N0002423R5202 Draft RFP 05302023.doc

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

CLIN Number 0001

Data

FFP

Data for CLINs 0002, 0004, 0008, 0009.

See Note C.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 1287

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0002

Engineering and Technical Services

CPFF

See Notes A and I.

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0003

Other Direct Costs (ODCs)

COST

ODCs, Travel, and Material in support of CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0008. See Notes A, B, and H.

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0004

Each

Production

CPIF

System Production. See Note E.

TARGET COST

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

CLIN Number 0005

Enhanced Data Rights

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0006

Spares and Other Negotiated Material

See Notes G.

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0008

Program Management Office (PMO)

CPFF

PMO in support of production. See Notes A and I.

CLIN Number 0009

Each

Production

FPI

System Production. See Note F.

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLIN Number 1001

FFP

Data for CLINs 1002, 1004, 1008, and 1009. See Notes C and D.

NET AMT

CLIN Number 1002

CPFF

See Notes A, D, and I.

CLIN Number 1003

COST

ODCs, Travel and Material in support of CLIN 1002 and 1008. See Notes A, B, D, and H.

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 1004

Each

CPIF

See Notes D and E.

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

CLIN Number 1005

FFP

See Note D.

NET AMT

CLIN Number 1006

FFP

See Notes D and G.

NET AMT

CLIN Number 1008

CPFF

PMO in support of production. See Notes A, D, and I.

CLIN Number 1009

Each

FPI

System Production. See Notes D and F.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-215-H002 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (excluding economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR 52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor. Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid. If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "Disputes" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor shall make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment if the Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

(End of text)

B-216-H006 FEE TABLE (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019)

*The offeror shall divide the proposed fee for each CLIN by the quantity of labor hours indicated to complete the table. Fee is calculated based on cost less FCCOM; if FCCOM is proposed, necessary columns may be added.

In the event of any inconsistency between the above table and the CLIN pricing, the CLIN pricing shall take precedence.

(End of text)

B-227-H001 PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION – WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For the purpose of paragraph (c) of the "Progress Payments" clause of this contract, if included, the requirement that the Contractor develop and deliver Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) is considered to be a "material requirement of this contract," and Contractor failure to make adequate progress in the development of PTD, or to deliver acceptable PTD on a timely basis, may result in reduction or suspension of Progress Payments as provided in said paragraph.

(b) The PTD is considered to be a part of the "Technical Data" specified to be delivered under this contract for the purposes of the "Technical Data--Withholding of Payment" (DFARS 252.227-7030) clause. The terms and conditions of the clause entitled "Limitation On Withholding of Payments (FAR 52.232-9), if included in this contract, shall not apply to withholding of payment for failure to make timely delivery of the PTD or delivery of deficient PTD.

(End of text)

B-231-H001 TRAVEL COSTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The travel costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs for which the Contractor has maintained appropriate documentation and which have been determined to be allowable, allocable, and reasonable by the Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, or their duly authorized representative.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incidental to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35; however, Procuring Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incidental to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the Contractor's or employee's convenience.

(End of text)

B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to TBD percent (TBD%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee payable is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, per the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22) or "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

(End of Text)

B-232-H005 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT)--ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost and Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable. Fee paid per hour shall be based on total fee dollars divided by total hours to be provided. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract.

(End of text)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-232-H006 LIMITATION OF COST OR LIMITATION OF FUNDS CLARIFICATION (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018) The clause entitled "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20) or "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

(End of text)

NOTE A - TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS - Applicable to Items 0002, 0003, (and if Option(s) exercised) 1002, 1003, and 1008– The Government will issue Technical Instructions in accordance with C-242-H003 TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS (NAVSEA)(OCT 2018) included in SECTION C of this contract.

NOTE B - OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – Other Direct Costs (ODCs) to include travel and per diem and materials incidental to engineering performance for 0002, 0008 (and if Option(s) are Exercised, 1002, and 1008), are to be included on a cost-only basis (non-fee bearing) under Items 0003 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1003. See FAR 16.302 for a description of this cost-only contract type.

NOTE C – Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) - The Contractor should note that Items 0001 and 1001 is not separately priced (NSP) and therefore, the Contractor is expected to incorporate the price of the CDRLs into Item 0002, 0008 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1002, and 1008 where the work will be performed.

NOTE D – Option Item to which the option clause in SECTION I applies and which is to be supplied only if and to the extent said option is exercised. Applicable to Items 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1008, and 1009.

NOTE E – INCENTIVE FEE INSTRUCTIONS – Applicable to Items 0004 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1004.

Minimum fee shall be zero percent (0%). Maximum fee shall not be greater than TBD percent (TBD%). Target fee shall not be greater than TBD percent (TBD%). Additionally, these fee maximums apply to all subcontractors when CPIF type subcontracts are proposed.

The share ratio for the CPIF portion of the fee structure is 50/50 Government/Contractor for overruns and underruns.

NOTE F – Applicable to Items 0009 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1009 - Fixed Price Incentive Firm (FPIF) (if option is exercised) IAW FAR 52.216-16 in Section I of this RFP – The maximum profit is TBD percent (TBD%) of the Target Cost. The Offeror shall fill in their target profit (0-TBD%) within this range. The share ratio is 50/50 above and below Target Cost. The Government share under Target Cost is fifty percent (50%). The Government share above Target Cost to Ceiling is fifty percent (50%). The Ceiling is established at 120% of Target Cost.

NOTE G – Applicable to Items 0006 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1006 – CLINs X006 shall be Firm Fixed Price (FFP). The profit proposed for Spares and Other Negotiated Material (CLINs X006) shall be no greater than TBD Percent (TBD%). Offerors shall apply proposed profit to the Government Estimate, provided in the cost portion of SEC L.

NOTE H – Applicable to Items 0003 (and if Option(s) exercised) 1003 – Offeror is to propose the Government specified Estimated Cost only amount, provided in the cost portion of SEC L.

NOTE I - Offerors shall submit proposed pricing for Section B by completing an SF-33. Proposed Costs and Fees must be provided for each applicable Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) identified in this solicitation. Offerors shall not propose fees greater than TBD Percent (TBD%).

COMPOSITE RATE TABLE

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

*This table will be completed at the time of contract award and is inclusive of all labor categories for each calendar year.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

SECTION C: SOW

SOW Section Table of Contents Listing

181.0

NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE ACQUISITION

181.1

DESCRIPTION OF THE EFFORT

181.1.1 Open Systems Architecture Approach

181.2

SCOPE

Error! Bookmark not defined.1.3 Contract Delivery Requirement List

192.0

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

192.1

GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

192.1.1 Military Standards

202.1.2 Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Navy (DON) Regulations, Directives and Instructions

202.1.3 OPNAV Instructions and Documents

212.1.4 NAVSEA and PEO IWS Instructions and Documents

212.2 Government Specifications

212.3 Non-Government Documents/Publications

212.3.1

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) STANDARDS

212.3.2

INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERS

212.3.3

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

212.3.4

INDUSTRY STANDARDS

223.0

REQUIREMENTS

233.1

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

233.1.1 Financial Reporting

233.1.2 Subcontract Management and Control

233.1.3 Contract Work Breakdown Structure

243.1.4 Integrated Baseline Reviews

243.1.5 Integrated Master Schedule

243.1.6 Program Risk Analysis

243.1.7 Program Management Plan

253.1.8 Meetings

253.1.9 Design Disclosure, Intellectual Property and Data Rights

263.1.10 Non-Developmental Items Licenses

263.1.11 Data Management

273.1.12 Integrated Product Team

273.1.13 Contractor Facilities

283.1.14 Use of Contractor Facilities

283.1.15 Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)

293.1.16 Program Security Requirements

303.1.17 Transition Plan

303.2

ENGINEERING

323.2.1 Systems Engineering

353.2.2 Hardware

373.2.3 System Integration

383.2.4 Production

403.3

TEST AND EVALUATION

403.3.1 Test and Evaluation Program

403.3.2 Failure Reporting

413.3.3 Government Test Monitoring and Witnessing

413.3.4 Test Requirements

413.3.5 Test Readiness Review

413.3.6 Testing and Inspections

443.4

INTEGRATED LOGISTICS SUPPORT

453.4.1 Performance Based Logistics

453.4.2 End Of Life Status Meeting

453.4.3 Parts Management Program

453.4.4 Supportability Analyses

453.4.5 Support and Test Equipment

463.4.6 Supply Support Analysis

463.4.7 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages Parts Management

463.4.8 Item Unique Identification Requirements

463.4.9 Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation

473.4.10 Radio Frequency Identification

473.4.11 Provisioning Data

473.4.12 Source Material for Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Products

483.5

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM)

483.5.1 Contractor CM Policy and Procedures

483.5.2 CM Data Distribution/Access

483.5.3 Configuration Identification

493.5.4 Configuration Control

493.5.5 Engineering Change Proposal

493.5.6 COTS Module Substitutions

493.5.7 Correction of Deficiencies

503.5.8 Requests for Variance (RFV)

503.5.9 Escalation of Class II ECPs and RFVs

503.5.10 Revisions/Corrections to ECPs/RFVs

503.5.11 Data Classification

503.5.12 Specification Change Notices

503.5.13 Notice of Revision

513.5.14 Engineering Change Installation

513.5.15 Configuration Status Accounting System

513.5.16 As-Built Configuration List

513.5.17 Assembly Aides and Work Instructions

513.5.18 Physical Configuration Audit

523.5.19 Support for ILS Development and Production Site

523.6

TRAINING

523.6.1 Training Source Content

523.6.2 Training Support

523.7 INSTALLATION, CHECKOUT and FIELD SUPPORT

533.8

IN-SERVICE ENGINEERING AGENT (ISEA) SUPPORT

533.8.1 Post-Delivery/In-Service Support

533.8.2 System Support

534.0

LIST OF SOW ACRONYMS

Surface Ship Undersea Warfare Systems Design, Integration and Production

1.0 NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE ACQUISITION

DESCRIPTION OF THE EFFORT

The Program Executive Office for Integrated Warfare Systems, Undersea Systems Program Office (PEO IWS 5.0) executes the acquisition and total life cycle system support responsibility for the Navy’s Surface Ship Undersea Warfare (USW) programs. The program consists of the AN/SQQ-89(V) fitted on Cruisers (CGs), Arleigh Burke Destroyers (DDG-51s), as well as derivative USW efforts in support of Foreign Military Sale cases. Each USW system combines improved sensors, support systems, and weapon control systems with advanced acoustic data processing and displays. The systems are specifically designed to support multiple ship class requirements by leveraging technology and common components to meet operational requirements for each ship class. Individual systems integrate the specific USW combat system with MH-60R Multi-Mission Helicopter, shipboard electronics, weapon control and launch systems, and other sensors.

Surface USW Combat Systems consist of a complex set of personnel, equipment, and computer programs that provide U.S. Navy DDGs, CGs, and other surface ships with the capability to effectively meet their offensive and defensive USW mission requirements within a multi-mission operational context. The USW system designated AN/SQQ-89(V) is an element of the Advanced Electronic Guidance and Instrumentation System (AEGIS) Combat System on forward fit DDGs and FFGs, back fit DDGs and CGs. The system is fully interoperable with the parent combat system. The AN/SQQ-89(V) systems provide the capability for the AEGIS Destroyers, Cruisers, and Frigates to support battlespace dominance through effective conduct of USW operations in open-ocean and littoral environments. It supports implementation of command doctrine for end- to-end execution of assigned USW missions. This support includes the ability to plan, conduct, and evaluate underwater searches; to detect, classify, localize, and track contacts; and to engage or evade submarines, small objects, and torpedo threats as part of multiple platform or individual ship operations.

Open Systems Architecture Approach

The Government intends to procure system(s) having an Open System Architecture (OSA), to include support for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) via the use of hypervisor technologies. As part of this contract, the Contractor shall define, document and follow an open systems approach for using modular design, standards-based interfaces and widely supported consensus-based standards. The Contractor shall demonstrate compliance with open systems architecture during all design reviews.

As part of an open system architecture approach, the Contractor shall identify to the Government all Commercial- Off-The-Shelf/Non-Developmental Item (COTS/NDI) components and software licenses, their functionality and proposed use in the system, and provide copies of license agreements related to the use of these components for Government approval prior to use.

SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the efforts required for the production manufacturing, systems engineering, program management, logistics and supportability engineering, configuration management, hardware integration (including material procurement or fabrication, and integration of Government Furnished Property (GFP), as applicable), test, evaluation, and installation support of Surface Ship USW systems, including the AN/SQQ-89(V) system, with provisions included to support other Surface USW systems and components. This SOW addresses the following major task areas:

a) Program Management

b) Engineering

c) Test and Evaluation

d) Development of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and Training source material

e) Configuration Management (CM)

f) Support Installation, Checkout and Field Support

g) Production

The Contractor shall execute this SOW as specified in the Contract Schedule and as identified in individual Technical Instructions (TIs) under each Task Order.

The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system will be a variant of the USW combat system approved for release. Work associated with unique functional, physical, and interface requirements of the FMS system will be accomplished by the Contractor under separate tasking (i.e. separate TI) and funding. This SOW defines the minimum efforts required for the system design, hardware integration (including material procurement, fabrication and integration of GFP, as applicable), test, evaluation, production and installation preparation, and delivery of the Surface Ship USW systems which will meet the requirements specified in the appropriate USW combat system Functional Performance Specification.

The AN/SQQ-89(V) family of hardware baselines will be periodically upgraded with the latest market based Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) hardware to resolve obsolescence, and/or add capacity and capability. The extent of system upgrades and technical refresh applied to the baseline is based on obsolescence concerns, required capacity and capability expansions, cost trade analyses, resolution of Fleet generated issues, and the approved budget. The program supports delivery of the AN/SQQ-89(V) configuration as the initial system baseline as part of AEGIS backfit, forward fit, and modernization programs. These systems, once installed, will be sustained via technology refresh to resolve obsolescence and incorporate future capabilities. Given this program is in the post-delivery phase, technology refresh and sustainability life cycle phase to continue to standardize the system across each ship variant.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents, specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this SOW and are for use by the Contractor as general guidance. The documents include the basic references for the performance of this SOW. The list is not intended to be all inclusive. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW supersedes the referenced document.

GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

Military Standards

MIL-STD-167-1A

MIL-STD-1474E

MIL-STD-461G

Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard Equipment, 02 Nov 2005

DOD Design Criteria Standard: Noise Limits, 15 Apr 2015

Requirements for Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, 11 Dec 2015

MIL-STD-3018 Chg. 2

MIL-STD-2073-1E Chg. 4

MIL-STD-881E

MIL-STD-3034

Parts Management, 02 Jun 2015

Standard Practice for Military Packaging, 22 Apr 2019

Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, 06 Oct 2020

Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Process, 15 Apr 2019

Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Navy (DON) Regulations, Directives and Instructions

SECNAVINST 4900.46D

Technology Transfer and Security Assistance Review Board, 26 Apr 2019

DoD 8750.01-M Chg. 4

DoDI 5200.48

DoDI 5200.39 Chg. 3 Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program, as 10 Nov 2015

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), 6 Mar 2020

Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), 1 Oct 2020

DoD Supplier's Passive RFID Information Guide (available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/rfid/index.html), Version 14

Modeling And Simulation Guidance For The Acquisition Workforce, Version 1.01, October 2008, DoD USD(AT&L)

NAVEDTREA 131-B Chg. 1 Personnel Performance Profile Based Curriculum Development Manual Nov 2010

Naval Open Architecture Contract Guidebook for Program Managers, Version 2.0, 20 Jun 2010 (available at http://acc.dau.mil/NOAGuidebook)

OPNAV Instructions and Documents

OPNAVINST 1500.76D

Naval Training Systems Requirements, Acquisition, and Management, 5 May 2019

OPNAVINST 5090.1D

Environmental Readiness Program Manual, 25 Jun 2021

OPNAVINST 5310.23A

Navy Personnel Human Systems Integration, 17 Oct 2017

OPNAVINST C5510.93F

Navy/Marine Corps Implementation of National Policy on Control of Compromising Emanations, 10 Jan 2002

04-5023602-00 (October 2004) AN/SQQ-89(V) Operational Requirements Document (Classified Document)

NAVSEA and PEO IWS Instructions and Documents

Government Specifications

140-2 Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, May 2001

Non-Government Documents/Publications

The following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW supersedes any reference document.

Technical society and technical association specifications and standards are generally available for reference from libraries. They are also distributed among technical groups and using Federal Agencies.

Copies of specifications, standards, drawings, and publications required by suppliers, in connection with specified procurement functions, should be obtained from the contracting agency or as directed by the contracting officer.

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) STANDARDS

INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERS

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

INDUSTRY STANDARDS

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

This SOW defines the efforts required for the program management, production manufacturing, systems engineering, logistics and supportability engineering, configuration management, hardware and non-developmental software integration (including material procurement or fabrication, and integration of GFP, as applicable), test, evaluation, and installation support of Surface Ship USW systems.

The Surface Ship USW Combat Systems Contractor shall provide the material, equipment, supplies and technical engineering required to define, design, develop, integrate, test, deliver and support surface combatants such as CG-47s, DDG-51s, FFG-62s, DDG-1000s, future surface combatants, and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case platforms.

Frequently within ship classes there are multiple versions of hardware and software. This procurement provides for the upgrades and replacement to these diverse platforms in an Open Architecture (OA) environment. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is an organic part of this procurement that will serve to streamline the effort associated with the alteration of computing infrastructure. This procurement will also make it possible for physical alteration to be performed on installed shipboard cabinets via a Build-in-Place concept. The Build-In-Place philosophy aims to avoid unnecessary removal of AN/SQQ-89 cabinets and subassemblies when conducting a technology refresh. To the maximum extent possible, hardware that is still sustainable and provides the required capacity and capability will be kept in place during an upgrade. Reclaimed components may also be supplied as GFE to the contractor to be integrated with future system deliveries.

The requirements in Sections 3.1 through 3.8 of the SOW have been organized into the following subparagraphs:

3.1) Program Management: Details the overall Program Manager (PM) requirements across all elements of the contract.

3.2) Engineering: Requirements for the design and integration of hardware baselines; requirements for Infrastructure as a Service; requirements for the manufacture of hardware systems.

3.3) Test and Evaluation: Details the test and evaluation activities associated with developing, certifying, and fielding USW combat system baselines and updates.

3.4) Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Support: Details development of source material for ILS products that will be created under other contract(s).

3.5) Configuration Management (CM): Details management of the hardware and software configurations across the development and fielding of USW combat system variants.

3.6) Training: Details activities associated with developing source material for USW combat system training products developed under other contract(s).

3.7) Installation, Checkout and Field Support: Details activities, to include on-site subject matter expertise, in support of USW combat system installation and check out (INCO) performed under other contract(s).

3.8) In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) Support: Addresses maintenance activities associated with required updates to USW combat system configurations that have already been fielded.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Applicable CLINs: x002, x003, x004, x005, x007, x008

The Contractor shall designate a Program Manager (PM) who shall have the responsibility for the planning, execution, and control of all aspects of this contract and the authority to commit the Contractor to specific courses of action. In addition, the PM shall be responsible for directing its subcontracting efforts. The PM shall have the necessary authority to utilize the company’s resources to assure the tasks of this SOW are accomplished. The Contractor shall authorize the PM to deal directly with PEO IWS 5.0 and/or the designated representative on all matters pertaining to this contract.

The Contractor shall facilitate participation by the large number of organizations contributing to the USW baseline, including establishing relationships with key small businesses participating in USW system development. The Contractor shall be responsible for organizing, coordinating, controlling and reporting the status of all contract activities related to this contract, including activities assigned to subcontractors, to ensure the on-time delivery of all supplies and services specified in this contract.

The Contractor shall perform program management of production CLINs under production Program Management Office (PMO) CLINs. This requirement may be modified to the extent that production program management efforts are included within each production CLIN.

CDRL A001 – Contractor's Progress and Status Report

Financial Reporting

The Contractor shall maintain technical and financial status and generate progress reports. The financial status shall include the Actuals to Date (ATD), Estimate to Complete (ETC), amount funded and outlooks for when additional funding is required, as necessary, for tasks as identified in Technical Instructions.

For production tasks, the Contractor shall utilize an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) and provide a Contract Performance Report for tracking and reporting costs segregated by tasks. EVMS must be linked to and supported by the Contractor’s management processes and systems to include the integrated master schedule, contract work breakdown structure, change management, material management, procurement, cost estimating, and accounting. The correlation and integration of these systems and processes shall provide for the early indication of cost and schedule problems, and their relation to technical achievement. The Contractor shall submit EVMS data in EVM-CR (https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/ae/ada/ipm/about-evm-cr.html) in addition to the Integrated Program Management Report.

CDRL A001 – Contractor's Progress and Status Report

CDRL A003 – Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR)

CDRL A061 – Cost Data Summary Report

Subcontract Management and Control

The Contractor shall identify and monitor subcontractor technical, quality, schedule, and milestone achievement on a continuing basis, according to the Contractor’s own established subcontract management techniques. The USW system is comprised of segments developed and maintained by a multi-organizational community of experts, including a large number of small businesses. The infrastructure of the USW system is determined by the Program Office.

Contract Work Breakdown Structure

The Contractor shall develop and maintain the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) and CWBS dictionary using MIL-STD-881C for guidance. The CWBS provides the basis for further extension by the Contractor to lower levels during the performance of the contract. The Contractor shall extend the CWBS down to a minimum of three (3) levels required to provide adequate internal management, surveillance, and performance measurement, regardless of the reporting level stipulated in the contract for Government visibility. The Contractor shall use the CWBS as the primary framework for contract planning, budgeting, and reporting of the cost, schedule, and technical performance status to the Government. The Contractor shall analyze the system requirements specified in this SOW and the system specifications and translate them into a structure representing the products and services that comprise the entire work effort under the contract. Changes to the CWBS or associated definitions, at any reporting level, require approval of the Government.

CDRL A002 – Contract Work Breakdown Structure

Integrated Baseline Reviews

The Contractor shall engage jointly with the Government’s Program Manager in Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBR) to evaluate risks inherent in the Contractor’s planned performance measurement baseline established from the culmination of Delivery Orders in effect per year during execution of the contract. The Contractor and Government PM shall jointly determine the initial IBR baseline 90 days after a hardware order is issued; subsequent baselines will be established prior to the year of execution. Each IBR shall verify that the Contractor is using a reliable performance measurement baseline, which includes the entire scope of work for the culmination of Delivery Orders that are in place during the year of execution and is consistent with Contract schedule requirements and has adequate resources assigned.

CDRL A005 – Meeting Minutes

CDRL A006 – Meeting Agenda

Integrated Master Schedule

The Contractor shall establish and maintain the initial baseline Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) by logically networking detailed program activities, task interdependencies, and critical path activities to completion of the contract. Any changes to the baseline require approval by the Government. The schedule shall contain the planned events and milestones, accomplishments, exit criteria, and all activities from contract award to the completion of each system baseline. The schedule shall reflect all assigned Technical Instructions. The IMS should have a direct and traceable correlation between events in the Program Management Plan (PMP). The Contractor shall make periodic deliveries of the IMS in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).

CDRL A003 – Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR)

Program Risk Analysis

The Contractor shall perform a continuous analysis of program, technical, cost and schedule risk. The analysis shall identify the risks associated with each area, identify the impact of each risk on the overall program, and propose approaches for reducing identified risks. The Contractor shall report risk analysis in the Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report and presented during Program and Technical Reviews.

CDRL A001 – Contractor's Progress and Status Report

CDRL A004 – Risk Management Status Report

Program Management Plan

The Contractor shall develop a Program Management Plan (PMP) for the program that will support Government established schedule requirements as documented and specified in this SOW and any subsequent Technical Instructions. Using a metrics based management approach, the Contractor shall document in the PMP all planning, scheduling, technical, cost, risk, and quality monitoring/reporting of each Technical Instruction/contracted tasks with program-wide visibility of plan versus actual efforts under this contract. The Contractor shall provide its proposed metrics in the PMP.

CDRL A001 – Contractor's Progress and Status Report

CDRL A019 – Program Management Plan

Meetings

The Contractor shall conduct program progress and status review meetings at regular intervals at times and places mutually agreed upon between the Contractor and PEO IWS 5.0. The Contractor shall hold these meetings with a minimum frequency of two times per year. The Contractor shall invite PEO IWS 5.0, or such representatives as designated by PEO IWS 5.0, to the meetings. The Contractor shall issue a schedule for Program Reviews on a quarterly basis that plans at least 6 months into the future. The Contractor shall conduct Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) in accordance with each Technical Instruction.

At each program review the Contractor shall report at a minimum the status of the following activities:

a) Cost/schedule performance

b) Small Business Utilization

c) Design and technical issues

d) Engineering

e) Risk analysis

f) Reliability and maintainability

g) Test and evaluation

h) Production

i) Logistics development

j) Safety program

k) Configuration management

l) Government Furnished Property (GFP) status

m) Efforts authorized under Technical Instructions

n) Data items delivery schedule

o) Hazardous material management

p) Cybersecurity/ Information Assurance/Anti-Tamper

q) Field Engineering Support/Post Delivery Support

The Contractor shall prepare agendas for Contractor-hosted meetings, program reviews, Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) and all other meetings/reviews. The agendas shall be reviewed jointly between the Government and Contractor and distributed electronically (i.e., e-mail or other suitable manner) by the Contractor. The Contractor shall keep minutes of the meetings unless otherwise directed by the Government. Minutes of major programmatic and technical review meetings highlighted above, shall include a summary of discussions, copies of handouts or graphics, and a listing of action items, and distributed electronically.

CDRL A005 – Meeting Minutes

CDRL A006 – Meeting Agenda

CDRL A029 – Contractor's Risk Management Plan

Design Disclosure, Intellectual Property and Data Rights

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a process that will provide design disclosure directly to third party developers via electronic access to in-process design documentation. The Contractor shall support initiatives of the Shipboard Combat Systems Development community intended to achieve open architecture and commonality. The Contractor shall establish an Associate Contractor Agreement with each third-party developer and coordinate disclosure directly with the developers. The exchange of information must be structured so as to protect the Contractor's and third-party developers’ proprietary rights in the information. The Contractor shall furnish to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), if requested, a copy of the Associate Contractor Agreement and copies of any written communication between the Contractor and the third-party developers that is pertinent to this contract. The Contractor shall discuss and attempt to resolve any problems between the Contractor and the third-party developers and notify the PCO if required, in writing, of any problems including documentation of problem resolution. The Contractor and its subcontractors are responsible to ensure that all software developed under this contract is properly marked with the delivered product. In addition, metadata for documents must be provided with all final USN document products.

Non-Developmental Items Licenses

The Contractor shall be responsible for the procurement of all hardware and software licenses for Non-Development Item (NDI) products delivered in this contract including both Contractor developed and third-party NDI. If the Contractor needs to obtain a license for any NDI incorporated into a deliverable under this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Government immediately in writing. This notification shall specify whether the license(s) that need to be procured are transferable to the Government, FMS, and/or any other contractors. Specifically, licenses shall support transfer of the total integrated system to the Government, including FMS. The notification shall also provide all pricing information necessary to the Government for any such licenses that the Contractor procures under this Section.

The Contractor shall provide to the Government all licenses and documentation required by the Government to support any NDI that is modified by the Contractor.

Data Management

The Contractor shall be responsible for the digital generation, reception and electronic delivery of data. All data must developed, managed, used, and delivered/exchanged electronically to the greatest extent practical.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) submitted by email must be digitally signed and encrypted. The Contractor shall deliver all unclassified electronic deliverable data items via the Government’s web server, PEO IWS 5.0’s Integrated Product Data Management System (iPDM). Individual iPDM accounts must be requested by the Contractor for all personnel who will load or access data into the Government system. A Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate is required to access all Government databases and it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to obtain PKI certificates. The Government will provide the Contractor twenty-four hour a day access to iPDM (except for planned maintenance or unplanned outages). The Government shall provide training for using iPDM and iPDM application tools if requested. Tracking, review, comment generation and consolidation, comment resolution and approval of the Contract Deliverables shall be performed between the Contractor and the Government via iPDM.

The Contractor shall maintain a record of any Government Furnished Property (GFP) received, data items submitted, and technical and logistic documents generated in support of USW combat system development and production which is submitted for Government use. Such data must be cataloged in a Data Accession List (DAL). The Contractor shall provide the Government team access to all data listed in the DAL created for this contract.

CDRL A007 – Data Accession List

When data has been developed under a previous contract, a certificate of prior submission may be submitted in lieu of submitting a duplicate data item. The item must, however, be certified by the Contractor as being 100% correct and in full compliance with the requirements of this contract. The Contractor shall provide a copy of previously submitted data, if requested by the COR.

All contract data delivered by electronic media must be accessible by one or more of the following application programs:

a) NMCI Microsoft Office Suite (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, MS Project)

b) AutoCAD 21.0 with compatibility to Solidworks 2016 c)

MATLAB 9.0

d) Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) Stand-Alone 5.1 and ICAPS Client/Server (C/S) (for Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) only)

The version of the application programs may be changed to a different version with mutual consent of the Contractor and PEO IWS 5.0. Other application programs may be used upon explicit approval by PEO IWS 5.0.

As required by the Security Classification Guidelines, the Contractor shall establish secure communication capabilities for the transmission of sensitive and classified data and to provide support to the operating Fleet and its land based support activities.

The Contractor shall deliver classified data that require digital media delivery in electronic media and hardcopy format. Deliveries too large for delivery by e-mail or electronic media (file size, drawings, data packages, etc.) must be delivered in hardcopy format in accordance with the applicable CDRL.

Integrated Product Team

It is essential that the Contractor works in a collaborative environment with a consortium of Navy, Navy Laboratories, Academia, and other industry partners to ensure continued success of the program. The Contractor (including subcontractors and vendors as necessary) shall attend, present as necessary, and participate in Integrated Product Team (IPT) meetings. Contractor participants must be subject matter experts in the appropriate areas and have sufficient decision making authority to expedite process and product changes within the scope and terms of this contract.