Attch 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Civil Works IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4417-11-R-0019
About this file
Solicitation FA4417-11-R-0019 Civil Works IDIQ Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4417-11-R-0019 Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Civil Works Responses to Questions.pdf | ||
| FA4417-11-R-0019 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Site Vist MFR and List of Attendees.pdf | ||
| FA4417-11-R-0019-0001.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 Working Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 6a SOW-Technical Evaluation Project.pdf | ||
| Solicitation FA4417-11-R-0019 Civil Works IDIQ.pdf | ||
| Attch_5 _Financial_Institution_Ref_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch 6b Drawing Technical Evaluation Project | — | |
| Attch 2 Civil Works Specs.pdf | ||
| Attch 3 Schedule of Wage Rates.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
FA4417-11-R-0019
Past/Present Performance Questionnaire
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Project Title:
6. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
6. Project Title:
7. Period of Performance:
C. FAX or Email COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO: 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron/LGCB, 350 Tully St, Bldg 90339, Hulburt Field, FL 32544-5810, Attention: Mary Hallmon, FAX : (850) 884-6626. mary.hallmon@hurlburt.af.mil
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: 5 Jul 2011, 2:00P.M. local time.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| None |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the established schedule.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? YES NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)
9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? YES NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING ___________________________________________________
Signature of Rater: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .