MF715-24 GREENLEE BENDER.pdf

PDF 195 KB Posted

Attached to
HYDRAULIC BENDER Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W44W9M-20-Q-0042
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Joint Munitions Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to HYDRAULIC BENDER, newest first.
File Type Posted
20Q0042 Hydraulic Bender.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITON PROCEDURES (SAP)

Justification for Brand Name and or Sole Source Acquisitions Over $3,500 but not Exceeding The Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT)

SOLICITATIONS MAY BE LIMITED TO ONE SOURCE ONLY IF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER DETERMINES THAT ONLY ONE SOURCE IS REASONABLE AVAILABLE. THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE SUPPORTED WITH FULL JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE FROM THE CUSTOMER. WHEN THE CUSTOMER DESCRIBES AN ITEM WITH A PURCHASE DESCRIPTION, WHICH LIMTS THE AVAILABILITY TO ONE SOURCE, THE JUSTIFICATION MUST EXPLAIN WHY THE ITEM IS THE ONLY ONE THAT WILL MEET THE GOVERNMENTS REQUIREMENT. STATEMENTS SUCH AS “ONLY KNOWN SOURCE” OR “ONLY SOURCE WHICH CAN MEET THE REQUIRED DELIVERY DATE “ARE INADEQUATE TO SUPPORT A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE THE

CUSTOMER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

1. PURCHASE REQUEST OR REQUISITION NUMBER 2. PROJECT/TASK NUMBER 3. ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED AND THE INTENDED USE.

5. UNIQUE CHARACTERISTIC THAT LIMIT AVIALIABILITY TO ONLY ONE SOURCE, WITH THE REASON NO OTHER SUPPLIES OR SERVICES CAN BE USED. MOST RECENT MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED (INCLUDE DATES & DETAILS). IF MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT

CONDUCTED, EXPLAIN.

6. REASON THAT SUGGESTED SOURCE IS THE ONLY SOURCE WHICH CAN PROVIDE THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES. COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING SYSTEM, IF APPLICABLE, & NON-CONPATIBILITY COULD RESULT IN EXCESSIVE ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURING AND/OR

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

7. EXPLAIN WHY AN ADEQUATE PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OR OTHER INFORMATION SUITABLE TO SOLICIT BY FULL AND OPEN

COMMPETITION HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED OR ARE NOT AVAILABLE.

8. PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF ACTIONS, IF ANY THE GOVERNMENT MAY TAKE TO REMOVE OR OVERCOME ANY BARRIER TO COMPETITION BEFORE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IF THIS IS A FOLLOW-ON ACTION TO A PREVIOUSLY COMPETED ACTION, SO STATE.

9A. OFFICE SYMBOL 9B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 9C. SIGNATURE OF DIVISION CHIEF OR HIGHER 9D. DATE

10A. OFFICE SYMBOL 10B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 10C. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER 10D. DATE

MCAAP FORM 715-24, February 2016 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE jinny.menees

SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITON PROCEDURES (SAP)

Justification for Brand Name and or Sole Source Acquisitions Over $3,500 but not Exceeding The Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) SOLICITATIONS MAY BE LIMITED TO ONE SOURCE ONLY IF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER DETERMINES THAT ONLY ONE SOURCE IS REASONABLE AVAILABLE. THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE SUPPORTED WITH FULL JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE FROM THE CUSTOMER. WHEN THE CUSTOMER DESCRIBES AN ITEM WITH A PURCHASE DESCRIPTION, WHICH LIMTS THE AVAILABILITY TO ONE SOURCE, THE JUSTIFICATION MUST EXPLAIN WHY THE ITEM IS THE ONLY ONE THAT WILL MEET THE GOVERNMENTS REQUIREMENT. STATEMENTS SUCH AS “ONLY KNOWN SOURCE” OR “ONLY SOURCE WHICH CAN MEET THE REQUIRED DELIVERY DATE “ARE INADEQUATE TO SUPPORT A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE THE

CUSTOMER SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:

1. PURCHASE REQUEST OR REQUISITION NUMBER

2. PROJECT/TASK NUMBER

3. ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED AND THE INTENDED USE.

5. UNIQUE CHARACTERISTIC THAT LIMIT AVIALIABILITY TO ONLY ONE SOURCE, WITH THE REASON NO OTHER SUPPLIES OR SERVICES CAN BE USED. MOST RECENT MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED (INCLUDE DATES & DETAILS). IF MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT

CONDUCTED, EXPLAIN.

6.

REASON THAT SUGGESTED SOURCE IS THE ONLY SOURCE WHICH CAN PROVIDE THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES. COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING SYSTEM, IF APPLICABLE, & NON-CONPATIBILITY COULD RESULT IN EXCESSIVE ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURING AND/OR

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

7. EXPLAIN WHY AN ADEQUATE PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OR OTHER INFORMATION SUITABLE TO SOLICIT BY FULL AND OPEN

COMMPETITION HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED OR ARE NOT AVAILABLE.

8.

PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF ACTIONS, IF ANY THE GOVERNMENT MAY TAKE TO REMOVE O

R OVERCOME ANY BARRIER TO

COMPETITION BEFORE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IF THIS IS A FOLLOW-ON ACTION TO A PREVIOUSLY COMPETED ACTION, SO STATE.

9A. OFFICE SYMBOL

9B. TELEPHONE NUMBER

9C. SIGNATURE OF DIVISION CHIEF OR HIGHER

9D. DATE

10A

. OFFICE SYMBOL

10B. TELEPHONE NUMBER

10C. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

10D. DATE

MCAAP FORM 715-24, February 2016 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE

6. REASON THAT SUGGESTED SOURCE IS THE ONLY SOURCE WHICH CAN PROVIDE THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES. COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING SYSTEM, IF APPLICABLE, & NON-CONPATIBILITY COULD RESULT IN EXCESSIVE ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURING AND/OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.:
1. PURCHASE REQUEST OR REQUISITION NUMBER: W44W9M024601L0
2. PROJECT/TASK NUMBER: 83781
3. ESTIMATED AMOUNT:
4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED AND THE INTENDED USE.: 1EA. GREENLEE BENDER 881CTE980 2-1/2 HYDRAULIC BENDER $23,209.00/ ACCESSORIES REQUIRED: 1 EA GRN 27554 2-1/2 SHOE GROUP$1,885.00/ 1EA. GRN 27555 3- INCH SHOE GROUP $2,718.00/ 1 EA. GRN 31281 3-1/2 CT SHOE GROUP $4,052.00/ 1 EA. GRN 31274 4-INCH CT SHOE GROUP $4,528.00/ 1 EA GRN 1813 PIPE BENDING TABLE $2,268.OO THIS EQUIPMENT IS TO BEND EMT/RIGID 2 1/2 INCH TO 4 INCH METAL CONDUIT FOR ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS.
5. UNIQUE CHARACTERISTIC THAT LIMIT AVIALIABILITY TO ONLY ONE SOURCE, WITH THE REASON NO OTHER SUPPLIES OR SERVICES CAN BE USED. MOST RECENT MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED (INCLUDE DATES & DETAILS). IF MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT CONDUCTED, EXPLAIN.: THIS EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE WITH MULTIPLE VENDORS. THIS IS A NAME BRAND REQUEST: GREENLEE BENDER ALONG WITH THE DIFFERENT SHOE GROUPS REQUIRED TO BEND EMT/RIGID CONDUIT. THIS BRAND OF BENDER IS ALREADY ON THE PLANT AND THE ELECTRICIANS ARE FAMILAR WITH THE WORKING CAPABILITIES OF THE GREENLEE PRODUCTS. COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING PIPE BENDING SYSTEMS USED ON PLANT FOR INTERCHANGEABILITY, SPARE PARTS, TRAINING ON USE AND MAINTENANCE.
7. EXPLAIN WHY AN ADEQUATE PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OR OTHER INFORMATION SUITABLE TO SOLICIT BY FULL AND OPEN COMMPETITION HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED OR ARE NOT AVAILABLE.:
8. PROVIDE A STATEMENT OF ACTIONS, IF ANY THE GOVERNMENT MAY TAKE TO REMOVE OR OVERCOME ANY BARRIER TO COMPETITION BEFORE FUTURE ACQUISITIONS ARE REQUIRED. IF THIS IS A FOLLOW-ON ACTION TO A PREVIOUSLY COMPETED ACTION, SO STATE.: ALL THE BENDERS WE HAVE ARE GREENLEE BRANDS THAT WERE PURCHASED PREVIOUSLY.
9A. OFFICE SYMBOL: DEO
9B. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 918-420-6607
Signature1:
10A. OFFICE SYMBOL:
10B. TELEPHONE NUMBER:
Signature2:
DateField1: 08/12/2020
DateField2: 09/03/2020
BLOCK6: THIS BENDER AND ACCESSORIES ARE AVAILABLE WITH MULTIPLE VENDORS. THE BENDERS WE HAVE ON PLANT ARE GREENLEE AND THEY HAVE BEEN USED FOR MANY YEARS AND PRODUCE A EXTREMELY GOOD PRODUCT. WE LIKE TO GET EQUIPMENT WE KNOW WILL PERFORM AND MEET OUR NEEDS ALONG BEING USER FRIENDLY TO THE OPERATOR.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .