Past_Performance_Part_2_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Music Notation Software Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-18-R-0006
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
Past Performance Part 2, Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FBO_reopened_Amendment_4.pdf | ||
| 3_amendment.pdf | ||
| Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance_Part_I,_Attachment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| HE1254-18-R-0006_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| GPAT,_Attachment_4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sibelius-BrandName_J_&_A.pdf | ||
| Cloud_Questionnaire__Attachment_3.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: Past Performance Part 2: Questionnaire
RFP: HE1254-16-R-0006 DoDEA Music Notation Software
** Information to be completed by vendor’s references and emailed directly to DoDEA Procurement to leaundria.shaheed@hq.dodea.edu by March 2018 at 10:00 A.M. EST.
REFERENCE INQUIRY
Name of Vendor: ____________________________________________________________________
1. Reference Firm Contacted
2. Project Title: __________________________________________________________________________
3. Contract Number (if known):
4. Name of Key Person Contact:
5. Key Contact Phone No.:
6. Did the Key Contact work directly on the contract referenced? Yes [ ] No [ ]
7. Contract period: From to
8. Brief Description of Work Performed:
9. Quality of Work Performed and Products Delivered:
1. Degree of Cooperation by Contractor and Your Organization.
(a) How well overall did the Contractor work with the Contracting Organization?
| (b) | How well did the key personnel and Contractor’s staff work with COTR and |
| Contracting Organization’s staff? |
1. Timeliness of Contract Work.
(a) Was work completed on time?
(b) Were there any unresolved problems during performance or afterwards? ____________
| 12. | Effectiveness of Cost Controls (For Cost Reimbursement Contracts Only). | |
| (a) | Was the project completed within budget? | |
| (b) | Were costs properly controlled? ____________________________________________ |
13. Would you recommend the Contractor? Yes No If no explain why
Rating __________________ (Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory) Supporting Comments:
Common DoD Assessment Rating System
Excellent (E) - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory (U) - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(End of Attachment 2)
File details come from the government source that posted it.