Redacted_J&A_EGI-M_FA8540-17-F-0013.pdf

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN

FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

I. Contracting Activity.

This is a Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition for the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Agile Combat Support Directorate, Electronic Warfare/Avionics Program Office, Joint Service System Management Office (JSSMO) Robins AFB, GA requiring activity and is responsible for the proposed contracting action. Purchase Request (PR) FD2060-16- 90888 for Northrop Grumman (NG) and FD2060-16-90900 for Honeywell International (HI) have been coordinated with the Procuring Contracting Officer.

II. Nature and/or description of the action being processed

The purpose of this J&A is to gain approval to use other than full and open competition procedures to modify and issue two separate Task Orders (TOs) against current Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contracts to incorporate the Military Global Positioning System (GPS) User Equipment (MGUE) - specifically addressing the M-Code capability - into existing fielded and future production Embedded GPSInertial Navigation System (INS) (EGI) for the Technical Maturity and Risk Reduction (TMRR) Effort.

GPS Modernization and Civil Aviation advancements through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) NextGen Program have resulted in the need for upgrades to military aircraft in order for them to remain in compliance with applicable Civil Mandates and Public Law. Modernization of the EGI system will provide a path to overcoming emerging threats and to conform to the Civil Mandate for adoption of ADS-B Out and allow the Department of Defense (DoD) to remain in compliance with Public Law. The mandates specific to GPS M- Code and ADS-B Out are as follows: GPS M-Code: Public Law 111-383, effective 7 January 2011, states, “…none of the funds authorized to be appropriated… for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to purchase user equipment for the Global Positioning System during fiscal years after fiscal year 2017 unless the equipment is capable of receiving military code…” ADS-B Out: 14 CFR §92.225 and § 91.227 direct that after January 1, 2020, and unless otherwise authorized by Air Traffic Control, no person may operate an aircraft in Class A airspace unless the aircraft has equipment installed that meets a group of requirements established by the FAA for Extended Squitter ADS-B. DoD aircraft are not exempt from this policy. Finally, this effort provides avenues to consolidate initial integration costs of modernizing CORE GPS receivers to meet DoD/Civil mandates, address obsolescence, and reduce configuration.

There are two separate Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), NG and HI, both are the exclusive suppliers of the EGI for the airframes they support, as identified in Sections III, V and Attachment 1 which have been designated Contractor Logistic Support (CLS) for the life of the system through the Source of Repair Approval Process (SORAP). No commonality exists between the configurations which could be exploited for competitive procurement. The current contracts, FA8540-14-D-0001 (NG) and FA8540-13-D-0002 (HI), utilize a mix of Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) types, specifically Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF), Cost-Reimbursable No Fee (CR) and Time & Materials (T&M).

Due to the circumstances described herein, the activity requests authority to acquire Engineering Services for Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) listed in this document using Other Than Full and Open Competition as prescribed by FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements. The JSSMO plans to award two CPFF TOs as vehicles to cover a 12 month period of performance, under PRs FD2060-16-90888 (NG), estimated cost of and FD2060-16-90900 (HI), estimated cost of

. The estimated award date for each of the TOs is 25 Apr 2017. These Purchase Requests will support USAF, USA, USN, USMC, USCG platforms for EGI-Modernized (EGI-M) during TMRR Effort for Engineering Services and trade studies. FMS platforms will not see any TMRR support under these TOs.

This sole source CPFF requirement will be performed by the following companies:

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation 21240 Burbank Blvd Woodland Hills, CA 91367-6675 Large Business Cage Code: 06481

Honeywell International Inc.

13350 US Highway 19 North Clearwater, FL 33764-7226 Large Business Cage Code: 0BFA5

III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.

A. This contract action will modify both companies' respective contracts to include RDT&E requirements for Engineering Services. The estimated Period of Performance (PoP) for this effort is 27 April 2017 through 26 April 2018. This will provide implementation of additional trade studies for the EGI-M system. This will be a TMRR Effort, until the end of the contract performance period is realized. This contract will foster comprehensive Engineering Services and provide certainty in the delivery of services that support the warfighter. Estimated award date is 27 April 2017. Appropriation 3600, RDT&E, will be used for both contracts.

B. Under the contemplated orders, NG and HI will provide the following services in support of EGI-M program. Scope of work in accordance with the PWS shall include, but is not limited to:

(1) Prepare a preliminary design for EGI-M to include; Modernization retrofit/upgrades, perform Risk Assessment analysis, provide technical support for Open System Architecture integration, conduct travel as required by the Government to facilitate collaboration of Third Party Application space, and host platform integration support.

(2) Conduct software engineering services to study, generate, document, code, test, integrate, provide cost/feasibility and deliver software updates. These software engineering services should lead to the completion of the Systems Requirement Document (SRD), development of Interface Control Document (ICD) and Prime Item Development Specification (PIDS).

(3) Support Delta SRR/SFR and PDR and use these forums as a vehicle to maintain living documents such as the Systems Engineering management Plan (SEMP), Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). Ensure all entry criteria has been met before major review events (Delta SRR/SFR and PDR) and exit criteria has been satisfied before the next scheduled review is convened.

(4) Perform feature testing of the updated Operational Flight Program (OFP).

(5) Perform Diminishing Manufacturing Source monitoring and review, analyze, and recommend appropriate resolutions and ensure any risks identified are captured, documented and the SEMP updated accordingly.

(6) Support Flight Test Planning by providing technical support and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to conduct data analysis and anomaly resolution and document results in test reports.

Total Estimated Cost: The TMRR Effort for NG will be and for HI will be , for their respective TOs, as outlined in Section II for a total cost of $65M. Support for the Flight Test Planning and Execution is included in the overall Total Estimated Cost for this TO and is of that total; this cost is further broken out with for NG and for HI.

IV. Statutory authority permitting Other than Full and Open Competition.

The statutory authority, which permits other than full and open competition for this acquisition, is 10 USC 2304 (c) (1), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1 Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, required by FAR 6.303-2(b)(4).

V. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or nature of the acquisition requires the use of the authority cited above (applicability of authority).

The EGI is a highly specialized all-attitude navigation system providing outputs of linear and angular acceleration, velocity, position, attitude (roll, pitch and platform azimuth), magnetic and true heading, altitude, body angular rates, time tags, and time. There is no similar product (integrated GPS and INS) customarily used for non-Governmental purposes. The EGI uses a Precise Positioning System (PPS) GPS as opposed to the commercial Standard Positioning Service (SPS) GPS. PPS is not available commercially and is regulated by a security device controlled by the GPS Directorate and the National Security Agency; SPS does not meet current DoD GPS requirements. In addition, modifications to the EGI are not of a commercial nature.

They revolve around such military applications as: anti-jamming, weapon hand-over/interface, targeting, interface with encrypted radios, aircraft carrier alignment, gunfire vibration, electro-magnetic interference, and stricter military temperature and humidity range requirements. These changes are not minor; nor do they have commercial applications.

NG and HI were identified through Request for Information (RFI) and Market Research as the only EGI capable companies that combine both GPS and INS in a single receiver unit that meets military requirements. Both manufacturer's services are highly specialized and capabilities include, specifically trained and skilled personnel, unique experience and knowledge base, specially designed facilities, software data rights, and manufacturing/tooling equipment necessary to support specific platform configurations for their specific product. However, the core hardware and software for their perspective EGI are not interchangeable or supportable by either vendor. They are not functionally equivalent, as each EGI is integrated to satisfy a specific platform requirement. Due to the proprietary nature of the designs and since the EGI is a Non-Developmental Item (NDI), there is no commonality between HI and NG designs and competition cannot be conducted between any contractors. The unique and highly specialized capability possessed by both manufacturers is further demonstrated through 1) exclusive familiarity with the EGI system specification and related systems engineering processes to translate operational needs into system requirement documents and sub-specifications, 2) unique engineering expertise to research EGI system problems, develop and test engineering changes associated with modifications, enhancements, and upgrades, and 3) robust support infrastructure (manufacturing, production, test, and repair equipment) to continue the existing two-level maintenance concept and relationships, and furnish uncompromised field support for operational customers.

In 1999, Aeronautical Systems Center issued a solicitation to purchase data rights to organically repair the A-10, F-16, F-15, and KC-135 EGIs, and received a proposal for . In 2007, the Air Force received an estimate of for repair data rights from NG on the F-16 LN-260 EGI.

The cost to buy the NG repair data on LN-100/251/260 EGI models (just the chassis, INS sensor, and GPS receiver) is estimated to be . There are 12 weapon systems specific data configurations of these EGIs, which would add an estimated ; hence, the total estimated cost to purchase repair data from NG would total . The last effort in August 2010 to obtain repair data for the B-1 EGI was estimated at from HI. The cost of the repair data (just the chassis, INS sensor, and GPS receiver) for a HI H-764 EGI is estimated to be .

There are 48-weapon systems specific data configurations, which would add an estimated $ ; hence, the total estimated cost to purchase repair data from HI is $ . With over 200 configurations, the Program Office estimated the costs to purchase repair data rights from NG and HI to be over $1B.

The Government does not own the technical data required to manufacture or repair for the EGI units, however the Government has acquired limited engineering drawings, Interface Control Documents (ICD), and Acceptance Test Procedures (ATP) as needed. The Government contacted both EGI OEMs via e-mail and through verbal communication on 11 August 2016. HI responded on 19 August 2016, and NG on 06 September 2016; both HI and NG refused to release pricing information and refused to sell the most critical software. In addition to their response, NG cited the software is company proprietary. As this is a modification to the current contract with NG and HI, the Government will request the purchase of data on a future contract that will be generated for the Engineering, Manufacture, and Development (EMD) effort and will research this further and engage in a Business Case Analysis (BCA) from both manufacturers regarding cost feasibility. The Government is striving to incorporate Open Architecture (OA) standards progressively, beginning with trade studies on the feasibility of OA in the TMRR Effort through limited implementation in the EMD phase and finally culminating with the projected full implementation in a future effort known as Resilient EGI (R-EGI). Prior to R- EGI, a BCA will most likely be accomplished (prior to that effort going to the Early Strategy Issue Session).

The award of a contract for the existing EGI configurations to any other source would result in substantial duplication of cost to the DoD platforms that would not be recovered through competition. This duplication in costs would occur if new vendors were required to develop new EGI configurations from scratch as Northrop and Honeywell claim proprietary rights to much of the EGI development, design and operating software. This effort would require, at minimum, a 48-month delay in order to design and develop a first article. This time lag is substantiated by the four years it took to develop and produce the F-16 EGI Block 50 EGI. This gap in contract coverage would significantly impact the support of DoD customer operational requirements, on-going testing, modification, and integration efforts that require continuous contractor support.

Procurement of a replacement common EGI core configuration would incur duplicate costs for each platform for new integration and flight test, new support equipment, new technical manuals, and software in addition to the cost of the new hardware and modification of an entire fleet of air vehicles. A replacement common EGI core configuration would require most, if not all, of this testing to be re-accomplished. Based on actual historical platform (DoD fixed and rotary wing aircraft) costs associated with this testing, the re-testing cost is estimated at per platform.

This would equate to over $1B to re-test over 69 weapon platforms in targeting, navigation, guidance, weapons release, rescue, and tracking of possible hostile forces. In summation, the total costs to procure, test, and integrate a new common box would equate to $1.3B.

Procurement of existing EGI configurations from a new source is not economically feasible since it would require a full Technical Data Package which is not available for competitive solicitation due to proprietary rights owned by the OEMs. Because technical data was not purchased, additional sources would have to design their own EGI, which would be cost prohibitive.

A Reverse Engineering Cost Analysis was concluded in October 2016 and it was determined that it would not be beneficial to the Government to pursue a re-engineering effort. The effort of such re-engineering of the EGI would require an estimated 210 man-years and cost $173M to complete, whereas a sole source procurement would cost approximately $67M. The estimate is from reverse engineering the six platforms anticipated for the TMRR efforts to distinguish it from the $1.3B figure for all the platforms. The estimate demonstrates reverse engineering is not economically viable. Taking the projected useful life of the EGI, which is 15 years due to technology obsolescence, there would be no cost benefit and would further delay meeting the M- Code mandate. With a new EGI on the horizon (i.e. R-EGI) projected to replace the legacy EGI in 2020-2023, it is the intent of the Government to incorporate an open system architecture and to purchase repair data rights. In doing so, there is the possibility of establishing an organic depot repair capability and to compete production in the future.

VI. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable.

This requirement has been synopsized on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web page as required by FAR 5.201. It is anticipated that sources having an interest in subcontracting may be identified through synopsis. Although the Government does not own data to support acquisition of this repair from any other source, any source who responds to the Government as a result of this synopsis will be identified as a potential repair source. A Request for Information (RFI) was posted on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website on 15 July 2016 under solicitation number FA8523-16-R-AAAA for a period of thirty (30) days, and expired on 15 August 2016. No new sources were identified/disclosed; the only two responses received were from NG and HI. This RFI sought qualified industry partners that would be required to provide engineering design, development and test capability to incorporate the MGUE -specifically addressing the M-Code capability - into existing fielded and future production EGIs.

VII. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

The overall cost of this effort will be fair and reasonable to the government. In accordance with FAR 15.403-4, the contractor will be required to provide certified cost or pricing data to be used in supporting the Government's evaluation of the proposed cost. The proposed skill mix of labor, labor hours, types and quantities of materials, other direct cost, and direct and indirect rates will be negotiated by the Government based on recommendations from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and expert technical personnel supporting the program. The contract price will be negotiated in accordance with the procedures in FAR Part 15 ensuring that the ultimate contract costs to the government will be fair and reasonable.

VIII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

Market research was conducted in accordance with FAR Part 10 and was completed 29 August 2016, in an attempt to identify additional sources capable of fulfilling this requirement.

Although this workload has been designated as Contractor Logistic Support (CLS) for the life of the system through the SORAP, it is the intent to work towards developing and incorporating OA for the EGI and possibly assume some repair capability at an organic depot location. Sources were investigated/sought by internet searches using "Embedded GPS/INS". Google and Yahoo search engines were used to accomplish the search; the result was no other sources were found other than HI and NG. No other supplier was found that combines both GPS and INS in a single Line Replacement Unit (LRU). The GSA Advantage website was also searched using "Embedded GPS/INS receiver" and "GPS/INS receiver". When performing a search under the term “Embedded GPS/INS receiver” the only results to appear were Northrop Grumman, Honeywell, and Trimble. Trimble's role in the Embedded GPS/INS receiver is the development and manufacture of the MGUE card, a component that will be used in the EGI-M internally.

Trimble is currently under contract with the GPS Directorate (Space and Missile Command) for this effort. Under "GPS/INS receiver", eight products were found. Honeywell was listed, as was Systron Donner, Novatel, VectorNav, and Raytheon. Apart from the EGI receivers manufactured by Honeywell, the other companies listed either manufactured components utilized internally to GPS/INS receivers, or their product was not designed for use in large scale platforms and as a result did not meet the Government's capability requirements. In addition, a RFI was posted on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at https://www.fbo.gov on 15 July 2016 under solicitation number FA8523-16-R-AAAA for a period of 30 days, expiring on 15 August 2016, no new sources were identified/disclosed. Only two responses were received; one from Northrop Grumman, another from Honeywell. The responses were determined to be relevant and demonstrated that these two vendors were more than qualified to meet the needs of the Government.

HI and NG have been able to leverage their many years of Navigation System experience and lessons learned to refine their processes and optimize effectiveness while also minimizing both risk and cost. The market survey and results of the RFI, published on 15 July 2016 and closed 15 August 2016, found no technically acceptable alternative sources. Recommendation is to continue with sole source TOs to NG under PR FD2060-16-90888 and HI under PR FD2060-16- 90900.

IX. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

None

X. List of sources, if any, that expressed interest in the acquisition.

See Section VI.

XI. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before making subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

The Government does not own the rights to the data required for production of the EGI system.

A complete data package is not available for competitive solicitation due to proprietary rights claimed by both manufacturers; therefore, this limits the Government's ability to compete this item. The program SORAP has designated this workload as Contractor Logistic Support (CLS) for the life of the system. Trade studies performed under the current contracts, FA8540-14-D- 0001 (NG) and FA8540-13-D-0002 (HI), have focused upon the implementation of Open System Architecture. In adopting the Open System Architecture, it will make it easier to integrate third party hardware and software. It is the intent of the Government to migrate to an Open System Architecture by FY20, making the data rights in future EGI development (i.e. Resilient EGI (R- EGI)) property of the Government. This will make it possible to bring the repair activities of future EGI LRU form factors under organic control and increasing the possibility of removing the barriers to competition closer to reality.

Space and Missile Command (SMC) moved responsibility for the EGI program to EW and Avionics Program Office under PEO, Agile Combat Support in 2014. Although there is not an official `EGI Program Office' per se at the present, the JSSMO is in the process of making that happen and it is estimated that EGI will become an ACAT II program sometime within the next 24 months (NLT FY19). Service Level Expectation Management Agreements (EMAs) with the other DoD Services, and EMAs with the Air Force platforms are currently in progress and will be established in the way of MOAs/MOUs with those entities. The JSSMO is presently teaming with all stakeholders and developing service-wide key functional / performance parameters via a Systems Requirements Document (SRD), which will meet most of the DoD platform EGI needs.

With JSSMO as the centralized authority, configuration proliferation will be controlled and managed through these agreements with the DoD platforms as it relates to their applicable Mission Design Series (MDS) aircraft.

XII. Certification by the Contracting Officer.

As evidenced by his/her signature, the contracting officer has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief. (FAR 6.303-2(b) (12)).

XIII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.

As evidenced by their signatures, the technical and/or requirements personnel have certified that any supporting data contained herein, which is their responsibility, is both accurate and complete. (FAR 6.303-2(c)).

Attachment 1

Current EGI PN/NSN Listing Air Force

Honeywell Model H-764

F-15 EGI 34200750-3042 6605-01-449-4965

F-15 EGI SAASM 34200750-R041-960 6605-01-511-3424

F-16 EGI Block 30 34201700-2M22 6605-01-426-0560 A-10 34201700-3M42 6605-01-426-0552

A-10 PE 34201700-3M43 6605-01-544-6537

KC-135 34200600-30H4 6605-01-426-8522

F-15 TSPI 34200750-3046

F-16 EGI JPALS 34249700-RM53

F-16 SAR 34200600-C097

TSPI 34209850-WC40-001

TSPIU (GEM IV) HAVE QUICK 34200650-300U

TSPI 34210059-004, GAINR II

HH-60 (No P/N) TSPI (legacy) 34200650-3006

Northrop Grumman Model LN-260 F-16 Blk 50 / E-8C 311931-01-14ASD 6605-01-576-7054

A-10 311931-01-14ASD 6605-01-576-7054

Northrop Grumman Model LN-100

E-3 833910-01-14ASD 6605-01-544-6099

E-3 833910-02-14ASD

E-3 897105-0016 6605-01-508-8984 E-3 897105-0017 6605-01-534-3874

Army

Honeywell Model H-764

AH-64 P3I SAASM 34209950-R004-960

AH-64 P3I SAASM w/ MMR 34249950-R004-960

P3I EGI+429 34209950-RN14-960

P3I EGI+429 w/MMR 34249950-RN14-960

SOA P3I EGI 34209200-RJAD-001

AH-64D EB2 (No P/N) AH-64D WRA (No P/N) Apache Block 3 34209950-R004-960

CH-47 34209950-RN14-960

AH-1W 34200650-3021

AH-64 /OH-58D 34200650-300J

AH-64D 34200650-800J

UH-60M/HH-60M 34209950-RN14-960

OH-58D 34200650-800J

SOA 47G/60M/6M 34201700-3M12

MH-6M/MH060L 34200600-3JA1

MH-60K, 60L, 47E 34201700-3M12

Navy

Honeywell Model H-764

AH-1W 34200600-3057 6605-01-415-9079

UH-1Y/AH-1Z EGI 34200602-3057 6605-01-522-2012

C-2A, E2-C, H-53E, CH-46E, AN/SPN-46 34209950-RN12-001

F-18E/F ANAV 34209400-TB44-001

SSC (No P/N)

MH-53 34209950-RN12-001

VH-3D 34209200-RJAD-001

HH-60 34201700-3M13

HH-60T 34209200-RJAD-001 (HG9869K1-001)

USCG C-130 34209200-RJAD-001VH-60N

USCG C-130J/HC-144A 34209700-5N7A

USCG MH-60J 34209950-RN12-001

USCG MH-60T 34209950-RN12-001

USCJ HH-60T 34209200-RJAD-001

USCG HC-130H (No P/N)

USCG HH-65 34209950-RN12-001

LCAC EGI 34200650-30Q7

HH-60T 34209200-RJAD-001

HH-60J 34209200-RJAD-001

MH-60T (No P/N) CGMH-65 (No P/N) NUCAS (No P/N) LCAC (SAASM) (No P/N) 9.8” mount 34200575-001 12.75” mount 34077590-001 C-130J Mount 34200575-003

HH-60 34201700-3M13

P3I EGI SW Modularization 34209950-CN13

AH-1W 34200650-3021

AH-64 /OH-58D 34200650-300J

AH-64 34200650-800J

S-3 34200650-30P7

SOF 12.75 34201700-3M12

SOF 9.8 34200600-3JA1

F-14 34200601-3067

SPN-46 34209950-RN12-001

C-130T (No P/N)

F/A-18E/F 34209400-WB44-001

MV-22 34200550-001

Northrop Grumman Model LN-100

Navy 803400-0100 F/A-18 800990-0002

EA-6B 800990-0002

P-3/C-130 803440-0001

T-45 GINA 801400 (803400-0100)

Northrop Grumman Model LN-100/251/260

CH-53 311898-11-0008-121-1-USASD

MH-60R/S 810400-2, GEM-IV

MH-60R/S 810400-5, GEM-IV RAIM

MH-60R/S 812700-5, F5GS

MH-60R/S 812700-6, 524D

AH-64D (No P/N)

FMS****************************FMS****************************FMS

Honeywell Model H-764

AH-64/ Apache Japan 34200650-300JD F-15 EGI SAASM - Korea 34200750-R041-075 FMS production unit 34200600-3035-SM (PPS) FMS production unit 34200600-H035 (SPS) C-130 J (Slovenia) (No P/N) C-130 J (Israel) (No P/N) C-130 J (Egypt) (No P/N) C-130 J (Australia) (No P/N) C-130 J (Ghana) (No P/N) C-130 J Taiwan) (No P/N) C-130 (Kuwait) (No P/N) C-130 (Iraq) (No P/N) AH-64/ UK Apache 34200650-8004 P-3 (Egypt) (No P/N)

CH-47 FMS 34209950-RN14-*

UH-60M FMS 34209950-RN14-*

C-130J Oman 34200600-3XXX AH-64D Saudi Arabia 34200650-001

AH-64D Israel 34200650-300J

AH-64D EGYPT 34200650-800J

AH-64D EGYPT 34200650-800J

C-130J Kuwait 34209950-RN12-029 CH-47 Australia 34209950-RN14-020 CH-47 Canada 34209950-RN14- *

CH-47F UAE 34209950-RN14- *

CH-47F Italy 34209950-RN14- * UH-60M Sweden 34209950-RN14- * CH-47 Turkey 34209950-RN14-* UH-60M Saudi Arabian Royal Guard 34249950-R004-0XX* AH-64D Saudi Arabia 34249950-R004-0XX* AH-64D India 34249950-R004-0XX* AH-64D Saudi Arabia 34249950-R004-0XX* AH-64D Saudi Arabian Royal Guard 34249950-R004-0XX* AH-64D India 34249950-R004-XXX* F-16 Singapore 34209700-5M53-C F-15SR Saudi Arabia 34200750-M042-025 C-130J Iraq 34200600-H035 UH-60 Taiwan 34249950-R004-026

*Note – For all HI SAASM based configurations listed above, the following part number derivations covering eligible FMS configurations are included [ -020, -019, -018, -017, -016, - 015, -014, -013, -012,-011, -010, -021, -008, -007, -006, -205, -009, -004, -003, -002, -001].

Example: 34209950-RN14-960 is a SAASM based configuration. For other countries, the “-960” is replaced by the appropriate dash number listed above.

Northrop Grumman Model LN-260

F-17 Portugal 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX F-16 (Belgium) 311931-01-23ASD F-16 (Denmark) 311931-01-75ASD F-16 (Netherlands) 311931-01-09ASD F-16 (Norway) 311931-01-33ASD F-16 (Portugal) 311931-01-34ASD Navy FMS 311898-11-0008-121-1-XXASD AH-64 Taiwan 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX AH-6iD Saudi Arabian Royal Guard 311898-01-0800-101-1-XXXX F-16 Pakistan 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX F-16 Korea 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX F-16 Oman 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX

F-16 EGYPT 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX

F-16 Iraq 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX F-16 Thailand 311916-01-0800-001-2XXX

Northrop Grumman Model LN-100/260

CF-18 FMS (No P/N) MH-60 (Australia) (No P/N) MH-60 (India) (No P/N) H-60 (Norway) (No P/N) Fire Scout (UAE) (No P/N)