Atch_7_-_PP_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TRANSCOM Reference Data Management Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC711-13-R-D001
About this file
Atch 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch_5_-_PP_Reference_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| HTC711-13-R-D001-0002.pdf | ||
| HTC711-13-R-D001-0001.pdf | ||
| Atch_5_-_PP_Reference_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| ConsolidatedRFPQuestions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_4_-_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HTC711-13-R-D001.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_-_TRDM_QASP.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch_6_-_PP_Log.doc | DOC document | |
| TRDM_Website_Code_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Atch_2_-_DD254_TRDM_ALPHA_01OCT12.pdf | ||
| JITC_Test_Plan_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Atch_4_-_Labor_Rates_-_Price_Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Web_Services_Code_CDRL.pdf | ||
| JITC_Test_Report_CDRL.pdf | ||
| IDD_CDRL.pdf | ||
| HTC711-13-R-D001.pdf | ||
| Accreditation_CDRL.pdf | ||
| DB_models_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Atch_5_-_PP_Reference_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Reengineered_Code_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Gov_revisions_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Arch_Doc_CDRL.pdf | ||
| Engineering_Plan_CDRL.pdf |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HTC711-13-R-D001
ATTACHMENT 7
Recent and Relevant Past Performance
USTRANSCOM
HTC711-13-R-D001, TRANSCOM Reference Data Management
Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings (i.e. Satisfactory, Exceptional, etc.) should include comments for any question rated exceptional or lower than satisfactory. Definitions for ratings are provided on page 5. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below.
| USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-D |
| ATTN: Deborah K. Crisp |
| E-mail: deborah.crisp@ustranscom.mil |
| Phone: 618-220-6731 DSN 220-6731 |
Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)
I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION
Contractor (Company/Division):
Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):
Work Performed Title:____________________________________________________________________
Brief Description of Work Performed:________________________________________________________
Dollar value:____________________________________________________________________________
Period of Performance:____________________________________________________________________
II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
Name:____________________________________________________________________________ Position/Title:______________________________________________________________________ Business Address:___________________________________________________________________ Relation to Program:_________________________________________________________________ Phone:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ FAX:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________________ Other suggested points of contact:___________________________________________________________
Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.
REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________
III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.
1. Staffing
a. Were the types of personnel (skill, expertise, and certification level) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without Government intervention?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality, skills, and certification level of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
c. Did the contractor provide personnel meeting the DOD 8570 requirement?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
d. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other) to meet varying workloads?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
e. How would you rate the contractor’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
2. Technical Approach
a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
d. How effectively did the contractor perform database administration and maintenance particularly in an Oracle environment?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
e. How effectively did the contractor operate and maintain a virtual server environment?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
f. How effectively did the contractor manage large volumes of data, particularly relating to the Department of Defense and Transportation communities?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
g. How effectively did the contractor model and design database tables and views to meet customer requirements?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
h. How effectively did the contractor draft proper documentation and perform the necessary steps to obtain and/or maintain a Government system accreditation (i.e. DIACAP)?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
i. How effectively did the contractor coordinate and interact with customers and peers to develop technical solutions to complex problems.
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
j. How effectively did the contractor develop and document solutions to interface with other systems via database to database, XML, SFTP, etc.?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
k. How effectively did the contractor design, develop, and maintain web pages to view and manage complex datasets?
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
l. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?
Yes ___________ No_______
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
3. Cost Control.
a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls?
Yes___________ No_______
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
4. Contractor’s Overall performance
Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____
REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________
5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?
Yes___________ No_________ If “no”, why?_____________________________________________________________________________
Any additional comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________
DOD uses a common DOD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional”.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the governments benefit. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .