Attachment_2.doc

DOC document 49 KB Posted

Attached to
Multi Aircraft Canopy Cranes Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA853314R30933
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Multi Aircraft Canopy Cranes, newest first.
File Type Posted
Question_1.docx DOCX document
FA853314R30933.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment_1.doc DOC document
Attachment_6.docx DOCX document
Packaging.pdf PDF
Transportation.pdf PDF
TMCR_CDRL.pdf PDF
SPI.pdf PDF
Attachment_3.docx DOCX document
IUID.pdf PDF
Attachment_5.doc DOC document
Data_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Attachment_4.doc DOC document
EDL.pdf PDF
Air_Force_TMCR.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FA8533-14-R-30933

ATTACHMENT 2

MULTI AIRCRAFT CANOPY CRANE PROGRAM

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:

Name and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Business: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________

Return your completed questionnaire via fax to (478) 222-1854 or electronically mail to jennifer.lee.23@us.af.mil or salena.arrington@us.af.mil. Please Call (478) 222-1922 or -1755, respectively before transmitting by fax to ensure confidentiality.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION:

Name of Contractor: _____________________________________________

CAGE Code: __________

Program Title and Brief Description: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Contractor’s Role in the Program:

_____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years? ____________________ Contract Type(s), i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc: ___________________________________________________________

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION:

Period of Performance (assuming all options exercised) of Contract or Effort: Beginning Date _________ through ____________

Current Dollar Value: ______________________

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS:

1. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract, or action of any kind to terminate performance? If yes, explain.

2. Describe the contractor’s strong and/or weak characteristics:

3. If given a choice, would your company award to this contractor again? If not, please explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

TABLE

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions in the table below. Should your response be other than “satisfactory,” provide supporting documentation on an additional sheet to this document (which is in WORD format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted to be “satisfactory.”

PERFORMANCE AREAS
Not Applicable
Unsatis-factory
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excep-tional

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the requirements of your contract or project:

2. Company’s proficiency with preparing technical data such as test plans, test reports, operations and maintenance manuals, Instructional media for customers, or parts provisioning documents:

3. Company’s proficiency with processing your order including timely initiation of work, timely deliveries of products/services and invoices:

4. Customer’s satisfaction with the company’s response to warranty claims, corrective actions, product recalls, and/or other “after the sale” actions:

5. Company’s knowledge and proficiency with industry specifications and standards, e.g. SAE, EPA, EMI

6. Quality of completed product:

7. Extent to which Company utilized small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and other such socio-economic business sectors in its contract performance:

RFP FA8533-14-R-30933

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not transmit this page when faxing your input to the name/address listed on page 1.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .