FINAL AMENDMENT I 2.13.24.pdf

PDF 886 KB Posted

Attached to
Inpatient Pharmacy Equipment Testing and Certification Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HT940624Q0023
Issued by
Defense Health Agency

About this file

This document is an amendment to a solicitation for testing and certification services for inpatient pharmacy equipment at Naval Hospital Jacksonville in Florida. The amendment revises the technical evaluation criteria, removes notes from cost line items, and provides responses to offeror questions. The solicitation seeks monthly viable sampling, surface testing with colony identification on trypticase soy agar and sabouraud dextrose agar, to be performed at the hospital facility from Monday through Friday except federal holidays. Offerors must demonstrate the ability to begin services in February 2024, attend a virtual kickoff meeting, and provide electronic field service reports within 72 hours of completion. The evaluation will consider technical approach, past performance examples from the last 36 months, and pricing for the base period of 12 months plus four 12-month option periods and a potential additional six month extension. This is a small business set-aside being procured as a commercial item by the Defense Health Agency.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Inpatient Pharmacy Equipment Testing and Certification, newest first.
File Type Posted
Government Responses to Offerors Questions 2.13.24.pdf PDF
FINAL Solicitation 2.8.24.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1.) Provide the Government's response to offeror questions.

2.) Revise the Technical Evaluation Criteria, number 10.

3.) To remove the 'Note' under CLIN 0001 and corresponding option period CLINs.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X HT940624Q0023

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Feb-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

U0001

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Feb-2024

CODE

DHA CONTRACTING OFFICE TIDEWATER HT9406

7700 ARLINGTON BLVD

FALLS CHURCH VA 22042

HT9406 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HT940624Q0023

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 1001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

To:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

CLIN 2001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

To:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

CLIN 3001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

To:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

CLIN 4001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

To:

Monthly Viable Sampling, surface with Colony ID TSA & SDA (26 tests per month) in support of the Inpatient Pharmacy Naval Hospital Jacksonville, FL.

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS – QUOTATION PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. Offerors shall clearly demonstrate their ability to meet the requirements and deliverable schedule as outlined in the associated solicitation.

B. As set forth in FAR 52.212-1 (g), Contract award, the Government intends to evaluate quotations and award one contract without discussions with offerors. The offeror’s initial quotation should contain the offerors best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines it necessary.

C. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM) REGISTRATION

In accordance with FAR Clause 52.204-7, the awardee must be registered in System for Award Management (www.sam.gov) prior to award.

D. Please Reference the Request for Quotation (RFQ) number (XXXXXXXXXX) in the subject line of email communications. Offerors quotations shall not be deemed received by the Government until the quotation is entered in the Contracting Officer’s e-mail inbox:

andrea.l.giuliano.civ@health.mil.

E. Any questions must be addressed to April.m.gillespie2.civ@health.mil and andrea.l.giuliano.civ@health.mil by email only no later than 2:00 PM local time on February 9, 2024. No phone calls accepted. Answers to questions will be addressed and posted to SAM.gov, as soon as possible after the deadline for questions has closed. In the event multiple questions address the same issue, the Government reserves the right to answer a representative question that best exemplifies the issue. Please submit only one set of questions per company.

F. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. SUBMIT ONE QUOTE VIA EMAIL. The quote shall be organized, concise, and tabbed. Each factor shall be described in a separate tabbed section. Those Offerors that meet the requirement described in this announcement and wish to be considered must submit (1) electronic email with the RFQ response no later than 11:30 AM, EST, February 14, 2024.

2. Each submittal shall contain the following information:

a. Cover page and title

b. Offeror’s name, address, and Point of Contract (POC) for Contractual Authority

c. RFQ number

3. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Contract Costs

d. The RFQ solicitation does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a quote or for any other costs incurred by any offeror submitting a quote in response to this solicitation.

e. The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the offeror.

f. Failure to clearly address all submittal requirements, evaluation criteria and information requirements of the RFQ above may result in rejection of the submission.

III. ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS - EVALUATION

CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD

A. The Government intends to evaluate quotations and issue a firm fixed price contract based on the initial quotations received, utilizing FAR SUBPART 12.6- STREAMLINED PROCEDURES

FOR EVALUATION AND SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES. The Government will evaluate quotes utilizing the procedures found at FAR 12.602 Streamlined Evaluation of Offers. The Government reserves the right to request revised quotations from, or negotiate final contract terms with, one or more, but not all, Offerors if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all quotations if such action is in the public interest and issue a contract to other than the Offeror with the lowest priced quotation.

B. Incomplete quotations may be considered non-responsive and removed from further consideration.

Quotations shall be clearly and concisely written as well as being neat, indexed (cross-indexed as appropriate) and logically assembled. All pages of each part shall be appropriately numbered and identified with the name of the offeror, the date, and the solicitation number.

C. BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government will consider price and technical nonprice factors to determine the quotation that is most advantageous and represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) quote. The Government will not use the formal source selection procedures described in FAR part 15. The Government will evaluate quotations utilizing the procedures of FAR 12.602 Streamlined Evaluation of Offers. This will be a firm fixed price contract.

EVALUATION CRITERIA. Evaluation of Technical Capability will be based on the information provided in the quotation. Documentation submitted in the quotation shall be evaluated to determine that the proposed service meets or exceeds the Governments minimum required specifications. Failure to clearly and unambiguously demonstrate this will result in an “unacceptable” rating.

FACTORS FOR AWARD:

There are three evaluation factors for award consisting of the following:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH, Volume 1 FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE, Volume 2 FACTOR 3: PRICE, Volume 3

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH (Volume 1)

1. The TECHNICAL APPROACH (capabilities) is defined as the vendor’s proposed solution(s) to successfully fulfill the contract requirements.

2. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.

The vendor shall submit technical approach and capability documentation which may include a narrative, charts, graphs, tables, drawings, product / service literature, and demonstrated authority to provide the necessary items and perform the required services identified in the statement of work. The documentation shall clearly describe, in sufficient detail, the vendor's authority, proposed items, resources and methods to successfully fulfill the requirements including specifications, performance capability requirements, delivery schedules, warranties and all service requirements per the Request for Quotations. In addition, the vendor will be evaluated to the extent in which they demonstrate acceptable technical capability per the Technical Evaluation Criteria listed below.

3. BASIS OF EVALUATION

Evaluation of this factor is an evaluation of the vendor's demonstrated resources, capability and methods to meet all requirements. This factor will be evaluated on an Acceptable / Unacceptable basis. The vendor’s submittals will be evaluated to determine whether the proposed technical approach demonstrates a clear and unambiguous understanding and a demonstrated ability to meet the minimum requirements. Failure to demonstrate a clear and unambiguous technical approach to meeting the requirements will result in an “Unacceptable” rating for this factor.

Vendors with an Unacceptable rating may be determined ineligible for award.

Technical Evaluation Criteria In order for a quote to be determined technically acceptable, the vendor must demonstrate technical acceptability for each of the following technical evaluation criteria:

1. Is the vendor able to perform the first required samplings during the month of February as stated in the Statement of Work, on or before February 28, 2024?

2. Is the vendor capable of completing the work as defined in the Statement of Work?

3. Is the vendor able to provide onsite services at Naval Hospital Jacksonville in Jacksonville, Florida?

4. Is the vendor able to conduct business Monday through Friday except federal holidays or when the Government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government directed facility closings?

5. Will the vendor provide vendor provided identification badges that clearly displays his or her name and the name of their company? And will the vendor identify themselves as a vendor to all those with whom the vendor personnel interacts with in any face-to-face dealings?

6. Will the vendor attend a virtual kick-off meeting within two business days upon initial contract award and within 5 business days upon exercise of option periods?

7. Will the vendor perform all monthly, semi-annual, annual, DIY testing as specified in the Statement of Work under 2.0 Specific Tasks, 2.3.1 Perform the following testing – for all periods of performance?

8. Will the vendor provide an electronic Field Service Report (FSR) to the inpatient pharmacy POC within 72 hours of completed service?

9. Are all vendor employees performing tasks under this contract US citizens?

10. Does the vendor’s sampling and certification process comply with the following:

All testing is performed by qualified personnel using instrumentation, procedures and methods which ensure measurements observed are reliable. When specified, testing is performed in accordance with current ISO-17025, ISO-14644, USP- <797> standards. Specifications comply with One or More of the following; applicable IEST recommended practices, CETA CAG- 009-2011v3 and Manufacturer Recommendations. Measurement instruments used are traceable to The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Results obtained apply to the specific room or equipment and are reflective of conditions at the time of this test, to include performance under dynamic conditions.

FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE (Volume 2)

1. Offerors are required to submit examples of past performance of similar scope and complexity with their quote. Only recent (within the last 36 months) and relevant past performance will be considered. Relevance, for the purposes of this procurement, is defined as substantially similar to the current requirement in terms of effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type. Offerors shall submit no more than three examples of past performance. Past performance ratings will be assigned in accordance with the following chart.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Definition Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through CPAR, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) using all CAGE / Unique Identification number of vendor. The Government reserves the right to contact any other source of information that may have knowledge or information on a vendor’s relevant past performance history.

FACTOR 3 - PRICE (Volume 3)

1. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Offeror’s shall submit a quotation which will be evaluated for price reasonableness.

The offeror shall submit an electronic copy of the completed price proposal to the Contracting Officer. The offeror shall propose a separate firm-fixed-price for each CLIN and for each option period (Base Period of 12 months, plus four Option Periods of 12 months each. The total price of the base period and all option periods if exercised shall be clearly indicated. In addition, this solicitation contains FAR Clause 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. Offeror’s shall price out an additional 6 months of services. This additional 6 months of pricing must be evaluated prior to award. A total amount for services for the base period, all option periods and the additional 6 months of services must clearly be identified in the quote. Price quote shall remain valid for a period of 45 calendar days from the date quotations are due.

2. BASIS OF EVALUATION

The quoted price will be evaluated for reasonableness in relation to the solicitation requirements. Prices must be entirely compatible with the technical portion of the proposal.

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .