J_and_A_Sole-Source_or_Brand-Name (IAW FAR 6.302) - Advantor Camera Replacement Post.pdf

PDF 804 KB Posted

Attached to
Intrusion Detection System Camera Replacement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W50S72-20-Q-7210
Issued by
Department of the Army National Guard

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

IOWA AIR NATIONAL GUARD

HEADQUARTERS 185TH AIR REFUELING WING

2920 HEADQUARTERS AVE

SIOUX CITY IOWA 51111-1300

185 MSC

SUBJECT: Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition – Requirements valued less than $250,000; Control Number:

1. Contracting Activity:185th Air Refueling Wing Contracting Office Attention: 185 ARW/MSC 2920 Headquarters Ave Sioux City, IA 51111-1300

2. Nature and/or description of action being approved:

Brand Name Only Acquisition

Sole Source Acquisition

3. Description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s need to include estimated value:

(if more space is required, continue answer in Block 12)

4. Authority:

FAR 6.302-1, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or

Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements (including Brand Name Only)

FAR 6.302-2, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(2) Unusual and Compelling Urgency

FAR 6.302-3, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(3) Industrial Mobobilization; Engineering, Developmental, or

Research Capability; or Expert Services

FAR 6.302-4, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(4) International Agreement

FAR 6.302-5, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(5) Authorized or Required by Statute

FAR 6.302-6, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(6) National Security

FAR 6.302-7, 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(7) Public Interest

185 MSC

SUBJECT: Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition – Requirements valued less than $250,000

5. Reason Authority Cited (Explain circumstances preventing full and open competition, including proposed contractor’s qualifications or brand/model's unique features/functions to meet the Government's needs, and describe what harm will come to the Government if this action is not taken.

Contracting without providing for full and open competition shall NOT be justified on the basis of lack of planning by requiring activity or concerns related to the amount of funds available (e.g. funds will expire) to the requiring agency or activity): (if more space is required, continue answer in Block 12)

6. Market Research (Describe the extent of market research conducted to identify all qualified sources and the results thereof, or explain the reason market research was not conducted. Market research means collecting and analyzing information about capabilities within the market to satisfy agency needs): (if more space is required, continue answer in Block 12)

7. Other Interested Sources (List all sources, if any, that expressed an interest in the acquisition in writing):

8. Actions to Increase Competition (Describe the efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many sources as practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under 5.202 applies):

SUBJECT: Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition – Requirements valued less than $250,000

9. Subsequent acquisitions (Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services are required):

10. Procurement History:

a. Previous Contract or Order Number:

b. Previously Competed? Yes No

c. Previous authority for other than Full and Open Competition: FAR

11. Fair and Reasonable Price Determination. IAW FAR 13.106-3(a), I have determined that the anticipated cost to the Government is fair and reasonable based upon one or more of the following (Contracting Officer check as appropriate):

a. Market Research;

b. Comparison of the (anticipated) price with prices found reasonable on previous purchases;

c. Current price lists, catalogs or advertisement. However, inclusion of a price in a price list, catalog or

d. advertisement does not, in itself, establish fairness and reasonableness of the price;

e. A comparison with similar items in a related industry;

f. The contracting officer’s personal knowledge of the item being requested;

g. Any other reasonable basis. Specify:

12. Continuation Space. (indicate number of paragraph that is being continued, followed by the text)

SUBJECT: Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition – Requirements valued less than $250,000

13. Certification: I certify that the information included in this J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Requesting Activity

Purchasing & Contracting

Group 1: SS
3:
Description: The 185th Security Forces Squadron requires the acquisition of equipment and services to upgrade the current Advantor video management system. The upgrade of the video management system is required in order to allow Security Forces personnel to conduct immediate visual assessment of alarms for PL3 restricted areas.
Group 2: 1
5:
Reason Authority Cited: The US Air Forces has approved three types of Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) annunciators for use on Air Force installations. They are Advantor, Vindicator and Will-Burt Annunciator (formerly Diebold). The 185 ARW currently has the Advantor System. Advantor parts and components are proprietary in nature and there is no authorized distributor, only Advantor software and components can be used with the existing Advantor system. Installation of upgraded of the video management system can only be performed by Advantor.
6:
Market Research: Phases I and II of the IDS system were competed among the three authorized providers by NGB, and they selected the Advantor system for the 185th ARW. The Advantor system has been installed and tested, and upgrades or additions to the IDS system must be compatible with the installed Advantor system. Market research was conducted to ensure there were no authorized distributors of the required Advantor software or products.
7:
Other Interested Sources: N/A
8:
Actions to Increase Competition: AW FAR 5.201(b)(1) For acquisitions of supplies and services, other than those covered by the

exceptions in 5.202 … the contracting officer must transmit a notice to the GPE, for each proposed --

(i) Contract action meeting the threshold in 5.101(a)(1);

(ii) Modification to an existing contract for additional supplies or services that meets the threshold in 5.101(a)(1); or

(iii) Contract action in any amount when advantageous to the Government.

FAR 5.101(a)(1) states, “For proposed contract actions expected to exceed $25,000, by synopsizing in the GPE (see 5.201).”

The estimated cost of this acquisition is above $25,000; therefore, IAW with FAR 5.101(a)(1), advertisement of this acquisition is required and a notice will be transmitted to the GPE.

9:
Subsequent Acquisitions: Future upgrades and/or additions to the existing Advantor system will be researched to determine if Advantor is the only compatible option.
10:
a:
Previous Contract or Order Number: W912LP-18-P-6013
Group 3: No
11:
Previous Authority: 6.302-1
b: Yes
c: Yes
d: Off
e: Off
f: Off
a: Yes
g: Off
12:
Continuation Space:
13:
Requesting Activity Signature Block: CMSgt Phillip Oregon

Security Forces Manager P&C Signature Block: ALLISON N. HARBIT, 2d Lt, IA ANG Base Contracting Officer

2020-05-28T07:28:28-0500
OREGON.PHILLIP.M.1139194914
2020-08-10T14:33:39-0500
HARBIT.ALLISON.NICOLE.1288048505
Date: 27-May-20
Control No: 2020-2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .