LARS_Section_L-Instruction_to_Offerors.pdf
PDF 188 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) Software Upgrade Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8509-23-R-0018
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for proposals submitted in response to solicitation number FA8509-23-R-0018 for a Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) Software Upgrade. Proposals will be evaluated based on three factors: technical, past performance, and price. The technical factor includes three equally weighted subfactors related to submittal requirements for updating and delivering the software, associated documentation, and planned updates to technical orders and manuals. Proposals must receive an acceptable rating in all subfactors to be eligible for award. Evaluation of past performance will consider the offeror's record of relevant projects. Price is the least important factor, and technical and past performance combined are more important than price. The solicitation allows for evaluation of option prices and determination that a proposal is unacceptable if option prices are significantly unbalanced. The contract will be awarded to the responsible offeror providing the best overall value to the government.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| LARS_FORM_158.pdf | ||
| RFP FA8509-23-R-0018.pdf | ||
| LARS_Combined_CDRLs.pdf | ||
| LARS_PD_13July23.pdf | ||
| Closed_sessions_REV2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposal and Eval Criteria for
HC-130J Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) Software Update
L - INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
How proposals will be evaluated:
Factor 1: Technical.
The offeror’s proposal shall, at a minimum, address each of the sub factors, as they apply to the HC-130J LARS Software Update, and the technical proposal should demonstrate the contractor’s ability to perform the technical requirements.
Sub-Factor 1.1 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the process for updating and delivering software to address customer requirements.
Sub-Factor 1.2 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the following elements: Software Development Plan, Software Version Plan, Acceptance Test Plan, and Software User’s Manual updates.
Subfactor 1.3 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the planned documentation updates to TOs, flight manuals, training, etc.
To be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every Subfactor.
Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:
Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable 1. Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.
2. Meets development and delivery schedule of 12 months after award.
Unacceptable 1. Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.
2. Does not meet development and delivery schedule of 12 months after award.
Factor 2: Past Performance.
Factor 3: Price.
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Technical, Past Performance, and Price.
Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than Price.
Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
| Factor 1: Technical. |
| Factor 2: Past Performance. |
| Factor 3: Price. |
| The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be... |
| Technical, Past Performance, and Price. |
| Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than Price. |
| Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly u... |
| A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the o... |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .