01_AIRSPEC_EDA.pdf

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

FAR 9.202(a) Policy and DoD 4120.24M Defense Standardization Program, Policy and Procedures

Section A: Item Identification

1. Stock Number (NSN): 1377-00-269-0552ES

2. Part Number (P/N): 32-72317-23 Contractor Part Number(s): 2130300-1, 6124100

3. Noun: Cartridge, Initiator

4. Application: F-15 Egress System

Section B: Justification for Establishing a Qualification Requirement and Reason Why Qualification Requirement Must Be Demonstrated Prior to Any Contract Award.

1. The Initiator is a critical safety item (CSI). Characteristics associated with the manufacture of the Initiator, if not correct, would result in aircrew inability to egress the aircraft in emergency situations and ultimately loss of life. This item and performs a critical function on the aircraft egress system and special equipment is required for its manufacture and testing. Special care and attention is required but not limited to finish, processing, assembly, performance, and part interchangeability of this item.

2. The prospective bidder must interpret engineering drawings and specifications and conduct the execution of the qualification requirements specified herein to verify the structural and functional integrity and/or form, fit, and function of the item being procured.

3. Failure to procure this item from a fully qualified source could result in failure of the part, degradation of aircraft mission capability, or loss of aircraft and crew.

4. Completion of the specified pre-contract award qualification requirements, will ensure the government that the prospective offeror is technically capable of producing the item in compliance with the applicable technical specifications and associated drawings and within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. To protect the interests of the Air Force, only United States and Canada suppliers will be considered. There are sufficient technical and schedule risks, which can only be minimized by completion of the requirements prior to contract award.

Section C: Qualification Requirements That Must be Satisfied to Become a Qualified Source and Qualification Waiver Requirements.

1. Prequalification Notice. The offeror shall notify AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in AFLCMC/EBHKB of intent to qualify as a source for this item.

2. Facilities. The offeror must certify to the design control activity (AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT) that they have the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, and package the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

3. Data Verification. A complete data package, qualification test procedure per DI-NDTI- 80604, and a qualification test report per DI-NDTI-80604 shall be provided through the AFLCMC/EBHKB contracting office to the AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT. Qualification testing must be accomplished in accordance with specification 32-72317-23.

4. Process Verification. The offeror shall identify sources for materials and standards for internally used processes. The offeror shall further define/provide written procedures for the utilization of any special test or inspection facilities and/or equipment. This documentation shall also include a diagnostic procedure showing the process the items being produced would undergo. The production process shall show how the offeror shall test, inspect, diagnose, produce and perform a final functional checkout. Development of special test procedures not available from the government is required. The offeror shall develop those procedures for review and approval by the design control activity identified in paragraph 2 above. The contractor must be capable of locating alternative components to minimize any diminishing manufacturing sources (DMS) problems. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed in the CAD/PAD Marking Instruction version 1.1. Given this item is a safety critical item the offeror must provide evidence in their management process that they will manage the CSI and all of the critical characteristics.

5. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification. The offeror shall submit to the design control activity an explanation of how they will certify that the test methods and production procedures meet the specifications for the item. The government retains the option to inspect the offeror’s production and testing facilities. To allow for government inspection, the offeror’s facilities shall be made available to government inspection during the qualification effort upon 10 days written notice.

6. Qualification Article. Upon satisfactory compliance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5 above, the offeror shall build and test the item in accordance with 32-72317-23 (latest revision) to demonstrate production capability, form and function and also provide an inert Initiator to demonstrate proper fit. This production and testing shall be done at the offeror’s expense.

7. Sensitive Military Technology. Not applicable.

8. Testing and Production Evaluation. The offeror shall be required to submit a complete test report for the production capability demonstration verifying compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements, including top level drawing and all related item and source control drawings. In addition the test report shall contain detailed documentation describing the testing procedures during production.

This data shall describe in detail the point(s) in the production process that testing occurred, and if failures were noted, the corrective action taken and the results of the retest. The government retains the option to inspect the production and testing process, including on-site witnessing of any or all production and testing activities. The offeror is responsible and liable for ensuring compliance with all applicable system and item requirements. The offeror will provide notification to the government of testing and evaluation 30 days in advance so the government can witness, if desired, as well as coordinate needed activities, support, etc.

9. Time Completion Estimate. The design control activity estimates completion of qualification efforts should require 360 days. This is based on complexity and hazards associated with the item and other factors. This is not a deadline but a notification to a potential offeror of the time believed to be required. Events that occur during the qualification process may increase or perhaps decrease, this time depending on individual circumstances.

10. Time Limitation. An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered, an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer and cognizant engineering activity that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the contractor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standard specified in this source qualification statement.

11. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified. The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in this Justification for Qualification Requirements before the date specified for award of the contract. The government reserves the right to award a contract at the time specified for award, to a qualified source even though other sources may not have finished qualifying.

12. Waiver. Any offeror who has had previous experience in the production of the Initiator or other similar items may apply to the design control activity identified in paragraph 2 for a waiver of all or part of the above requirements. A waiver will be granted only if the design control activity can establish the qualification of the offeror from previous knowledge/interface or from written inputs from the offeror.

13. Approval. Once the qualification requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved source for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.

Approved Sources: Cage Code Vendor P/N United Technology Corp. 17610 2130300-1 Chemring Energetic Devices 93455 6124100

Section D: Signatures.

8/8/2013

X Quinn Tidwell AFLCMC/EBHJ Project Engineer Signed by: TIDWELL.QUINN.RAY.1241451913

David B. Monk AFLCMC/EBHJ Chief Engineer

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Section A: Item Identification

1. Stock Number (NSN): 1377-01-414-8933ES

2. Part Number (P/N): 32-72317-21 Contractor Part Number(s): 21301900-2, 6121100

1. The Initiator is a critical safety item (CSI). Characteristics associated with the manufacture of the Initiator, if not correct, would result in aircrew inability to egress the aircraft in emergency situations and ultimately loss of life. This item and performs a critical function on the aircraft egress system and special equipment is required for its manufacture and testing. Special care and attention is required but not limited to finish, processing, assembly, performance, and part interchangeability of this item.

2. The prospective bidder must interpret engineering drawings and specifications and conduct the execution of the qualification requirements specified herein to verify the structural and functional integrity and/or form, fit, and function of the item being procured.

3. Failure to procure this item from a fully qualified source could result in failure of the part, degradation of aircraft mission capability, or loss of aircraft and crew.

4. Completion of the specified pre-contract award qualification requirements, will ensure the government that the prospective offeror is technically capable of producing the item in compliance with the applicable technical specifications and associated drawings and within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. To protect the interests of the Air Force, only United States and Canada suppliers will be considered. There are sufficient as a source for this item.

2. Facilities. The offeror must certify to the design control activity (AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT) that they have the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, and package the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

3. Data Verification. A complete data package, qualification test procedure per DI-NDTI- 80604, and a qualification test report per DI-NDTI-80604 shall be provided through the AFLCMC/EBHKB contracting office to the AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT. Qualification testing must be accomplished in accordance with specification 32-72317-21.

4. Process Verification. The offeror shall identify sources for materials and standards for internally used processes. The offeror shall further define/provide written procedures for the utilization of any special test or inspection facilities and/or equipment. This documentation shall also include a diagnostic procedure showing the process the items being produced would undergo. The production process shall show how the offeror shall test, inspect, diagnose, produce and perform a final functional checkout. Development of special test procedures not available from the government is required. The offeror shall develop those procedures for review and approval by the design control activity identified in paragraph 2 above. The contractor must be capable of locating alternative components to minimize any diminishing manufacturing sources (DMS) problems. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed in the CAD/PAD Marking Instruction version 1.1. Given this item is a safety critical item the offeror must provide evidence in their management process that they will manage the CSI and all of the critical characteristics.

5. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification. The offeror shall submit to the design control activity an explanation of how they will certify that the test methods and production procedures meet the specifications for the item. The government retains the option to inspect the offeror’s production and testing facilities. To allow for government inspection, the offeror’s facilities shall be made available to government inspection during the qualification effort upon 10 days written notice.

6. Qualification Article. Upon satisfactory compliance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5 above, the offeror shall build and test the item in accordance with 32-72317-21 (latest revision) to demonstrate production capability, form and function and also provide an inert test report for the production capability demonstration verifying compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements, including top level drawing and all related item and source control drawings. In addition the test report shall contain detailed documentation describing the testing procedures during production.

This data shall describe in detail the point(s) in the production process that testing occurred, and if failures were noted, the corrective action taken and the results of the retest. The government retains the option to inspect the production and testing process, including on-site witnessing of any or all production and testing activities. The offeror is responsible and liable for ensuring compliance with all applicable system and item requirements. The offeror will provide notification to the government of testing and evaluation 30 days in advance so the government can witness, if desired, as well as coordinate needed activities, support, etc.

9. Time Completion Estimate. The design control activity estimates completion of qualification efforts should require 360 days. This is based on complexity and hazards associated with the item and other factors. This is not a deadline but a notification to a potential offeror of the time believed to be required. Events that occur during the qualification process may increase or perhaps decrease, this time depending on individual circumstances.

10. Time Limitation. An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered, an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer and cognizant engineering activity that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the contractor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standard specified in this source qualification statement.

11. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified. The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in this Justification for Qualification Requirements before the date specified for award of the contract. The government reserves the right to award a waiver of all or part of the above requirements. A waiver will be granted only if the design control activity can establish the qualification of the offeror from previous knowledge/interface or from written inputs from the offeror.

13. Approval. Once the qualification requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an

United Technology Corp. 17610 21301900-1 Chemring Energetic Devices 93455 6121100

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Section A: Item Identification

1. Stock Number (NSN): 1377-01-425-0548ES

2. Part Number (P/N): 32-72317-23 Contractor Part Number(s): 2130300-1, 6124100

1. The Initiator is a critical safety item (CSI). Characteristics associated with the manufacture of the Initiator, if not correct, would result in aircrew inability to egress the aircraft in emergency situations and ultimately loss of life. This item and performs a critical function on the aircraft egress system and special equipment is required for its manufacture and testing. Special care and attention is required but not limited to finish, processing, assembly, performance, and part interchangeability of this item.

2. The prospective bidder must interpret engineering drawings and specifications and conduct the execution of the qualification requirements specified herein to verify the structural and functional integrity and/or form, fit, and function of the item being procured.

3. Failure to procure this item from a fully qualified source could result in failure of the part, degradation of aircraft mission capability, or loss of aircraft and crew.

4. Completion of the specified pre-contract award qualification requirements, will ensure the government that the prospective offeror is technically capable of producing the item in compliance with the applicable technical specifications and associated drawings and within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. To protect the interests of the Air Force, only United States and Canada suppliers will be considered. There are sufficient as a source for this item.

2. Facilities. The offeror must certify to the design control activity (AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT) that they have the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, and package the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

3. Data Verification. A complete data package, qualification test procedure per DI-NDTI- 80604, and a qualification test report per DI-NDTI-80604 shall be provided through the AFLCMC/EBHKB contracting office to the AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT. Qualification testing must be accomplished in accordance with specification 32-72317-23.

4. Process Verification. The offeror shall identify sources for materials and standards for internally used processes. The offeror shall further define/provide written procedures for the utilization of any special test or inspection facilities and/or equipment. This documentation shall also include a diagnostic procedure showing the process the items being produced would undergo. The production process shall show how the offeror shall test, inspect, diagnose, produce and perform a final functional checkout. Development of special test procedures not available from the government is required. The offeror shall develop those procedures for review and approval by the design control activity identified in paragraph 2 above. The contractor must be capable of locating alternative components to minimize any diminishing manufacturing sources (DMS) problems. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed in the CAD/PAD Marking Instruction version 1.1. Given this item is a safety critical item the offeror must provide evidence in their management process that they will manage the CSI and all of the critical characteristics.

5. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification. The offeror shall submit to the design control activity an explanation of how they will certify that the test methods and production procedures meet the specifications for the item. The government retains the option to inspect the offeror’s production and testing facilities. To allow for government inspection, the offeror’s facilities shall be made available to government inspection during the qualification effort upon 10 days written notice.

6. Qualification Article. Upon satisfactory compliance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5 above, the offeror shall build and test the item in accordance with 32-72317-23 (latest revision) to demonstrate production capability, form and function and also provide an inert test report for the production capability demonstration verifying compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements, including top level drawing and all related item and source control drawings. In addition the test report shall contain detailed documentation describing the testing procedures during production.

This data shall describe in detail the point(s) in the production process that testing occurred, and if failures were noted, the corrective action taken and the results of the retest. The government retains the option to inspect the production and testing process, including on-site witnessing of any or all production and testing activities. The offeror is responsible and liable for ensuring compliance with all applicable system and item requirements. The offeror will provide notification to the government of testing and evaluation 30 days in advance so the government can witness, if desired, as well as coordinate needed activities, support, etc.

9. Time Completion Estimate. The design control activity estimates completion of qualification efforts should require 360 days. This is based on complexity and hazards associated with the item and other factors. This is not a deadline but a notification to a potential offeror of the time believed to be required. Events that occur during the qualification process may increase or perhaps decrease, this time depending on individual circumstances.

10. Time Limitation. An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered, an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer and cognizant engineering activity that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the contractor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standard specified in this source qualification statement.

11. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified. The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in this Justification for Qualification Requirements before the date specified for award of the contract. The government reserves the right to award a waiver of all or part of the above requirements. A waiver will be granted only if the design control activity can establish the qualification of the offeror from previous knowledge/interface or from written inputs from the offeror.

13. Approval. Once the qualification requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an

United Technology Corp. 17610 2130300-1 Chemring Energetic Devices 93455 6124100

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Section A: Item Identification

CAD/PAD Item Marking Instruction, V 1.5

CAD/PAD Item Marking Instruction

Prepared By CAD/PAD Joint Program Office

NSWC IHEODTD and AFLCMC/EBHJ

Version 1.5 Dated 01 May 2019

1.

Purpose

Table of Contents

2. Scope Page 5

3. Marking Requirements Page 6

4. Placement of UID Markings Page 8

5. Items delivered in kit format Page 9

6. Waivers Page 9

References

NOTE: Use latest revision of all reference documents.

1. MIL-STD-130 Department of Defense Standard Practice Identification Marking of U.S.

Military Property

2. MIL- STD-1168 (current revision) Ammunition Lot Numbering and Ammunition Data Card

(Note section 3.1 for new lot assignment for “remanufactured CAD/PAD Components”)

3. ISO/IEC 16022 Information technology - Automatic identification and data capture techniques - Data Matrix bar code symbology specification

4. ISO/IEC 15434 Information technology - Automatic identification and data capture techniques - Syntax for high capacity ADC media

5. ISO/IEC 15418 Information technology - Automatic identification and data capture techniques - GS1 Application Identifiers and ASC MH10 Data Identifiers and maintenance

6. UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION POLICY AND

TECHNOLOGY Department of Defense Guide to Uniquely Identifying Items version 1.6 (this document is available on line at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/index.html or from Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Room 3E1044, Washington, DC 20301-3060)

7. DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENT 252.211-7003

Item Identification and Valuation (Copies of this document are available on line at http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ or from the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954)

8. AFSCM 21-556 Vol. 2 Julian Date format

9. ANS MH10.8.2 - 2006 Data Application Identifier Standard

10. –ISO 28219 Labeling and Direct Product Marking with Linear Bar Code and Two- Dimensional Symbols http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/index.html http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Figures

1. Determining IUID requirement

2. Sample UID Data Stream

3. Sample CAD/PAD Data Plate/Label

4. Sample of Etched Data

5. Sample CAD/PAD Small Item Data Plate/Label

1. Purpose.

The Under Secretary of Defense has implemented policy requiring DoD components meeting the requirements identified in Figure 1 to be marked with Item Unique Identifiers (IUID). Cartridge Actuated Devices and Propellant Actuated Devices (CAD/PAD) items, regardless of dollar value, are typically serially managed in aircraft maintenance data systems and therefore are applicable to the IUID requirement.

Additionally, the Air Force Aircrew Escape System Executive Working Group (AESEWG) and the egress system maintenance community has requested that CAD/PAD items be marked with Data Matrix ECC 200 on item data plates or items to enhance accuracy of aircraft maintenance data.

In accordance with MIL-STD-130, this marking instruction identifies marking requirements that meet the above objectives by tailoring Unique Identification (UID) requirements to include aircraft maintenance data requirements for both free text Human Readable Information (HRI) and Machine Readable Information (MRI), which are both mandated requirements for CAD/PAD items.

Figure 1. Determining UID Requirement

2. SCOPE.

This instruction identifies marking requirements applicable to suppliers/manufacturers of CAD/PAD components. It is applicable to both production of new CAD/PAD components and remanufacture of service returned, over-aged components. It identifies marking methods applicable to the various sizes and shapes of CAD/PAD components.

As of this writing, guidance regarding mandated transfer of data to the IUID registry can be found at “http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/index.html”. Go to Training and Communication link, select IUID Toolkit (www.IUIDtoolkit.com), and select “Defense Suppliers”, then under “Submit”, select subsection “Registration of IUID Data11”, under Support Tools select “Data Submission”.

http://www.iuidtoolkit.com/

3. Marking Requirements.

Both Human Readable Information (HRI) and Machine Readable Information (MRI) are required (see section 4). In accordance with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), DoD has mandated the use of Data Matrix ECC 200 as the standard format for UID MRI markings. Guidance for the construct and application of Data Matrix markings is contained in MIL-STD-130 and the DoD UID Guide located at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/index.html, select Guides link.

3. 1. HRI Marking Requirements. The following HRI data is required (as a minimum):

- Item Nomenclature; Per applicable manufacturer drawing

- Manufacturer’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE); Five (5) alpha/numeric characters.

- Item Lot Number; Lot numbers shall be assigned IAW MIL-STD-1168 (current revision), unless otherwise directed. A new lot number and serial number shall also be assigned for “remanufactured” CAD/PAD components as opposed to adding a suffix to the original lot number for a “rework, overhaul or renovation” effort.

NOTE: The requirement for unique lot number has been deleted.

DOM is NOT required if the lot number contains the DOM as identified in MIL-STD-1168

- Item Serial Number; Serial number shall be up to eight (8) numeric characters.

The serial numbers shall be sequentially assigned and shall not be repeated until serial number 99,999,999 has been reached.

- Item manufacturer’s Part Number

NOTE: The weapon system Specification Number does not meet this requirement

- Optional markings: Additional markings (such as manufacturer’s name, logo, contract number) are acceptable, provided that space is available on the item/data label. Date of Manufacture (DOM); DOM shall be MM/YYYY and be the same date that is coded into the lot number.

NOTE: Markings and/or attachments shall make no reference to item installation requirements/procedures or shelf/service lives

S S S S S o

3.2. MRI Data Construct.

Data Matrix ECC200 markings shall be developed based on UID Data Construct #2 using Data Identifiers (DIs) in accordance with MIL-STD-130 and the DoD UID Guide (see Figure 2). To facilitate durability throughout the scanning life cycle, the largest symbol size, including quiet zone, shall be fitted within the available marking real estate. The symbol’s internal module (cell) sizes shall be no smaller than 0.0075 inch (0.19 mm) and no larger than 0.025 inch (0.64 mm). Marks shall contain only the data elements identified below:

NOTE: The actual UII will be comprised of CAGE, Part Number, and Serial Number data. The parenthesis surrounding the Data Identifiers are NOT encoded in the 2D symbol

(17V) Manufacturer’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, 5 alpha/numeric characters

- (1P) Manufacturer’s Item Part Number, 18 alpha/numeric characters maximum

NOTE: The weapon system specification numbers do not meet this requirement

- (S) Item Serial Number, IAW HRI requirement, up to eight (8) numeric characters

- (30T) Item production Lot Number, IAW HRI requirement, 15 alpha/numeric characters maximum

NOTE: The data identifier for Lot Number has been changed from 1T to 30T

- (4D) Date of Manufacture (DOM), in Julian Date format, five (5) numeric characters:

Example: 08151 = 31 May 2008

The first two positions are the last two digits of the year, the last three positions are the Julian Date (001 through 366)

[)> R 06 G 17V 12345 G 1P 123456789-ABCDEFGH G S 12345678 G 30T ABC06D123-001 G 4D 08151 R E

Figure 2. Sample UID Data Stream

S S T

4. Placement of UID Marking. CAD/PAD items vary considerably in size and shape. A large percentage of these items are currently marked with HRI printed on data plates or labels permanently affixed to the item. The preferred method for incorporating the UID required MRI is to include it on the current data plate/label and, wherever possible, the supplier is to incorporate this concept. The following identifies known variations in marking and preferred MRI incorporation methods.

Note: Unless specifically identified as a requirement in the procurement contract, subcomponents of the End Item Assembly shall not be UID marked.

4.1. CAD/PAD Items Currently Marked with Data Plates, Labels, or Flag-Tags. The data plates/labels for these items shall be modified/arranged to allow space for the MRI per paragraph 3.2. Marking shall comply with MIL-STD-130 and the DoD UID Guide (see figure 3).

Figure 3. Sample Data Plate/Label

4.2. CAD/PAD Items Currently Marked With Ink or Laser Etching Directly on the Item.

Item marking shall be modified/arranged to allow space for the incorporation of ink or laser etched MRI per paragraph 3.2. Marking shall comply with MIL-STD-130 and the DoD UID Guide (see figure 4).

CAD/PAD Builder Inc.

Acft Explosive Component Noun

CAGE: 12345

P/N: 123456789-1234

Ser No: 0001 Lot No: ABC08D001-001

DOM: 04/2008

Figure 4. Sample of Etched Data

CAD/PAD Builder Inc.

Acft Explosive Component Noun

CAGE: 12345

P/N: 123456789-1234 Ser No: 0001

4.3. CAD/PAD Items Considered to be Too Small for HRI and MRI. These items shall be physically marked using currently approved methods for HRI. A self-adhesive label shall be supplied in the item inner packaging that includes the minimum HRI (per paragraph 3.1) and the MRI Data Matrix marking (per paragraph 3.2). The label shall be as small as possible (meeting MIL-STD-130 requirements for HRI) and will include only the minimum required data (see figure 5).

Figure 5. Sample Small Item Data Plate/Label

Note: This will allow the maintainer to scan the MRI from the label and the ability to affix it to the next higher assembly.

5. Kit Marking Requirements. Individual components procured and delivered in a “kit” or “ship-set” format shall each be marked with HRI and MRI as identified in sections 3 and 4.

The kit containers shall also be marked with HRI and MRI per sections 3 and 4.

Note: Individual components supplied in kits or ship-sets require unique item identifiers. Their markings shall not reflect those identifying the kit or ship-set.

5.1 Only the “kit “or “ship-set” will require data submission into the UID Registry. Data submission for individual components in a kit is not required, as these components were not individually priced as line items when placed on contract.

Note: To meet UID requirements, each kit will be assigned an individual serial number. Kits that are comprised of multiple containers will all be marked with the same serial number.

5.2 “Kits” or “ship sets” will typically be assigned lot numbers coinciding with the oldest individual component in the kit.

6. JSF F-35 Instructions. The marking instructions for F-35 components, labels, and packaging, shall be as outlined in this document. Additionally, contractors are required to submit an Electronic Equipment Logbook (EEL) for all serial numbers delivered to the Government. When submitting EELs, the lot number is limited to 10 characters and shall only include the year of production, month of production, interfix number, and sequence number with no dashes. Use of these nine characters will allow for an optional lot suffix as

Acft Explosive Item Noun

CAGE: 12345

P/N: 123456789-1234 Ser No: 0001 deemed necessary by procuring agency. The lot number identified on the Ammo Data Card (ADC) shall match the lot number used on the components and shall be generated

IAW MIL-STD-1168.

7. Waivers. Waivers to the UID requirement are not allowed. Requests for waivers to marking methods outlined in this instruction may be considered. Submit requests through appropriate contracting channels.

CAD/PAD Item

Dated 01 May 2019

Figures

1. Purpose.

2. SCOPE.

3. Marking Requirements.

Example: 08151 = 31 May 2008

Figure 2. Sample UID Data Stream

Figure 3. Sample Data Plate/Label

Figure 4. Sample of Etched Data

Figure 5. Sample Small Item Data Plate/Label

REPSHIP Data Requirements for Individual Shipments of Hazardous Material (HAZMAT) and Inert

Component Parts - Continental United States (CONUS) to CONUS, CONUS to Overseas or From All

Overseas Locations

FROM: Shipping Activity

To: Domestic Customer or Transshipping Activity Clearance Authority (Ocean) or Customer Service

Branch (CSB) (Air) or CONUS Sea Terminal

INFO: GACP TRANSPORTATION, HILL AFB UT - (AFLCMC / EBHMB)

email: ooalc.gacp.transportation@us.af.mil or FAX (801) 777-1089.

INFO: Sponsoring Service Accountable Supply Activity Ultimate Consignee/ Final Destination

SUBJ: Report of Shipment (REPSHIP)

1. Shipment Date written as a three-digit day of the year (Julian)

2. Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) written as a three-digit day of the year (Julian) (Observe Standard Transit

Time (STT), if CONUS Truck Shipment and no Required Delivery Date (RDD) identified)

3. Required Delivery Date (RDD) or Delivery Date (DD), if specified

4. Carrier

5. Bill of Lading (BL) Number (Notes 1, 2, 3, 4)

6. Military Traffic Expediting-Greater Security (MTX-GS) Service Number (Notes 1, 2, 3)

7. Air Release Number (Notes 1, 2, 3) or for Surface Shipments, Export Traffic Release (ETR) Number and

Vessel Name and/or Voyage Document Number

8. Shipment (Cargo) Name (Example: Bombs)

9. Container and Seal Number (if applicable):

a. Container Transportation Control Number (TCN)

b. Total Weight of Contents

c. Rounds, Pieces, Weight, Cube, Condition code, and Lot Numbers (Note 4)

10. Security Risk Category (SRC), (E.G., Security Risk Category I, II, III, IV, Unclassified, Confidential, Secret, None)

11. Controlled Item Inventory Code (CIIC)

12. Total Net Explosive Weight (NEW)

13. Hazard Classification (s)

14. Department of Defense Identification Code / Navy Ammunition Logistic Code (DODIC/NALC). (Note 4).

15. Name, address, and phone number of person responsible for information contained in REPSHIP

NOTES:

1. When the conveyance contains more than one shipment unit, repeat the data elements in separately lettered paragraphs for each shipment unit.

2. Cargo for more than one vessel or flight, but shipped to Port of Embarkation (POE) in a single conveyance, is included in a single REPSHIP. When cargo for a single vessel is moved to the Seaport of Embarkation (SPOE) in more than one conveyance, repeat all the data elements as above in separate numbered paragraphs for each conveyance or REPSHIP.

3. A separate REPSHIP is used for each mode of shipment to the POE.

4. Lot number, DODIC and NALC are not mandatory fields. If available, they may be provided in the electronic

RESHIP or in the template above. If a CBL is used, the lot number and ammunition condition code should be included in the remarks section. Weapons must be identified on the CBL by each serial number contained within the shipment.

5. DODIC and NALC are codes used specifically for logistic administration and control of ammunition.

Attachment 1 mailto:ooalc.gacp.transportation@us.af.mil

Contractor Name

CAGE code

PR No. FD2020-

Date Contract Awarded

Final Delivery Date (FDD)

Program Name

DODIC

Part Number

The contractor, at a minimum, shall allow DCMA to inspect the following points:

Mandatory - M: Stamp and/ or Signature on original documentation (i.e., Mfg. Planning, ATP, FAT Report, etc.)

Witness - W: GSI required to attend per comment section.

Verification - V: Stamp and/or Signature required unless noted otherwise (may be done by written verification) Monitor - R: Will monitor testing, may reduce to verification per comment section.

Notify - N: By phone or email prior to action.

Additional requirements: (DCMA reserves the right to impose additional inspection points as deemed necessary.)

Prepared by:

Date

THIS PLANNING SHEET WILL BE UPDATED IF NECESSARY.

QUALITY ASSURANCE LETTER OF INSTRUCTION

Planning Requirements

COMMENTS

NOTICE

Engineer Signature

Rev Date: 5 May 2019

Sheet1

Text46: 17 JUN 2020

2020-06-17T09:45:37-0600

TIDWELL.QUINN.RAY.1241451913

undefined_9: N

Text32: 9. Additional Requirements undefined_8: M

Text31: 8. Shippers (DD250, Reports) undefined_7: M

Text30: 7. AMMO Data Card Review undefined_6: V

Text29: 6. Preparation for Shipment undefined_5: W

Text28: 5. LAT undefined_4: V

Text27: 4. LAT Sample Selection undefined_3: V

Text26: 3. X-Ray/N-Ray undefined_2: V

Text25: 2. Leak Test undefined: V

Text36: 1. Explosive Weight

2. Verify gross leak and fine leak check are performed.

3. Ensure film labeling correct. Ensure radiographic film is readable and well-defined. DCMA is not required to interpret film.

4. Randomly select LAT units per latest government approved ATP.

5. Testing should occur in accordance with latest government approved ATP. Prior to LAT ensure proper calibration and validation of all test equipment. Witness proper test setup and at least the first 3 functional tests. Further witnessing may be required if there are known concerns with the item or requested by Government Engineer.

6. Ensure Paperwork is correct.

7. Verify all energetic materials: list original manufacturer,original lot number, and latest certification/recertification date < 24 months.

8. Ensure Paperwork is correct. Verify Packaging, Packing, Preservation & Marking (PPP&M)

9. Any additional requirements imposed by DCMA shall be approved by Government Project Engineer

Text24: 1.Inspection

Part Number: 3123900-6, 6123100, 3123900-5, 6122100

DODIC: MT15, MU84, MT14, MU87

Text20:

Text19:

Part Number Line 2:

Contract No: 21-50126, 21-50127

Date Contract Awarded:

Final Delivery Date FDD:

Program Name: F-15

Mandatory - M: Stamp and/ or Signature on original documentation (i.e., Mfg. Planning, ATP, FAT Report, etc.)

Verification - V: Stamp and/or Signature required unless noted otherwise (may be done by written verification)

Additional requirements: (DCMA reserves the right to impose additional inspection points as deemed necessary.)

Sheet1

Text46: 17 JUN 2020

2020-06-17T09:42:17-0600

TIDWELL.QUINN.RAY.1241451913

undefined_9: N

Text32: 9. Additional Requirements undefined_8: M

Text31: 8. Shippers (DD250, Reports) undefined_7: M

Text30: 7. AMMO Data Card Review undefined_6: V

Text29: 6. Preparation for Shipment undefined_5: W

Text28: 5. LAT undefined_4: V

Text27: 4. LAT Sample Selection undefined_3: V

Text26: 3. X-Ray/N-Ray undefined_2: V

Text25: 2. Leak Test undefined: V

Text36: 1. Explosive Weight

2. Verify gross leak and fine leak check are performed.

3. Ensure film labeling correct. Ensure radiographic film is readable and well-defined. DCMA is not required to interpret film.

4. Randomly select LAT units per latest government approved ATP.

5. Testing should occur in accordance with latest government approved ATP. Prior to LAT ensure proper calibration and validation of all test equipment. Witness proper test setup and at least the first 3 functional tests. Further witnessing may be required if there are known concerns with the item or requested by Government Engineer.

6. Ensure Paperwork is correct.

7. Verify all energetic materials: list original manufacturer,original lot number, and latest certification/recertification date < 24 months.

8. Ensure Paperwork is correct. Verify Packaging, Packing, Preservation & Marking (PPP&M)

9. Any additional requirements imposed by DCMA shall be approved by Government Project Engineer

Text24: 1.Inspection

Part Number: 6028200, 2271500-1

DODIC: MH64, MC61

Text20:

Text19:

Part Number Line 2:

Contract No: 21-50126, 21-50127

Date Contract Awarded:

Final Delivery Date FDD:

Program Name: f-5

Mandatory - M: Stamp and/ or Signature on original documentation (i.e., Mfg. Planning, ATP, FAT Report, etc.)

Verification - V: Stamp and/or Signature required unless noted otherwise (may be done by written verification)

Additional requirements: (DCMA reserves the right to impose additional inspection points as deemed necessary.)

Sheet1

Text46: 17 JUN 2020

2020-06-17T09:51:22-0600

TIDWELL.QUINN.RAY.1241451913

undefined_9: N

Text32: 9. Additional Requirements undefined_8: M

Text31: 8. Shippers (DD250, Reports) undefined_7: M

Text30: 7. AMMO Data Card Review undefined_6: V

Text29: 6. Preparation for Shipment undefined_5: W

Text28: 5. LAT undefined_4: V

Text27: 4. LAT Sample Selection undefined_3: V

Text26: 3. X-Ray/N-Ray undefined_2: V

Text25: 2. Leak Test undefined: V

Text36: 1. Explosive Weight

2. Verify gross leak and fine leak check are performed.

3. Ensure film labeling correct. Ensure radiographic film is readable and well-defined. DCMA is not required to interpret film.

4. Randomly select LAT units per latest government approved ATP.

5. Testing should occur in accordance with latest government approved ATP. Prior to LAT ensure proper calibration and validation of all test equipment. Witness proper test setup and at least the first 3 functional tests. Further witnessing may be required if there are known concerns with the item or requested by Government Engineer.

6. Ensure Paperwork is correct.

7. Verify all energetic materials: list original manufacturer,original lot number, and latest certification/recertification date < 24 months.

8. Ensure Paperwork is correct. Verify Packaging, Packing, Preservation & Marking (PPP&M)

9. Any additional requirements imposed by DCMA shall be approved by Government Project Engineer

Text24: 1.Inspection

Part Number: 2130300-1, 6124100, 21301900-2, 6121100

DODIC: M720, M679, MU78

Text20:

Text19:

Part Number Line 2:

Contract No: 21-50126, 21-50127

Date Contract Awarded:

Final Delivery Date FDD:

Program Name: F-15

1. Stock Number (NSN): 1377-00-299-1512ES

2. Part Number (P/N): 68-710065-105 Contractor Part Number(s): 2271500-1

3. Noun: Canopy Actuated Initiator

1. The Initiator is a critical safety item (CSI). Characteristics associated with the manufacture of the Initiator, if not correct, would result in aircrew inability to egress the aircraft in emergency situations and ultimately loss of life. This item and performs a critical function on the aircraft egress system and special equipment is required for its manufacture and testing. Special care and attention is required but not limited to finish, processing, assembly, performance, and part interchangeability of this item.

2. The prospective bidder must interpret engineering drawings and specifications and conduct the execution of the qualification requirements specified herein to verify the structural and functional integrity and/or form, fit, and function of the item being procured.

3. Failure to procure this item from a fully qualified source could result in failure of the part, degradation of aircraft mission capability, or loss of aircraft and crew.

4. Completion of the specified pre-contract award qualification requirements, will ensure the government that the prospective offeror is technically capable of producing the item in compliance with the applicable technical specifications and associated drawings and within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. To protect the interests of the Air Force, only United States and Canada suppliers will be considered. There are sufficient as a source for this item.

2. Facilities. The offeror must certify to the design control activity (AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT) that they have the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, and package the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

3. Data Verification. A complete data package, qualification test procedure per DI-NDTI- 80604, and a qualification test report per DI-NDTI-80604 shall be provided through the AFLCMC/EBHKB contracting office to the AFLCMC/EBHJ CAD/PAD IPT. Qualification testing must be accomplished in accordance with specification 68-710065-105.

4. Process Verification. The offeror shall identify sources for materials and standards for internally used processes. The offeror shall further define/provide written procedures for the utilization of any special test or inspection facilities and/or equipment. This documentation shall also include a diagnostic procedure showing the process the items being produced would undergo. The production process shall show how the offeror shall test, inspect, diagnose, produce and perform a final functional checkout. Development of special test procedures not available from the government is required. The offeror shall develop those procedures for review and approval by the design control activity identified in paragraph 2 above. The contractor must be capable of locating alternative components to minimize any diminishing manufacturing sources (DMS) problems. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed in the CAD/PAD Marking Instruction version 1.1. Given this item is a safety critical item the offeror must provide evidence in their management process that they will manage the CSI and all of the critical characteristics.

5. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification. The offeror shall submit to the design control activity an explanation of how they will certify that the test methods and production procedures meet the specifications for the item. The government retains the option to inspect the offeror’s production and testing facilities. To allow for government inspection, the offeror’s facilities shall be made available to government inspection during the qualification effort upon 10 days written notice.

6. Qualification Article. Upon satisfactory compliance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5 above, the offeror shall build and test the item in accordance with 68-710065-105 (latest revision) to demonstrate production capability, form and function and also provide an inert test report for the production capability demonstration verifying compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements, including top level drawing and all related item and source control drawings. In addition the test report shall contain detailed documentation describing the testing procedures during production.

This data shall describe in detail the point(s) in the production process that testing occurred, and if failures were noted, the corrective action taken and the results of the retest. The government retains the option to inspect the production and testing process, including on-site witnessing of any or all production and testing activities. The offeror is responsible and liable for ensuring compliance with all applicable system and item requirements. The offeror will provide notification to the government of testing and evaluation 30 days in advance so the government can witness, if desired, as well as coordinate needed activities, support, etc.

9. Time Completion Estimate. The design control activity estimates completion of qualification efforts should require 360 days. This is based on complexity and hazards associated with the item and other factors. This is not a deadline but a notification to a potential offeror of the time believed to be required. Events that occur during the qualification process may increase or perhaps decrease, this time depending on individual circumstances.

10. Time Limitation. An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered, an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer and cognizant engineering activity that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract.