N0002425R4440A0001 Mod.pdf

N0002425FR62191

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the proposal due date to 8 January 2025. This amendment w ill also update the J-4 and J-8 attachments, respond to the first batch of pre-proposal inquiries, and add Eratta 4.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 16

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Nov-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N0002425R4400

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-Oct-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Nov-2025

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2020

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002425R4400

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:

No. Document Attachment S-1 RESERVED Attachment S-2 Past Performance Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

References Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form Attachment S-4 Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet Attachment S-5 Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet Attachment S-6 RESERVED Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment Attachment S-8 Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template Attachment S-9 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:

Attachment J-1 Specification Package TPPC-LSD 51-MARMC25-CNO1 E1-E4 Attachment J-2 Work Item Plans, Drawings and Other References Attachment J-3 Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates, as proposed Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook, as proposed (Updated in A0001) Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Attachment J-6 Subcontracting Plan, as proposed (to be incorporated upon award) Attachment J-7 Schedule Model Review Attachment J-8 Government Furnished Material (GFM) List (Updated in A0001) Attachment J-9 Compartment Closeout List (NSI 009-81) Attachment J-10 Open & Inspect List, as proposed Attachment J-11 Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD), as proposed

Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003, A005-A009, A011, A014, A016- A017) (Does not include A004, A0010, A012-A0013, or A015) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract to complete the USS OAK HILL (LSD 51) Docking Selected Restricted Availability.

B. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the Offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government, utilizing trade off source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-1 and Section M of this solicitation.

C. ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Brian Han, Contracting Officer, and LT Jourdan Jenkins, Contract Specialist, at brian.s.han3.civ@us.navy.mil, and jourdan.e.jenkins.mil@us.navy.mil, respectively. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to Offeror pre-proposal information (PPI) via amendments, it is requested Offerors submit no more than four sets of controlled questions, outlined in the table below, before 11:59 pm, local time, Washington, DC.

Each set of questions shall be submitted together in one attachment via email properly titled, “Contractor Name - Submission No. X (1, 2, 3, or 4) as of date XX/XX/XXXX.” Solicitation questions should reference the solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre- Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation. Proposal due date shall not be extended solely on the basis of more than one request, extensive questioning, or requests received after this date and time.

Controlled Set of Bidders Questions Due Date Set 1 8 November 2024 Set 2 15 November 2024 Set 3 22 November 2024 Set 4 29 November 2024

Offerors SHALL NOT submit comments, questions, or inquiries to any Government representative other than the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist identified herein.

Information contained in the Government’s responses to bidder’s question shall not supersede any information contained in the solicitation (including amendments). In the event of a discrepancy between a response to a bidder’s question and the content of the solicitation, the solicitation shall take precedence.

The Government reserves the right to not answer any more than four sets of PPI requests per contractor, in accordance with the deadlines identified herein.

D. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making an award in or before May 2025.

E. Potential Prime Offeror’s Negative Response: The Government requests a negative response from any potential Prime Offeror who, after reviewing this solicitation, does not intend on submitting a proposal.

Negative response are to be delivered to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist listed above NLT seven (7) business dates after solicitation release.

II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. Proposal Due Date:

1. All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government via PIEE no later than 08 January 2025 at 2:00 PM, local time, Washington DC. Offerors are instructed to submit their proposal electronically via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) application located at https://piee.eb.mil. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

a) Offerors must provide a proposal valid for at least 180 calendar days (07 July 2025) from the proposal due date (08 January 2025). (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF-33).

B. Directions for Electronic Submission of Proposals:

1. Offerors are instructed to submit proposals electronically via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise

Environment (PIEE) located at https://piee.eb.mil/. Offerors are strongly encouraged to submit early and to confirm receipt of the proposal materials with the PCO and Contract Specialist.

2. Offerors wishing to submit a proposal in response to this notification shall ensure a representative of their organization registers at the PIEE website within seven (7) working days of solicitation release, and that the Proposal Manager role in the Solicitation Module is approved for the Offeror’s representative. A vendor registration guide for obtaining access to the PIEE Solicitation Module is posted to the Defense Pricing and Contracting website at: https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module.

3. Proposals sent through proprietary or third-party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites will not be accepted.

4. For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf.

5. Upon proposal submission, the offeror should receive a system notification of successful proposal submission from PIEE. Offerors’ proposals submitted via the PIEE Solicitation Module shall not contain CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

6. Offerors shall address their package with the RFP number and Offeror’s company name. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that it drops off its proposals and generates a drop-off time prior to the proposal submission date and time. In the event of a dispute of proposal time submission, the submittal date and time documented in PIEE shall serve as the official time that the proposal was submitted to the Government. Late proposal submissions will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

7. Proposals must be submitted as one .zip file per ship/proposal, formatted so that each Volume 1 Price

Volume and each Volume 2 Technical Volume are submitted in separate file folders clearly marked. In the event that the offeror is unable to submit a .zip file, submittal of individual files will be acceptable as long as each file is clearly labelled to which Volume the file is in relation to: Volume 1 Price Volume or Volume 2 Technical Volume. Each Volume shall be formatted with separate files submitted for each Factor.

8. All files uploaded must be scanned to ensure that there are no computer viruses within the file. The files shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat. The proposal shall have separate files. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious and traceable. No fields or documents shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

9. Proposal volumes shall be structured as follows:

Proposal Volume Title

USS OAK HILL

OKH-1 USS OAK HILL Price Volume OKH-2 USS OAK HILL Technical Volume

III. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Ship Checks:

1. The USS OAK HILL (LSD 51) will NOT be available for ship check prior to the proposal submission due date. Potential Offerors may inspect the sister ship, USS CARTER HALL (LSD 50) in Norfolk, Virginia, from 4 November 2024 to 21 November 2024.

2. To schedule a ship check, Offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Brian Han and LT Jourdan Jenkins at brian.s.han3.civ@us.navy.mil and jourdan.e.jenkins.mil@us.navy.mil respectively. Due to the ship location, additional information will be provided upon request.

3. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by MARMC and ship’s Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting MARMC related work efforts must visit MARMC security website for latest forms and instructions at:

a. http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/MARMC/Visitor-Information/

b. https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrma/installations/ns_MARMC/om/pass_and_id.html

B. Specifications and Associated Reference Documentation:

1. Offerors may request solicitation attachments by submitting a request to:

a) Brian Han at brian.s.han3.civ@us.navy.mil, and

b) LT Jourdan Jenkins at jourdan.e.jenkins.mil@us.navy.mil

2. Upon request, the Government will provide the Specification Package Work Items and Work Item

References.

3. Additional work item references not already in the possession of the Offerors, commercially available, listed under FAR 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

a) https://jedmics.net/

b) https://nmfom-prd.mfomls.navsea.cloud.navy.mil/mfom

c) https://nsedr.nnsy.navy.mil//

d) http://www.coretl.com/help/shell.php

C. Alteration of Solicitation

1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

D. Proposal Information

1. Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, Offerors are advised conclusory statements regarding an Offeror’s experience such as: “the Offeror understands”, “the Offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors shall provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

E. Amendments

1. The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the SAM.gov website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

F. Teaming Arrangements

1. Proposals must be submitted by one (1) Prime Contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a Prime Contractor with a unique

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), Offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

G. One-bid Situation

1. If the Government receives only one bid for solicitation N0002425R4400, the Government reserves the right to require certified cost or pricing data in accordance with DFARS 252.215- 7008, Only One Offer. As identified by the Contracting Officer, additional cost or pricing data will be required in order to determine whether proposed pricing is fair and reasonable or to comply with the statutory requirements of certified cost or pricing data in accordance with 10 USC 2306a and FAR 15.403-4.

The Offeror agrees to provide current, thorough, complete and accurate cost and pricing data and any additional data requested within 30 calendar days after receipt of the Contracting Officer’s request or sooner. The data package shall be submitted in an electronic format and shall be valid for a minimum period of six (6) months from the date of submittal. The proposal and submission of cost or pricing data shall conform to the requirements outlined in FAR 15.408 Table 15-2, Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals When Certified Cost or Pricing Data Are Required, and DFARS 252.215-7009, Proposal Adequacy Checklist, as well as any additional detailed requirements specified by the Contracting Officer. Additionally, the data package shall include:

(1) A computational spreadsheet (cost model) in Microsoft Excel-compatible format containing any cost calculations (i.e. formulas) associated with the proposed costs. The spreadsheet must segregate the proposed direct labor hours, direct labor costs, direct material costs, other direct costs, subcontract costs, profit and any indirect costs (e.g., overhead, fringe benefits, G&A, and FCCOM, including visibility into the specific pricing rates applied and the methodology by which rates are applied to applicable cost bases), as applicable, by calendar year, work item and CLIN, or as specified by the Contracting Officer. The elements of cost in the spreadsheet must be traceable to the supporting rationale provided in the Basis of Estimate (BOE) information.

(2) A completed Proposal Adequacy Checklist, pursuant to DFARS 252.215-7009, Proposal Adequacy Checklist.

(3) Five years of historical end of year actuals of direct labor rates, indirect pools, and indirect basis.

(4) Five years of historical end of year actuals of direct labor hours, direct material, and subcontractor costs (labor hours and material).

(5) Five years of historical end of year actuals of daily extension rates.

(6) Certified cost or pricing data for subcontracts that are the lower of either (i) $15M or more; or

(ii) both more than the pertinent certified cost or pricing data threshold and more than 10 percent of the prime contractor’s proposed price (as per FAR 15.404-3 Subcontract Pricing Considerations).

All elements of the electronic package and computational spreadsheet shall be capable of being searched, reproduced, manipulated and cross-referenced to the supporting cost or pricing data (i.e.

Excel file with formulas vice hard entry/PDF). Each Basis of Estimate (BOE) in prime and subcontractor proposals must address four critical questions:

What is the estimate?

What is the estimate based on?

How was the estimate derived?

Why is the estimate reasonable?

In accordance with FAR 15.406-2, Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data, when certified cost or pricing data are required, a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data will be required immediately after agreement on cost/price is reached.

All data provided by the Offeror will be safeguarded and protected in accordance with FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information, FAR 15.207, Handling proposals and information, and the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. Sections 2101-2107.

H. Notification of Use of Navy Support Contractors for Official Contract Files

1. NAVSEA currently utilizes support contractors from Serco-IPS Corporation, DELTA Resources, Inc.

(a wholly owned subsidiary of VT Group Holdings, Inc.), and Herren Associates Inc. to manage official contract files, including the official file supporting this procurement. NAVSEA may, without further notice, enter into contracts with other contractors for file management services as described in NAVSEA Standard Text L-204-H003. Please refer to NAVSEA Standard Text L-204-H003 for further details.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT

A. To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. PROPOSALS

WHICH DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE

AND THUS INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD. NON-RESPONSIVE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE

EVALUATED.

B. Electronic Proposals: Electronic Proposals: All proposals shall be submitted via PIEE as outlined above.

Pages shall be formatted to 8.5 x 11 inch paper with one inch margins. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum of 12 point font. Any revisions to Offerors’ proposals (if required) shall be submitted in two (2) forms: (1) a final clean revised document; and (2) a redlined document outlining the Offeror’s changes. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to provide any additional instructions regarding revisions to Offerors’ proposals via letter. Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section L, paragraph V where required.

C. Page Limits:

1. Volume I (OKH-1)

a) Factor 1 – Price: No page limitation with the exception of the cover letter which shall not exceed three (3) pages.

2. Volume II (OKH-2)

a) Non-price Factor 1 - Technical Eligibility & Physical Resource Capacity: No page limitation with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 10 pages

b) Non-price Factor 2 – Manpower & Small Business Participation:

a. Subfactor A (Manpower): No page limitation, with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 20 pages

b. Subfactor B (Small Business Participation): No page limitation, with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 10 pages

c) Non-price Factor 3 - Schedule & Execution Approach: No page limitation, with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 30 pages

(1) Emphasis Area A (Open and Inspect (O&I) Reports Plan): No page limitation, with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 15 pages

(2) Emphasis Area B (High Level Schedule Substantiation ): No page limitation, with the exception of the narrative which shall not exceed 15 pages

d) Non-price Factor 4 – Past Performance: No page limitation

V. PROPOSAL CONTENT

A. VOLUME I

Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information.

1. Factor 1: Price: The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a) Cover Letter,

b) Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

c) Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

d) Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

e) NSI 009-72 Narrative and Supporting Documentation (if applicable),

f) Completed Attachment J-4 and Solicitation Section B carrying forward information from Attachment

J-4, as applicable, containing:

(1) Work Item Pricing for all Base and Option Items,

(2) Daily Extension Rates,

(3) Inter-port Differential (IPD),

(4) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor & Material Burden Rate, New Work & Growth Reservation,

(5) NSI 009-72 Deduction (if applicable),

g) Completed Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3).

h) Completed Proposal Assessment (Attachment S-7).

2. Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the Offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

a) Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

b) CAGE and SAM Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) numbers for the Prime contractor,

c) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

d) As outlined in FAR 15.404-3(c)(1), name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at the lower of either:

(1) $15 million or more, or

(2) More than 10 percent of the prime contractor’s proposed price.

e) For any work item (WI) with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

(1) For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

(2) For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

3. Standard Form 33 (SF-33): As part of the price proposal package, the Offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

4. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP):

a. An Offeror shall submit a SBSP outlining its strategy for maintaining compliance with FAR

52.219-9 ALT II for the duration of the USS OAK HILL availability, which includes:

i. A subcontracting goal of 25 percent of an Offeror’s total subcontracting dollars utilizing small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and HUB-Zone small businesses. Note, the 25 percent goal is inclusive of the congressionally mandated five percent (5%) goal for small disadvantaged business concerns.

ii. A statement of the total dollars planned to be subcontracted and a statement of the total dollars planned to be subcontracted to small business (including ANCs and Indian tribes), veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business (including ANCs and Indian tribes) and women-owned small business concerns, as a percentage of total subcontract dollars as well as total contract dollars.

iii. Offerors must provide rationale for any proposed plan which does not meet the following thresholds (as applied to subcontracted dollars):

(1) 25 percent of contracts for small businesses;

(2) Five percent for women-owned small businesses;

(3) Five percent of for small disadvantaged businesses;

(4) Three percent for HUBZone small businesses; and

(5) Three percent for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses.

iv. In addition, Offerors must provide explanation for any SBSP which fails to address all requirements outlined in FAR 52.219-9 ALT II.

v. A SBSP is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

5. Completed Solicitation Section B and Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4):

a) Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs) including all base and option CLINs, complete Section B “NOTE B: SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED),” complete Section B “NOTE D: SCHEDULE OF DAILY

RATES FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED) FOR PURPOSES OF

A COMPENSABLE EXTENSION TO THE DRY-DOCKING OR DELIVERY DATE,” and complete all tabs of Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

b) The Offeror shall submit prices using the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) for all Tabs, including:

Work Item Pricing Index, Daily Extension Rates, Labor Rate & Material Burden Rates, Total Value of the Small Dollar Value Growth Incentive, and Total Proposed Evaluated Price in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate must match the rates provided in the Section B “NOTE B:

SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED).” If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate shall govern.

c) Offerors shall insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields in the pricing workbook (Attachment J-4).

6. Inter-port Differential (IPD)

a) The IPD applicable to the USS OAK HILL (LSD 51) FY25 DSRA must be included in all offers and reflects the costs incurred by the Navy to accomplish an availability at a port other than the homeport.

The following chart provides the values to be included in all Offerors’ price proposals to determine the Offeror’s total evaluated price.

Location Differential Norfolk, VA $40,869 Mayport, FL $1,711,101 Pascagoula $1,317,314

Philadelphia, PA $2,667,896 Bath, ME $3,969,868

Charleston, SC $1,845,807 Mobile, AL $1,658,256

b) An Offeror whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a bidder’s question requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the Offeror’s proposed location for the USS OAK HILL (LSD 51) FY25 DSRA.

7. NSI 009-72 Reduction (if applicable)

a) Offeror must provide a narrative as well as other than certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-3, supporting the impact of SI 009-72 Security Measures for Surface Combatants and Amphibious ships use of a water barrier, numbered Fleet Commander-approved barge or other physical barrier approved by the numbered Fleet Commander.

B. VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: Do not include cost or price information in this volume. The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four (4) factors, as follows:

1. Non-Price Factor 1 – Technical Eligibility & Physical Resource Capacity: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility for Award and ability to provide the physical resources necessary to successfully complete the solicited availability. (Narrative shall not exceed 10 pages):

a) Provide a completed Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) that identifies the specific pier and drydock intended to be used for the proposed availability and indicates that the pier and drydock meet the minimum characteristics identified in Attachment S-5.

b) Provide a completed Execution Milestones & Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3) in Microsoft Excel format and a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier available to berth the vessel from the ‘Availability Start’ through ‘Contract Complete’ milestones and a drydock capable of docking the vessel from the ‘Dock Vessel’ through ‘Undock Vessel’ milestones as outlined in the Execution Milestones & Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the Offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources (pier or drydock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier from the ‘Availability Start’ through ‘Contract Complete’ milestone and/or a drydock capable of docking the vessel from the ‘Dock Vessel’ through ‘Undock Vessel’ milestones as outlined in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3) is required.

The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. The proposed pier and drydock facilities, whether owned by the Offeror or subcontractor, must be accessible by the USS OAK HILL (LSD 51) without any modification to the vessel.

c) In accordance with the most current version of MIL-STD-1625, provide a current drydock certification applicable to the drydock proposed for the Availability. Certifications shall demonstrate the drydock will remain certified from the ‘Dock Vessel’ through ‘Undock Vessel’ milestones as outlined in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). If the proposed drydock is currently uncertified, or if the certificate will expire prior to the ‘Undock Vessel’ milestone date, the Offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the drydock in order to remain certified through the period between the ‘Dock Vessel’ and ‘Undock Vessel’ milestones as outlined in the Execution Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). Certification or recertification plans shall include timeline to complete the requirements of MIL-STD-1625 including the below items. Offeror’s plan shall provide a plan of action and milestones (including specific dates or timeframes) to commence and complete the following actions:

(1) Contractor Navy Audit request.

(2) Contractor preparation of facility spaces to be inspected. Contractor shall describe when they expect these facilities to be available to complete necessary inspections and any risks to their availability. The Contractor shall state if no risks will be present as a result of this action.

(3) Navy examination of the facility, facility certification report, maintenance program documentation, and operational records.

(4) Navy observation of a docking or undocking operation, whenever possible. In the case of a floating dry dock, this operation shall include a submergence test to the maximum dock draft.

(5) Navy evaluation of the control inspection, operating, and maintenance procedures.

(6) Navy preparation of exit brief and formalized in a written report.

(7) Contractor actions to resolve any identified deficiencies. Contractor shall explain the time allotted to deficiency resolution and any associated risks.

(8) Navy examination of actions to resolve deficiencies.

d) Complete the Pier and Dry Dock Graphical Representation Template (Attachment S-8) to demonstrate the Offeror has the pier and dry dock available to complete the requirements of the proposed availability. Attachment S-8 must show:

a. The piers and dry docks expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the Contract Completion Date in Attachment J-3 and

b. The awarded and outstanding projects and work using those resources by month. The Attachment S-8 must include:

(1) The piers and dry-docks required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedules.

(2) The piers and dry-docks required to complete all outstanding proposals, including this proposal, per proposed schedules.

(3) The piers and dry-docks required to complete any other anticipated requirements, including but not limited to Non-Navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades, maintenance or dredging.

e) Provide a narrative not to exceed 10 pages to support the Attachment S-8 and address:

i. If the Offeror proposes a subcontracted pier or dry dock, explain the resource requirements that the prime contractor will provide and the pier and dry dock that the subcontractor will provide.

ii. The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry dock resource conflicts as a result of proposed and awarded projects. Piers and dry docks must not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without explanation.

iii. If the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven days between the unberthing or undocking date of another requirement and the proposed berthing or docking date of this availability or a proposed docking date within the first seven days of this availability, then detail the necessary steps to accomplish this effort.

2. Non-Price Factor 2 – Manpower and Small Business Participation:

Subfactor A- Manpower: To assess the Offeror’s ability to provide efficient manpower to successfully complete the solicited availability, the Government requires the Offeror to provide specified workload data that contains historical workload performance and forecasted workload estimates. (Narrative shall not exceed 20 pages):

a) Manpower Performance Data Sheet (Attachment S-4): Provide a completed Manpower Performance

Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. Include all projects, defined as Navy or Non-Navy Ship Repair and New Construction Projects, for which the Offeror is the prime or a major subcontractor (performing 30% or more of a CNO availability or comparable portion of a Non-Navy project) which were active (on-going or completed) or planned (awarded or proposed) (including the proposal for this solicitation) during the first month identified in Attachment S-4 and the Contract Complete Date of this solicitation. All projects, which are yet to complete (on-going or planned), require monthly data throughout the full duration. In the case that an on-going project began prior to the date range provided within the S-4, this will require the Offeror to modify the S-4 so that the provided data captures the project’s full duration. The Attachment S-4 must capture all work performed by the Offeror within the shipyard and at the local Naval Station, if the Offeror’s shipyard is within the homeport fleet concentration area. The Offeror may estimate performance information for subcontractors based on prime contractor budgets and the prime contractor’s actual outlays to subcontractors. Enter remaining growth work options in the distinguished column/row, using the phasing assumptions provided in Section B Note F.

The “Definitions” tab within Attachment S-4 defines the following terms: Contract / Actual / Forecast Start and Completion Date, Project Status, Time-now, Cumulative Earned Value, Time-phased Earned Value, Full Time Equivalents (FTE), Budget at Complete (BAC), Estimate at Complete (EAC), Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS), Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP), Budget to Complete (BTC), Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP), Estimate to Complete (ETC), Cost Performance Index (CPI), To-Complete Cost Performance Index (TCPI), Schedule Performance Index (SPI), Remaining Growth Options, New Work, Prime Contractor Labor, Overtime Labor, Subcontractor Labor, and Temporary Labor.

i. For each project, provide the Earned Value (hours) data on a time phased, month-by-month basis (month-ending) over each project’s duration, from the Actual / Forecast Start Dates to the Actual / Forecast Completion Dates.

ii. For each project, verify the cumulative hour values calculated within the S-4 in the “Cumulative EV” tab align with internal earned value information. If the cumulative calculation does not align with the internal earned value information, then enter the value manually and “Insert Comment” to the manually adjusted cell that describes the discrepancy.

Provide the additional project related information requested in the “Cumulative EV” tab (all cells that are green).

iii. Provide a list of holiday dates in the “Holiday Calendar” tab. If the monthly reporting dates associated with the monthly earned value data are not aligned to the calendar month, then provide the appropriate values for the “Month Start” and “Month End” in the “Monthly EV” tab (rows 3 and 4). This date information is necessary to convert the monthly hours data into monthly FTE as described in Attachment S-4.

b) Manpower Charts: Provide manpower charts reflecting the data in Attachment S-4. The manpower charts must represent each project’s ACWP and ETC within the Actual / Forecast Start Date and Actual / Forecast Completion Date for each project provided in Attachment S-4. The manpower charts must show separate stacked areas for each project in the chart. The manpower charts must meet all format requirements stated in “Manpower Charts Format” tab within Attachment S-4. The “Manpower Charts Format” tab within Attachment S-4 includes an example manpower chart formatted to requirements. Provide the following manpower charts:

(1) Manpower chart showing the total FTE resources required for all projects completed, on-going, awarded, the solicited availability and the Offeror’s remaining outstanding proposals, as provided in Attachment S-4.

(2) Manpower chart showing the total FTE resources required for all projects completed, on-going, awarded, the solicited availability and the Offeror’s executable award scenario from the Offeror’s remaining outstanding proposals accounting for all un-mitigatable resource conflicts, as provided in Attachment S-4. This manpower chart is not required if it produces the same chart required in Section L, paragraph V.B.2b)(1) above.

c) Manpower Narrative: Provide a narrative to characterize the workload information from the manpower charts required in Section L, paragraph V.B.2b)(1)-(2), by describing and quantifying the: historical yard-wide FTE levels, forecasted yard-wide FTE levels, and the composition of historical/forecasted FTE values for: prime straight, prime overtime, subcontracted, and temporary labor. The narrative must explain how and when the Offeror plans to adjust or maintain the current workforce to achieve the proposed forecasted FTE levels and whether the adjustment occurs via additional hiring, use of subcontractors, use of temporary labor, or overtime. Provide supporting data and historical evidence to the maximum extent possible. The narrative should not exceed 20 pages. Address the following possibilities:

i. Any existing constraints between outstanding proposals that would prohibit the Offeror from executing one or more outstanding proposals.

ii. Should the Offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the solicited availability, the narrative must quantify the proposed number of hires and describe the plan to hire and manage the additional personnel from Time-now through Contract Completion Date.

iii. Should the Offeror propose overtime for the solicited availability, the narrative must include:

the historical overtime rate, the forecasted overtime rate, and the plan to manage and provide the overtime from Time-now through Contract Completion Date.

iv. Should the Offeror propose temporary labor for the solicited availability, the narrative must include: the historical temporary labor FTE, the forecasted temporary labor FTE, and the plan to manage and provide the temporary labor from Time-now through Contract Completion Date.

v. Should the Offeror propose subcontracted resources for the solicited availability, the Offeror must explain which requirements the prime contractor will complete and which work the subcontractor will complete, including the work item and trade, of each subcontracted requirement. The Government considers the use of subcontractors in excess of 45% of production labor to increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. The Offeror must include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included from Time-now through Contract Completion Date.

vi. The Offeror must explain any atypical circumstances that caused or contributed to poor historical earned value performance. The Offeror must address how its proposed approach for the evaluated project reflects resiliency to atypical causes of risk (e.g. government furnished material delays or foreseeable trade labor demand).

Subfactor B- Small Business Participation: To assess the Offeror’s commitment to small business participation, the Government requires the Offeror to provide a completed Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD), Attachment J-11 with cells C11-C14 completed. The Government will use the submitted SBPCD to evaluate the contractor’s commitment to small business participation for this subfactor. This evaluation is separate from the FAR requirement for the review and acceptance of an Offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan. All offerors (both other than small businesses and small businesses) will be evaluated on this subfactor. Dollar values shall not be submitted as part of the non price proposal. (Narrative shall not exceed 10 pages):

a) The Offeror shall provide a narrative that is sufficiently complete as to clearly describe the Offeror’s understanding of the Small Business requirements and its planned approach to meet its stated goals, such as the type of commitment (e.g. joint venture, teaming arrangement, subcontractor, etc.);

complexity and variety of the work small businesses are to perform; and participation of small businesses in terms of the total acquisition expressed in percentage. The narrative shall not exceed 10 pages.

The small business participation percentage shall be calculated in terms of total contract value:

Participation percentage = Total Small Business Dollars*

Total Contract Value

* The Total Small Business Dollars is inclusive of the work to be performed directly by a Small Business Prime Offeror.

b) The Government’s Small Business Participation Minimum Quantitative Requirement (MQR) for this contract is: 3%. The offeror is encouraged to propose a Small Business Participation objective percentage as high as is practicable, as long as the percentage is supported by the related SBPCD and the written narrative. The Offeror’s proposed Small Business Participation percentage for this contract shall be incorporated into the contract upon award via the SBCPD (Attachment J-11).

3. Non-Price Factor 3 –Schedule & Execution Approach: The Offeror shall provide an Open and Inspect

(O&I) Reports Plan and a High Level Schedule Substantiation. (Narrative shall not exceed 15 pages for Emphasis Area A and 15 pages for Emphasis Area B):

a) Emphasis Area A - Open and Inspect (O&I) Reports Plan – Attachment J-10 may not include all

O&I reports required by Attachment J-1. Offerors are still required to plan for/schedule for the remaining reports within their proposals and schedules. Offerors shall provide a completed Attachment J-10 (20% O&I Reports Due) and an O&I Reports Plan as follows:

(1) Attachment J-10 (20% O&I Reports Due):

i. Offerors shall enter a proposed milestone for 20% Open/Inspect (Early). The 20% Open/Inspect (Early) milestone is the Offeror’s proposed milestone for submission of O&I Reports prior to the 20% Milestone. The proposed date shall be entered into both Attachment J-3 and an “X” in the appropriate column in the J-10.

ii. Offerors shall enter a proposed milestone for 20% Open/Inspect (Docking). The 20% Open/Inspect (Docking) milestone is the Offeror’s proposed milestone for submission of O&I Reports tied to Undocking in accordance with NSI 009-60. The milestone shall be set at 20% of the docking duration proposed by the contractor. This date will auto-calculate on the Attachment J-3 based on the Offerors proposed Docking and Undocking milestones. An “X” shall be entered in the appropriate column in the J-10.

iii. Offeror’s shall enter a proposed milestone for 20% Open/Inspect (Exception). The 20% Open/Inspect (Exception) milestone is the Offeror’s proposed milestone for submission of O&I Reports after the 20% Milestone. The proposed date shall be entered into both Attachment J-3 and J-10. An “X” shall be entered in the appropriate column in the J-10.

iv. Offerors shall enter a proposed milestone for 20% Open/Inspect (All). The 20% Open/Insect (All) milestone is set forth on Attachment J-3. For any milestone that is not Early Docking, or Exception related the auto-calculated date shall be entered into Attachment J-10. An “X” shall be entered in the appropriate column in the J-10.

(2) O&I Reports Plan:

The Offeror’s O&I Reports Plan shall:

i. Explain the rationale supporting the selection of the date for the 20% Open/Inspect (Early) milestone.

ii. Explain the overall logic and rationale supporting the Offeror’s selection of O&I Reports work items for the 20% Open/Inspect (Early) milestone. The explanation shall:

(1) Substantiate the Offeror’s ability to provide the O&I Reports by the 20% Open/Inspect (Early) milestone.

(2) Substantiate how the Offeror’s sequencing and prioritization improves the Offeror’s ability to provide on-time delivery of the availability.

(3) Explain the rationale supporting the selection of the date for the 20% Open/Inspect (Early) milestone, demonstrating that the date is feasible and supports on-time delivery of the Availability.

iii. Explain the overall logic and rationale supporting the Offeror’s selection of O&I Reports for the 20% Open/Inspect (Exception) milestone. For each exception the Offeror shall:

(1) Explain why the Offeror requires an exception to provide the O&I Reports by the 20% Open/Inspect (Exception) milestone (examples for the rationale include, but are not limited to, sequencing conflicts, stability concerns, and work integration.)

(2) Identify and explain the risks to an on-time delivery of the availability created by the delayed provision of the Reports.

(3) Identify and substantiate the reasonableness of the Offeror’s risk mitigations to ensure the delay does not undermine the Offeror’s ability to provide on-time delivery of the availability.

iv. No additional justification is required for on time reports.

b) Emphasis Area B - High Level Schedule Substantiation: Provide a narrative explanation of the Offeror’s plan to complete the Availability’s major phases, seen as the work completed between the following key events / milestones :

Dock Vessel to PCD

(1) The Offeror shall accomplish the following for each phase:

i. Develop an overarching schedule at the system level or above, identify and explain the phase’s major components / processes and identify the components / processes that will comprise the phase’s critical path. Pages can be formatted to 11x17 inch paper with one inch margins.

ii. An estimate of the number of days the Offeror will require to complete each component / process within each phase The Offeror must substantiate their estimates with data informed schedule estimating relationships. Examples of substantiation may include (but are not limited to):

A. Analogies to historically completed projects B. Historical or engineering informed parametric estimates

iii. Identify and explain the most likely major risks the Offeror sees in their ability to complete each phase’s scope within the phase’s proposed duration.

iv. Identify and quantify contingencies available to the Offeror to mitigate those risks.

Examples of substantiation may include (but are not limited to):

A. Schedule float B. Capacity for additional shifts C. Capacity to incorporate additional personnel

v. Substantiate the estimated effectiveness of each potential risk mitigation contingency.

Substantiation must include schedule estimating relationships to demonstrate mitigation effectiveness. Examples of substantiation may include (but are not limited to):

A. Analogies…