Attachment_C_PROPOSAL_SUMMARY_SLIDE_TEMPLATE.PPTX
PPTX presentation 444 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Gamma Ray Inspection Technology (GRIT) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HR001119S0073
About this file
This document contains a slide template and details for a federal contract opportunity solicitation. The slide template outlines the required proposal structure and content, including concept impact, approach, schedule and milestones, cost summary, cost breakout, component matrix, and integration tables. Key details of the solicitation include that it was issued by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to develop transformational approaches for high intensity, tunable, and narrow-bandwidth gamma-ray production in a compact form factor for applications such as nuclear material detection and medical technologies. Proposals are sought to achieve gamma ray source objectives and metrics for intensity, repetition rate, energy range, and bandwidth, with consideration given to additional desired capabilities.
Not Listed
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_G_PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE_VOLUME_3_ADMINISTRATIVE_AND_NATIONAL_POLICY_REQUIREMENTS_VOLUME.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_A_ABSTRACT_SUMMARY_SLIDE_TEMPLATE.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Attachment_B_ABSTRACT_TEMPLATE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_F_COST_PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_E_PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE_VOLUME_2_COST_VOLUME.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_D_PROPOSAL_TEMPLATE_VOLUME_1_TECHNICAL_AND_MANAGEMENT_VOLUME.docx | DOCX document | |
| HR001119S0073.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TA #: Full Proposal Title Organization Name(s); Technical POC Name(s) Provide graphic and description.
Describe need and problem being addressed.
Describe goals.
Describe proposed demonstrations/stakeholders.
Describe new ideas and innovations.
Key risks and mitigations.
Describe existing approaches, and current state of the art of your/related approaches.
HR001119S0073 GRIT BAA
Proposal Summary Slide Template Source Selection Information – see FAR 2.101 & 3.104
CONCEPT
IMPACT
CONTEXT
APPROACH
Organization Name – Technical Area X Concept Title Describe How It Works/Innovative Claims (One slide per TA addressed) Source Selection Information – see FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Organization Name – Schedule Tasks/Deliverables/Milestones/Demonstrations/Time-Table (e.g. Gantt Chart)
Organization Name – Cost Summary
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 (ROM) | |
| Phase Length(Months) | ||
| Direct Labor ($) | ||
| # of FTEs/year* (Researcher) | ||
| # of FTEs/year* (Technician) | ||
| # of FTEs/year* (Business) | ||
| Indirect Costs/Overhead (as a percentage of direct labor) | ||
| Materials and Equipment ($) | ||
| Travel ($) | ||
| Total Proposal Cost ($) |
*Please include the total number of FTEs/year working on the project including subcontractors.
Organization Name – Cost Breakout (By Task)
| Phase 1 | Phase 2 (ROM) | |
| Labor + Indirect + Overhead (Task 1) | ||
| Labor + Indirect + Overhead (Task 2) | ||
| Labor + Indirect + Overhead (Task 3) | ||
| … |
*Please include the total number of FTEs/year working on the project including subcontractors.
Component/Sub-system Summary Matrix (All Proposals)
| Component Summary Matrix Table | |||||
| Component Name[1] | Technology/Approach | Component Metric(s) | State of the Art Metric Value(s) | End of Phase 1 Metric Value(s) | Final Metric Value(s) |
| ~Cost | Highest Risk | Mitigation | |||
| Name[2] |
[1]: List all major/key components comprising your technical approach [2]: Include a footnote for each component describing how achieving the metric(s) enables the desired integrated system performance in Phase 2 for either TA1 or TA2. Add additional slide if needed to capture all key components.
Integration Table: High Intensity, High Purity Source (TA1 Only)
| Primary Objectives | ||||
| System Metric | Objective | Proposed Value | Highest Risk | Mitigation |
| Intensity (ph/s) | 10^10 | |||
| Repetition Rate (kHz) | 0.5 | |||
| Energy Range (MeV) | 0.03 – 1 | |||
| Bandwidth (dE/E) | < 10% | |||
| Size (m) |
Weight (kg) Power (kW) < 2.4x2.3x12.0 < 16,000 < 300
| Secondary (Desired) Objectives | |||
| System Metric | Goal | Proposed Value | Notes: |
| Variable format beam (pencil, fan, or cone) geometries | Yes | If applicable, describe additional beam formats available, methods, limitations, and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters such as energy | |
| Tunable intensity and brilliance | Yes | If applicable, describe intensity tunability methods, limitations and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters | |
| Ultralow bandwidth (dE/E) of 10-6 | Yes | If applicable, describe ultralow bandwidth methods, limitations and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters |
Integration Table: High Energy Source (TA2 Only)
| Primary Objectives | ||||
| System Metric | Objective | Proposed Value | Highest Risk | Mitigation |
| Intensity (ph/s) | 10^12 | |||
| Repetition Rate (kHz) | 1 | |||
| Energy Range (MeV) | 0.03 – 3 | |||
| Bandwidth (dE/E) | < 0.1% | |||
| Size (m) |
Weight (kg) Power (kW) < 2.4x2.3x12.0 < 16,000 < 300
| Secondary (Desired) Objectives | |||
| System Metric | Goal | Proposed Value | Notes: |
| Variable format beam (pencil, fan, or cone) geometries | Yes | If applicable, describe additional beam formats available, methods, limitations, and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters such as energy | |
| Tunable intensity and brilliance | Yes | If applicable, describe intensity tunability methods, limitations and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters | |
| Variable pulse rate and duty factors | Yes | If applicable, describe pulse rate tunability methods, limitations and anticipated dependencies on other system parameters |
image2.png image4.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .