HC102819R0105_AMD04.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- DITCO Gym Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HC102819R0105
- Issued by
- Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
1) Is there an equipment inventory? If not, please provide a list of cardio equipment (Treadmills, Elipticals, Stepmills, others) and brands (Life Fitness, Woodway or others). This allows us to calculate the amount of time needed to properly PM the equipment and quote it properly. Answer: Product/Equipment List Incorporated 2) If parts are needed to make repairs, is the contractor expected to cover all parts and repair visits under CLIN 2? Answer: Yes
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CLIN_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HC102819R0105_AMD05.pdf | ||
| RFQ_Questions_and_Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| HC102819R0105_AMD03.pdf | ||
| HC102819R0105_AMD02.pdf | ||
| HC102819R0105_AMD01.pdf | ||
| HC102819R0105_DTICO_Gym_RFQ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HC102819R0105
SEE ADDENDUM
(No Collect Calls)
HC102819R0105 12-Sep-2019
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER
618-418-6767
8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME
08:00 AM 20 Sep 2019
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
(TYPE OR PRINT)
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)
ADDENDA ARE
26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )
23.
CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS
SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT
BELOW IS CHECKED
TELEPHONE NO.
HC10289. ISSUED BY
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
a. NAME
CHLOE M. BECKEMEYER
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER
(TYPE OR PRINT)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
20.
ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN
% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X
SMALL BUSINESSX
17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY
OFFEROR CODE
DISA/DITCO-SCOTT-PL83
2300 EAST DRIVE, BUILDING 3600
SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5406
18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
RATED ORDER UNDER
DPAS (15 CFR 700)
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A
13b. RATING
CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE HC1013 16. ADMINISTERED BY
12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-
TION UNLESS BLOCK IS
MARKED
SEE SCHEDULE
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
RFQ IFB RFPX
DISA/DITCO-SCOTT
2300 EAST DRIVE
BLDG 3600
SCOTT AFB IL 62225-5406
JEFFREY REVISKY
TEL: 618-418-6735 FAX:
FAX:
TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS
8(A)
HUBZONE SMALL
BUSINESS
SIZE STANDARD:
$7,500,000
NAICS:
811490
OFFER DATED
29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.
DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY
COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND
EMAIL:
TEL:
31c. DATE SIGNED
SEE SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
24.22.21.19.
WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)
ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM
EDWOSB
32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(CONTINUED)
ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________
32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN
RECEIVED INSPECTED
32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
37. CHECK NUMBER
FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE
36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED
CORRECT FOR
34. VOUCHER NUMBER
FINAL
33. SHIP NUMBER
PARTIAL
38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY
41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT 41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE
42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)
42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)
42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
SEE SCHEDULE
20.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES
21.
QUANTITY UNIT
22. 23.
UNIT PRICE
24.
AMOUNT
19.
ITEM NO.
Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
QASP
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
1. Contract or Task Order Title: DITCO Gym Maintenance
2. Purpose:
This QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
• What will be monitored?
• How monitoring will take place.
• Who will conduct the monitoring?
• How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
3. Roles and Responsibilities:
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
Program/Project Manager (PM) – The PM provides program oversight and supports the COR’s performance assessment activities.
Contracting Officer (KO) – The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process.
The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for documenting contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf.
4. Primary Method of Surveillance:
Acceptable surveillance methods include:
Periodic Inspection: These services are monitored weekly, monthly, quarterly, semiannually, annually, etc. Periodic types of activities are perfect for periodic inspection because not only are they infrequent, but there is normally a predetermined, specified time frame within which the tasks must be accomplished.
Therefore, you know exactly when to conduct the evaluations. Periodic inspections automatically become 100 percent evaluations or "100 percent checks." Inspections should be divided and scheduled by frequency: annual, semiannual, quarterly, monthly, weekly and as required. Sometimes services are required for which the time or frequency cannot be predicted, such as accident investigations, one-time special tasking by higher headquarters, etc. These would be labeled "as required inspections." Others are known and predictable such as the quarterly status report or the monthly travel report currently included in some DISA service contracts.
Customer Input. Although usually not a primary method, this is a valuable supplement to more systematic methods. For example, in a case where random sampling indicates unsatisfactory service, customer complaints can be used as substantiating evidence. In certain situations where customers can be relied upon to complain consistently when the quality of performance is poor, e.g., dining facilities, building services, customer surveys and customer complaints may be a primary surveillance method, and customer satisfaction an appropriate performance standard. In all cases, complaints should be documented, preferably on a standard form.
Surveillance Matrix
The Surveillance Matrix (Appendix 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.
Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performance surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The AQL performance Standard Table should be used to form the foundation of the COR’s inspection checklist.
5. Performance Standards:
• Maintain equipment during the hours 0700 - 1500
• Response times for maintenance calls should occur within 24 hours of placing a call
• Maintain and service gym equipment for DITCO-Scott 2300 East Drive, Bldg. 3600, Scott AFB, IL 62225.
Install new equipment if required, and maintain the warranty of those items. Provide a monthly PM status on the equipment to the COR or the Alternate COR.
Performance Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Methods of Calculation Maintain and service gym equipment
99% of all equipment is working
Minimum Acceptable:
> 95% of equipment is working
The COR and Alternate COR will review equipment and notify Contractor if items are unacceptable.
6. Documenting Performance:
Acceptable Performance.
The Government shall document positive performance. A Performance Assessment Report (PAR) template is attached (Appendix 2). Any report may become part of the supporting documentation for fixed price payments, award/incentive fee payments, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) entries, or other actions. Government acceptance of services permits the contractor to invoice for the service fee.
Unacceptable performance.
Unacceptable contractor performance can be identified by customer complaints (Appendix 3) or upon schedule surveillance evaluations. When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. The COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file and provide a copy to the KO.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Corrective Action Report (CAR). The CAR is forwarded to the KO for dissemination to the contractor. A CAR template is attached to this QASP (Appendix 4).
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CAR in writing. The CAR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CAR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the KO and COR. The Government may withhold payment for services until corrective action is taken. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. Upon Government acceptance of the corrected services the contractor will be permitted to invoice for the service fee.
Any CAR may become a part of the supporting documentation for contract payment deductions, fixed fee deductions, award fee nonpayment, CPARS or other actions deemed necessary by the KO.
7. Mandatory or regulatory compliance items:
The contractor will provide initial proof of compliance with regulatory and compliance items contained in the contract. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and the Contracting Officer (KO) will evaluate the initial submission and will conduct ad hoc reviews of the contractor's compliance throughout the remainder of the contract.
The contractor will monitor compliance as required by FAR 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons, and report any issues to the KO.
8. Acceptable Quality Level (AQL):
The AQL for this project is 100% to maintain gym equipment.
9. Evaluation Method:
The COR will document the time of verbal notification to the contractor. The COR will document the official time and date of notification on the Maintenance Call Record. The COR will review self-diagnostic systems logs, conduct a comparison with actual maintenance performance and otherwise verify and validate contractor performance. The contractor shall enter in the record the official time the system is restored to full operational status. The COR will confirm the date and time of problem resolution in the record.
10. Performance Rating
In evaluating the quality of contractor’s performance, the following performance ratings may be used (same as CPAR ratings).
Performance Rating Criteria
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefits. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no problems and contractor actions were highly effective.
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government benefits. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Appendix 1 - Surveillance Matrix equipment
99% of all equipment is working
Minimum Acceptable:
> 95% of equipment is working
The COR and Alternate COR will review
Appendix 2 – Performance Assessment Report
Appendix 3 – Customer Complaint Record
CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD
DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT
SOURCE OF COMPLAINT
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
1. CONTRACT/TASK ORDER
NUMBER
2. CONTRACTOR 3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE
5. COR PHONE 6. SUSPENSE DATE
I. PERFORMANCE
7. DEFICIENCY (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT
APPLY)
NEW
REPEAT
NO DEFICIENCY NOTED
8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM
REVIEWED
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY (IF DEFICIENCY
BOX WAS CHECKED)
10. DETAILED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION
11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CONCUR
NON-CONCUR
12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION
DATE
13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON
FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY
III. ACTION CORRECTED
14. CONCUR NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE
15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)
6. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS
ORGANIZATION
BUILDING
NUMBER
INDIVIDUAL
PHONE NUMBER
NATURE OF COMPLAINT
CONTRACT REFERENCE
VALIDATION
DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT
ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR
RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY
Appendix 4 – Corrective Action Report
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1(B)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1
Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Submission of Offers is tailored as follows:
(b) Submission of offers:
1. CONTRACTOR
2. CONTRACT NUMBER
3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. FUNCTIONAL AREA
5. SUSPENSE DATE
6. CONTROL NUMBER
7. DEFICIENCY MAJOR MINOR
FINDING:
FINDING IMPACT:
Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
9. ISSUING AUTHORITY
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
11. COR DETERMINATION
ACCEPTED REJECTED
12. CLOSE DATE
(12) Other Instructions
(i) General Information
(A) Points of Contact: The contracting officer (KO) and contract specialist (CS) are the sole points of contact for this procurement. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the KO/CS. Written requests for clarification must be sent to the KO/CS at stephanie.r.mccarthy2@mail.mil and chloe.m.beckemeyer@mail.mil.
(B) Discrepancies: If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.
(C) Electronic Reference Documents: All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.
(D) Communications: Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the KO and CS. Email will be used to transmit such information to the offeror and will include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104” in the Subject line.
(ii) Offerors are requested to submit a written technical proposal and a price proposal in response to the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). Information on submission of technical and price proposals is provided below. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of statements asserted in the proposal. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements.
Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and capabilities and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the RFP and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The proposal should sufficiently address the requirements as stated in the PWS. Non-conformance with these instructions may result in removal of the proposal from further evaluation.
(iii) IAW DISA Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal whether or not any potential or actual Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest (OCCI), as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5, exists for this instant procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on the instant procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.
mailto:stephanie.r.mccarthy2@mail.mil mailto:chloe.m.beckemeyer@mail.mil http://www.fedbizopps.gov/
(iv) Page limitations, if applicable, are identified below and will be treated as maximums. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be
8.5 x 11 inches. Page limitations are identified below under each evaluation factor and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, past performances, OCCI mitigation plan, GFP Attachment, Fixed Price Payment Plans, FAR/DFARS Provisions/Clauses attachment, and Section 508 compliance. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered part of a proposal. The Government reserves the right not to consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this
RFP.
(v) Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the information to offerors paragraph as noted in the table below. To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. Each volume may contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing may be used to identify sections.
Additionally, each volume may contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
Table 1 Proposal Organization
VOLUME 52.212-1
Paragraph Number
VOLUME TITLE COPIES PAGE LIMIT
I (b)(12)(vii)(A) Executive Summary 1 electronic 1 II (b)(12)(vii)(B) Technical/Management 1 electronic 5 III (b)(12)(vii)(C) Price 1 electronic No page limit IV (b)(12)(vii)(D) Contract Documentation 1 electronic No page limit
(vi) Electronic Offers. The offeror shall submit volumes I through IV in electronic format via email and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104” in the Subject line. Each volume shall be a separate file. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. Proposals shall be submitted to the KO/CS identified below:
Chloe Beckemeyer (Contract Specialist) – chloe.m.beckemeyer@mail.mil Stephanie R. McCarthy (KO) – stephanie.r.mccarthy@mail.mil
(vii) Proposal Organization:
(A) Volume I - Executive Summary. In the executive summary volume, the offeror shall describe the significant attributes and theme of its proposal. It should be concise, to include addressing any significant risks, and highlighting any key or unique features, excluding price. Any summary material presented in the Executive Summary shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal. Include a master table of contents for the entire proposal.
(B) Volume II – Technical/Management. The technical/management volume should be specific and complete, and will be evaluated against the technical/management subfactors defined in FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1 inch margin using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The file size of each document shall not exceed 2MB. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying the factors/subfactors.
In the Technical/Management volume, address your proposed approach to meeting or exceeding the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical/management factor/subfactors, as well as any risks in your proposed approach in terms of technical/performance, price, and/or schedule. Address any technical/management risk by identifying those aspects of the proposal you consider to have the potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, poor performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Describe the impact of each identified risk in terms of its potential to interfere with or prevent the successful accomplishment of other contract requirements (e.g., PWS or specification requirements), whether or not those requirements are identified as subfactors. Propose a realistic "work-around" or risk mitigation for identified risks that will eliminate or reduce risk to an acceptable level. Identify any new risks introduced by such risk mitigation.
Volume II - Technical/Management shall be organized as follows:
-Table of Contents -List of Table and Drawings -Glossary -Subfactor One -Subfactor Two -Subfactor Three -All other aspects of the PWS mailto:chloe.m.beckemeyer@mail.mil mailto:stephanie.r.mccarthy@mail.mil
(C) Volume III – Price. The quotation will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR Part 15.404 in order to determine if they are reasonable and complete.
Reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR
15.404. For a price/cost proposal/quotation to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated, and prices/costs presented in in a clear and useful format.
You shall submit pricing for the base period and all option periods. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be submitted in MSExcel 2007 format or newer. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The file size of each document shall not exceed 20MB. Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your price. All information relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price Volume. The Offeror shall propose a fixed price payment plan as a separate document commensurate with the value of the deliverables and/or significant milestones in the PWS for this requirement. A firm fixed price payment plan with the total dollar amount divided into equal monthly payments will not be accepted unless the offeror provides justification for this plan that the Government subsequently deems adequate. The eventual awardee will be authorized to invoice monthly for all approved travel costs incurred and approved by the COR. Under no circumstances shall the information and documentation from the Price Volume be included elsewhere in the proposal other than Volume II, Price Volume and Volume IV, Contract Documentation, which includes CLIN pricing.
Price submissions should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness. Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, materials, etc.). Data other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support the price reasonableness of your quotation in accordance with FAR 15.403.
FAR 12.504(a) The following laws are not applicable to subcontracts at any tier for the acquisition of commercial items or commercial components at any tier:
(7) 41 U.S.C. 4706(d) and 10 U.S.C. 2313(c),Examination of Records of Contractor, when a subcontractor is not required to provide certified cost or pricing data (see 15.209(b)), unless using funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5).
Volume III – Price shall be organized as follows:
-Attachment X, CLIN Pricing Worksheet -Price Narrative - to include cost or pricing information, supporting data, estimating methodology.
(D) Volume V - Contract Documentation. The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file.
http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P195_32714
1. You must complete blocks 30 a, b, and c of the SF Form 1449 and return this form with your proposal. Signature by the offeror on the SF1449 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.
2. You must provide completed pricing information on a CLIN spreadsheet.
3. You must provide FAR 52.212-3 Alt I (completed representations, certifications, acknowledgments and statements).
4. OCCI Mitigation Plan or a statement that OCCI does not exist.
5. Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan must adequately address each of the requirements listed in FAR 19.704(a) and DFARS 252.219.704.
A subcontracting plan is required (FAR 52.219-9) for Other than U.S. Small Businesses only (i.e. Large Businesses). ONLY OTHER THAN U.S. SMALL BUSINESS OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SUBCONTRACTING PLAN. Offerors are required to submit either an individual subcontracting plan, an approved commercial plan, or a negotiated DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan. In addition, offerors are required to complete the DISA Subcontracting Review Checklist (Attachment XXX) by inserting dollar values and percentages from your subcontracting plan as applicable for items 1 and 2, and also items 3 through 19 by completing the paragraph and page number columns.
The subcontracting plan is the organization’s business plan for the inclusion of small businesses within their capture/contracting processes. An individual subcontracting plan highlights the general “potential” for subcontracting opportunities within a specific procurement. The contract awardee has the “life of the contract” to make a “good faith effort” to ensure that subcontracted dollars will go to small businesses. Although distinct and different from each other, the small business participation plan is complementary to a subcontracting plan. Subcontracting plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments presented in the small business participation plan.
Other than U.S. Small Business Offerors (i.e., Large Businesses) must submit a subcontracting plan that meets the requirements of FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219- 7004 if the Offeror has a DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan).
The contracting officer will review subcontracting plans on an acceptable or unacceptable basis for compliance with FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations), and the applicable DFARS clause. A subcontracting plan is unacceptable if it does not clearly meet the requirements of FAR 19.704, FAR Clause 52.219-9 (Alternates and Deviations) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219- 7004 if the Offeror has a DoD Comprehensive Test Program subcontracting plan). Subcontracting plans will only be reviewed for acceptability for those Offeror(s) deemed to be an apparent awardee(s).
The subcontracting plan shall be included in the offer, and the approved subcontracting plan shall be incorporated into the contract.
8. Authorized Offeror Personnel. Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. Contractor Point of Contract information will be used for the clause at DARS 52.204-9000, Points of Contact.
9. Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations. Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code;
DUNS code; TIN; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other locations. List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.
(End of provision revisions)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2(A)
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2(a)
Addendum to 52.212-2(a), Evaluation-Commercial Items is tailored as follows:
a. Basis for Contract Award
Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) process. The technical proposal should include all information the offeror wants the Government to consider and evaluate regarding its ability to perform all required tasks and conform to all required terms and conditions. To be eligible for award, the offeror’s proposal must sufficiently address all aspects of the PWS. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.
With regard to the best value analysis for the award decision, the below evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to determine technical acceptability. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply to this requirement.
b. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors
(1) The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal.
Factor 1: Technical/Management
(a) Subfactor 1: Equipment, PWS Paragraph 6.1.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable the contractor must describe how the listed gym equipment will be tested and how troubleshooting will be performed to meet the Equipment Plan Requirements.
(b) Subfactor 2: Warranty, PWS Paragraph 6.2.1. In order for this subfactor to be rate
Acceptable the contractor must describe plan for proper execution of the manufacturer’s recommended warranty procedures.
(c) Subfactor 3: Preventative Maintenance, PWS Paragraph 6.3.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable the contractor must describe technical knowledge, plan for acquisition of replacement parts and maintenance of commercial gym equipment.
Factor 2: Price
(a). The Offeror’s firm-fixed price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes based upon the total evaluated price which consists of the offeror’s proposed prices for the base period and all option periods. Evaluation of the options shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine if it is reasonable and complete. Normally, price reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR
15.404. For a price to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated and prices presented in in a clear and useful format. The Government reserves the right, but is not obligated, to conduct a realism analysis.
c. Ratings
(1) Each technical/management subfactor will receive one of the ratings described in Table
1. The subfactor ratings will not be rolled up into an overall color rating for the Technical/Management factor.
The Technical/Management subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the subfactors must be rated Acceptable.
Evaluation Tables for LPTA
Technical Ratings
Technical Ratings Rating Description
Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
d. Evaluation of Options
The offeror shall submit pricing for the base period and all option periods, including option pricing. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
e. Discussions
The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without exchanges.
However, the Government reserves the right to conduct exchanges or seek clarifications if the KO determines they are necessary. If exchanges are required, the number of proposals being competitively considered may be narrowed to all of the most highly rated proposals. The Government further reserves the right to reduce the number of proposals being competitively considered to the greatest number that will permit efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. If an offeror’s proposal is removed from further consideration for award, written notice of the removal will be provided to the offeror. In the event issues pertaining to the solicitation cannot be resolved to the KO's satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the solicitation. In such event, offerors will be notified in writing.
(End of provision revisions)
PWS
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
as of 12/September/2019
Contract Number: (completed by the KO at time of contract or TO award) Task Order Number: (completed by the KO at time of TO award or N/A) Contractor Name (completed by the KO at time of contract or TO award) Tracking Number: 831914716 Follow-on to Previous Contract and Task Order Number:
N/A
1. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).
a. Primary COR.
Name:
Organization:
Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DODAAC):
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
2. Contract or Task Order Title. DITCO Gym Maintenance.
3. Background. In an effort to promote the health and wellness of DITCO employees, a gym with an array of workout equipment was constructed in the DITCO facility. To ensure an efficient and safe workout environment, the gym equipment must be maintained.
4. Objectives: Contractor shall maintain gym equipment to include parts and repairs. The service shall include a base plus four-year maintenance contract for DITCO-Scott 2300 East Drive, Bldg. 3600, Scott AFB, IL 62225
5. Scope. Preventative Maintenance (PM) to include parts, repairs, labor, and installation shall be performed on the equipment for the base period of one year, with four 1-year option periods.
6. Performance Requirements.
6.1 Task 1. Preventative Maintenance Monthly Requirements. The contractor shall perform preventative maintenance on all fitness equipment monthly. Equipment repairs, monthly maintenance, and monthly safety inspections shall be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendation. The contractor shall repair all broken equipment with repair parts available within the same business week. If this is not possible, provide the COR with a reasonable repair time. Preventative maintenance and equipment repair will take place at the DITCO Bldg 3600 Fitness Center, approximately the same day each month and in coordination with the COR, Monday through Friday, 07:30-15:00. The contractor shall provide a monthly PM status to the COR on the equipment. The COR will be monitoring quality assurance, progress/status reporting and program reviews as identified in the contract and the QASP. All existing equipment and any future equipment added to the gym shall be covered by the preventative maintenance.
6.1.1 Preventative maintenance includes:
6.1.1.1 Inspection, tune-up, and calibration on each piece of equipment.
6.1.1.2 Cleaning of interior parts as needed. Complete removal of all covers, guards, etc. may be required on each piece of equipment for cleaning, greasing, tightening belts, replacing or tightening loose or missing screws, bolts and brackets, and any other actions required to keep the equipment operating within the manufacturer’s specifications.
6.1.1.3 Lubrication and greasing as needed.
Deliverable: Monthly PM Status Report to the COR or the Alternate COR.
6.1.2 Warranty Plan maintenance. The contractor shall perform maintenance/repairs in accordance with the warranty/maintenance agreement per manufacturer’s recommendation on any new parts or existing equipment with remaining warranty.
6.1.3 Equipment Plan Requirements. Provide the technical and functional activities required for the integration of all tasks specified within this PWS. Include productivity and management methods such as quality assurance, progress/status reporting and program reviews. If a new part is required it shall include Freight, Delivery, Installation, and the removal of old part. The contractor shall provide all labor, tools, equipment (fasteners, etc.), materials, and transportation necessary to provide the removal of old part and the installation of new part. The COR will be monitoring quality assurance, progress/status reporting and program reviews as identified in the contract and the QASP.
Deliverable: A report shall be provided in a detailed format any parts replaced, also any items not covered under the warranty plan to the COR, or the Alternate COR.
6.2 Task 2 – Unscheduled Repairs/Service Calls – The contractor shall perform all repairs and replacement of equipment parts found to be defective during scheduled monthly preventative maintenance. The contractor can be called to respond within 24 hours for unscheduled service calls providing full repair recommendations. Unscheduled service calls must be performed during normal operating hours 07:30 – 15:00 M-F.
The contractor’s scheduled work will be coordinated through the COR or the Alternate COR from the facility. The COR or the Alternate COR, will be the inspector/acceptor of all work performed. The COR or Alternate COR will coordinate with Security Police for vendor vehicle pass and entry into facilities.
Deliverable Schedule:
PWS
Task#
Deliverable Title Format Due Date Distribution/Copies Frequency and Remarks
6.1. Monthly PM Contractor
format
After inspection/monthly
PM
Copy to COR Monthly
6.1.2 Plan Contractor
format
At time of award
Standard Distribution*
Once
*Standard Distribution: 1 copy of the transmittal letter without the deliverable to the Contracting Officer, 1 copy of the transmittal letter with the deliverable to the Primary COR.
7. Performance Standards. Maintain and service gym equipment for DITCO-Scott 2300 East Drive, Bldg. 3600, Scott AFB, IL 62225. Install new parts if required, and maintain the warranty of those items. Provide a monthly PM status on the equipment to the COR or the Alternate COR.
equipment
99% of all equipment is working
Minimum Acceptable:
> 95% of equipment is working
The COR and Alternate COR will review
8. Incentives. N/A
9. Place of Performance.
DITCO Gym, 2300 East Drive, Bldg 3600, Scott AFB, IL 62225.
10. Period of Performance. Base Year Plus Four 1-year Options.
11. Security Requirements.
11.1 Facility Security Clearance. N/A
11.2 Security Clearance and Information Technology (IT) Level. All personnel performing on or supporting a DISA contract/order in any way shall be U.S. citizens.
11.3 Investigation Requirements. N/A
11.4 Adjudication for IT-I access. N/A
11.5 Visit Authorization Letters (VAL). N/A
11.6 Security Contacts. N/A
11.7 Information Security and other miscellaneous requirements.
11.7.1 Contractor personnel shall comply with all local security requirements including entry and exit control for personnel and property at the government facility.
11.7.2 Contractor employees shall be required to comply with all Government security regulations and requirements.
Government security personnel will provide initial and periodic safety and security training and briefings. Failure to comply with Government security regulations and requirements shall require the company to provide the
Government with a written remediation/corrective action plan; furthermore, failure to comply with such requirements can be cause for removal and the contractor will not be able to provide service on this contract/order.
11.7.3 Contractor employees with an incident report in JPAS who have had their access to classified suspended will not be permitted to fill positions requiring access to classified information on a DISA contract/order.
11.7.4 The Contractor shall not divulge any information, classified or unclassified, about DoD files, data processing activities or functions, user identifications, passwords, or any other knowledge that may be gained, to anyone who is not authorized to have access to such information. The Contractor shall observe and comply with the security provisions in effect at the DoD facility. Identification shall be worn and displayed as required.
11.7.5 DISA retains the right to request removal of contractor personnel regardless of prior clearance or adjudication status, whose actions, while assigned to this contract, clearly conflict with the interest of the Government.
11.7.6 All contractor deliverables shall be marked in accordance with DoDM 5200.1, Vol. 3, Vol. 4, Information Security, DoD 5400.7-R, Freedom of Information Act Program, unless otherwise directed by the Government. The contractor shall comply with the provisions of the DoD Industrial Security Manual for handling classified material and producing deliverables. The contractor shall comply with DISA Instruction 630-230-19, Cybersecurity.
11.7.7 The Contractor shall afford the Government access to the contractor’s facilities, installations, operations, documentation, databases and personnel used in performance of the contract/order. Access shall be provided to the extent required to carry out a program of IT inspection (to include vulnerability testing), investigation and audit to safeguard against threats and hazards to the integrity, availability and confidentiality of data or to the function of information technology systems operated on behalf of DISA or DoD, and to preserve evidence of computer crime.
12. Government Furnished Property (GFP)/Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)/ Government-Furnished Information (GFI). N/A
13. Other Pertinent Information or Special Considerations.
Handling of Non-Public Information. In performance of this contract, the contractor may have access to Department of Defense (DoD) information. The contractor agrees (a) to use and protect such information from unauthorized dis-closure IAW DoD Instruction 8582.01: Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems; (b) to use and disclose such information only for the purpose of performing this contract and to not use or disclose such information for any personal or commercial purpose; (c) to comply with other current Federal and DoD information protection and reporting requirements for specified categories of information (e.g., medical, proprietary, critical program information (CPI), personally identifiable information, export controlled); (d) to obtain permission of the Government Requiring Activity before disclosing/discussing such information with a third party;
(e) to return and /or electronically purge, upon Government request, any DoD information no longer required for contractor performance; and (f) to advise the Contracting Officer and/or Contracting Officer’s Representative of any unauthorized release of such information.
a. Identification of Possible Follow-on Work. NONE
b. Identification of Potential Conflicts of Interest (COI). NONE
c. Identification of Non-Disclosure Requirements. NONE
d. Packaging, Packing and Shipping Instructions. NONE
e. Inspection and Acceptance Criteria. The COR has final acceptance for contract deliverables.
f. Property Accountability. N/A
g. Transitioning. N/A
h. Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM). N/A
i. Training. Contractor employees may be required to take periodic mandatory training courses provided through the agency , such as records management training and other training required by statute, regulation, DoD, or DISA policy. (Note if there are specific courses you will require from your contractors, insert those here.) No other training of contractor personnel shall be provided by the Government unless authorized by the Contracting Officer.
15. Section 508 Accessibility Standards. The following Section 508 Accessibility Standard(s) (Technical Standards and Functional Performance Criteria) are applicable (if box is checked) to this acquisition.
Technical Standards
1194.21 - Software Applications and Operating Systems
1194.22 - Web Based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications
1194.23 - Telecommunications Products
1194.24 - Video and Multimedia Products
1194.25 - Self-Contained, Closed Products
1194.26 - Desktop and Portable Computers
1194.41 - Information, Documentation and Support
The Technical Standards above facilitate the assurance that the maximum technical standards are provided to the Offerors. Functional Performance Criteria is the minimally acceptable standards to ensure Section 508 compliance.
This block is checked to ensure that the minimally acceptable electronic and information technology (E&IT) products are proposed.
Functional Performance Criteria
1194.31 - Functional Performance Criteria
WAGE DETERMINATION
LABOR
"REGISTER OF WAGE DETERMINATIONS UNDER | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
THE SERVICE CONTRACT ACT | EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
By direction of the Secretary of Labor | WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION
| WASHINGTON D.C. 20210
| Wage Determination No.: 2015-5075
Daniel W. Simms Division of | Revision No.: 13
Director Wage Determinations| Date Of Last Revision: 07/16/2019
Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658 an hourly minimum wage of $10.60 for calendar year 2019 applies to all contracts subject to the Service Contract Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1 2015.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.