N0010419RK183.docx

N0010419RK183

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

JN25 Power Module

FFP

1377-01-625-4503 Eagle Picher P/N EP-4054

OR

1377-01-616-5059ES CHEMRING P/N 6254100

OR

1377-01-524-2412ES UPCO P/N 1847-066-01

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N0010420NB055

NET AMT

0001AA

JN25 Power Module

Technical Data See DD Form 1423, Exhibit A FOB: Destination

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

PSC CD: 1377

NET AMT

0001AB

JN25 Power Module

First Article Test Samples Consists of: 30 Each for testing and 3 Each for investigative purposes

Ownership Code: 3 FOB: Destination

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AC

JN25 Power Module

FAT Investigative Units Consists of: 33 Each for testing and 3 Each for investigative purposes

Ownership Code: 3 NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AD

JN25 Power Module

Production Lot Test Samples Consists of: 5 Lots of 150 each net and 1 lot of 101 net, plus an additional 12 each per lot for test. (10 each for test and 2 each for investigative purposes.)

Ownership Code: 3 FOB: Destination

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AE

JN25 Power Module

Investigative Units Consists of: 5 Lots of 150 each net and 1 lot of 101 net, plus an additional 12 each per lot for test. (10 each for test and 2 each for investigative purposes.)

Ownership Code: 3

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AF

JN25 Power Module

FY20 PANMC Ownership Code: 5 NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AG

JN25 Power Module

NASA HOUSTON Ownership Code: 3 NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AH

JN25 Power Module

FY20 USAF Ownership Code: 6

MIPR: TBD

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AJ

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: BE-D-CYK Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /01

REQN#: DBEP4490675324

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AK

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: SN-D-CAI Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /03

REQN#: DSNT2490675309

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AL

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: GR-D-QCH Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /05

REQN#: DGRQ4490795342

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AM

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: TK-D-CAU Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /07

REQN#: DTKC4490795345

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AN

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: SR-D-CDA Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /09

REQN#: DSRP4490795300

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AP

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: JO-D-CBX Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /11

REQN#: DJOB4N90805306

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AQ

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: DE-D-CAE Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /13

REQN#: DDED4490805320

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AR

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: EG-D-CAA Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /15

REQN#: DEG24N90805330

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AS

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: SR-D-CDA Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /17

REQN#: DSRP4490795338

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AT

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case:TW-D-CAB Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /19

REQN#: DTWV2490865331

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AU

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: KS-D-CBM Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /21

REQN#: DKSH4490865337

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AV

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: IQ-D-CAA Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /23

REQN#: DIQT9490805319

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

0001AW

JN25 Power Module

FMS Case: PK-D-CDP Ownership Code: 8

F2DCDE9137G101 /25

REQN#: DPK24490865309

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

NSN: 1377-01-625-4503

NET AMT

SECTION B NOTES

SOLICITATION NOTES:

1. Faxed offers will NOT be accepted.

1. Because the Government intends to award without discussion, any exceptions to the requirements of this solicitation should be raised prior to submission of an offer.

1. This item is a CSI – Critical Safety Item.

1. Electronic submission of an offer may be accomplished by attaching your offer to an email directed to ashley.leonard@navy.mil. The size limitation of an email through the NAVSUP WSS mail server is 10 MB. All files designated as .zip files will be stripped from any email sent. Files larger than the server limitation may be segregated and sent via several emails as long as they are clearly identified as such. It is highly recommended that the Offeror request email delivery confirmation or other form of acknowledgement to verify that the proposal submission was received.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

SECTION C

SECTION C – DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS

NOTE 1: NON-ANTICIPATION OF INITIAL DEVIATIONS ON AWARDS

Offerors are reminded that any resultant contract will require performance in strict compliance with the specifications set forth therein, and that prices offered should not be predicated upon Contractor anticipation of Government authorization of deviations, even though such deviations may have been granted previously under other contracts for the same item.

NOTE 2: SPECIFICATIONS THAT DO NOT INDICATE SPECIFIC REVISION LEVELS ARE TO BE MADE TO THE REVISION LEVELS LISTED ON THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INDEX OF SPECIFICATION AND STANDARDS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF SOLICITATION ISSUANCE.

1. DATA LIST / PART NUMBERS / DRAWING NUMBERS:

OR

CHEMRING P/N 6254100

OR

UPCO P/N 1847-066-01

2. SPECIFICATIONS:

3. For Contractor part number, Contractor SHALL submit Product Baseline in accordance with DD1423, sequence number A001 .

SECTION C – CONFIGURATION CONTROL: SAE EIA-649 (NAVY STOCK CLASS 1377)

1. Configuration Control - The Contractor shall maintain the total equipment baseline configuration. For items of proprietary design, Contractor drawings showing the latest assembly configuration shall be provided to the Government in electronic format.

2. Variances – Requests for Variance (RFV) - RFVs shall be designated as Critical, Major, or Minor. RFVs shall be in Contractor format and shall include information outlined in SAE EIA-649 section 5.3.4.1 and SAE EIA-649-1 section 3.3.2. DD Form 1694 is the preferred format for RFV submissions.

Note: A copy of the preferred RFV Form DD Form 1694 is available at:

http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/dd/ddforms1500-1999.htm Additional guidance for completion of RFV can be found at the Attachment “Request for Variance Form 1694 Additional Guidance Rev A”. This attachment is incorporated by reference with the same force and effect as if contained herein.

The Contractor's assigned RFV number shall use the following numbering format:

Definitions: (See SAE EIA 649 and MIL-HDBK-61 for additional guidance on critical, major and minor classifications.)

Critical: Critical variances impact safety, health, environment, or other critical requirement. A departure from a requirement classified as critical in configuration documentation.

Major: Major variances have significant impacts such as performance or operational limits, structural strength, interchangeability, reliability, survivability, maintainability, durability of the item or repair parts, supportability, cost, effective use or operation, weight or size, or appearance. A departure from a requirement classified as major in configuration documentation.

Minor: Minor variances are issued when departure does not involve any of the factors listed for critical or major variance. Minor variances have little or no impact and are generally associated with non-functional factory defects that can be dispositioned locally as: “use as is” or “after suitable repair”. A departure from a requirement classified as minor in configuration documentation.

3. Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) - The Government will maintain configuration control and change authority for all modifications or changes affecting form, fit, function, or interface parameters of the Equipment and its sub-assemblies. ECPs shall be designated as Major (Class I) or Minor (Class II). The use of DD Form 1692 is acceptable for ECP submissions. ECPs may also be prepared in Contractor format and shall include information outlined in SAE EIA-649 section 5.3.1.4. MIL-HDBK-61 provides additional guidance for preparation of ECPs.

The Contractor's assigned ECP number shall use the following numbering format:

Definitions: (See SAE EIA 649 and MIL-HDBK-61A for additional guidance on Major (Class I) and Minor (Class II) classifications.)

Major (Class I):

- required calibration to the extent that product identification should be changed

- interchangeability or substitutability of replaceable products, assemblies, or components

- change to add a previously non-qualified supplier, where supplier selection is specified

- requires retrofit of delivered products Minor (Class II): Affects configuration documentation (released design information), product or processes but does not affect Major Change Criteria.

4. ECP changes to Contractor drawings: Minor (Class II) and Major (Class I) ECP changes shall be approved by the Navy Configuration Control Board (CCB) and technical approval authority prior to implementation. Contractors may use their own numbering format for ECP changes to Contractor drawings. Minor (Class II) ECP changes are defined as changes that do not affect the form, fit, or function. Minor (Class II) affects configuration documentation (released design information), product or processes but does not affect Major Change Criteria. Major (Class I) ECP changes are defined as changes that affect the form, fit, and/or function, and/or requirements, performance, interoperability, supportability, maintainability, cost, safety, addition of a vendor, or a vendor moves facility and the item has not been qualified at that site.

Definitions:

Form: the shape, external size, and marking which uniquely characterizes an item.

Fit: the ability of an item to physically interface or interconnect with and become an integral part of a higher level assembly.

Function: the action[s] that an item is designed to perform including performance, durability and safety.

The following are examples of Major (Class I) changes with regard to function

If the Navy technical approval authority does not approve the ECP submitted by the Contractor, then the Contractor is required to revert to the Government approved revision of the drawing per the approved product baseline or to the revision used in the prior lot accepted by the Government. The Government reserves the right to invoke First Article Testing (FAT) per paragraph 2 of “Section E-CAD/PAD Inspection and Acceptance”, or require the Contractor to undergo qualification testing.

5. Contractors do not have MRB authority. Authorization to accept or rework any nonconformance is specifically retained by the Contracting Officer. The contractor's MRB shall not make any "use-as-is" or "rework" disposition on any nonconformance, and the MRB recommendations shall be submitted per paragraph six (6) below.

Prior to submission of the lot to the Government for inspection and acceptance, all parts, subassemblies, and even the end item that undergo in-process screening for defects can be reworked under the direction of the contractor to ensure all parts meet the requirements of the Technical Data Package (TDP) and detailed specification.

If the contractor recommends, through an internal Material Review Board (MRB), to process defective parts, subassemblies, or the end item for use "as is", then the contractor will be required to submit a Request for Variance (RFV) to the Government for disposition. If a defect and/or non-conformance is discovered, which results in a failure of the item to meet the requirements of the TDP or detailed specification after the lot has been presented to the Government, then the contractor will be required to provide to the Government documentation such as RFVs, Discrepancy Reports(DR) related to contractor's MRBs, and/or rework procedures used to correct the deficiency (if applicable).

Rework of a lot to correct a deficiency after it has been presented to the Government may require the lot number and all the associated records to be changed, per the requirements of MIL-STD-1168.

6. The Contractor shall submit an electronic copy of any ECP or RFV to the Contracting Officer, Local DCMA QAR, and the technical activity below:

7. Technical approval authority for RFVs and ECPs is NSWC IHEODTD, CAD/PAD Senior Engineer, Code E2CE.

8. Final approval of any ECP and/or RFV shall be in writing, by the Contracting Officer, NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support.

SECTION C - IDENTIFICATION OF COVERED DEFENSE INFORMATION (252.204-7012)

1. In accordance with the DFARS clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, the Contractor shall provide adequate security for all government and contractor owned Technical Data Packages (TDPs), drawings and item detail specifications on all covered defense information systems that support the performance of work under this contract.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Section D - Packaging and Marking

SECTION D

SECTION D – UID CAD/PAD ITEM MARKING INFORMATION

Unless otherwise specified in the Technical Data Package (TDP), CAD/PAD items shall meet the Human Readable Information (HRI) marking requirements of paragraph 3.1 of the attachment “CAD/PAD Item Marking Instruction Version 1.5” NSWC IHEODTD. The Machine Readable Information (MRI) Data Construct, paragraph 3.2, and Placement of Unique Identification (UID), paragraph 4, are mandatory requirements.

NOTE: UID marking is REQUIRED for investigative units (also known as retains).

SECTION D – PACKING, MARKING, AND TRANSPORTATION

1. Preservation, packaging, packing, and marking shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-129, MIL-STD-2073, CFR 49 171-178, MIL-STD-1320, DLAR 4145.41.

2. Packaging and packing for production lots, first article samples and lot acceptance samples shall be IAW the following by item:

1377-01-625-4503, TO 00-85B-3, F00-000-9XC9

NOTE: Quantity per Unit Pack (QUP) is defined as the first tie, wrap, or container applied to a single item, or a quantity thereof, or to a group of items of a single stock number, preserved or unpreserved, which constitutes a complete or identifiable package.

3. Labels for Human Readable Information (HRI) and Machine Readable Information (MRI) shall meet the requirements for a Grade A, Style 2, Composition (b) label as specified in MIL-PRF-61002. The performance requirements for solvent and detergent resistance are not required. The label should be the pressure sensitive adhesive type.

4. Human Readable Information (HRI) markings shall be applied to ammunition, explosives containers and units loads IAW the applicable provisions of MIL-STD-129.

a. At a minimum, inner container markings for CLIN 0001 shall include:

National Stock Number and (DoD) Code: (see Section “B” for applicable CLIN) Item Nomenclature: (see Section “B” for applicable CLIN) Item Assembly Drawing Number: (see Section “B” for applicable CLIN) Quantity: As Applicable Lot Number: IAW MIL-STD-1168 Serial Number: Required ( x ) N/A ( )

b. At a minimum, outer container markings for CLIN 0001 shall include:

National Stock Number and (DoD) Code: (see Section “B” for applicable CLIN) Item Nomenclature: (see section “B” for applicable CLIN) Item Assembly Drawing Number: (see Section “B” for applicable CLIN) Quantity: As Applicable Lot Number: IAW MIL-STD-1168 Serial Number: Required ( x) N/A ( ) Gross Weight and Cube: As Applicable DoD Contract Number: As Applicable POP Markings: (see Section “D” – Packaging & Marking paragraph 6 – below.)

UN Proper Shipping Name, UN Number, Hazard Class, Compatibility Code, Net Explosive Weight, and EX Number: (see TABLE 1 below for applicable CLIN)

CAA: USG DOT 'EX NUMBER'

(see TABLE 1 EX NUMBER COLUMN below for applicable CLIN) Example CAA: USG DOT 880832

TABLE 1: United Nations Shipping / Storage Information

NUMBER

HAZARD

CLASS

COMPA.

CODE

NET

EXPLOSIVE

WT (lbs)

EX

NUMBER

5. Machine Readable Information (MRI) markings shall be applied to ammunition, explosive containers and unit loads IAW the following coded elements of data from MIL-STD-129. MRI labels shall able to be read and interpreted by automatic bar code reading devices (scanners). MRI markings shall contain the minimum data elements identified below:

a. Inner container:

b. Outer container:

NOTE: The parenthesis surrounding the data elements are NOT encoded in the 2D(PDF417) bar code.

NOTE: Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Shipments: As applicable, all outer containers should be clearly marked with the FMS Case Designation, Requisition Number and Project Code, and Country Specific EX Numbers for NOA required shipments- See Section "F" for proper identification.

6. Traceable Seals for shipping containers:

a. Traceable seals are required for delivery of all "ready to issue" (condition code A, B, C, or N) or "pending acceptance" (condition code D) ammunition and ordnance items, including inert configuration items. Traceable seals provide an indication of security and certification of material serviceability and apply to more than just hazardous materials.

b. The Contractor shall ensure traceable seals are properly affixed in accordance with these requirements:

(1) Traceable seals are applied to each shipping and storage container at the time of packaging. The shipping container will normally be the outer container.

(2) WIRE SEALS: A wire seal is a wire length with an aluminum disk or pellet which is crimped or crushed using a die which imprints a “U.S.” symbol on the disk/pellet. Wire seals are applied to containers having provisions or means for application of wire seals, e.g., metal containers, drums, or cradles and wood boxes with hinged covers and/or latches.

(3) LABEL SEALS: A label seal is a nonmetallic label with a pressure sensitive backing and which is printed or stamped with a “U.S.” symbol. Label seals are applied to containers which do not have provisions or means for application of wire seals, e.g., fiberboard or wood boxes without hasps or latches. Label seals shall be applied such that the label must be cut or defaced in order to open a container. Adhesives shall adhere well enough to prevent peeling during shipping conditions and well enough to prevent lifting and replacement of the label. Particular consideration shall be given to label seals required to adhere to wood and fiberboard surfaces.

7. Restrictions Involving Non-Manufactured Wood Packaging (NMWP) and Pallets (per Defense Logistics Agency Directive subpart 47.305-1(c)(90): “All wooden pallets and wood containers produced of non-manufactured wood shall be constructed from Heat Treated (HT to 56 degrees Centigrade for 30 minutes) material and certified by an accredited agency recognized by the American Lumber Standards Committee (ALSC) in accordance with Non-manufactured Wood Packing Policy and Non-manufactured Wood Packing Enforcement Regulations, both dated May 30, 2001.”

SECTION D – PALLETIZATION

Production Lot units shall be palletized in accordance MIL-STD-1322, MIL-STD-1322-1000, MIL-STD-129, MIL-STD-1320, and CFR 49 171-178 with the following exceptions:

a.) Navy items pertain to CLIN(s): 0001AF.

SECTION D – AMMUNITION LOT NUMBERING: MIL-STD-1168

Ammunition lot numbering shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-1168 (and MIL-DTL-85097 for Propellant Actuated Devices). The applicable lot interfix series number will be furnished in the signed contract.

*Lot number formulation shall consist of the following:

Section E - Inspection and Acceptance

SECTION E

SECTION E – PRODUCTION LOT TEST SAMPLES (CONTRACTOR TESTING)

1. Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

0001AB First Article Testing 0001AC FAT Investigative Units Contractor Contractor Government Government Contractor Contractor Government Government

0001AD Lot Acceptance Testing 0001AE LAT Investigative Units Contractor Contractor Government Government Contractor Contractor Government Government

If supplies will be packaged at a location different from the offeror address indicated on the solicitation, the offeror shall provide the name and street address of the packaging location:

Packaging House

Address

2. Test samples are required from each production lot and are to be tested in accordance with the approved test plan. A production lot shall consist of net deliverable quantity, plus additional lot test sample/investigative units and any retained sample units for investigative purposes as may be required by Section B.

3. The production lot(s) must be manufactured and presented to the Government Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) with all documentation required by section B. The documentation (WAWF-RRs and Ammunition Data Card printed from WARP) accompanying the production lot test samples shall contain the contract number, item, lot number identification, DODIC, NSN, and serial numbers. The samples shall be selected, at random, from each production lot, by the QAR within 2 workdays for resident QARs, or 7 workdays for non-resident QARs after presentation of the lot.

4. Sample units removed for testing from different lots shall not be commingled.

5. Production lot testing shall be performed by the Contractor within 30 calendar days of production lot sample selection. Production lot testing shall be witnessed by a representative of the engineering activity and/or the cognizant QAR. The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Contracting Officer, with concurrent notification to the engineering activity, and the QAR, at least 20 calendar days prior to the planned testing date. If testing is cancelled within the 20 calendar day period, the contractor shall provide notification to the Contracting Officer, with concurrent notification to the engineering activity. At a minimum, cancellation notification shall be sent no later than two days prior to planned test date NOTE: If a failure occurs during testing and an engineering activity representative is not present, all testing shall be halted and the engineering activity and contracting officer shall be notified within 24 hours. A Government representative shall be allowed to participate in the failure investigation in accordance with applicable CDRLs. Contractor testing shall resume upon notification by the Contracting Officer.

6. Disposition of Production Lot Test Samples – The production lot samples are subjected to non-destructive testing. Sample units which meet test and contract requirements may be delivered as part of the total contract quantity.

7. A production lot test report is required and shall be forwarded in accordance with the DD 1423 sequence number A002_requirements to the address shown in Block 14. The test report shall include all results of testing conducted in accordance with the approved test plan.

8. Acceptance, shipment, and payment shall not be accomplished until the production lot test samples have been tested, the required report approved, and the lot has been released for service use. The retained samples, if applicable, shall be shipped to the address provided in Section F of the contract after the lot has been released for service use.

9. The only valid and contractually binding notification of production lot approval, conditional approval, or disapproval shall be in writing and issued by the Contracting Officer. This notification shall be made to the Contractor within 20 calendar days after the Contracting Officer receives the production lot test report(s) and all applicable CDRL requirements. Upon receipt of the written approval accepting a production lot(s) and final approval of the Material Inspection Receiving Report in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF), the Contractor shall ship the production lot(s) as soon as possible and no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of such notice. Final acceptance of the production lot(s) shall be the responsibility of the cognizant DCMA QAR, but shall not occur unless and until the production lot approval has been issued in writing by the Contracting Officer.

i. Any of the test samples failing to meet the requirements of the specification and/or drawing,

ii. Any of the test samples fracturing and/or exhibiting any cracks post-firing unless specifically designed to do so,

iii. A non-ignition or failure to fire.

10. At a minimum, the following is required:

a. Failure date

b. Failed part number (e.g. national stock number (NSN), logistics control number, work unit code)

c. Test or mission being performed when the failure occurred(LAT/FAT)

d. Failure symptoms and description of detection or diagnosis methods (e.g. Built In Test)

e. Failure effects (e.g. none, degradation, abort)

f. Repair action (e.g. remove/replace)

g. Failure mode description

h. Failure mechanism/cause of failure

i. Contributing factors, including multiple factor interactions, or secondary effects of the failure

j. Corrective action required to mitigate the failure mode, including:

- Identification of the failure mode

- The recommended process or process control changes, when the failure cause is due to workmanship defects -Proposals for retrofit of all equipment already delivered or assembled, including recommended effectivity, in accordance with the contract

- Disposition of all defective material and material rendered obsolete because of any necessary redesign, to assure their exclusion from production items -Identification of previous functional and environmental qualification tests, if any, invalidated by the corrective action changes and recommendation of those tests that should be repeated, in accordance with the terms of the contract, to demonstrate the corrective action’s effectiveness

11. If the production lot test report(s) is disapproved by the Contracting Officer, the QAR may be required to select an additional production lot test sample(s) for testing. This direction may be given by the Contracting Officer in the notice of disapproval. The Contractor shall furnish such additional test sample(s) under the terms and conditions and within the time specified in the notification. The cost of each additional approval test, and all costs related to such test(s), shall be borne by the Contractor. Upon approval of the production lot test sample(s) and report(s), the Contracting Officer may, at his/her discretion, equitably adjust the delivery schedule of the contract for only the lot represented by such sample(s). The Government reserves the right to require an equitable decrease of the contract price for any extension of the delivery schedule necessitated by additional test(s) or for any additional costs incurred by the Government due to the need for additional approval test(s).

12. If the Contractor fails to deliver any production lot test sample(s) within the time or times specified, or if the Contracting Officer disapproves any production lot test report(s), the contract may be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the "Default" clause of this contract, and this contract may be subject to termination for default. In such an event, failure of the Government to terminate this contract for default shall not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to meet the delivery schedule for production quantities.

SECTION E – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF TEST PLANS / PROCEDURES

1. The Contractor shall submit a test plan/procedure for Government approval/disapproval as specified in the Contract Data Requirements List (DD Form 1423, sequence number, A004 ). The test plan shall be submitted within sixty (60) calendar days after contract award date. The Acceptance Test Plan shall identify that test fixtures are available for use at the Contractor’s Facility.

2. Notification of test plan approval, conditional approval, or disapproval shall be provided via Wide Area Workflow (WAWF). This notification may be made within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Test Plan/Procedure.

3. The notice of approval or conditional approval shall not relieve the Contractor from complying with all requirements of the specifications and all other terms and conditions of this contract.

4. A notice of conditional approval may state any further action required of the Contractor.

5. A notice of disapproval shall cite the reasons for such. If the plan or procedure is disapproved by the Government, the Contractor may be required, at the option of the Government, to submit a revised plan or procedure for evaluation. After each notification by the Government to submit a revised plan or procedure, the Contractor shall, at no additional cost to the Government, make any necessary revisions or modifications to the plan or procedure. Such revisions shall be furnished in accordance with terms and conditions and within the time specified in the notification. The Government may take action on the resubmitted plan or procedure within the time specified above. The Government reserves the right to require an equitable adjustment of the contract price for any extension of the delivery schedule necessitated by resubmission of the plan or procedure.

6. If the Contractor fails to deliver the plan or procedure within the time specified, or if the Contracting Officer disapproves any plan or procedure, the Contractor shall be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the "Default" clause of this contract, and this contract shall be subject to termination for default. However, failure of the Government in such an event to terminate the contract shall not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to meet all requirements of the contract including delivery of any first article sample(s), data requirements, and/or production quantities.

7. There is hereby created an option for the Government to waive the requirement for submission of a plan or procedure. If the offeror has had its plan previously approved by the Government, the following information shall be furnished:

Approved by__________________________ Date of approval___________________ Contract number and Contractor under which plan/procedure was approved__________________.

Test Plan number, revision date and NSN for which the item was previously approved_____________.

8. If the submission of the plan or procedure is waived, the previously approved plan or procedure shall apply to the contract.

SECTION E – CAD/PAD INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

1. Inspection and acceptance shall be in accordance with MIL-DTL-82909A, 1847-053 Rev F, and 1847-139 Rev C.

2. The Government reserves the right to invoke the requirement for First Article Testing (FAT) if there is a change in process, facilities, materials, equipment, or production of the item. “Process” is defined as the steps or tasks that are performed to create a product. “Facilities” is defined as location or buildings where the process(es) are performed to manufacture a product. “Materials” is defined as all the raw ingredients that are used in the manufacturing of the item. “Equipment” is defined as all the tools used to manufacture a product. “Production” is defined as to make, manufacture, or create a product. FAT can be invoked if two years or more have passed since the item was last manufactured, or if the item has developed a manufacturing or performance related issue that can affect form, fit, or function such as changes to technical requirements, performance, interoperability, supportability, maintainability, or safety.

If there is a desire to have predetermination of a potential change to the process, facilities, materials, equipment, or production of the item, a proposal describing the change and any supporting documentation should be written in a formal letter and provided to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer will provide the letter with the supporting documentation of the proposed changes to the cognizant engineering activity. A formal response on the determination of whether an FAT is required may be provided within fifteen (15) business days after receipt from the Contracting Officer.

3. The Contractor shall provide and maintain a quality program acceptable to the Government and modeled on ISO 9001:2015 or an equivalent quality system. If the quality program is not modeled on ISO 9001:2015 the offeror/prospective Contractor shall indicate the quality system proposed along with how it is equivalent, under separate letter submitted with the offer/proposal.

ISO 9001:2015Other This quality system along with program specific production documentation shall be made available for review by the Government’s representative upon request, at the Contractor’s facility at no cost to the Government.

4. Due to the critical nature and safety application of these items, the Contractor and the QAR are cautioned that it is mandatory to ensure the correct identification and nomenclature are assigned for all items and shipping containers prior to shipment including CAGE codes. CAD/PAD Devices are exempt from MIL-STD-129 shelf life markings on packaging; however, they shall have a minimum of 85% of the shelf life remaining at time of delivery. Any delivery from a contractor not having at least 85% shelf-life remaining shall be considered non-conforming.

NOTE: The shelf life for CLIN 0001 is: 11 years and 0 months.

5. Radiographic equipment and procedures shall meet the standards stipulated in the latest revisions of the following specifications: ASTM E1742, ASTM E748, and ASTM E545.

6. Radiographers shall be qualified and certified level II or III in accordance with the requirements described in specification NAS 410.

7. In order to fulfill contractual requirements, the Contractor must submit acceptable radiographs. Radiographs should be reviewed by a Level II or Level III certified radiographer in accordance with NAS 410. Radiographs not conforming to the requirements specified herein will not be reviewed by NSWC IHEODTD. Disposition of nonconforming radiographs will be by mutual agreement of the parties.

8. Radiographic Test Technique (RTT) shall include variables which affect the exposure, such as x-ray source, kV or MeV (voltage), mA (current), SFD (Source to Film Distance), or SDD (Source to Detector Distance), exposure time, and film type/detector, and include a diagram or photo of the test setup.

9. Representative Quality Indicators (RQI) should be used on radiographic film or digital images for all CAD/PAD devices. The RQI (also known as a defect standard) contains a known defect (i.e. missing explosive charge, missing O-rings, etc.) placed next to a good unit for comparison, to aid in interpretation. Radiographic test technique shall include RQI to be used and RQI placement.

Radiographic Test Technique for X-rays and N-rays, as applicable, shall be submitted with the First Article Test (FAT) samples to the activity cited below. If there is no FAT requirement, the radiographic test technique for X-rays and N-rays, as applicable, shall be submitted to the activity below as described in paragraphs 9a and 9b herein.

**(NO EXPLOSIVES TO BE SENT TO THIS ADDRESS)**

NSWC IHEODTD

ATTN: AMS Per Section H

INDIAN HEAD MD

a. Test technique information for ALL radiographs is specified in section 6 of ASTM E1742, refer to DD Form 1423 sequence number A005. The radiographic images shall display a number of units representative of a production lot. Units shall be positioned on the radiographic plate at the areas of minimum and maximum geometric distortion.

10. The Contractor shall submit radiographic film as marked (X) below:

X

First Article Sample

X

Lot Acceptance Test Samples

X

Production Lot Units

Explosive Sub-Assemblies (i.e., NON-GFP CTGS, Booster Sleeves, etc.)

a. Radiographs of Production Lot Units shall include Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) samples.

11. Radiographs may be produced using film (conventional x-ray), or non-film (digital) techniques such as Digital Detector Array (DDA), or Computed Radiography (CR), with the understanding that the Contractor must be qualified and given prior approval to use digital radiography by NSWC IHEODTD. A qualification plan must be submitted to the Level III Radiographer at NSWC Indian Head EODTD for review prior to qualification of the digital x-ray system. Once the qualification plan has been reviewed and approved, the Level III Radiographer at NSWC Indian Head EODTD will conduct a site visit (i.e. audit) to witness the qualification of the digital x-ray system. The results of the tests performed during the digital x-ray system qualification will be documented in a qualification document, which will be submitted to the Level III Radiographer at NSWC Indian Head EODTD. An official approval letter will then be issued by the Commanding Officer, NSWC Indian Head EODTD, which authorizes the use of the digital system. Follow up audits at regular intervals (i.e. annually) may be conducted to assure the long term stability and performance of the digital x-ray system. If digital radiographs are submitted, they shall be in the form of raw data that is Digital Imaging and Communication in Nondestructive Evaluation (DICONDE) compliant. In addition to the raw DICONDE data, 16 bit Tagged Image Format (TIF) images of the digital radiographs must be submitted. The qualification of non-film techniques will be done IAW the latest versions of standards referenced in the latest version of ASTM E1742 (currently ASTM E1742/E1742M-12), such as ASTM E2698 and ASTM E2737 (for the qualification of Digital Detector Array (DDA) detectors), or ASTM E2033 and ASTM E2445 (for the qualification of Computed Radiography (CR) systems).

12. Notification of approval of the RTT shall be provided via Wide Area Workflow (WAWF). Written notification of rejection will be provided by the Contracting Officer. Approval of the RTT must be received prior to performing radiographic inspection of the production lot units. The Contractor shall then follow the approved technique to produce subsequent radiographs in accordance with the approved RTT. Any change in the approved radiographic technique or equipment requires submittal and approval of new RTT at the Contractor's expense.

Contract number under which RTT was approved ________________________________

13. An acceptable radiographic image is required for each line item on this contract.

14. When submitting the radiographic images, the Contractor shall also submit a report of radiographic inspection. This report shall clearly indicate the units subjected to radiographic inspection by the following data:

Missing units by serial number Any units found to be nonconforming shall be clearly identified. The specific nature of the non-conformance shall be cited, as well as any assignable cause or analysis related to the occurrence.

15. When undergoing radiographic inspection, each unit in the sample or lot shall be permanently serialized in consecutive numerical order per MIL-STD-1168 before radiographic inspection. Serial numbers shall not be repeated on items with the same part number regardless of changes in the lot number. The numbering shall be from left to right, top to bottom with the first item on the left of each row having the lowest serial number. All annotation must be represented using a method which leaves a permanent image on the film, such as placing lead letters on the film cassette or digital detector prior to each exposure. It is NOT acceptable to use adhesive labels, or to write annotation on the film using a marker or other writing instrument. Units that are missing on a radiograph must be indicated by identifying the serial number of the unit immediately preceding, and immediately following, the missing unit(s).

All units shall be arranged on trays or boards in consecutive numerical order. Radiographs shall reveal internal components. This may require using various techniques which may include multiple exposures, multiple speeds of film being loaded for each exposure, or additional orientation of unit(s) i.e. 0 degree and 90 degree exposures.