Targeted_Survey_for_Asbestos_ _Lead-In_Paint.pdf

PDF 8 MB Posted

Attached to
Repair Fuel System Maintenance Hangar, B731 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA6703-15-B-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Reserve Command

About this file

Targeted Survey for Asbestos Lead-in Paint.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair Fuel System Maintenance Hangar, B731, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA6703-15-B-0001_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
FA6703-15-B-0001-0001.doc DOC document
FA6703-15-B-00001_-_Vendor_Questions.docx DOCX document
Site_Visit _Attendees_Sign-In_Roster.pdf PDF
Attachment_2 _Repair_Hangar_B731_Drawings.pdf PDF
Attachment_1 _Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment_4 _Decision_No_GA_134_Building_Construction.pdf PDF
DARB4.pdf PDF
Solicitation_FA6703-15-B-0001.doc DOC document
Attachment_3 _Financial_Institution_Sheet.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Dobbins AFB Hangar 731 DEC Project No. 1308.001

TARGETED SURVEY

FOR ASBESTOS & LEAD-IN PAINT

DOBBINS AFB HANGAR 731

DOBBINS AIR FORCE BASE

MARIETTA, GEORGIA

Prepared for:

TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR

590 MEANS STREET NW, SUITE 200

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30318

Report Date:

September 3, 2013 (Revised October 1, 2014)

Prepared by:

DURBIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.

3461 LAWRENCEVILLE-SUWANEE ROAD, SUITE A

SUWANEE, GEORGIA 30024

(678) 482-9917

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1. INTRODUCTION 3

2. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS 3

a. Asbestos

b. Lead

c. PCBs/Fluorescent Lights

3. METHODOLOGY 6

Asbestos sampling protocol

Lead-In Paint (LBP) sampling protocol

4. OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS 8

5. RECOMMENDATIONS 9

6. REFERENCES 10

APPENDIX

A. Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and

Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials

B. Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by the Laboratory Data and Photographs of Paint

Chip Samples

1. INTRODUCTION

Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc. (DEC) was retained by Toland Mizell Molnar, to conduct a targeted hazardous material assessment for suspect asbestos containing materials and lead-in paint (LBP) at Hangar 731, Dobbins Air Force Base, Marietta, Georgia in support of the

Dobbins Repair Fuel System Hangar Project. Michael F. Durbin, CIH and Sellers C. Carmack of

Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc., conducted the hazardous material assessment on

August 21, 2013. Mr. Durbin and Mr. Carmack are currently accredited as asbestos inspectors and asbestos project designers through an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved training provider.

The Scope of Work was expanded to include the mechanical room and duct insulation inside the hangar. Therefore; a supplemental survey was performed for suspect asbestos containing materials inside the mechanical room and hangar on September 22, 2014. Michael F. Durbin, CIH and Sellers C. Carmack of Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc., conducted the supplemental survey. Mr. Durbin and Mr. Carmack are currently accredited as asbestos inspectors and asbestos project designers through an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved training provider.

Bulk sample analysis for suspect asbestos containing materials was performed by Analytical

Environmental Services, Inc., 3080 Presidential Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30340. Analytical

Environmental Services Inc. is accredited for asbestos fiber analysis through participation in the

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and is assigned NVLAP Lab Code 102082-0. Analytical

Environmental Services Inc. utilized the analytical method: EPA/600/R-93/116: "Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (polarized light microscopy in conjunction with dispersion staining).

Paint Chip Sample analysis was performed via Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) by Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES), 3080 Presidential Parkway, Atlanta, GA

30340. AES is accredited in the analysis of lead-based paint (LBP) samples via the

Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (#100671).

2. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS

a. Hangar 731 - Asbestos

The asbestos survey was conducted in general accordance with the sampling protocol established in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA

40 CFR, Part 763) for the materials included in this specific survey (roofing materials were not included as part of this survey). The following provides general information and summarizes the potential impact of asbestos containing material during the scheduled renovation project.

Bulk samples were collected from the following suspect asbestos containing materials during the

August 21, 2013) survey:

1. Black Covebase and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #1)

2. Ceramic Tile and Associated Grout (HM #2)

3. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Speckles and Pinholes (HM #3)

4. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls (HM #4)

5. 2’ X 4’ White Ceiling Tile - Pinholes (HM #5)

6. Duct Insulation – Foil Wrapped (HM #6)

7. Drywall and Joint Compound - Ceiling (HM #7)

8. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)

9. 12” X 12” White Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #9)

10. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)

11. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11)

12. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12)

13. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive (HM #13))

The following collected bulk sample materials contained asbestos by Polarized Light

Microscopy (PLM) (reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing

Materials):

1. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)

2. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)

3. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Note: Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door

Insulation could not be determined without potentially damaging the Fire Door Rating.

The doors should be assumed positive if renovation disturbs the interior insulation of the door, or alternatively bulk samples could be collected prior to disturbance.

Additional bulk samples were collected from the following suspect asbestos containing materials during the September 22, 2014, supplemental survey:

1. Duct Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #6A)

2. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11). Three additional samples were collected of this material in the Mechanical Room to confirm that this material is the same homogeneous material that was sampled in other areas of the building in August 2013.

3. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12). Five additional samples were collected of this material in the Mechanical Room to confirm that this material is the same homogeneous material that was sampled in other areas of the building in August

2013.

4. Tank Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #14)

The additional bulk sample materials (in item 1-4, above) collected on September 22, 2014, did not contain asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis. Reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative

Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials.

b. Hangar 731 - Lead

Representative paint chip samples were collected from the following locations on August 21, 2013 (Note: the data obtained during the August 21, 2013 survey was sufficient so additional paint chip samples were not necessary during the September 22, 2013 survey):

1. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Women’s Restroom (Sample # 731-PB-01)

2. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Room/Office #4 (Sample # 731-PB-02)

3. Black Paint on Metal Door Frame, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-03)

4. White/Cream Paint on Metal Stairs, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-04)

5. Grey Paint on Metal Door Frame, Paint Booth Office (Sample # 731-PB-05)

6. White Paint on Structural Steel, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-06)

7. Yellow Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-07)

8. Gray Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-08)

All of the painted surfaces sampled with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-07 (1.12% lead by weight) in Hangar 731 were less than 0.5% lead by weight via Flame Atomic Absorption

Spectroscopy. Additionally, all other painted surfaces were below the analytical reporting limit with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-03 (0.0891% lead by weight).

Note: Disturbance to any painted item/surface/component shall be done in compliance with the

OSHA Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-

Based Paint Guide Specifications. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The

Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.

Refer to Appendix B for the Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by Laboratory Data and

Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples.

c. Hangar 731 – PCBs/Fluorescent Lights

The construction date of Hangar 731 at Dobbin Air Force Base is 1982 for the hangar and administration area and 1990 for the paint booth area. All ballasts installed or manufactured prior to 1978, should be assumed to contain PCBs unless specifically labeled as having no PCBs or PCB Free.

Additionally, the fluorescent lights and high intensity discharge bulbs (HID) should be assumed to contain mercury.

All known or assumed PCB ballasts should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and

Use Prohibitions.

All mercury vapor light fixtures should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 273

Standards for Universal Waste Management.

3. METHODOLOGY

Asbestos Sampling Protocol

The inspector sampled all suspect ACM in accessible areas. In order for a group of homogeneous materials to be considered as non asbestos containing, all samples from that specific homogeneous material must be analyzed and determined to be non asbestos containing or less than or equal to 1% asbestos.

Representative, randomly selected samples were collected from each homogeneous area of suspect asbestos-containing material. For purposes of this report, the homogeneous area is physically defined as all material with the same visual appearance, texture and hardness.

Material types followed by NOT APPLICABLE were not identified during this asbestos survey.

The minimum number of samples collected for each homogeneous area (or material) is as follows:

1. Friable Spray-applied or Trowel-applied Material (Not Applicable)

a. Less than or equal to 1000 square feet (S.F.) = 3 samples

b. Greater than 1000 S.F. and less than or equal to 5000 S.F. = 5 samples.

c. Greater than 5000 S. F. = 7 samples

2. Pipe and Duct Insulation

Three samples per homogeneous area of insulation were taken unless it was a confirmation sample.

3. Elbows, Valves, Fittings and Connection Mud

Three representative samples were taken from each representative type of insulated elbow, valve, fitting and connecting mud unless it was a confirmation sample.

4. Boiler, Tanks and Furnaces

A minimum of 3 samples per unit was collected.

5. Patchwork (NOT APPLICABLE)

Patchwork is defined as a patch or repair to existing material based on the following quantities:

a. Surfacing material patches are limited to a maximum of 6 S. F.

b. Pipe and duct insulation patches are limited to a maximum of 6 L. F. or 6

S. F.

c. Boiler, tanks and furnace patches are limited to 6 S.F. maximum.

If the patchwork exceeded the limits prescribed above, the sampling protocol resorted back to the homogeneous area descriptions in items 1-4. If a material qualifies as patchwork, a single sample was collected per patch.

6. Ceiling or Acoustical Tile

a. Minimum of 2 Samples

7. Miscellaneous Friable Material (INCLUDED DRYWALL & JOINT

COMPOUND)

a. 3 Samples

8. Non-friable Material

Non-friable materials for purposes of this survey would include material such as floor tiles and mastic/adhesive, linoleum floor covering, interior/exterior caulks, flooring felt (if still under floor tile), roofing materials, miscellaneous cementitious material such as wall or ceiling panels, caulking or sealant, or window glazing.

a. Minimum of 2 samples

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Sampling Protocol

Paint chips containing lead concentrations at or above 0.5 percent by weight are considered positive for lead based on EPA and Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines for Target Housing and Child Occupied Facilities.

The inspector collected paint chip samples from representative surfaces and components likely to be impacted by any renovation project and compared them against the HUD definition for Lead-

Based Paint (LBP) of 0.5 % by weight. Individual sample results are presented in tabular form in Appendix B.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Construction Industry Standard for

Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead

Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.

4. OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Hangar 731 - Asbestos

The following collected bulk sample materials contained asbestos by Polarized Light

Microscopy (PLM) (reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing

Materials):

1. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)

2. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)

3. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Note: Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door

Insulation could not be determined without potentially damaging the Fire Door Rating.

The doors should be assumed positive if renovation disturbs the interior insulation of the door, or alternatively bulk samples could be collected prior to disturbance.

Hangar 731 - Lead

All of the painted surfaces sampled with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-07 (1.12% lead by weight) in Hangar 731 were less than 0.5% lead by weight via Flame Atomic Absorption

Spectroscopy. Additionally, all other painted surfaces were below the analytical reporting limit with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-03 (0.0891% lead by weight).

Note: Disturbance to any painted item/surface/component shall be done in compliance with the

OSHA Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-

Based Paint Guide Specifications. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The

Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.

Refer to Appendix B for the Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by Laboratory Data and

Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples.

Hangar 731– PCBs/Fluorescent Lights

The construction date of Hangar 731 at Dobbin Air Force Base is 1982 for the hangar and administration area and 1990 for the paint booth area. All ballasts installed or manufactured prior to 1978, should be assumed to contain PCBs unless specifically labeled as having no PCBs or PCB Free.

Additionally, the fluorescent lights and high intensity discharge bulbs (HID) should be assumed to contain mercury.

All known or assumed PCB ballasts should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and

Use Prohibitions.

All mercury vapor light fixtures should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 273

Standards for Universal Waste Management.

5. RECOMMENDATIONS

A. The asbestos containing material survey report should be maintained at the job site during performance of the construction activities.

B. Communication of this asbestos survey report results should be presented in accordance with the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 Asbestos Standard to all personnel who may enter or perform work in Building 2.

C. Disturbance of painted surfaces should be performed in accordance with the OSHA Lead

Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-Based Paint Guide Specifications.

Waste generated by disturbance of painted surfaces should be subjected to Toxicity

Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing to determine leachable lead concentrations. If leachable concentrations of lead in construction waste are determined by

TCLP testing, those materials should be disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR Part 260 to

271.

D. Remove and dispose of all PCB ballasts in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use

Prohibitions, and other applicable Federal, State and Local Regulations.

E. Remove and dispose of (or recycle) all mercury vapor light fixtures in accordance with 40

CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management and other applicable Federal, State and Local Regulations.

6. REFERENCES

1. Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings”

(Purple Book). EPA 560/5-85-024. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances

Washington, DC 20460.

2. 40 CFR, Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

3. 40 CFR, Part 763, Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act

4. 40 CFR, Part 61, Subpart M Asbestos

5. 29 CFR Part 1926.1101 Asbestos

6. 29 CFR Part 1926.62 Lead

7. HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing

(Most recent issue)

8. 40 CFR Part 260 General Hazardous Waste Management.

9. 40 CFR Part 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste.

10. 40 CFR Part 262 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste.

11. 40 CFR Part 263 Standards Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste.

12. 40 CFR Part 268 Land Disposal Restrictions.

13. 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions.

14. 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management

If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely, Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Sellers C. Carmack

Sellers C. Carmack (EPA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector, Certificate Number 14558, Expiration

Date: September 23, 2015)

Vice President

Michael F. Durbin, CIH Michael F. Durbin, CIH (EPA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner, Certificate

Number 14413, Expiration Date: May 14, 2015)

President

APPENDIX A

Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary

Followed By the Laboratory Data and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials

Sample

Number Description Asbestos

Present Friable Non-

Asbestos

Material

Present

Sample

Location

HM

731-CB1-01

Black Covebase and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive NAD N/A See Lab

Report Janitor’s

Closet

731-CB1-02

Black Covebase and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive NAD N/A See Lab

Report Room #2 1

731-CB1-03

Black Covebase and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Paint Booth

Office

731-CER1-

Ceramic Tile and

Associated Grout NAD N/A See Lab

Report Women’s

Restroom

731-CER1-

Ceramic Tile and

Associated Grout NAD N/A See Lab

Report Men’s

Restroom 2

731-CT1-01

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Speckles and

Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

Outside

Room #4 and

Room #5

731-CT1-02

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Speckles and

Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Room #5 3

731-CT1-03

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Speckles and

Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Room #4

731-CT2-01

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Janitor’s

Closet

731-CT2-02

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Janitor’s

Closet

731-CT2-03

2’ X 2’ White Ceiling

Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Janitor’s

Closet

Description Asbestos

Present Friable Non-

Asbestos

Material

Present

Sample

Location

HM

731-CT3-01

2’ X 4’ White Ceiling

Tile - Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

731-CT3-02

2’ X 4’ White Ceiling

Tile - Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Paint Booth

Office 5

731-CT3-02

2’ X 4’ White Ceiling

Tile - Pinholes

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

731-DI1-01

Duct Insulation – Foil

Wrapped

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

Outside

731-DI1-02

Duct Insulation – Foil

Wrapped

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

Outside

Room #5

731-DI1-03

Duct Insulation – Foil

Wrapped

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

Room #4

731-DI2-01

Duct Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Hangar

731-DI2-02

Duct Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Hangar 6A

731-DI2-03

Duct Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Hangar

Description Asbestos

Present Friable Non-

Asbestos

Material

Present

Sample

Location

HM

731-DWJC-

Drywall and Joint

Compound - Ceiling

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Men’s

Restroom

731-DWJC-

Drywall and Joint

Compound - Ceiling

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Room #2 7

731-DWJC-

Drywall and Joint

Compound - Ceiling

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Women’s

Restroom

731-FT1-01

12” X 12” Olive

Colored Floor Tile and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (Floor

Tile); 3%

Chrysotile

(Black

Mastic)

No See Lab

731-FT1-02

12” X 12” Olive

Colored Floor Tile and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (Floor

Tile); 3%

Chrysotile

(Black

Mastic)

No See Lab

Report Room #4 8

731-FT1-03

12” X 12” Olive Floor

Tile and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (Floor

Tile); 3%

Chrysotile

(Black

Mastic)

No See Lab

Report Room #4

731-FT2-01

12” X 12” White

Floor Tile and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD N/A

See Lab

Vestibule

731-FT2-02

12” X 12” White

Floor Tile and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report Vestibule 9

731-FT2-03

12” X 12” White

Floor Tile and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD N/A

See Lab

Vestibule

Description Asbestos

Present Friable Non-

Asbestos

Material

Present

Sample

Location

HM

731-FT3-01

12” X 12” Beige

Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (Floor

Tile); 3%

Chrysotile

(Black

Mastic)

No See Lab

Report Room #5

731-FT3-02

12” X 12” Beige

Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (Floor

Tile); 3%

Chrysotile

(Black

Mastic)

No See Lab

Report Room #2 10

731-FT3-03

12” X 12” Beige

Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and

Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive

NAD (not enough black mastic present for analysis)

No See Lab

Report

731-PF1-01

Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

731-PF1-02

with PVC Jacket and

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

731-PF1-03

with PVC Jacket and

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room

731-PF1-04

Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room, HWR

731-PF1-05

with PVC Jacket and

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room, Pipe

Going to

Tank

731-PI1-01

Paper Wrapped Pipe

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

731-PI1-02

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Corridor

Outside

Description Asbestos

Present Friable Non-

Asbestos

Material

Present

Sample

Location

HM

731-PI1-03

Paper Wrapped Pipe

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Area

731-PI1-04

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Room, HWS

731-PI1-05

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room, Cold

Water Return

731-PI1-06

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room, HWS

731-PI1-07

Paper Wrapped Pipe

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Room, HWR

731-PI1-08

Insulation with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room, Pipe

Going to

Tank

N/A Fire Doors Assumed

Positive No N/A Throughout 13

731-TI1-01

Tank Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Room

731-TI1-02

Tank Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Mechanical

Room

731-TI1-03

Tank Insulation –

Paper Wrapped with

Fiberglass

NAD N/A

See Lab

Report

Room

NAD – No Asbestos Detected; N/A – Not Applicable

Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing

Materials

1. Black Covebase and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #1) - NAD

2. Ceramic Tile and Associated Grout (HM #2) - NAD

3. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Speckles and Pinholes (HM #3) - NAD

4. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls (HM #4) - NAD

5. 2’ X 4’ White Ceiling Tile - Pinholes (HM #5) - NAD

6. Duct Insulation – Foil Wrapped (HM #6) – NAD

7. Duct Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #6A)

8. Drywall and Joint Compound - Ceiling (HM #7) - NAD

9. 12” X 12” Olive Colored Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8) –

ACM in the Black Mastic

10. 12” X 12” White Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #9) - NAD

11. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated

Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10) – ACM in the Black Mastic

12. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11) - NAD

13. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12) - NAD

14. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door

Insulation Could Not Be Determined Without Potentially Damaging the Fire Door

Rating.

15. Tank Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #14)

APPENDIX B

Paint Chip Sample Summary Table Followed by Laboratory Data and Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples

Collection

Date

Sample

Number

Description Location Analytical

Method

Percent Lead by Weight

(wt%)

08/21/2013 731-PB-01 Beige Paint Chip

Women’s

Restroom, CMU

Wall

AAS BRL

08/21/2013 731-PB-02 Beige Paint Chip Room/Office #4 AAS BRL

08/21/2013 731-PB-03 Black Paint Chip

Janitor’s Closet, Metal Door

Frame

AAS 0.0891

08/21/2013 731-PB-04

White/Cream

Paint Chip

Janitor’s Closet, Metal Stairs

AAS BRL

08/21/2013 731-PB-05 Grey Paint Chip

Paint Booth

Office, Metal

Door Frame

AAS BRL

08/21/2013 731-PB-06

White Paint

Chip

Hangar, on

Structural Steel

AAS BRL

08/21/2013 731-PB-07

Yellow Paint

Chip

Hangar, on

Concrete Floor

AAS 1.12

08/21/2013 731-PB-08 Grey Paint Chip Hangar, On

Concrete Floor

AAS BRL

BRL: Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples

1. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Women’s Restroom (Sample # 731-PB-01) - BRL

2. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Room/Office #4 (Sample # 731-PB-02) - BRL

3. Black Paint on Metal Door Frame, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-03) – 0.0891%

(lead by weight)

4. White/Cream Paint on Metal Stairs, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-04) - BRL

5. Grey Paint on Metal Door Frame, Paint Booth Office (Sample # 731-PB-05) - BRL

6. White Paint on Structural Steel, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-06) - BRL

7. Yellow Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-07) – 1.12% (lead by weight)

8. Gray Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-08) - BRL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .