HTC711-14-R-R012-0001.pdf

PDF 97 KB Posted

Attached to
Container Repair Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC711-14-R-R012
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

HTC711-14-R-R012-0001 (Amendment 0001) replaces DRAFT copy file Amendment 0001.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Container Repair Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
HTC711-14-R-R012-0004.pdf PDF
Questions_from_SOLICITATION_HTC711-14-R-R012_22July_(2).pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-R012-0003.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-R012_Attch-2-Pricing_ScheduleV4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HTC711-14-R-R012_Attach_2-Pricing_ScheduleV3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HTC711-14-R-R012-0002.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-R012-0001.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-R012_Attach_2-Pricing_ScheduleV2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Questions_from_SOLICITATION_HTC711-14-R-R012_10_July.pdf PDF
HTC711-14-R-R012_(CR).pdf PDF
Attachment_2-Pricing_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1-Performance_Work_Statement__(PWS).pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is the follow ing:

A. Change the response date for proposal submission.

FROM: 12:00 PM CST 23 July 2014.

TO: 9:00 AM CST 28 July 2014.

B. Revise Attachment 2, Pricing Schedule.

The point of contact for this amendment is Ms. Deborah D.Crumity, deborah.d.crumity.civ@mail.mil.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Jul-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HTC711-14-R-R012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Jun-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Jul-2014

CODE

USTRANSCOM-AQ - HTC711

508 SCOTT DR

SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5357

HTC711 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HTC711-14-R-R012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 23-Jul-2014 12:00 PM to 28-Jul-2014 09:00 AM.

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 & 2

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTION TO OFFERRORS - COMMERCIAL ITEMS

1. Paragraph (b) of FAR 52.212-1 entitled “Submission of Offers” is removed and replaced with the following paragraph (b):

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers on or before 9:00 am Central Time on 28 Jul 2014.

Offers shall be submitted using SF 1449 in accordance with paragraph (3) entitled “Proposal Preparation

Instructions” and shall be mailed to:

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-R/Bldg 1900W

ATTN: Ms. Deborah D. Crumity

508 SCOTT DRIVE

SCOTT AFB, IL 62225

(1) Any questions concerning the RFP shall be submitted via email to the following:

Ms. Kristina R. Schneider: kristina.r.schneider2.civ@mail.mil

Ms. Deborah D. Crumity: deborah.d.crumity.civ@mail.mil

(2) Answers to questions will be provided to all offerors via FedBizOpps and any changes will be made via an amendment to the solicitation. Due to the time required to research a question and provide an answer, questions received less than 10 calendar days prior to the due date of offers specified in this solicitation may not be answered.

(3) Proposal Preparation Instructions:

(A) Offerors are required to submit an original and two copies of the proposal, as well as an electronic version of the proposal on a CD ROM, by the due date specified. Proposals shall be submitted on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper using Times New Roman 12 point font except figures, charts, and diagrams where smaller is acceptable as long as it is readable. The maximum page limit for each volume includes all text pages, tables, graphs, and other types of material and if proposals are double-sided, each side will count as one page for page limitation purposes. Table of contents do not count against the page limits for respective volumes. Excess pages exceeding the page limit will not be read or considered in the evaluation.

(B) Offerors shall complete blocks 17a, and 30 a, b, and c of the SF 1449. Signature by the offeror on the SF

1449 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.

(C) Proposals shall identify two (2) separate volumes:

(i) Volume I -- Price Proposal

(ii) Volume II-- Technical Proposal mailto:kristina.r.schneider2.civ@mail.mil mailto:deborah.d.crumity.civ@mail.mil

(D) Instructions for submitting Volumes I & II are as follows:

(i) Volume I: Price proposal. Offeror shall complete Attachment 2, Column D, with the Fixed Unit

Price for each repair line item for the Base Year, Option Year One and Option Year Two. The pricing schedule will automatically calculate.

(ii) Volume II: Technical proposal. Technical proposal shall not exceed 20 pages. Offeror shall submit the following information:

(a) Certificate, license, etc. to show proof of Welder Certification according to Germanishcer

Lloyd (GL) DIN EN 287-1 (Renewal Every two Years)

(b) Approach for achieving the objectives of PWS Paragraph 1.3.

(c) Container repair facility address which is searchable using Google Maps.

(d) Information Assurance Report that describes its environment for adequately safeguarding DoD non-public information resident on or transiting on the contractor’s unclassified information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure. Protection measures applied should consider the risks (i.e. consequences and their probability) of loss, misuse, authorized access, or modification of information. The report shall also address the SANS (SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security) Institute’s Twenty Critical Security Controls for Effective Cyber Defense: Consensus

Audit Guidelines (http://www.sans.org/critical-security-controls) and be provide in accordance with the template at Exhibit IV to the PWS. Offerors may provide additional information to support their security posture.

2. Paragraph (c), entitled “Period of acceptance of offers” is modified to read: The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

3. Paragraph (e), entitled “ Multiple Offers” is modified to read: The Government will not consider multiple offers presenting alternate terms and conditions for satisfying the requirement of this solicitation.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

FAR 52.212-2 is amended in its entirety as follows:

(A) This is a competitive best value source selection and the Government intends to award a single contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will conduct a low price technically acceptable (LPTA) source selection and intends to award a contract without conducting discussions.

However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is determined to be in its best interest. The

Government will utilize a LPTA source selection process as described below to identify the offeror who represents the best value to the Government. The following factors shall be used to evaluate proposals:

(1) Price

(2) Technical Capability

(B) Evaluation Process

(1) After receipt of proposals, the Government will calculate the Total Proposed Price (TPP) of all offerors as described below and rank them in ascending order. The technical evaluation will begin with the proposal calculated to have the lowest TPP.

(2) If the lowest priced offeror has an Acceptable Technical Capability rating and that offeror’s pricing is determined fair and reasonable, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

http://www.sans.org/critical-security-controls

(3) If the lowest priced offer is rated unacceptable, the next lowest priced offer will be evaluated for

Technical Capability. If rated Acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. This process will continue until an offeror is determined to be technically Acceptable.

(C) Evaluation Factors

(1) Each offeror’s’ proposal will be evaluated against the following criteria: Price and Technical

Capability.

(a) Factor 1 – Price: Price will be considered in determining the best value offeror. FAR 52.217-

8, Option to Extend Services Clause, is included in this RFP. The Government will calculate the offeror’s TPP by adding the total price of the base requirement, all option periods, and the total price for the 6-month extension of services. Pricing for the 6- month extension of services period will be based on the unit prices proposed in the offeror’s final option period. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Prior to award, the Government will complete a price analysis to determine if the TPP is fair and reasonable using techniques at FAR 15.404-1.

(b) Factor 2 – Technical Capability: Technical Capability will be evaluated on an Acceptable or

Unacceptable basis. Proposals receiving final rating of Unacceptable will no longer be considered for award.

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal meets the Government’s minimum requirements.

Unacceptable Proposal fails to meet the Government’s minimum requirements.

To be rated Acceptable:

(i) The offeror’s proposal effectively demonstrates it meets the requirement for DIN EN

287-1 (proper certification, licenses, etc).

(ii) The offeror’s proposal demonstrates a realistic technical approach for accomplishing

PWS paragraph 1.3 and its subsequent sub-paragraphs within the required period of performance.

(iii) The offeror’s repair facility shall be located within 50 Kilometer (km) of the Carl-

Shurz Industrial area, Bremerhaven, Germany IAW PWS Paragraph 3.0.

(iv) The offeror must submit an Information Assurance Report that describes their environment for adequately safeguarding DOD non-public information resident on or transiting on the contractor's unclassified information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure AND address the SANS (SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security) Institute's Twenty Critical Security Controls for Effective Cyber Defense: Consensus

Audit Guidelines (http://www.sans.org/critical-security-controls).

(End of Summary of Changes) http://www.sans.org/critical-security-controls

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .