Attachment_C.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Gulfstream V Pilot and Crew Training Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG23-13-R-PBR006
About this file
Attachment B is an internal document. Attachment C is the Past Performance Questionnaire that is to be used by interested vendors. Interested vendors are to have their selected references provid the completed survey back to the Contract Specialist by March 22 2013.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30.pdf | ||
| SF30.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_HSCG23-13-R-PBR006.pdf | ||
| Final_HSCG23-13-R-PBR006.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment C: Past Performance Questionnaire
Please fill out the following information in regards to the referenced contract:
Contract #: _________________________________
Contractor: _______________________________________
Period of Performance:
Evaluation
Indicate the contractor’s past performance for each category area by identifying with an “x” for the most appropriate rating according to the scale shown below. Provide rationale, including specific examples, as appropriate, to support your ratings in the space provided for comments for each category area. If more space is needed, continue your comments in the “Additional Comments” section at the end of this questionnaire. It is important that the information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If there is an area that you do not have detailed knowledge then you may consult with someone in your organization that does.
Consider the criteria for each category area in Table 1 in the assessment.
TABLE 1- Category Area
| Rating |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards). |
| Schedule |
| Assessment based on the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). |
| Cost Control |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. |
***If contract is/was Firm-Fixed Price or Firm-Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, please mark “Not Applicable”***
| Business Relations |
| Assessment based on the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. |
| Management of Key Personnel |
| Assessment based on the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. |
| Utilization of Small Business |
| Assessment based on whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for Small Business (including Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) and Indian Tribes) (including Small Disadvantaged Businesses (which also includes ANCs and Indian Tribes), Women Owned Small Businesses, HUBZone, Veteran Owned, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, Historically Black Colleges and Minority Institutions and ANCs and Indian Tribes that are not Small Disadvantaged Businesses or Small Businesses) to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract. Also assessment based on compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to Small Business participation (including FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (when required). |
Use the ratings in Table 2 to assess contractor performance where appropriate.
TABLE 2- PERFORMANCE RATINGS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with no problems. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective |
| Not Rated |
| Not applicable or has no history. |
1. Quality of Service
2. Schedule
3. Cost Control
4. Business Relations
5. Management of Key Personnel
6. Utilization of Small Business
Additional Comments:
_ _Exceptional ___Very Good _ _Satisfactory ___Marginal ___Unsatisfactory ___Not Rated
___Exceptional
___Satisfactory ___Marginal
___Satisfactory ___Marginal
__ _Satisfactory ___Marginal
___Satisfactory ___Marginal
___Satisfactory ___Marginal
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .