Enclosure_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_HSCG23-15-Q-MMC003_.doc
DOC document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical Writing and Documentation, Administrative, and Research Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG23-15-R-MSR012
About this file
Attachment 4 - Past Performance Worksheet
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_and_A_MSR012_(2).pdf | ||
| Performance_Work_Statement_MSR012.pdf | ||
| ADDITIONAL_TERMS_AND_CONDITIONS_Attachment_5.pdf | ||
| MSR012_-_Attachment_3_-_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ADDITIONAL_TERMS_AND_CONDITIONS_Attachment_5.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Clauses_and_Provisions_MSR012.pdf | ||
| Performance_Work_Statement_MSR012.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Enclosure 4
HSCG23-15-R-MSR012
Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Marlecia.M.Newby@uscg.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
See the below table for the adjectival ratings and definitions for the past performance evaluation:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Three or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly exceeded requirements to the Government’s benefit. |
| Very Good |
| One or two examples where performance on the subject contract met requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance on the subject contract met requirements. |
| Marginal |
| Performance on the subject contract did not meet some requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| One or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly failed to meet requirements due to fault of contractor. |
Quality of Product or Service:
Remarks:
Timeliness of Performance:
Remarks:
Business Relations:
Remarks:
If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:
Remarks:
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Remarks:
Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Remarks:
Overall Rating:
_1398677679.doc Enclosure 3
HSCG23-12-Q-MOT001
Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Marlecia Newby
Email: Marlecia.M.Newby@uscg.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor’s Name:
Customer’s Name:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value: $
Description of Requirement:
Quality of Product or Service:
Cost Control:
Timeliness of Performance:
Business Relations: Rating -
If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .