Targeted_Survey_for_Asbestos_ _Lead-In_Paint.pdf
PDF 8 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Fuel System Maintenance Hangar, B731 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA6703-15-B-0001
About this file
Targeted Survey for Asbestos Lead-in Paint.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA6703-15-B-0001_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| FA6703-15-B-0001-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| FA6703-15-B-00001_-_Vendor_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Site_Visit _Attendees_Sign-In_Roster.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2 _Repair_Hangar_B731_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1 _Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4 _Decision_No_GA_134_Building_Construction.pdf | ||
| DARB4.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_FA6703-15-B-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3 _Financial_Institution_Sheet.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Dobbins AFB Hangar 731 DEC Project No. 1308.001
TARGETED SURVEY
FOR ASBESTOS & LEAD-IN PAINT
DOBBINS AFB HANGAR 731
DOBBINS AIR FORCE BASE
MARIETTA, GEORGIA
Prepared for:
TOLAND MIZELL MOLNAR
590 MEANS STREET NW, SUITE 200
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30318
Report Date:
September 3, 2013 (Revised October 1, 2014)
Prepared by:
DURBIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
3461 LAWRENCEVILLE-SUWANEE ROAD, SUITE A
SUWANEE, GEORGIA 30024
(678) 482-9917
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS 3
a. Asbestos
b. Lead
c. PCBs/Fluorescent Lights
3. METHODOLOGY 6
Asbestos sampling protocol
Lead-In Paint (LBP) sampling protocol
4. OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS 8
5. RECOMMENDATIONS 9
6. REFERENCES 10
APPENDIX
A. Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and
Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials
B. Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by the Laboratory Data and Photographs of Paint
Chip Samples
1. INTRODUCTION
Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc. (DEC) was retained by Toland Mizell Molnar, to conduct a targeted hazardous material assessment for suspect asbestos containing materials and lead-in paint (LBP) at Hangar 731, Dobbins Air Force Base, Marietta, Georgia in support of the
Dobbins Repair Fuel System Hangar Project. Michael F. Durbin, CIH and Sellers C. Carmack of
Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc., conducted the hazardous material assessment on
August 21, 2013. Mr. Durbin and Mr. Carmack are currently accredited as asbestos inspectors and asbestos project designers through an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved training provider.
The Scope of Work was expanded to include the mechanical room and duct insulation inside the hangar. Therefore; a supplemental survey was performed for suspect asbestos containing materials inside the mechanical room and hangar on September 22, 2014. Michael F. Durbin, CIH and Sellers C. Carmack of Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc., conducted the supplemental survey. Mr. Durbin and Mr. Carmack are currently accredited as asbestos inspectors and asbestos project designers through an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved training provider.
Bulk sample analysis for suspect asbestos containing materials was performed by Analytical
Environmental Services, Inc., 3080 Presidential Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30340. Analytical
Environmental Services Inc. is accredited for asbestos fiber analysis through participation in the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and is assigned NVLAP Lab Code 102082-0. Analytical
Environmental Services Inc. utilized the analytical method: EPA/600/R-93/116: "Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (polarized light microscopy in conjunction with dispersion staining).
Paint Chip Sample analysis was performed via Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) by Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES), 3080 Presidential Parkway, Atlanta, GA
30340. AES is accredited in the analysis of lead-based paint (LBP) samples via the
Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (#100671).
2. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS
a. Hangar 731 - Asbestos
The asbestos survey was conducted in general accordance with the sampling protocol established in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA
40 CFR, Part 763) for the materials included in this specific survey (roofing materials were not included as part of this survey). The following provides general information and summarizes the potential impact of asbestos containing material during the scheduled renovation project.
Bulk samples were collected from the following suspect asbestos containing materials during the
August 21, 2013) survey:
1. Black Covebase and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #1)
2. Ceramic Tile and Associated Grout (HM #2)
3. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Speckles and Pinholes (HM #3)
4. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls (HM #4)
5. 2’ X 4’ White Ceiling Tile - Pinholes (HM #5)
6. Duct Insulation – Foil Wrapped (HM #6)
7. Drywall and Joint Compound - Ceiling (HM #7)
8. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)
9. 12” X 12” White Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #9)
10. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)
11. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11)
12. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12)
13. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive (HM #13))
The following collected bulk sample materials contained asbestos by Polarized Light
Microscopy (PLM) (reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing
Materials):
1. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)
2. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)
3. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Note: Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door
Insulation could not be determined without potentially damaging the Fire Door Rating.
The doors should be assumed positive if renovation disturbs the interior insulation of the door, or alternatively bulk samples could be collected prior to disturbance.
Additional bulk samples were collected from the following suspect asbestos containing materials during the September 22, 2014, supplemental survey:
1. Duct Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #6A)
2. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11). Three additional samples were collected of this material in the Mechanical Room to confirm that this material is the same homogeneous material that was sampled in other areas of the building in August 2013.
3. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12). Five additional samples were collected of this material in the Mechanical Room to confirm that this material is the same homogeneous material that was sampled in other areas of the building in August
2013.
4. Tank Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #14)
The additional bulk sample materials (in item 1-4, above) collected on September 22, 2014, did not contain asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis. Reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative
Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials.
b. Hangar 731 - Lead
Representative paint chip samples were collected from the following locations on August 21, 2013 (Note: the data obtained during the August 21, 2013 survey was sufficient so additional paint chip samples were not necessary during the September 22, 2013 survey):
1. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Women’s Restroom (Sample # 731-PB-01)
2. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Room/Office #4 (Sample # 731-PB-02)
3. Black Paint on Metal Door Frame, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-03)
4. White/Cream Paint on Metal Stairs, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-04)
5. Grey Paint on Metal Door Frame, Paint Booth Office (Sample # 731-PB-05)
6. White Paint on Structural Steel, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-06)
7. Yellow Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-07)
8. Gray Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-08)
All of the painted surfaces sampled with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-07 (1.12% lead by weight) in Hangar 731 were less than 0.5% lead by weight via Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy. Additionally, all other painted surfaces were below the analytical reporting limit with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-03 (0.0891% lead by weight).
Note: Disturbance to any painted item/surface/component shall be done in compliance with the
OSHA Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-
Based Paint Guide Specifications. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The
Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.
Refer to Appendix B for the Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by Laboratory Data and
Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples.
c. Hangar 731 – PCBs/Fluorescent Lights
The construction date of Hangar 731 at Dobbin Air Force Base is 1982 for the hangar and administration area and 1990 for the paint booth area. All ballasts installed or manufactured prior to 1978, should be assumed to contain PCBs unless specifically labeled as having no PCBs or PCB Free.
Additionally, the fluorescent lights and high intensity discharge bulbs (HID) should be assumed to contain mercury.
All known or assumed PCB ballasts should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and
Use Prohibitions.
All mercury vapor light fixtures should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 273
Standards for Universal Waste Management.
3. METHODOLOGY
Asbestos Sampling Protocol
The inspector sampled all suspect ACM in accessible areas. In order for a group of homogeneous materials to be considered as non asbestos containing, all samples from that specific homogeneous material must be analyzed and determined to be non asbestos containing or less than or equal to 1% asbestos.
Representative, randomly selected samples were collected from each homogeneous area of suspect asbestos-containing material. For purposes of this report, the homogeneous area is physically defined as all material with the same visual appearance, texture and hardness.
Material types followed by NOT APPLICABLE were not identified during this asbestos survey.
The minimum number of samples collected for each homogeneous area (or material) is as follows:
1. Friable Spray-applied or Trowel-applied Material (Not Applicable)
a. Less than or equal to 1000 square feet (S.F.) = 3 samples
b. Greater than 1000 S.F. and less than or equal to 5000 S.F. = 5 samples.
c. Greater than 5000 S. F. = 7 samples
2. Pipe and Duct Insulation
Three samples per homogeneous area of insulation were taken unless it was a confirmation sample.
3. Elbows, Valves, Fittings and Connection Mud
Three representative samples were taken from each representative type of insulated elbow, valve, fitting and connecting mud unless it was a confirmation sample.
4. Boiler, Tanks and Furnaces
A minimum of 3 samples per unit was collected.
5. Patchwork (NOT APPLICABLE)
Patchwork is defined as a patch or repair to existing material based on the following quantities:
a. Surfacing material patches are limited to a maximum of 6 S. F.
b. Pipe and duct insulation patches are limited to a maximum of 6 L. F. or 6
S. F.
c. Boiler, tanks and furnace patches are limited to 6 S.F. maximum.
If the patchwork exceeded the limits prescribed above, the sampling protocol resorted back to the homogeneous area descriptions in items 1-4. If a material qualifies as patchwork, a single sample was collected per patch.
6. Ceiling or Acoustical Tile
a. Minimum of 2 Samples
7. Miscellaneous Friable Material (INCLUDED DRYWALL & JOINT
COMPOUND)
a. 3 Samples
8. Non-friable Material
Non-friable materials for purposes of this survey would include material such as floor tiles and mastic/adhesive, linoleum floor covering, interior/exterior caulks, flooring felt (if still under floor tile), roofing materials, miscellaneous cementitious material such as wall or ceiling panels, caulking or sealant, or window glazing.
a. Minimum of 2 samples
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Sampling Protocol
Paint chips containing lead concentrations at or above 0.5 percent by weight are considered positive for lead based on EPA and Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines for Target Housing and Child Occupied Facilities.
The inspector collected paint chip samples from representative surfaces and components likely to be impacted by any renovation project and compared them against the HUD definition for Lead-
Based Paint (LBP) of 0.5 % by weight. Individual sample results are presented in tabular form in Appendix B.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Construction Industry Standard for
Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead
Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.
4. OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS
Hangar 731 - Asbestos
The following collected bulk sample materials contained asbestos by Polarized Light
Microscopy (PLM) (reference Appendix A for the Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary followed by the Laboratory Report and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing
Materials):
1. 12” X 12” Olive Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8)
2. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10)
3. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Note: Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door
Insulation could not be determined without potentially damaging the Fire Door Rating.
The doors should be assumed positive if renovation disturbs the interior insulation of the door, or alternatively bulk samples could be collected prior to disturbance.
Hangar 731 - Lead
All of the painted surfaces sampled with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-07 (1.12% lead by weight) in Hangar 731 were less than 0.5% lead by weight via Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy. Additionally, all other painted surfaces were below the analytical reporting limit with the exception of Sample # 731-PB-03 (0.0891% lead by weight).
Note: Disturbance to any painted item/surface/component shall be done in compliance with the
OSHA Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-
Based Paint Guide Specifications. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Construction Industry Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62) does not reference the HUD definition for LBP. If detectable levels of lead are identified in any painted surface, paint disturbance will fall under the OSHA Lead Standard. OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 requires employers to perform exposure monitoring for employees whose tasks disturb or potentially disturb lead. The data contained in this survey report should be provided to the Contractor, prior to the Contractor submitting bids for maintenance, renovation or demolition work. The
Contractor shall assume that all painted surfaces may contain detectable levels of lead for purposes of this project and demonstrate through personal air sampling that airborne lead levels will not exceed 30 micrograms (ug) lead per cubic meter (m3) of air determined as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), for each representative task and trade that disturbs painted surfaces.
Refer to Appendix B for the Paint Chip Sample Summary followed by Laboratory Data and
Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples.
Hangar 731– PCBs/Fluorescent Lights
The construction date of Hangar 731 at Dobbin Air Force Base is 1982 for the hangar and administration area and 1990 for the paint booth area. All ballasts installed or manufactured prior to 1978, should be assumed to contain PCBs unless specifically labeled as having no PCBs or PCB Free.
Additionally, the fluorescent lights and high intensity discharge bulbs (HID) should be assumed to contain mercury.
All known or assumed PCB ballasts should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and
Use Prohibitions.
All mercury vapor light fixtures should be handled in accordance with 40 CFR Part 273
Standards for Universal Waste Management.
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
A. The asbestos containing material survey report should be maintained at the job site during performance of the construction activities.
B. Communication of this asbestos survey report results should be presented in accordance with the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 Asbestos Standard to all personnel who may enter or perform work in Building 2.
C. Disturbance of painted surfaces should be performed in accordance with the OSHA Lead
Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) and the Dobbins AFB Lead-Based Paint Guide Specifications.
Waste generated by disturbance of painted surfaces should be subjected to Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing to determine leachable lead concentrations. If leachable concentrations of lead in construction waste are determined by
TCLP testing, those materials should be disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR Part 260 to
271.
D. Remove and dispose of all PCB ballasts in accordance with 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use
Prohibitions, and other applicable Federal, State and Local Regulations.
E. Remove and dispose of (or recycle) all mercury vapor light fixtures in accordance with 40
CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management and other applicable Federal, State and Local Regulations.
6. REFERENCES
1. Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings”
(Purple Book). EPA 560/5-85-024. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Washington, DC 20460.
2. 40 CFR, Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act
3. 40 CFR, Part 763, Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act
4. 40 CFR, Part 61, Subpart M Asbestos
5. 29 CFR Part 1926.1101 Asbestos
6. 29 CFR Part 1926.62 Lead
7. HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing
(Most recent issue)
8. 40 CFR Part 260 General Hazardous Waste Management.
9. 40 CFR Part 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste.
10. 40 CFR Part 262 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste.
11. 40 CFR Part 263 Standards Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste.
12. 40 CFR Part 268 Land Disposal Restrictions.
13. 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Manufacturing, Processing, Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions.
14. 40 CFR Part 273 Standards for Universal Waste Management
If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely, Durbin Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Sellers C. Carmack
Sellers C. Carmack (EPA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector, Certificate Number 14558, Expiration
Date: September 23, 2015)
Vice President
Michael F. Durbin, CIH Michael F. Durbin, CIH (EPA-Accredited Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner, Certificate
Number 14413, Expiration Date: May 14, 2015)
President
APPENDIX A
Asbestos Bulk Sampling Summary
Followed By the Laboratory Data and Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials
Sample
Number Description Asbestos
Present Friable Non-
Asbestos
Material
Present
Sample
Location
HM
731-CB1-01
Black Covebase and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive NAD N/A See Lab
Report Janitor’s
Closet
731-CB1-02
Black Covebase and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive NAD N/A See Lab
Report Room #2 1
731-CB1-03
Black Covebase and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Paint Booth
Office
731-CER1-
Ceramic Tile and
Associated Grout NAD N/A See Lab
Report Women’s
Restroom
731-CER1-
Ceramic Tile and
Associated Grout NAD N/A See Lab
Report Men’s
Restroom 2
731-CT1-01
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Speckles and
Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
Outside
Room #4 and
Room #5
731-CT1-02
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Speckles and
Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Room #5 3
731-CT1-03
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Speckles and
Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Room #4
731-CT2-01
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Janitor’s
Closet
731-CT2-02
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Janitor’s
Closet
731-CT2-03
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling
Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Janitor’s
Closet
Description Asbestos
Present Friable Non-
Asbestos
Material
Present
Sample
Location
HM
731-CT3-01
2’ X 4’ White Ceiling
Tile - Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
731-CT3-02
2’ X 4’ White Ceiling
Tile - Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Paint Booth
Office 5
731-CT3-02
2’ X 4’ White Ceiling
Tile - Pinholes
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
731-DI1-01
Duct Insulation – Foil
Wrapped
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
Outside
731-DI1-02
Duct Insulation – Foil
Wrapped
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
Outside
Room #5
731-DI1-03
Duct Insulation – Foil
Wrapped
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
Room #4
731-DI2-01
Duct Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Hangar
731-DI2-02
Duct Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Hangar 6A
731-DI2-03
Duct Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Hangar
Description Asbestos
Present Friable Non-
Asbestos
Material
Present
Sample
Location
HM
731-DWJC-
Drywall and Joint
Compound - Ceiling
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Men’s
Restroom
731-DWJC-
Drywall and Joint
Compound - Ceiling
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Room #2 7
731-DWJC-
Drywall and Joint
Compound - Ceiling
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Women’s
Restroom
731-FT1-01
12” X 12” Olive
Colored Floor Tile and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (Floor
Tile); 3%
Chrysotile
(Black
Mastic)
No See Lab
731-FT1-02
12” X 12” Olive
Colored Floor Tile and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (Floor
Tile); 3%
Chrysotile
(Black
Mastic)
No See Lab
Report Room #4 8
731-FT1-03
12” X 12” Olive Floor
Tile and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (Floor
Tile); 3%
Chrysotile
(Black
Mastic)
No See Lab
Report Room #4
731-FT2-01
12” X 12” White
Floor Tile and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD N/A
See Lab
Vestibule
731-FT2-02
12” X 12” White
Floor Tile and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report Vestibule 9
731-FT2-03
12” X 12” White
Floor Tile and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD N/A
See Lab
Vestibule
Description Asbestos
Present Friable Non-
Asbestos
Material
Present
Sample
Location
HM
731-FT3-01
12” X 12” Beige
Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (Floor
Tile); 3%
Chrysotile
(Black
Mastic)
No See Lab
Report Room #5
731-FT3-02
12” X 12” Beige
Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (Floor
Tile); 3%
Chrysotile
(Black
Mastic)
No See Lab
Report Room #2 10
731-FT3-03
12” X 12” Beige
Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and
Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive
NAD (not enough black mastic present for analysis)
No See Lab
Report
731-PF1-01
Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
731-PF1-02
with PVC Jacket and
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
731-PF1-03
with PVC Jacket and
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room
731-PF1-04
Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room, HWR
731-PF1-05
with PVC Jacket and
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room, Pipe
Going to
Tank
731-PI1-01
Paper Wrapped Pipe
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
731-PI1-02
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Corridor
Outside
Description Asbestos
Present Friable Non-
Asbestos
Material
Present
Sample
Location
HM
731-PI1-03
Paper Wrapped Pipe
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Area
731-PI1-04
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Room, HWS
731-PI1-05
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room, Cold
Water Return
731-PI1-06
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room, HWS
731-PI1-07
Paper Wrapped Pipe
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Room, HWR
731-PI1-08
Insulation with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room, Pipe
Going to
Tank
N/A Fire Doors Assumed
Positive No N/A Throughout 13
731-TI1-01
Tank Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Room
731-TI1-02
Tank Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Mechanical
Room
731-TI1-03
Tank Insulation –
Paper Wrapped with
Fiberglass
NAD N/A
See Lab
Report
Room
NAD – No Asbestos Detected; N/A – Not Applicable
Representative Photographs of Suspect Asbestos Containing
Materials
1. Black Covebase and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #1) - NAD
2. Ceramic Tile and Associated Grout (HM #2) - NAD
3. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Speckles and Pinholes (HM #3) - NAD
4. 2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile – Solid Pattern with Swirls (HM #4) - NAD
5. 2’ X 4’ White Ceiling Tile - Pinholes (HM #5) - NAD
6. Duct Insulation – Foil Wrapped (HM #6) – NAD
7. Duct Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #6A)
8. Drywall and Joint Compound - Ceiling (HM #7) - NAD
9. 12” X 12” Olive Colored Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #8) –
ACM in the Black Mastic
10. 12” X 12” White Floor Tile and Associated Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #9) - NAD
11. 12” X 12” Beige Floor Tile with Grey and White Specks and Associated
Mastic/Glue/Adhesive (HM #10) – ACM in the Black Mastic
12. Pipe Fitting Insulation with PVC Jacket and Fiberglass (HM #11) - NAD
13. Pipe Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #12) - NAD
14. Fire Doors (Assumed Positive) (HM #13) – Confirmation of UL Listed Fire Door
Insulation Could Not Be Determined Without Potentially Damaging the Fire Door
Rating.
15. Tank Insulation – Paper Wrapped with Fiberglass (HM #14)
APPENDIX B
Paint Chip Sample Summary Table Followed by Laboratory Data and Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples
Collection
Date
Sample
Number
Description Location Analytical
Method
Percent Lead by Weight
(wt%)
08/21/2013 731-PB-01 Beige Paint Chip
Women’s
Restroom, CMU
Wall
AAS BRL
08/21/2013 731-PB-02 Beige Paint Chip Room/Office #4 AAS BRL
08/21/2013 731-PB-03 Black Paint Chip
Janitor’s Closet, Metal Door
Frame
AAS 0.0891
08/21/2013 731-PB-04
White/Cream
Paint Chip
Janitor’s Closet, Metal Stairs
AAS BRL
08/21/2013 731-PB-05 Grey Paint Chip
Paint Booth
Office, Metal
Door Frame
AAS BRL
08/21/2013 731-PB-06
White Paint
Chip
Hangar, on
Structural Steel
AAS BRL
08/21/2013 731-PB-07
Yellow Paint
Chip
Hangar, on
Concrete Floor
AAS 1.12
08/21/2013 731-PB-08 Grey Paint Chip Hangar, On
Concrete Floor
AAS BRL
BRL: Not Detected at the Reporting Limit
Representative Photographs of Paint Chip Samples
1. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Women’s Restroom (Sample # 731-PB-01) - BRL
2. Beige Paint on CMU Wall, Room/Office #4 (Sample # 731-PB-02) - BRL
3. Black Paint on Metal Door Frame, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-03) – 0.0891%
(lead by weight)
4. White/Cream Paint on Metal Stairs, Janitor’s Closet (Sample # 731-PB-04) - BRL
5. Grey Paint on Metal Door Frame, Paint Booth Office (Sample # 731-PB-05) - BRL
6. White Paint on Structural Steel, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-06) - BRL
7. Yellow Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-07) – 1.12% (lead by weight)
8. Gray Paint on Concrete Floor, in Hangar (Sample # 731-PB-08) - BRL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .