The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(Offeror to complete items II A. and II B. prior to issuing this questionnaire to the Evaluator.)
In order to assess potential vendors under the MCRC Web Proxy Server procurement, the Marine Corps Regional Contracting Office (RCO) is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information.
This is a critical acquisition to support the Marine Corps Recruiting Command , and your support is sincerely appreciated. We thank you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire.
The completed Questionnaire shall be submitted directly via email from the customer reference to Denise M. Hill at denise.hill@usmc.mil.
By the due date established for receipt of offers. The “subject” line in the submission email shall clearly indicate: “MCRC Non-cognitive Testing RFQ Past Performance” and the message shall originate from the Evaluator’s corporate or government email system.
I. GENERAL GUIDANCE
Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):
| Excellent |
| The Offeror's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror's past performance could have been improved. The Offeror required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements. |
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. ORGANIZATION/AGENCY & RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
| 1 |
| Type of Instrument (e.g. Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other): |
| 2 |
| Contract Identification Number: |
| 3 |
| Order Number (If applicable): |
| 4 |
| Project Title and Service Description (Add space if needed): |
| 5 |
| Type of Contract (e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid): |
| 6 |
| Pricing Type (e.g. fixed price, cost reimbursement, other): |
| 10 |
| Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): |
| 11 |
| Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options): |
| 12 |
| Period of Performance: |
| 13 |
| Place(s) of Performance: |
| 14 |
| Complexity of Work (e.g. difficult, routine): |
| 15 |
| Type and extent of subcontracting (add rows if needed): |
C. GENERAL INFORMATION
| 1 |
| Has the Contractor even been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, etc.? If yes, explain. |
| 2 |
| Has this contract been partially or completely terminated? If yes, explain and identify type of termination (e.g. default, convenience). |
| 3 |
| If this was an award or incentive fee contract, what percentage of the available fee did the Contractor usually receive? |
| 4 |
| Changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract are/were generally attributable to customer-issued Change Orders, Contractor-submitted claims, other Customer actions (please explain): |
III. EVALUATION: How Would You Rate This Contractor With Respect To:
A. Compliance with the SOW or PWS and specifications; conformance to standards of good workmanship, responsiveness to technical direction, and satisfactory deliverables. If a non-cognitive test was developed, please comment on the research design and effectiveness of the test:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
Comment: _________________________________________________________________
B. Adherence to the contract delivery schedule and ability to resolve any schedule problems (if any):
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
Comment: __________________________________________________________________
C. Adherence to task order estimates; reasonableness of change order quotes; and completeness of billing:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
Comment: ___________________________________________________________________
D. Working relationship with Contracting Officer, COR, and other points of contact:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
E. Effective management of personnel and ability to retain and replace experienced personnel:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
F. Relationship with and satisfaction level of agency end-user of product or service required:
| Rating |
| Excellent |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Check
In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this contractor (Continue onto next page).
Thank you for completing the questionnaire.