HH-60G Transmission Pre-Qual_Rev1_No_Sigs.pdf

PDF 377 KB Posted

Attached to
Overhaul HH-60G Transmission Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8524-22-R-0007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Overhaul HH-60G Transmission, newest first.
File Type Posted
Synopsis - FA8524-22-R-0007.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Chris Boarman, HH-60G Logistics Manager, 411 SCMS/GULAB

SOURCE PRE-QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

RMSC C: The HH-60G Transmission, NSN 1615-01-542-7514GC, Part Number 70351-58100-046, requires engineering source approval by the control activity to assure the integrity of the part. Alternative sources must pre-qualify by submitting a Source Approval Request (SAR) according to the design control activity’s procedures outlined in AFMCI 23-113 and receive approval from the applicable government engineering activity, AFLCMC/WIUEC.

SECTION A: ITEM IDENTIFICATION

STOCK NUMBER (NSN): 1615-01-542-7514GC

PART NUMBER (PN): 70351-58100-046

NOMENCLATURE: HH-60G TRANSMISSION

SECTION B: JUSTIFICATION FOR ESTABLISHING A QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT

The HH-60G Transmission is a Critical Safety Item and consists of complex precision-machined parts assembled per Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) drawing specifications to transfer power from the engines to the rotors in order to allow the helicopter to fly. The Transmission has special characteristics, which if not conforming to the design of the part could cause catastrophic failure that could result in complete loss of power to, and control of, the aircraft. Failure of the Transmission could result in the loss of aircraft and lives of the crew.

The overhaul of the HH-60G Transmission will require the contractor to conduct inspection/functional checkout and disassembly/assembly to restore to a serviceable condition end item that shall efficiently serve its intended purpose using the Army DMWR 1-1615-372 to overhaul the transmission up to the point of removal, disassembly, repair, and assembly of the tail takeoff housing and pinion, AF P/N 70351-38146-041, where the applicable technical reference will be NAVAIR A1-862QA-MDB-200.

Therefore, repair and overhaul sources must qualify in accordance with the appropriate Government engineering activity, AFLCMC/ WIUEC Engineering office, Robins AFB, GA. Additionally, AFLCMC/WIUEC Engineering office must approve the qualification procedures.

SECTION C: Pre-QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Source approval information: Listed below are the minimum requirements necessary to become a qualified bidder on the HH-60G Transmission. The repair and overhaul of the HH-60G Transmission will require the restoration of the unserviceable assets to serviceable condition using the Army DMWR 1- 1615-372 to overhaul the transmission up to the point of removal, disassembly, repair, and assembly of the tail takeoff housing and pinion, AF P/N 70351-38146-041, where the applicable technical reference will be NAVAIR A1-862QA-MDB-200. The extent of overhaul or repair work required shall be determined by the initial inspection/functional checkout and the disassembly/assembly required in order to restore it to a serviceable condition end item if being overhauled, or required to return the HH-60G Transmission to a serviceable end item if being repaired, that shall efficiently serve its intended purpose.

The Government will not provide a transmission asset for repair in the pre-qualification process. The Government will, however provide a serviceable transmission asset as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) once a contractor is awarded a contract. This will be used as a Reference Asset in accordance with DMWR: 1-1615-372, WP 0100, Main Transmission Assembly Test.

a. Potential bidders shall provide a summary of the company’s capabilities, including detailed factory layout, a list of machinery, fixtures, tooling and test and inspection equipment. At a minimum, vendors will be required to have special tooling and special test equipment called out in T.O.’s listed below:

Technical Order Noun DMWR: 1-1615-372 HH-60G Transmission A1-862QA-MDB-200 SH-60B Transmission

Special Tools and Test Equipment

IAW DMWR 1-1615-372

IAW NAVAIR A1-862QA-MDB-200

The summary shall demonstrate that the company has the required facilities and equipment to overhaul, repair, inspect, test, package, ship and store the item. The contractor shall furnish all material, support equipment, tools, test equipment and services. The contractor is responsible for providing, maintaining and calibrating all support equipment required at their facility or a subcontractor’s facility.

Alternates to the special tooling and/or test equipment may be used, provided the potential bidder can demonstrate that they have an equivalent piece of equipment that can accomplish the same task without damage to the components. Alternate tools/equipment must be identified by part number and potential bidders must specify by part number which piece of equipment the alternate is replacing. Alternate tools/equipment must receive approval from the applicable government engineering activity, AFLCMC/WIUEC Engineering office before such tools or equipment are used to overhaul or repair any flight safety critical components.

Contractor shall have an existing agreement or contract with the HH-60 transmission Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (SAC), CAGE 78286, where SAC provides Main Transmission Test Stand Correlation Certification in accordance with DMWR 1-1615-372, WP 0100.

Additionally, the contractor will have existing agreement or contract with SAC and/or Corpus Christie Army Depot (CCAD) to test all contractor overhauled transmissions on a SAC Correlation Certified Main Transmission Test Stand.

Contractor shall furnish all material, support equipment, tools, test equipment, and services. The contractor is responsible for providing, maintaining, and calibrating all support equipment required at their facility or a subcontractor’s facility. Contractor furnished material or parts used for replacement shall equal or exceed the quality of the original material or parts. The material or parts shall be entirely suitable for restoration of the end item for its intended purposes, and shall be completely interchangeable without alteration of either the parts or the end item. In order to protect integrity of the supply chain from counterfeit parts, the source of material or parts shall be traceable to the US Government, Defense Logistics Agency or the Original Equipment Manufacturer.

b. Potential bidders shall demonstrate the ability and have experience in repair and overhaul of similar critical safety of flight dynamic components, which are currently in use on commercial or military helicopters.

Potential bidders shall provide the following information on the similar items:

1. Contract Number

2. Procuring Agency

3. Contract Value

4. Number of assets shipped

5. Aircraft similar item is used on

6. Part number, stock number, nomenclature and drawing of similar item

Potential bidders shall provide a detailed quality plan implementing (or equivalent).

Potential bidders shall provide a detailed repair and a detailed overhaul plan describing repair, overhaul and inspection procedures and shall provide for:

Traceability of batch/lot for repaired / overhauled material Identification of material sources. Sources for raw materials must be documented for each type of material. No material waivers will be granted.

Identification of sources for processes not done in house shall be documented.

Potential bidders shall perform a minimum of 75% of the repair and overhaul workload in-house.

Testing shall not be sub-contracted to a third party facility.

After qualification, the repair and overhaul plan processes, vendor sources, quality procedures etc. shall not be changed without the approval of AFLCMC/WIUEC Engineering office, obtained through the contracting officer.

Potential bidders shall provide a sub-vendor qualification and quality assurance process to ensure conformance to requirements on work performed by subcontractors.

Potential bidders must show compliance with Unique Identification requirement in accordance with DFARS 211.274-2, DFARS 252-211.7003, and Military Standard (MILSTD)-130N, Department of Defense Standard Practice/Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property.

This qualification process shall be waived for companies who have already passed pre-qualification within 3 years for CSI.

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (CAGE 78286) and Corpus Christy Army Depot (CCAD) are currently qualified to repair, overhaul and test the HH-60G Transmission, NSN 1615-01-542-7514GC.

The Air Force may not qualify potential bidders who have had quality problems when delivering similar or identical items to the government. Potential bidders who have produced similar items for the commercial market shall also be considered for qualification and shall provide commercial brochures and at least five (5) references with phone numbers. Potential Bidders shall be

Potential bidders shall provide brochures and literature providing insight into plant facilities, special tooling, support/test equipment along with industry certifications.

SECTION D: QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT COST ESTIMATE

This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3) (The following categories may not apply in all cases. The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate N/A on all sections that do not apply.)

Section 1. Shipping, if required, use DD Form 1654, Evaluation of Transportation Cost Factors to develop the information. Refer any questions to Procurement Contracting Officer for cost estimation. N/A

Section 2. Dimensional/Electronic Verification. Contact the science/engineering laboratory to obtain cost estimates (bids) for tests such as:

a. Chemical N/A

b. Metallurgical N/A

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A

Section 3. Nuclear Hardness [This includes cost of shock, vibration, and Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP)].

Contact Systems Engineering Integration and Test Division for hourly rate. N/A

Section 4. Form, Fit, Function and Interface. Contact your organizational Production Management Specialist (PMS) to obtain information on the same or similar item where work has been accomplished in the past using AFMC Form 206, Temporary Work Request. N/A

Section 5. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Qualification Testing (If required) N/A

Laboratory Costs (Costs are directly dependent on the type of testing to be accomplished and the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the depth of testing. Aircraft and missile testing will vary as the requirement dictates and the cost will have to be identified by the source of testing).

Flight/Data Reduction & Analysis Costs. N/A

Section 6. Travel to Contractor or Test Site (if required) N/A

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A

e. Total: N/A

Section 7. SAR Package Development/Evaluation Cost: A potential new source’s development of a Source Approval (SAR) package may cost as much as $5,838.00. In addition, the cost incurred for Government evaluation of their SAR may be as much as N/A. Evaluation cost may be borne by the government if it is in the best interest of the Government to qualify alternate sources.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .