Past_Perf_Questionaire.doc
DOC document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCGC DEPENDABLE DOCKSIDE REPAIRS FY12 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG80-12-R-P45D48
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire Please forward this questionnaire to companies agencies and contractors you have performed contracts with and have those companies agencies and contractors forward their completed questionnaire to Emily Clark Emily.L.Clark uscg.mil or USCG Surface Forces Logistics Center Attn Emily Clark Contract Specialist 300 East Main Street Suite 550 Norfolk VA 23510
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF-30 A001.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| DEPENDABLE_DS_FY12_Spec_Rev-0.pdf | ||
| SF_1449.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE -
Project Title:
Contract No:
Performance Period:
Contract Value:
| Quality of Product or Service |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Quality of Product or Service – please rate |
Comments for Quality of Product or Service
| 2. |
| Cost Control – please rate |
Comments for Cost Control
Timeliness of Performance
| 3. |
| Timeliness of Performance – please rate |
Comments for Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations
| 4. |
| Business Relations – please rate |
Comments for Business Relations
Subcontracts
Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No
Comments for Subcontracts
Customer Satisfaction
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? Yes _____No
Comments for Customer Satisfaction
Past Performance information provided by:
The ratings used on the Contractor Performance Survey shall be used to evaluate Past Performance. See the description of ratings below.
| Criteria |
| Quality of Product or Service |
| Cost Control |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Business Relations |
| 0 = Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives |
| Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract |
| Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is not effective |
| 1 = Poor |
| Major problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having major difficulty in managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is marginally effective |
| 2 = Fair |
| Some problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective |
| 3 = Good |
| Minor inefficiencies, errors have been identified |
| Contractor is usually effective in managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is usually effective |
| 4 = Excellent |
| Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and or delivers quality products/service |
| Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and completed billings |
| Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule |
| Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is effective |
| 5 = Outstanding |
| The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent” |
| The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent” |
| The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent” |
| The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that satisfies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent” |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .