Attach_D_-_Dietician_QASP.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dietician Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- IHS1359498
About this file
Attach D- Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attach_A_-_Pricing_Schedule_Dietican.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach_B_-_SOW_for_Dietary_Services.pdf | ||
| Attach_C_-_Provisions_and_Clauses_IHS1359498.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
For: Dietician Services
Contract Number:
Contract Description: The Indian Health Service is an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and is responsible for providing federal health services to American Indians and Alaska Natives. Desert Visions is a residential youth program which provides substance abuse and healthcare to adolescents. It is a 24hr/7 day week operation located in Sacaton Az. Dietary/nutritional services for Desert Visions and Nevada Skies Youth Wellness Centers. Service includes dietary assessments, screening, assessing, and reassessing for nutritional needs, and menu planning. Vendor will also provide technical assistance in ordering and maintaining an inventory of dietary supplies, inspecting kitchen sanitation and food handling procedures. Provide kitchen staff in services and training for competency validation. This service must be provided by a vendor that can meet the performance specifications established by The Joint Commission.
Contractor’s name:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO:
Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Acquisition and Materiel Management
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Barbatunde Coker
c. Other Key Government Personnel – Michelle McGinn, Deputy CEO, Eugena Crossland, CEO Dr. Berkley Medical Director, Joan Parrish Quality Manger/Infection Prevention will function as Performance Monitors and Clinical Quality experts on behalf of the COR to monitor performance.
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager – Vincent Berkley, Medical Director
b. Other Contractor Personnel – Michelle McGinn, LPC Title: Deputy CEO
c. Other Contractor Personnel – Eugena Crossland Title: CEO
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
| Task |
| ID |
| Indicator |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Incentive |
| Clinical Information Return |
| 1 |
| Provide diet instruction, as needed for clients on therapeutic diets. After screening, assessing and developing nutritional plan |
| The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or in paper note. |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| 2 |
| Develop, review and approve food menu for the clients with assistance of dietary staff. |
| Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| 3. |
| Provide in-services and training to kitchen staff for sanitation, safe food handling and dietary preparation and food selections. Validate competency of staff as needed and document. |
Competency and validation is maintained on employees.
Training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| 4 |
| Inspect kitchen sanitation practices and food handling practices. Provide a compliance score with regulation and standards to Kitchen supervisor and CEO or designee. |
| Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
Quality Care
| 5 |
| Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation |
| Within 10days of care provided |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| 6 |
| Maintain license CPR |
| At all times |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
| Patient Safety |
| 7 |
| Patient safety incidents must be investigated, confirmed and resolved. |
| All incidents reported immediately (within 24 hours.) |
| 100% |
| Observation and random inspection (auditing) |
| Exercise of Option Period and past performance |
5. INCENTIVES
The Government shall use Exercise of Option Period and past performance and/or any other incentive that was proposed in your solution. as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
Direct Observation, random inspection, chart auditing, incident reports and satisfactions surveys
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. (Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance.)
The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or paper note. Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee
b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. (Evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled [Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or annually] or unscheduled, as required.)
Maintain license CPR, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation, Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee
d. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. (Relies on the patient to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.)
Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee
e. 100% INSPECTION. (Evaluates all outcomes.)
The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or paper note. Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee Maintain license CPR, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation,
f. PERIODIC SAMPLING. (Variation of random sampling. However, sample is only taken when a problem/deficiency is suspected. Sample results are applicable only for the specific work inspected. Since sample is not entirely random, it cannot be applied to total activity performance.)
The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or paper note. Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee Maintain license CPR, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation,
g. RANDOM SAMPLING. (Designed to evaluate performance by randomly selecting and inspecting a sample of cases.
The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or paper note. Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee Maintain license CPR, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation, Must document in Electronic Healthcare record and paper documentation,
h. Progress or status meetings.
The assessment will be entered into BH GUI or paper note. Competency and validation is maintained on employees and training will be documented and signed off for all staff participating. Document approval and recommendation monthly with Medical Director, Inspection and report per visit/inspection to supervisor of kitchen and/or CEO/Designee
8. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
Chart audits, group observations, and primary source verification of licensure and, patient and parent satisfaction surveys, webcidents, Inspection report audits
9. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
10. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor minimally annually to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
Signature – Contractor Program Manager
Signature – Contracting Officer’s Representative
File details come from the government source that posted it.