Attachment B - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.doc
DOC document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LIGHT TOWER SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSFELA-12-R-0011
About this file
ATTACHMENT B PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - Light Tower Schedule B-Revised.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT G
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Key:
Outstanding – Contractor, on balance, exceeded client expectations and requirements
Satisfactory – Contractor, on balance, met customer expectations and requirements
Unsatisfactory – Contractor, on balance, was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations and requirements
Other – The element is not applicable, no data has been obtained, or additional comments are provided
Telephone Interview conducted by: __________________________________
Company that provided the reference: ________________________________
Name of Individual/phone number: ___________________________________
Company that Performed the Work: ___________________________________
Description of the Type of Work Performed: _________________________________________
Size, Scope and Complexity of the Effort: ___________________________________________
| Performance Element |
| Outstanding |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Other/Comments |
1. QUALITY OF SOLUTION: The Contractor comprehended the goals, thoroughly researched the issues, and presented a comprehensive, complete, feasible, and effective solution. (Met the needs and performed successfully).
2. EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES: The Contractor deployed, in a timely manner, the proper amount and type of personnel, facilities and other resources to support the project. Use of subcontractors was appropriate in supporting the project.
3. COMMUNICATION: The Contractor worked and communicated well with client management, staff, and contracting officials as well as with his or her own staff and subcontractors.
4. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: The Contractor planned and proposed realistic schedules, successfully monitored performance and completed work on time.
5. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: The Contractor exhibited a commitment to customer satisfaction and achieved customer satisfaction.
6. RESPONSIVENESS AND ATTENTIVENESS: The Contractor exhibited reasonable and cooperative behavior in response to client changes, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and in detecting and correcting errors, poor performance, and other problems.
7. COST CONTROL: The Contractor successfully planned and proposed realistic costs and monitored performance, and consistently operated at or below budget.
For #8 and #9 please answer "Yes" or "No", as appropriate
| YES |
| NO |
8. Given the choice would you do business with this Contractor again?
9. Did either you or the Contractor have to resort to litigation to resolve problems?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .