ATCH 5 - Past Performance Questionaire

25 KB Posted

Attached to
Electronic Warfare Test and Evaluation University (EW T&E U) Specialized Technical Training Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9302-12-R-1056
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Word file Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 5 to Model Contract

Text of this file

Attachment 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEYS

ELECTRONIC WARFARE TEST AND EVALUATION UNIVERSITY (EW T&E U) SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL TRAINING SERVICE

The Air Force Flight Test Center (AFFTC) Directorate of Contracting is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Electronic Warfare Test and Evaluation University (EW T&E U) Specialized Technical Training Service program at Edwards Air Force Base, California.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors’ past and present performance on contracts which demonstrates ability to perform the proposed effort.

The areas of interest in the solicitation are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. We request the questionnaire be returned directly to the AFFTC Contracting Office

If you experience any problems with receipt, please contact either of the following individuals for assistance: Alex Scranton, at (661) 277-7586 or DSN 527-7586 or Dwight Franke at (661) 277-9567 or DSN 527-9567.

Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this process.

In advance, we’d like to thank you for your time and assistance in completing this request.

Below-named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for Solicitation No. FA9302-12-R-1056, Electronic Warfare Test and Evaluation University (EW T&E U) Specialized Technical Training Service program at Edwards AFB, CA.

A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Return the completed questionnaire by one of the following methods:

Fax: Attn: Alex Scranton 661-277-0470 or

Mail: Attn: Alex Scranton Solicitation: FA9302-12-R-1056 Bldg. 2800 5 South Wolfe Ave Edwards AFB CA 93524 or

Email: William.Scranton@edwards.af.mil and Dwight.Franke@edwards.af.mil

A. CONTRACTOR: _________________________________________________________

B. CONTRACT NUMBER: ___________________________________________________

C. CONTRACT TYPE(S) (FIXED PRICE, COST REIMBURSABLE OR OTHER):

D. TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE INCLUDING OPTIONS: $_________________________

E. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: _______________________________________________

F. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED:

G. DID CONTRACTOR PERFORM AS PRIME CONTRACTOR, SUB, OR KEY PERSONNEL ON THE LISTED CONTRACT?

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the letter corresponding to the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

Code Performance Assessment Definition E EXCEPTIONAL. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many [requirements] to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some [requirements] to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY. Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

M MARGINAL. Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE. Performance in this area not applicable to services performed.

For any marginal or unsatisfactory rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the remarks block. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. If a question is not applicable, mark NA. If more space is needed, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Be sure to identify your continued narration with the respective line number.

E
V
S
M
U
NA
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable

EVALUATION AREAS

The contractor:

A
GENERAL
1.
How well did the contractor provide for non-personal services for highly specialized, complex electronic warfare (EW) technical classroom instruction in the primary areas of infrared (IR) and radio frequency (RF), IR and RF countermeasure systems, directed energy weapon systems, low observable weapon systems, aircraft survivability, and net-centric warfare systems ?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
2.
How was the contractor’s performance on the completion of the requirement by the specified delivery date?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
3.
How well did the contractor work with government representatives?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
4.
How was the customer support from the contractor after the completion of the requirement?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
5.
How was the contractor’s feedback on providing recommendations or creative solutions to problems?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
6.
How well did the contractor provide for complex electronic warfare (EW) training at the advanced graduate level training?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
7.
How well did the contractor demonstrate the ability to maintain a library of current, state-of-the-art, graduate level EW courses?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
8.
How well did the contractor provide experienced, highly qualified and skilled, fully trained, and professional, instructors and staff with the requisite EW disciplines and security clearances (up to and including collateral Top Secret and Top Secret Special Access Required (SAR))?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
9.
How well did the contractor demonstrate the ability to execute a transition plan?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
B
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.
How would you rate the contractor’s management personnel by having adequate background, experience, and education to effectively manage the functions for which they have responsibility?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
2.
Did the contractor conform to contract/program requirements with quality results?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
3.
Was the contractor’s management effective in controlling cost, schedule, and performance requirements?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
4.
If required of the contract, did the contractor effectively manage its subcontractors?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
5.
Was the contractor able to successfully perform all contract requirements with the resources described in their proposal?
E
V
S
M
U
NA
C
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
1.
Rate the overall contractor’s performance under this contract
E
V
S
M
U
NA
2.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES
NO
3.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES
NO
4.
What are the contractor’s greatest strengths?
5.
What are the contractor’s greatest weaknesses?
6.
Do you know of anyone else who might have relevant information concerning this contractor’s past performance?

REMARKS:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Please provide:

A. Name of Evaluator:

B. Office Symbol/Phone Number (DSN/Commercial):

C. Fax Number (DSN/Commercial):

D. Position/Title:

E. Length of Involvement in Contract:

F. Date Questionnaire Completed:

Quality Assurance Personnel

Name: _______________________________________________________________________

Office: _______________________________________________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________________________________________________________

Email: _______________________________________________________________________

FAX Number: _________________________________________________________________

Contracting Officer:

Name: _______________________________________________________________________

Office: _______________________________________________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________________________________________________________

Email: _______________________________________________________________________

FAX Number: _________________________________________________________________

1 FA9302-12-R-1056

Attachment 5

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Electronic Warfare Test and Evaluation University (EW T&E U) Specialized Technical Training, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP FA9302-12-R-1056.pdf PDF
ATCH 3 - Class Price Schedule.doc DOC document
ATCH 4 - SCHEDULE OF CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT TASK ORDER LABOR RATES.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .