final-for-posting-dna-arrestee-collection-process-implementation-grants-program(a) fixed opportunity number new closing date508.pdf
PDF 198 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NIJ FY 15 DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program Federal grant opportunity
- Opportunity number
- NIJ-2015-3987
- Issued by
- Department of Justice
About this file
Updated full announcement.
View the file
Other files for this federal grant opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| final-for-posting-dna-arrestee-collection-process-implementation-grants-program(a) fixed opportunity number new closing date508.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MODIFICATION NOTICE
On February 24, 2015, the deadline for applications under this solicitation was changed from April 27, 2015 to June 22, 2015.
For questions or concerns related to this solicitation, please contact Charles.Heurich@usdoj.gov.
mailto:Charles.Heurich@usdoj.gov
NIJ-2015-3987
U.S. Department of Justice OMB No. 1121-0329 Office of Justice Programs Approval Expires 07/31/2016 National Institute of Justice
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is seeking applications for funding under the DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program. This program furthers the Department’s mission by offering assistance to eligible States with existing designated DNA database laboratories to help defray the costs associated with the implementation of DNA arrestee collection processes, to improve the capacity of laboratories that conduct DNA analysis of DNA database samples.
FY 2015 NIJ DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program
Eligibility Eligible applicants are States with a designated existing crime laboratory that conducts analysis of DNA database samples. For additional eligibility information regarding the applicant’s designated DNA database laboratory, see page 9. Also, to be eligible for an award, an applicant must submit a certification from the chief legal officer of the State, as specified under Section C.
Eligibility Information. FY 2014 DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program awardees are not eligible to apply.
For additional eligibility information, see Section C. Eligibility Information.
Deadline Applicants must register with Grants.gov prior to submitting an application. All applications are due to be submitted and in receipt of a successful validation message in Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. eastern time on June 22, 2015.
All applicants are encouraged to read this Important Notice: Applying for Grants in Grants.gov.
For additional information, see How To Apply in section D. Application and Submission Information.
Contact Information For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800-518-4726 or 606-545-5035, or via e-mail to support@grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Support Hotline hours of operation are 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except federal holidays.
Applicants that experience unforeseen Grants.gov technical issues beyond their control that prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must e-mail the NIJ contact identified below within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to submit their application. Additional information on reporting technical issues is found under “Experiencing Unforeseen Grants.gov Technical Issues” in the How To Apply section.
For assistance with any other requirements of this solicitation, contact Charles Heurich, Senior Program Manager, by telephone at 202-616-6264, or by e-mail at Charles.Heurich@usdoj.gov.
Grants.gov number assigned to this announcement: NIJ-2015-3987 Release date: February 11, 2015
SL001156
http://www.usdoj.gov/ http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ http://www.nij.gov/ http://www.nij.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp http://ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Grants-govInfo.htm http://ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Grants-govInfo.htm mailto:support@grants.gov http://www.grants.gov/applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp mailto:Charles.Heurich@usdoj.gov
Contents A. Program Description
Overview
Program Specific Information
Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables
Evidence-Based Programs or Practices
B. Federal Award Information
Type of Award
Budget Information
Cost Sharing or Match Requirement
Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals
Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver
Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs
Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable)
C. Eligibility Information
Cost Sharing or Match Requirement
Limit on Number of Application Submissions
D. Application and Submission Information
What an Application Should Include
How To Apply
E. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria
Review Process
F. Federal Award Administration
Federal Award Notices
Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements
General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s)
H. Other Information
Provide Feedback to OJP
Application Checklist
Appendix I: Certification Template
FY 2015 NIJ DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program
(CFDA No. 16.741)
A. Program Description
Overview
NIJ seeks applications from eligible States with designated DNA database laboratories for funding to assist with the costs associated with the implementation of DNA arrestee collection processes, in keeping with the purposes of the Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-253), thereby helping to improve the capacity of laboratories that conduct DNA analysis of DNA database samples.
Authorizing Legislation: Department of Justice Appropriations Act, 2015 (Public Law 113-235).
Program-Specific Information
This solicitation seeks applications for funds to assist States with designated DNA database laboratories with the costs associated with the implementation of DNA arrestee collection processes, in keeping with the purposes of the Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-253), thereby helping to improve the capacity of laboratories that conduct DNA analysis of DNA database samples.
For the purposes of this announcement, “DNA arrestee collection process” means a process under which the State provides for the collection, for purposes of inclusion in the National DNA Index System (NDIS), of DNA profiles or DNA data from the following individuals who are at least 18 years of age:
a. Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of a homicide.
b. Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that has an element involving a sexual act or sexual contact with another and that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.
c. Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that has an element of kidnapping or abduction and that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.
d. Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of burglary punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.
e. Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of aggravated assault punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.
Non-supplanting: As the primary purpose of this program is to assist States by defraying DNA arrestee process implementation costs, successful applicants will be expected to provide assurances, as a condition of receiving grant funds under this program, that the funds will be used to supplement, not supplant, State funds that would otherwise be available for the purposes described in this solicitation. NIJ will include grant special conditions to this effect in any award made from this solicitation.
Expungement of profiles: If funded, applicants must agree to provide to NIJ (within 60 days of award notification) as a condition of receiving access to grant funds, documentation that demonstrates that the applicant has a procedure in place to—
• Provide written notification of expungement provisions and instructions for requesting expungement to all persons who submit a DNA profile or DNA data for inclusion in the index.
• Provide the eligibility criteria for expungement and instructions for requesting expungement on an appropriate public web site.
• Make a determination on all expungement requests not later than 90 days after receipt and provide a written response of the determination to the requesting party.
If this information is available for inclusion with the application, applicants are encouraged to include documentation of procedures regarding expungement of profiles, as described above, with the application for funding.
Also, in addition to any requirements under State (or other applicable) law, States must adhere to applicable federal expungement of records requirements for States described in 42 U.S.C. § 14132(d)(2).
Please note: No profiles generated with funding from this program may be entered into any non-governmental DNA database without prior express written approval from NIJ.
All DNA analyses conducted and profiles generated under this program must be maintained pursuant to all applicable federal privacy requirements, including those described in 42 U.S.C.
§ 14132(b)(3).
Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables
The goal of this program is for States to implement an arrestee DNA collection program in keeping with the purposes of the Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-253). The program objectives are for States to develop and/or enhance the infrastructure(s) and process(es) needed to implement and sustain an arrestee DNA collection program. The project plan should discuss, in detail, how the proposed program would absorb any additional samples anticipated should the proposed project be implemented as planned.
Evidence-Based Programs or Practices
OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policy making and program development in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. OJP is committed to:
• Improving the quantity and quality of evidence OJP generates.
• Integrating evidence into program, practice, and policy decisions within OJP and the field.
• Improving the translation of evidence into practice.
OJP considers programs and practices to be evidence-based when their effectiveness has been demonstrated by causal evidence, generally obtained through one or more outcome evaluations. Causal evidence documents a relationship between an activity or intervention (including technology) and its intended outcome, including measuring the direction and size of a change, and the extent to which a change may be attributed to the activity or intervention.
Causal evidence depends on the use of scientific methods to rule out, to the extent possible, alternative explanations for the documented change. The strength of causal evidence, based on the factors described above, will influence the degree to which OJP considers a program or practice to be evidence-based. The OJP CrimeSolutions.gov Web site is one resource that applicants may use to find information about evidence-based programs in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services.
B. Federal Award Information
NIJ estimates that it will make awards of up to $500,000 for an estimated total of $1,500,000 for a 12-month project period, beginning on October 1, 2015.
Funding under this program will be provided to an agency only once, so successful applicants that receive FY 2015 grants should not expect to submit a subsequent application for funding under this program.
FY 2014 DNA Arrestee Collection Process Implementation Grants Program awardees are not eligible to apply.
All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by law.
Type of Award1
NIJ expects that it will make any award from this solicitation in the form of a grant.
Financial Management and System of Internal Controls
If selected for funding, the award recipient must:
a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller
1 See generally 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301-6305 (defines and describes various forms of federal assistance relationships, including grants and cooperative agreements (a type of grant)).
http://www.crimesolutions.gov/
General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
b) Comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards.
c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statute, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards.
d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings.
e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, state and local laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality.
In order to better understand administrative requirements and cost principles, award applicants are encouraged to enroll, at no charge, in the Department of Justice Grants Financial Management Online Training available here.
Budget Information
Permissible Expenses
Permissible uses of funds for eligible applicants for assistance with in-house analysis, data review, and upload of data to NDIS may include the following:
1. Overtime. Funds may be used for overtime of existing in-house laboratory employees directly engaged in (a) handling and analyzing DNA database samples, including handling and analyzing quality-assurance samples, and (b) data review of profiles generated in-house that, due to the lack of laboratory resources, have yet to be reviewed and entered into NDIS. Any payments for overtime must be in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Financial Guide, available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/.
2. Certain Supplies. Funds may be used to acquire commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits accepted by NDIS and other laboratory supplies for analysis of DNA database samples, including analysis of quality assurance samples.
3. Administrative Expenses. Up to three percent of the federal portion of an award under this program may be used for direct or indirect administrative expenses specifically related to grant administration and management. Applicants submitting budgets that include indirect costs must submit documentation of their federally approved indirect cost rate, but may not request indirect costs or direct costs in excess of three percent.
Permissible uses of funds for eligible applicants for assistance with analysis of DNA database samples by an accredited fee-for-service laboratory and data review of the resulting profiles may include the following:
http://gfm.webfirst.com/ http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/
1. Overtime. Funds may be used for overtime of laboratory employees directly engaged in data review of DNA database profiles generated by an accredited fee-for-service laboratory. Any payments for overtime must be in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Financial Guide, available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/.
2. Contracts. Funds may be used to establish a contract for analyzing DNA database samples with an accredited fee-for-service laboratory. Procurements under Federal awards are subject to the “Procurement Standards” set forth in 2 C.F.R. 200 (“Subpart D—Post Federal Award Requirements”) – including the provisions relating to competition
– and other applicable law.
3. Administrative Expenses. Up to three percent of the federal portion of an award under related to grant administration and management. Applicants submitting budgets that
Permissible uses of funds for eligible applicants solely for assistance with review and upload to NDIS of DNA profile data generated from DNA database samples by an accredited fee-for-service laboratory may include the following:
1. Overtime for Existing Laboratory Employees. Funds may be used to pay overtime for existing laboratory employees who will be directly engaged in the review of DNA profiles generated by an accredited fee-for-service laboratory. Any payments for overtime must be in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Financial Guide, available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/financialguide/.
2. Administrative Expenses. Up to three percent of the federal portion of an award under related to grant administration and management. Applicants submitting budgets that
Expenses that are not permitted:
Federal funds awarded under this program may only be used for the permissible expenses outlined above. Applicants must be careful not to request items that may be duplicated in any DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Program award to the applicant agency currently open. Among other things, funds may not be used for:
1. Salaries and Benefits for Existing Staff. Funds may not be used to pay salaries and/or benefits for existing staff, other than overtime as discussed above.
2. Salaries and Benefits for Additional Staff. Funds may not be used to hire and pay salaries and/or benefits for additional staff.
3. Consultant and Contractor Services for In-House Sample Analysis.
4. Payment for Technical Review of Data to Individuals Who Do Not Meet Standard
17.5.2 of the Quality Assurance Standards for DNA Databasing Laboratories Established by the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This standard currently states, in relevant part, “A technical review of a vendor laboratory’s DNA data shall be performed by an analyst or technical reviewer, employed by the NDIS participating laboratory, who is qualified or was previously qualified in the technology, platform, and test kit used to generate the DNA data, and participates in the laboratory’s proficiency testing program.”
5. Travel.
6. Construction.
7. Training or Continuing Education.
8. Accreditation.
9. Laboratory and Computer Equipment for the DNA Database Laboratory.
10. Renovations.
11. Other Capacity Enhancement Expenses. Funds may not be used to purchase software, such as expert systems and Laboratory Information Management Systems.
12. Administrative Expenses that Exceed Three Percent. Direct or indirect administrative expenses that exceed three percent of the federal portion of the award are not permitted.
Cost Sharing or Match Requirement
See “Cofunding” paragraph under item 4 (“Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative”) under What an Application Should Include in Section D. Application and Submission Information.
Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals
OJP does not typically approve pre-agreement costs; an applicant must request and obtain the prior written approval of OJP for all such costs. If approved, pre-agreement costs could be paid from grant funds consistent with a grantee’s approved budget, and under applicable cost standards. However, all such costs prior to award and prior to approval of the costs are incurred at the sole risk of an applicant. Generally, no applicant should incur project costs before submitting an application requesting federal funding for those costs. Should there be extenuating circumstances that appear to be appropriate for OJP’s consideration as pre-agreement costs, the applicant should contact the point of contact listed on the title page of this announcement for details on the requirements for submitting a written request for approval. See the section on Costs Requiring Prior Approval in the Financial Guide, for more information.
Limitation on Use of Award Funds for Employee Compensation; Waiver
With respect to any award of more than $250,000 made under this solicitation, recipients may not use federal funds to pay total cash compensation (salary plus cash bonuses) to any employee of the award recipient at a rate that exceeds 110% of the maximum annual salary payable to a member of the Federal Government’s Senior Executive Service (SES) at an http://ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm agency with a Certified SES Performance Appraisal System for that year.2 The 2015 salary table for SES employees is available at the Office of Personnel Management website. Note: A recipient may compensate an employee at a greater rate, provided the amount in excess of this compensation limitation is paid with non-federal funds. (Any such additional compensation will not be considered matching funds where match requirements apply.)
The Assistant Attorney General for OJP may exercise discretion to waive, on an individual basis, the limitation on compensation rates allowable under an award. An applicant requesting a waiver should include a detailed justification in the budget narrative of the application. Unless the applicant submits a waiver request and justification with the application, the applicant should anticipate that OJP will request the applicant to adjust and resubmit the budget.
The justification should include the particular qualifications and expertise of the individual, the uniqueness of the service the individual will provide, the individual’s specific knowledge of the program or project being undertaken with award funds, and a statement explaining that the individual’s salary is commensurate with the regular and customary rate for an individual with his/her qualifications and expertise, and for the work to be done.
Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs
OJP strongly encourages applicants that propose to use award funds for any conference-, meeting-, or training-related activity to review carefully – before submitting an application – the OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/PostawardRequirements/chapter15page1.htm. OJP policy and guidance (1) encourage minimization of conference, meeting, and training costs; (2) require prior written approval (which may affect project timelines) of most such costs for cooperative agreement recipients and of some such costs for grant recipients; and (3) set cost limits, including a general prohibition of all food and beverage costs.
Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable)
If an applicant proposes a program or activity that would deliver services or benefits to individuals, the costs of taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to those services or benefits for individuals with limited English proficiency may be allowable. Reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to services or benefits may include interpretation or translation services where appropriate.
For additional information, see the "Civil Rights Compliance" section under “Solicitation Requirements” in the OJP Funding Resource Center.
C. Eligibility Information
Please refer to the title page for important eligibility information under this program.
Additional eligibility information: Eligible applicants are States with a designated existing crime laboratory that conducts analysis of DNA database samples, provided the designated DNA database laboratory meets all of the following requirements:
2 This limitation on use of award funds does not apply to the non-profit organizations specifically named at Appendix VIII to 2 C.F.R. part 200.
http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/15Tables/exec/html/ES.aspx http://www.ojp.gov/financialguide/PostawardRequirements/chapter15page1.htm http://ojp.gov/funding/index.htm
• The laboratory is accredited by a nonprofit professional association of persons actively involved in forensic science that is nationally recognized within the forensic science community.
• The laboratory is a participant in the National DNA Index System (NDIS).
• The laboratory undergoes external audits, not less than once every 2 years, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Standards for DNA Databasing Laboratories established by the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Certification as to the State’s legal authority to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State: To be eligible for an award, the applicant State must submit an express certification from its chief legal officer (typically the Attorney General) that one (only one) of the following two circumstances (options (1) or (2) shown immediately below) applies with respect to the applicant State:
1. The State has legal authority to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State under a State statute enacted on or after January 1, 2013.
2. The State has legal authority to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State under a State statute enacted prior to January 1, 2013, but with regard to which the State is submitting documentation with this application for funding that—
a. Details the State’s plan (or statutory scheme), developed prior to January 1, 2013, to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State on or after January 1, 2013; or
b. Explains how the State’s request for funds via this application would be used to implement enhancements or other changes to existing DNA arrestee collection processes within the State pursuant to the enactment of legal authority to collect DNA arrestee samples from individuals arrested or charged with crimes with respect to which such legal authority was not previously available.
Any certification that is submitted must be personally executed by the chief legal officer of the State after a determination that the certification may properly be made. To establish eligibility, the certification must be received by NIJ no later than the application deadline as an attachment to the application. See also “What an Application Should Include” below and Appendix I, which includes a template for the certification. This certification must be submitted using the template that appears in Appendix I.
Cost Sharing or Match Requirement
For additional information on cost sharing and match requirement, see Section B. Federal Award Information.
Limit on Number of Application Submissions
If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, NIJ will review only the most recent system-validated version submitted. For more information on system-validated versions, see How To Apply.
D. Application and Submission Information
What an Application Should Include
Applicants should anticipate that if they fail to submit an application that contains all of the specified elements, it may negatively affect the review of their application; and, should a decision be made to make an award, it may result in the inclusion of special conditions that preclude the recipient from accessing or using award funds pending satisfaction of the conditions.
Moreover, applicants should anticipate that applications that are determined to be nonresponsive to the scope of the solicitation, or that do not include the application elements that NIJ has designated to be critical, will neither proceed to peer review nor receive further consideration. Under this solicitation, NIJ has designated the following application elements as critical: Program Narrative; Budget Detail Worksheet, Budget Narrative; resumes/curriculum vitae of key personnel; and the required express certification from the chief legal officer of the State, and any accompanying documentation (see Section C. Eligibility Information, and Appendix I). Applicants may combine the Budget Narrative and the Budget Detail Worksheet in one document. However, if an applicant submits only one budget document, it must contain both narrative and detail information. Please review the “Note on File Names and File Types” under How To Apply to be sure applications are submitted in permitted formats.
OJP strongly recommends that applicants use appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., “Program Narrative,” “Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,” “Timelines,” “Memoranda of Understanding,” “Resumes”) for all attachments. Also, OJP recommends that applicants include resumes in a single file.
1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424)
The SF-424 is a required standard form used as a cover sheet for submission of pre-applications, applications, and related information. Grants.gov and OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS) take information from the applicant’s profile to populate the fields on this form. When selecting "type of applicant," if the applicant is a for-profit entity, select "For-Profit Organization" or "Small Business" (as applicable).
Intergovernmental Review: This funding opportunity is subject to Executive Order 12372.
Applicants may find the names and addresses of their state’s Single Point of Contact (SPOC) at the following website: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/. Applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list must contact their state’s SPOC to find out about, and comply with, the state’s process under Executive Order 12372. In completing the SF-424, applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list are to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19 once the applicant has complied with their state’s E.O. 12372 process. (Applicants whose state does not appear on the SPOC list are to make the http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12372.html http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_spoc/ appropriate selection in response to question 19 to indicate that the “Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.”)
2. Project Abstract
Applications should include a high-quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed project in 400 words or less. Project abstracts should be—
• Written for a general public audience.
• Submitted as a separate attachment with “Project Abstract” as part of its file name.
• Single-spaced, using a standard 12-point font (Times New Roman) with 1-inch margins.
As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the program narrative.
All project abstracts should follow the detailed template available at ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/ProjectAbstractTemplate.pdf.
3. Program Narrative
The program narrative section of the application should not exceed 15 double-spaced pages in 12-point font with 1-inch margins. If included in the main body of the program narrative, tables, charts, figures, and other illustrations count toward the 15-page limit for the narrative section. The project abstract, table of contents, appendices, and government forms do not count toward the 15-page limit.
If the program narrative fails to comply with these length-related restrictions, NIJ may consider such noncompliance in peer review and in final award decisions.
The following sections should be included as part of the program narrative:
a. Statement of the Problem.
b. Project Design and Implementation.
c. Capabilities and Competencies.
d. Impact and Outcomes; Plan for Collecting the Data Required for this Solicitation’s
Performance Measures.
To assist the Department with fulfilling its responsibilities under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Public Law 103-62, and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, Public Law 111–352, applicants that receive funding under this solicitation must provide data that measure the results of their work done under this solicitation. OJP will require any award recipient, post award, to provide the data requested in the “Data Grantee Provides” column so that OJP can calculate values for the “Performance Measures” column. Performance measures for this solicitation are as follows:
http://ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/ProjectAbstractTemplate.pdf
Objective
Performance Measure(s)
Data Grantee Provides
To perform DNA analysis on arrestee DNA samples as part of an arrestee DNA collection program
Percentage of samples subjected to DNA analysis
Number of eligible arrestee DNA samples subjected to DNA analysis
Number of eligible arrestee DNA samples collected (if applicable).
To enter DNA profiles into the FBI’s National DNA Index System using CODIS version 7.0
Percent of DNA profiles resulting in a CODIS match.
Number of eligible Arrestee DNA profiles resulting in a CODIS match resulting from DNA analysis of arrestee samples funded under this award (if applicable).
Number of eligible Arrestee DNA profiles entered into CODIS resulting from DNA analysis of arrestee samples funded under this award (if applicable).
To improve an arrestee DNA collection program (if applicable)
Number of new policies, procedures, strategies or interventions developed to improve an arrestee DNA collection program
Number and description of new policies, procedures, strategies or interventions developed to improve an arrestee DNA collection program based on project evaluations to generate internal improvements (if applicable)
Number of new policies, procedures, strategies or interventions implemented to improve an arrestee DNA collection program
Number and description of new policies, procedures, strategies or interventions implemented to improve an arrestee DNA collection program based on project evaluations to generate internal improvements (if applicable)
NIJ does not require applicants to submit performance measures data with their application.
Performance measures are included as an alert that NIJ will require successful applicants to submit specific data as part of their reporting requirements. For the application, applicants should indicate an understanding of these requirements and discuss how they will gather the required data, should they receive funding.
Note on Project Evaluations
Applicants that propose to use funds awarded through this solicitation to conduct project evaluations should be aware that certain project evaluations (such as systematic investigations designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge) may constitute “research” for purposes of applicable DOJ human subjects protection regulations. However, project evaluations that are intended only to generate internal improvements to a program or service, or are conducted only to meet OJP’s performance measure data reporting requirements likely do not constitute “research.” Applicants should provide sufficient information for OJP to determine whether the particular project they propose would either intentionally or unintentionally collect and/or use information in such a way that it meets the DOJ regulatory definition of research.
Research, for the purposes of human subjects protections for OJP-funded programs, is defined as, “a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge” 28 C.F.R. § 46.102(d). For additional information on determining whether a proposed activity would constitute research, see the decision tree to assist applicants on the “Research and the Protection of Human Subjects” section of the OJP Funding Resource Center Web page (www.ojp.gov/funding/Explore/SolicitationRequirements/EvidenceResearchEvaluationRequirem ents.htm). Applicants whose proposals may involve a research or statistical component also should review the “Data Privacy and Confidentiality Requirements” section on that Web page.
4. Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative
a. Budget Detail Worksheet
A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at www.ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/BudgetDetailWorksheet.pdf. Applicants that submit their budget in a different format should include the budget categories listed in the sample budget worksheet.
For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, see the Financial Guide at www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm.
b. Budget Narrative
The budget narrative should thoroughly and clearly describe every category of expense listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. OJP expects proposed budgets to be complete, cost effective, and allowable (e.g., reasonable, allocable, and necessary for project activities).
Applicants should demonstrate in their budget narratives how they will maximize cost effectiveness of grant expenditures. Budget narratives should generally describe cost effectiveness in relation to potential alternatives and the goals of the project. For example, a budget narrative should detail why planned in-person meetings are necessary, or how technology and collaboration with outside organizations could be used to reduce costs, without compromising quality.
The narrative should be mathematically sound and correspond with the information and figures provided in the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should explain how the applicant estimated and calculated all costs, and how they are relevant to the completion of the proposed project. The narrative may include tables for clarification purposes but need not be in a spreadsheet format. As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget Narrative should be broken down by year.
http://ojp.gov/funding/Explore/SolicitationRequirements/EvidenceResearchEvaluationRequirements.htm http://ojp.gov/funding/Explore/SolicitationRequirements/EvidenceResearchEvaluationRequirements.htm http://ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/BudgetDetailWorksheet.pdf http://www.ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm
c. Cofunding
An award made by NIJ under this solicitation may account for up to 100 percent of the total cost of the project. The application should indicate whether it is feasible for the applicant to contribute cash, facilities, or services as non-federal support for the project.
The application should identify generally any such contributions that the applicant expects to make and the proposed budget should indicate in detail which items, if any, will be supported with non-federal contributions.
For additional match information, see the Cost Sharing or Match Requirement section under B. Federal Award Information.
If a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory and subject to audit.
d. Non-Competitive Procurement Contracts In Excess of Simplified Acquisition Threshold
If an applicant proposes to make one or more non-competitive procurements of products or services, where the non-competitive procurement will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (also known as the small purchase threshold), which is currently set at $150,000, the application should address the considerations outlined in the Financial Guide.
e. Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals
For information on pre-agreement costs, see Section B. Federal Award Information.
5. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable)
Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a current federally approved indirect cost rate. (This requirement does not apply to units of local government.) Attach a copy of the federally approved indirect cost rate agreement to the application. Applicants that do not have an approved rate may request one through their cognizant federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or, if the applicant’s accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct cost categories.
For the definition of Cognizant Federal Agency, see the “Glossary of Terms” in the Financial Guide. For assistance with identifying your cognizant agency, please contact the Customer Service Center at 1-800-458-0786 or at ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov. If DOJ is the cognizant federal agency, applicants may obtain information needed to submit an indirect cost rate proposal at http://www.ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/IndirectCosts.pdf.
6. Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status
Applicants are to disclose whether they are currently designated high risk by another federal grant making agency. This includes any status requiring additional oversight by the federal agency due to past programmatic or financial concerns. If an applicant is designated high risk by another federal grant making agency, you must email the following information to OJPComplianceReporting@usdoj.gov at the time of application submission:
http://ojp.gov/financialguide/index.htm mailto:ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/IndirectCosts.pdf mailto:OJPComplianceReporting@usdoj.gov
• The federal agency that currently designated the applicant as high risk;
• Date the applicant was designated high risk;
• The high risk point of contact name, phone number, and email address, from that federal agency; and
• Reasons for the high risk status;
OJP seeks this information to ensure appropriate federal oversight of any grant award.
Unlike the Excluded Parties List, this high risk information does not disqualify any organization from receiving an OJP award. However, additional grant oversight may be included, if necessary, in award documentation.
7. Additional Attachments
a. Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications
Applicants are to disclose whether they have pending applications for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation. The disclosure should include both direct applications for federal funding (e.g., applications to federal agencies) and indirect applications for such funding (e.g., applications to State agencies that will subaward federal funds).
OJP seeks this information to help avoid any inappropriate duplication of funding.
Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate duplication.
Applicants that have pending applications as described above are to provide the following information about pending applications submitted within the last 12 months:
• The federal or State funding agency.
• The solicitation name/project name.
• The point of contact information at the applicable funding agency.
SAMPLE
Applicants should include the table as a separate attachment, with the file name “Disclosure of Pending Applications,” to their application. Applicants that do not have pending applications as described above are to include a statement to this effect in the separate attachment page (e.g., “[Applicant Name on SF-424] does not have pending applications submitted within the last 12 months for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation.”).
b. Certification as to the State’s legal authority to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State
As described above in Section C. Eligibility Information, to be eligible for an award, a State must submit a specific certification personally executed by its chief legal officer (typically the Attorney General) as to the State’s legal authority to implement a DNA arrestee collection process in the applicant State. A template for the certification appears in Appendix I. Any such certification—along with any accompanying documentation for applicant States whose applicable arrestee collection legislation was enacted prior to January 1, 2013—must be received by NIJ by the application deadline, as an attachment, or the application will neither proceed to peer review nor receive further consideration.
8. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.205, Federal agencies must have in place a framework for evaluating the risks posed by applicants before they receive a Federal award. To facilitate part of this risk evaluation, all applicants (other than an individual) are to download, complete, and submit this form.
9. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
All applicants must complete this information. Applicants that expend any funds for lobbying activities are to provide the detailed information requested on the form Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL). Applicants that do not expend any funds for lobbying activities
Federal or State Funding Agency
Solicitation Name/Project Name
Name/Phone/E-mail for Point of Contact at Funding Agency
DOJ/COPS COPS Hiring Program
Jane Doe, 202/000-0000; jane.doe@usdoj.gov
HHS/
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration
Drug Free Communities Mentoring Program/ North County Youth Mentoring Program
John Doe, 202/000-0000; john.doe@hhs.gov http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=2ebfb13012953333f32ed4cf1411e33e&node=pt2.1.200&rgn=div5#se2.1.200_1205 http://ojp.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/FinancialCapability.pdf are to enter “N/A” in the text boxes for item 10 (“a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant” and “b. Individuals Performing Services”).
How To Apply
Applicants must register in, and submit applications through Grants.gov, a “one-stop storefront” to find federal funding opportunities and apply for funding. Find complete instructions on how to register and submit an application at www.Grants.gov. Applicants that experience technical difficulties during this process should call the Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at 800-518- 4726 or 606–545–5035, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except federal holidays. Registering with Grants.gov is a one-time process; however, processing delays may occur, and it can take several weeks for first-time registrants to receive confirmation and a user password. OJP encourages applicants to register several weeks before the application submission deadline.
In addition, OJP urges applicants to submit applications 72 hours prior to the application due date to allow time to receive validation messages or rejection notifications from Grants.gov, and to correct in a timely fashion any problems that may have caused a rejection notification.
NIJ strongly encourages all prospective applicants to sign up for Grants.gov email notifications regarding this solicitation. If this solicitation is cancelled or modified, individuals who sign up with Grants.gov for updates will be automatically notified.
Note on File Names and File Types: Grants.gov only permits the use of certain specific characters in names of attachment files. Valid file names may include only the characters shown in the table below. Grants.gov is designed to reject any application that includes an attachment(s) with a file name that contains any characters not shown in the table below.
Characters Special Characters Upper case (A – Z) Parenthesis ( ) Curly braces { } Square brackets [ ] Lower case (a – z) Ampersand (&) Tilde (~) Exclamation point (!)
Underscore (__) Comma ( , ) Semicolon ( ; ) Apostrophe ( ‘ ) Hyphen ( - ) At sign (@) Number sign (#) Dollar sign ($) Space Percent sign (%) Plus sign (+) Equal sign (=) Period (.) When using the ampersand (&) in XML, applicants must use the “&”
format.
Grants.gov is designed to forward successfully submitted applications to OJP’s Grants Management System (GMS).
GMS does not accept executable file types as application attachments. These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the following extensions: “.com,” “.bat,” “.exe,” “.vbs,” “.cfg,” “.dat,” “.db,” “.dbf,” “.dll,” “.ini,” “.log,” “.ora,” “.sys,” and “.zip.” GMS may reject applications with files that use these extensions. It is important to allow time to change the type of file(s) if the application is rejected.
All applicants are required to complete the following steps:
OJP may not make a federal award to an applicant until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time the federal awarding agency is ready to make a federal award, the federal awarding agency may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant.
http://www.grants.gov/
1. Acquire a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. In general, the Office of
Management and Budget requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal funds include a DUNS number in their applications for a new award or a supplement to an existing award. A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for identifying and differentiating entities receiving federal funds. The identifier is used for tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for federal assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. Call Dun and Bradstreet at 866–705–5711 to obtain a DUNS number or apply online at www.dnb.com. A DUNS number is usually received within 1-2 business days.
2. Acquire registration with the System for Award Management (SAM). SAM is the repository for standard information about federal financial assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. OJP requires all applicants (other than individuals) for federal financial assistance to maintain current registrations in the SAM database. Applicants must be registered in SAM to successfully register in Grants.gov. Applicants must update or renew their SAM registration annually to maintain an active status.
Applications cannot be successfully submitted in Grants.gov until Grants.gov receives the SAM registration information. The information transfer from SAM to Grants.gov can take up to 48 hours. OJP recommends that the applicant register or renew registration with SAM as early as possible.
Information about SAM registration procedures can be accessed at www.sam.gov.
3. Acquire an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) and a Grants.gov username and password. Complete the AOR profile on Grants.gov and create a username and password.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.