FY24 QASP WCMD Engineering Service.docx

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Version – 1/18/2024 For WCMD Engineering Services Contract Number: FA8213C24XXXX Contract Description: WCMD Engineering Support Contractor’s Name: Smart Munitions Expert Solutions (hereafter referred to as the contractor).

1. Mission: Arm the Forces to Deter, Defeat, and Win…Today and Tomorrow!

2. Vision: Delivering Affordable World-Dominant Armament Capabilities...On Time, On Target

3. Purpose

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan is a government-developed document used to determine if the contractor’s performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the detailed process for a continuous oversight process:

· What will be monitored

· How monitoring will take place

· Who will conduct the monitoring

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented

The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its Quality Control Plan. The QASP provides the structure for the government’s surveillance of the contractor’s performance and their Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) actions to assure they meet contract standards. It is the government’s responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.

The QASP is not part of the contract, nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor’s quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance.

The government may provide a copy of the QASP to the contractor to facilitate open communication. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.

Bottom line, the QASP should ensure early identification and resolution of performance issues to minimize impact on mission performance.

4. Authority

Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Inspection of Services clauses, which provides for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the service called for in the contract or order. This acceptance is to be executed by the contracting officer or a duly authorized representative.

5. Roles and Responsibilities

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

Program/Project Manager (PM) or Functional Services Manager (FSM) – The PM/FSM provides primary program oversight, nominates the COR, ensures the COR is trained before performing any COR duties and supports the COR’s performance assessment activities. While the PM/FSM may serve as a direct conduit to provide Government guidance and feedback to the Contractor on technical matters, they are not empowered to make any contractual commitments or any contract changes on the government’s behalf.

Assigned PM/FSM: Dewey Hayes Organization or Agency: AFLCMC/EBHCA Telephone: (801) 777-6951 Email: dewey.hayes@us.af.mil

Contracting Officer (KO) – The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned KO: Michael Garner Organization or Agency: AFLCMC/EBHK Telephone: 801-777-0134 Email: Michael.Garner.9@us.af.mil

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for surveillance of the contractor’s quality program and help the COR to document contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Curtis Goodrich Organization or Agency: AFLCMC/EBHCA Telephone: 801-775-6099 Email: curtis.goodrich@us.af.mil

Contractor Representatives

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Task Manager for this contract.

Contractor Program/Task Manager – Michael Princic Telephone: 570-955-7500 Email: MPrincic@SMExpertSolutions.com

6. Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance

6.1. Contract Surveillance

The goal of the QASP is to ensure that contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR’s contribution is their professional, non-adversarial relationships with the KO, PM and the contractor, which enables positive, open and timely communications. The foundation of this relationship is built upon objective, fair, and consistent COR evaluations of contractor performance against contract requirements. The COR uses the methods contained in this QASP to ensure the contractor is in compliance with contract requirements. The COR function is responsible for a wide range of surveillance requirements that effectively measure and evaluate the contractor’s performance. Additionally, this QASP is based on the premise that the contractor, not the government, is responsible for management and QC/QA actions to successfully meet the terms of the contract.

6.2. Surveillance Matrix

The Surveillance Matrix (see sample at Attachment 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance and frequency the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.

DFARS 222.17 mandates including surveillance for ensuring compliance with Combatting Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) in the QASP. Use the CTIP sample checklist from PGI 222.17. See the DoD CTIP website.

Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performs surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) should be used to form the foundation of the COR’s inspection checklist.

6.3. Performance Rating Definitions

The performance ratings below reflect definitions at FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1. The COR will use these rating to evaluate the quality of contractor’s performance.

Performance Rating Definition

Note 1: Plus or minus signs may be used to indicate an improving (+) or worsening (-) trend insufficient to change the evaluation status.

Note 2: N/A (not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

7. Performance Reporting

7.1. Corrective Action Report (CAR)

Describes how discrepancies are reported and resolved.

(See sample CAR below)

7.2. Customer Complaint Form

(See sample customer complaint form below)

7.3. Performance Assessment Report (PAR)

(See sample customer PAR below)

7.4. Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) Checklist

(See combatting Trafficking in Persons below)

Attachment 1 - Surveillance Matrix

PWS 2.0

The contractor shall collect and analyze telemetry data for WCMD weapons and document findings.

Deliverables:

A001 Technical Report

a) Provide sufficient manpower to support the required activities at each test event 100% of the time

b) Provide reports as outlined in the CDRL

What: Weapon test activities How: Observe activities and record findings.

Frequency: Once for each weapon test event.

Who: COR Standard(s): Inspection applies to standard (a) only

PWS 3.0

The Contractor shall maintain hardware and software for WCMD equipment.

Deliverables:

A003 Interface Control Documents.

a) Provide sufficient manpower and equipment to address equipment failures

b) Ensure repairs are complete within agreed upon timeline.

AQL: 90% of the time

What: WCMD Equipment How: perform on-site periodic inspections. Customer feedback trouble reports.

Who: PM, COR, and Customer Standard(s ): Inspection applies to all standards

PWS 4.0

The Contractor shall provide engineering support for CBU teardown and component testing.

a) Contract oversite for all Aging and Surveillance tests

b) Complies with all safety requirements.

What: Teardown and Test activities How: Perform on-site periodic inspections.

Who: PM and COR Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards.

Inspection Metrologies:

M1: Inspection of Reports. All reports shall be reviewed upon receipt. The reviewer will report any flaws in the document and categorize the flaws (Editorial, Format, and/or Substance).

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

1. CONTRACTOR

2. CONTRACT NUMBER

3. TYPE OF SERVICES

4. FUNCTIONAL AREA

5. SUSPENSE DATE

6. CONTROL NUMBER

7. DEFICIENCY |_| MAJOR |_| MINOR

FINDING:

FINDING IMPACT:

Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.

8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

9. ISSUING AUTHORITY

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

11. COR DETERMINATION

|_| ACCEPTED |_| REJECTED

12. CLOSE DATE

CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD

DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT

SOURCE OF COMPLAINT

ORGANIZATION

BUILDING NUMBER

INDIVIDUAL

PHONE NUMBER

NATURE OF COMPLAINT

CONTRACT REFERENCE

VALIDATION

DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR

RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE

I. PERFORMANCE

7. |_| DEFICIENCY (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY)

|_| NEW

|_| REPEAT

|_| NO DEFICIENCY NOTED

8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM REVIEWED

II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION

11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR

12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE

13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY

III. ACTION CORRECTED

14. |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE

15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)

6. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS

Combating Trafficking in Persons

1. Verify that the contractor has informed its employees of the U.S. Government’s zero-tolerance CTIP policy, to include informing employees of the actions that will be taken against them for violations of this policy.

2. Verify that the contractor has informed the contracting officer of any information it receives (including from host country law enforcement) that alleges a contractor employee or subcontractor employee has engaged in conduct violating the CTIP policy.

3. Verify that the contractor has informed the contracting officer of any actions taken against contractor employees, subcontractors, or subcontractor employees pursuant to this clause.

JCC-I/A 952.222-0001, Prohibition against Human Trafficking, Inhumane Living Conditions, and Withholding of Employee Passports (July 2009)

4. Verify that the contractor does not knowingly destroy or possess any employee passport (or other immigration document) to prevent an employee’s liberty to travel—in order to maintain the labor or services of that person.

5. Verify that the contractor only holds employee passports and other identification documents for the shortest period of time reasonable for administrative processing purposes.

6. Verify that the contractor provides all employees with a signed copy of their employment contract, in English as well as in the employee’s native language—that defines the terms of their employment/compensation.

7. Verify that the contractor provides adequate living conditions (sanitation, health, safety, living space) for their employees.

Note: Fifty square feet is the minimum acceptable square footage of personal living space per employee. Upon contractors’ written request, contracting officers may grant a waiver in writing in cases where the existing square footage is within 20% of the minimum, and the overall conditions are determined by the contracting officer to be acceptable. A copy of the waiver approval shall be maintained at the respective life support area.

8. Verify that the contractor’s Quality Control program incorporates checks of life support areas to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Trafficking in Persons Prohibition.

9. Verify that the contractor advises the Contracting Officer if/when they learn of their employees violating the human trafficking and inhumane livings conditions.