name, employment capacity, firm name, relationship of that firm to the Offeror, and which portion of the proposal was written by that person. This certificate requirement applies to both the prime and any subcontractors. The certification shall be provided in Volume I.

Volume I- Signed RFP with Amendments and a cover letter.

a) The Signed RFP with Amendments, a cover letter and subcontracting plans (to be submitted by large business pursuant to FAR 52.219-9) shall be submitted as Volume I.

The cover letter shall be no more than 2 pages. No page limit for signed RFP with amendments and FAR 52.219 Subcontracting Plan.

Volume II—Technical/Risk Capability & Management Approach.

a) The Technical/Risk Capability and Management Approach volume of the proposal shall be submitted as Volume II, and shall be no more than 30 pages (excluding coversheet, glossary of terms and Table of Contents (TOC)) for the Technical/Risk Capability and 15 pages for the Management Approach (excluding coversheet, glossary of terms and TOC).

b) No pricing information shall be contained in both the Technical/Risk Capability and Management Approach proposal.

c) Each Technical/Risk Capability and Management Approach proposal shall enable Government evaluating personnel to make a thorough evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the proposal will meet the requirements of the government. Each technical proposal shall be specific, detailed, and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective contractor has a thorough knowledge and understanding of the requirements and has valid and practical solutions to technical problems. Statements that paraphrase the Statement of Work or attest that "standard procedures will be employed” are inadequate to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the requirements of the Statement of Work. Unsupported promises to comply with contractual requirements will not be sufficient. Proposals must contain supporting rationale for any statements relating to proposed performance. No assumptions will be made by evaluators regarding areas that are not addressed in the Offeror’s written proposal.

d) An electronic or hard copy of the following documentation in response to the factors and subfactors described in the solicitation shall be provided in such detail as to allow the Government to evaluate the proposal. This shall include:

FACTOR I - Technical/Risk Capability —30 page limit (excluding TOC, Glossary of Terms)

A) Written Performance Specification Compliance. Each offeror shall provide the following:

1. The Offeror shall provide its depth and breadth of technical expertise in the prototype and production of crew served weapon sights systems by describing the primary processes and procedures the Offeror typically uses. A detailed description of how the prime contractor will plan to meet the requirements of specification shall be provided. The Offeror may provide examples of tasks performed in the functional areas to illustrate technical expertise by the Offeror or a proposed subcontractor (if so CLEARLY IDENTIFY

WHETHER THE OFFEROR PERFORMED THE TASK OR IDENTIFY

WHICH SUBCONTRACTOR PERFORMED THE TASK).

The Offeror shall provide as an attachment a matrix to summarize compliance with the technical requirements to the paragraph in the Offeror’s written technical proposal that demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to meet the requirements listed in the Performance Specification. The matrix shall be cross referenced to the Performance Specification by paragraph number and title to facilitate Government verification that all items have been addressed.

The attachment (Performance Specification Compliance Matrix) will NOT be included in the page count.

2. The Offeror shall provide as an attachment available test data showing capability of meeting Performance Specification paragraph 3.1.1 Target Acquisition and 3.1.2 Target Acquisition through Obscurants. The attachment (Test Data) will NOT be included in the page count. If actual test date is not available, modeling data should be submitted, if available.

B) Statement of Work Compliance

1. A detailed description of how the prime contractor will plan to meet the requirements of statement of work shall be provided. The Offeror may provide examples of tasks performed in the functional areas to illustrate technical expertise by the Offeror or a proposed subcontractor (if so

CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHETHER THE OFFEROR PERFORMED THE

TASK OR IDENTIFY WHICH SUBCONTRACTOR PERFORMED THE

TASK).

The Offeror shall provide as an attachment a matrix to summarize compliance with the technical requirements to the paragraph in the Offeror’s written technical proposal that demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to meet the requirements listed in the Statement of Work. The matrix shall be cross referenced to the Statement of Work by paragraph number and title to facilitate Government verification that all items have been addressed. The attachment (Statement of Work Compliance Matrix) will NOT be included in the page count.

2. List of qualifications held by the program manager responsible for the overall performance, completeness, and accuracy of all documentation, meeting goals, data deliverables, and meeting all milestones in accordance with

Statement of Work paragraph 3.7.1.

3. The Offeror shall discuss how it will implement a Configuration Management (CM) Program that complies with Section 3.9, Configuration Management of the Statement of Work (SOW). The Offeror shall demonstrate an understanding of the CM requirements for this acquisition and describe how it will implement a CM Program that will help manage baseline configuration and design changes. The Offeror shall address an ECP process, and how this will be implemented through its CM Program. The Offeror shall describe its experience implementing CM programs and provide examples of how it has successfully initiated CM on a previous program of similar complexity.

4. Offeror shall describe its quality management approach and define how it intends to ensure the production quality of the production systems. The Offeror shall describe how its quality management approach meets the requirements of ANSI/ASQC/ISO Q9001:2000.

5. Offeror shall demonstrate the capability to manage changes or deviations to the provided Technical Data Package (TDP) that may be submitted via the Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) process.

6. The Offeror shall describe its management information system for acquisition of material, material control, and monitoring delivery status of material previously ordered. The Offeror shall explain the automated qualities of its management information systems. This explanation shall include a discussion of the notification of problems, delay in material ordering/deliveries and how those problems and delays will be handled once they are identified by the system.

7. The Contractor shall provide proof of an ITAR compliance program which defines the handling, storage and transmission of ITAR data in accordance with statement of work 3.13.

8. The Offeror shall identify key cost, schedule, performance and technical risks and why these were identified as risks. The Contractor shall discuss the risks, including dependencies and mitigation of each identified risk.

C) Small Business Participation. Each offeror shall provide the following:

1. The Small Business Participation Data portion of the proposal shall be submitted as a part of Volume II Attachment (01) - Small Business Participation Data Form. All offerors shall provide a detailed description of how they will ensure the requirements of 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting will be met for each delivery order.

In accordance with FAR 15.304, it is the intent of the Government to encourage participation of small businesses whenever practicable. Describe the extent to which their company has identified and committed to provide for participation by small, small and disadvantaged businesses (SDB), woman-owned businesses (WOB), veteran owned small business and service-disabled veteran owned small business, and HUBZone small business concerns for the performance of this effort. Offerors shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the tasks assigned the selected subcontractors are meaningful in the sense that they will be performing functions important to the overall success of the program and also broaden the subcontractor's technical capability. Offerors shall describe their approach for enhancing small business subcontractors' technical capability. Of special interest is the amount and type of work to be performed by the small business subcontractors. Offerors shall explain how you, as the offeror, believe the proposed approach and plan for use of small business is realistic for this procurement.

Note: Submission shall be separate from subcontracting plans to be submitted by large business pursuant to FAR 52.219-9. Subcontracting plans portion of the proposal shall be submitted as part of Volume I.

FACTOR II – Management Approach—15 page limit

A) Prototype Delivery Schedule

1. Offeror shall demonstrate the capability to manufacture, assemble, test, and deliver prototype of crew served weapon sights systems, which will meet the specified performance requirements within the required delivery schedule.

2. Offeror shall provide production lead time for delivery of the prototype units ordered under delivery order for Phase I (line item 0003).

a. Two (2) Each * calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order.

Note: The required delivery schedule under line item 0001 is not later than 12 months after contract award. A proposed accelerated delivery schedule is advantageous to the Government. See Section F – Deliveries or Performance for the Government minimum required delivery schedule.

B) Production Delivery Schedule

1. Offeror shall demonstrate the capability to manufacture, assemble, test, and deliver production of crew served weapon sights systems, which will meet the specified performance requirements within the required delivery schedule.

2. Offeror shall provide production lead time for delivery of the LRIP units ordered under delivery order for Phase II (line item 0004).

a. Six (6) Each * calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order and completion of CDR.

3. Offeror shall provide production lead time for delivery of the production units ordered under delivery orders and delivery schedules for subsequent remaining units and rate of delivery per month thereafter (line item 0005).

a. * Each * calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order with * Each every 30 calendar days thereafter until complete.

Note: The required delivery schedule under line item 0004 is not later than 90 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order. The required delivery schedule under line item 0005 is 30 Each not later than 90 calendar days from the effective date of funded delivery order with 30 Each not later than every 30 calendar days thereafter until complete. A proposed accelerated delivery schedule is advantageous to the Government. See Section F – Deliveries or Performance for the Government minimum required delivery schedule for all line items.

Volume III—Past Performance Summaries & Matrix.

FACTOR III - Past Performance—15 page limit

a) The Past Performance portion of the proposal shall be submitted as a part of Volume III, and shall be no more than a maximum of fifteen (15) pages for the narrative not including the matrix (Attachment (02) – Past Performance Matrix).

b) The offeror shall provide a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) past performance references on prior contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement.

See below for what constitutes a “recent” and “relevant” prior contract for purposes of this solicitation. The offeror shall contact past performance references directly and request that they complete and submit directly to the agency, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment (03) – Past Performance Questionnaire) to the address in Block 7 of SF33, Page 1 of the Solicitation or to jonathan.dickinson@navy.mil in accordance with the timeline set in Block 9 of SF33, Page 1 of the Solicitation. .

The completed questionnaires shall be sent directly from the reference POC to the contract specialist, Jonathan Dickinson. Under no circumstances shall the questionnaires be returned to the offerors. Any information provided by the offeror’s references is subject to verification/validation by the Government during the evaluation process. The Government may make contact and follow up with the listed references identified on the Contractor Past Performance Data matrix. The Offeror may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts as well as the Offeror’s corrective actions.

c) Offeror shall provide a matrix (Attachment (02) – Past Performance Matrix) for each of the Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment (03) – Past Performance Questionnaire) sent out listing the following:

1) Organization/Customer

2) Brief Description

3) Contract Number

4) Telephone & E-mail of Organization/Customer Point of Contact (POC)

5) Date PPQ being sent to POC and transmission method utilized

The offeror’s matrix shall contain a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) references to contracts that are recent and relevant to this requirement. Proposals must acknowledge PPQs have been sent to each POC listed in the Matrix. Failure to send the PPQ to each POC will be considered a proposal concern and may result in exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from consideration for award. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that the POC for each relevant contract submits a completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the Government.

d) Up to fifteen (15) pages of past performance information may be submitted for contract references identified in the past performance summary matrix.

The offeror shall submit a description of a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five

(5) past performance references that are prime contracts or major subcontracts received, or in performance, during the past four (4) years which are relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. Commercial and state/local contracts may be included, if necessary.

The description shall include the following information in the following format:

1. Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation.

2. Your (and/or your subcontractor's) CAGE and DUNS numbers

3. Government or commercial contracting activity, address, and telephone number

4. Procuring Contracting Officer's (PCO's) name and telephone number

5. Government or commercial contracting activity technical representative, or COR; and telephone numbers

6. Government or commercial contract administration activity, and the name and telephone number of the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

7. Contract number

8. Contract award date

9. Contract type

10. Awarded price/cost

11. Final, or projected final, price/cost

12. Original delivery schedule

13. Final or projected final, delivery schedule

14. A narrative explanation on each previous contract listed describing the objectives achieved and any cost growth or schedule delays encountered and any revised delivery schedules as well as the reason(s) the delivery schedule was revised. For any contracts which did not or do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. The offeror shall also provide as an attachment a copy of any cure notices or show cause letters received on each previous contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.

15. The reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. The offeror shall also provide a copy of any cure notices or show cause letters received on each previous contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.

The offeror shall also provide the above required information for any and all contracts under which it has been terminated in whole or in part, for default or cause during the past 10 years, to include those currently in the process of such termination as well as those which are not similar to the proposed effort.

New corporate entities may Offerors which lack past performance information or for which such information is not available shall submit the above required past performance data on its predecessor companies, its key personnel that will perform this contract who have relevant experience, and major or critical subcontractors, which shall serve as the basis for the Government’s past performance evaluation of such Offerors. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited.

Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the solicitation will be assigned for performance within the contractor's corporate entity and among proposed subcontractors. Information required in the above paragraphs shall be provided for each proposed subcontractor who will perform a significant portion of the effort. "Significant" is defined for these purposes in terms of criticality of the subcontracted work to the whole. With regard to prime contract assignments that will be performed by the Offeror and not a proposed subcontractor, the Offeror shall indicate:

1) what internal corporate bodies/divisions will accomplish which portions of the effort,

2) whether or not those divisions were responsible for performance under the previous contracts for which the Offeror is providing information under the instant proposal, and

3) if those divisions have relocated since the accomplishment of previous cited contract efforts, a description of any changes arising from that relocation in terms of key personnel, processes, facilities and equipment.

Offerors shall include in their proposal the written consent of their proposed significant subcontractors to allow the Government to discuss the subcontractor's past performance assessment with the offeror during negotiations.

Note: Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by offerors in their proposals may be used to assess offeror past performance. Since the Government may not necessarily interview all of the sources provided by the offerors, it is incumbent upon the offeror to explain the relevance of the data provided. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance source data remains with the offerors.

Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or high performance risk assessment by the Government.

e) For the purposes of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which performance occurred during the last four (4) years. In determining relevancy, the offeror should consider the size, content, and complexity type and value of the contract, and the type of requirement compared to this solicited requirement. The offeror should also consider the level or amount of effort. Only past performance dealing with crew served weapon sights will be considered relevant. The offeror must provide details (if its Past Performance reference is based upon “related technology” as a reference) including how the “related technology” is applicable to the solicited effort. Should the offeror not explain how the related technology is applicable, the reference may not be considered relevant. If an offeror has no current or relevant past performance information for itself, its predecessor companies, its key personnel who will perform this contract, or its major or critical subcontracts, the Offeror should so state that in this volume and explain.

f) Each offeror shall submit present and past performance information for itself on projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity. The Offerors may choose to submit present and past performance information for major or critical proposed subcontractors, team members, or joint venture partners that have experience in projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity with its proposal. The total number of past performance references for each offeror shall not exceed five (including any references submitted by subcontractors, team members and/or joint ventures). This volume shall provide a list of current and relevant contracts on which the offeror has performed in the format requested in the Proposal Requirements portion of this document. This information, as well as other information the Government may obtain elsewhere via Government databases (CPARs, PPIRs etc.) and other government agencies (DCMA, DCAA etc.), will be used to evaluate the offeror's past performance. The Government reserves the right to solicit feedback beyond what is identified in the questionnaire. NO CLASSIFIED PAST PERFORMANCE SUPPLEMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED. The offeror may submit performance on classified programs as long as that information can be verified. If the offeror intends to submit in this manner the information that is classified (customer, contract number, etc.) should be marked “reserved” and the description/write up of the work performed shall remain unclassified. If the offeror cannot describe what work was accomplished in an unclassified manner the offeror cannot submit that program for Past Performance evaluation. Offerors are notified that the Government will evaluate the data provided in this volume and data obtained from other sources that is determined to be current and relevant to the effort at hand in the development of its performance risk assessments.

VOLUME IV – Factor IV -- Price

a) Each Offeror is required to submit the price volume separate from the other volumes, in the required number of copies and paper/electronic media format. Electronic copies of this volume shall be submitted on separate media, using MS Word or MS Excel, including all formulas. Electronic copies of any tables must be capable of being edited (i.e. not embedded pictures or screenshots) within MS Word or MS Excel. Excel files shall not include macros or pivot tables. In addition, all formulas and numerical relationships shall be retained and accessible in the MS Excel files. MS Excel or MS Word shall be used for supporting documentation, and failure to follow this instruction may result in rejection of the proposal.

b) The Offeror may propose under line item's 0004 and 0005 different quantity ranges that would be more advantageous to the Government.

c) The Offeror shall propose prices in such a manner as to allow the Government to evaluate as much of the Total Ownership Cost of the system as possible. The Offeror shall submit as volume III a price proposal to include the following:

Note: The maximum total dollar value of the prospective contract(s) is anticipated Not-to Exceed $49 Million over a five-year period across all line items.

Line Item 0001: Phase I - Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) to include delivery of 2 Each Prototypes - FFP/Minimum 2 Each/Maximum 2 Each.

Offerors shall provide a firm-fixed-price for completion of Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.4 and PS/15/JXQQ/139 with the exception of PS paragraph 3.9 Environmental Requirements for the initial Phase I delivery order. Include pricing for CDRLs:

A001, A002, A003, A004, A005, A013, A015, A017, A018, A019, A020, A021, A022.

Line Item 0002: Reserved.

Line Item 0003: Reserved.

Line Item 0004: Phase II - Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) - Crew Served Day/Night M2HB/M2A1 Weapon Sight (M2WS) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4, 3.5.5, 3.5.6 and PS/15/JXQQ/139

- FFP/Minimum 0 Each/Maximum 6 Each.

Offerors shall provide a firm-fixed-price for economic quantity ranges. Ranges of 1-3 and 4-6 each LRIP M2WS for Phase II delivery order are, however if additional quantity breaks more advantageous to the Government are available, the offeror may propose as such IAW Section “L” of the solicitation. Include pricing for CDRLs: A001, A002, A003, A006, A007, A009, A013, A017, A018, A019, A020, A021, A022.

Line Item 0005: Phase II - Production - Crew Served Day/Night M2HB/M2A1 Weapon Sight (M2WS) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.5.6, 3.5.7 and

PS/15/JXQQ/139

- FFP/Minimum 0 Each/Maximum 1,000 Each.

Offerors shall provide a firm-fixed-price for economic quantity ranges. Ranges of 1-10, 11-50, 51-100, 101-200, and 201+ each Production M2WS for Phase II delivery order are provided, however if additional quantity breaks more advantageous to the Government are available, the offeror may propose as such IAW Section “L” of the solicitation. Include pricing for CDRLs: A002, A009, A010, A011, A016, A017, A018, A020, A012, A013, A014, A015, A024, A025.

Line Item 0006: Phase II - Test, Teardown, and Evaluation (TT&E) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.8

- FFP*

The Offeror shall provide firm-fixed-price for quantity 1 each for TT&E of M2WS in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.10 Non-Warranty Failure Analysis and Repair. Include pricing for CDRLs: A023.

Line Item 0007: Phase II - Non-Warranty Repair in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.10

- FFP*

Line item 0007 will be negotiated post contract award in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.10 Non-Warranty Failure Analysis and Repair.

Line Item 0008: Phase II - Provisioning (Spare Parts) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.10.4

- FFP*

Line item 0008 will be negotiated post contract award in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.10.4 Supply Support and HQ C-1-0003 Provisioned Item Order

(NAVSEA).

Line Item 0009: Data

- FFP/Not Separately Priced.

The Offeror shall complete the “Price Group” and “Estimated Total Price” Block 17 and 18 of each data item on the CDRL

* Line Item 0006, 0007, 0008 has an estimated combined ordering maximum not to exceed value of $2,500,000.

NOTE: OFFERORS SHALL COMPLETE PRICE MATRIX’S IN SECTION B IN ITS

ENTIRETY

EXCEPTIONS

Offerors are not encouraged to take exceptions to this solicitation, however, any exceptions taken to the specifications, statement of work, or terms and conditions of this solicitation shall be explained in detail and set forth in a cover letter as well as in the cost/price proposal. Offerors are to detail the particular section, clause paragraph and page to which they are taking exception.

This information shall be submitted as a part of Volume II.

The Government is not required to concur with any exceptions, and offerors are placed on notice that exceptions, depending on their significance, may result in an offer being determined unacceptable.

ALTERNATE PROPOSALS ARE ENCOURAGED

Offers may submit more than one proposal, each of which must satisfy the mandatory requirements of the solicitation, including any Benchmark Tests, in order to be considered. As a minimum, one of the proposals submitted must be complete.