RFIs 20 May 21.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GPS GNSS Simulator Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2823-21-Q-A019
About this file
This document contains questions and responses regarding a Request for Information (RFI) for a GPS GNSS Simulator. The RFI seeks a simulator that meets the basic requirements outlined in the Technical Requirements Document (TRD), including the ability to generate Y/M code signals. Alternate proposals for systems that only meet basic requirements or that include additional contemplated features will be considered, but the lowest priced technically acceptable solution will be awarded. The integrating company must be a U.S.-owned, SMC-approved active participant in the GPS Satellite Simulation Working Group. Vendors need not provide a Vector Network Analyzer for calibration unless one is not built into their proposed solution. Specifics on spoofing signal requirements are considered sensitive and will not be disclosed in full. The opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| TRD 4 June 21.pdf | ||
| RFIs 2 Jun 21.pdf | ||
| TRD 2 June 21.pdf | ||
| RFIs 25 May 21.pdf | ||
| RFIs 18 May 21.pdf | ||
| Att 2 Reps and Certs.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA2823-21-Q-A019.pdf | ||
| Att 1 TRD 6 May 21.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA282321QA019 – GPS GNSS Simulator Consolidated Requests for Information As of 20 May 2021
Question 1): Is the government amenable to providing contract financing in the form of milestone payments? Is it possible to receive a milestone payment upon delivery of the system that is not fully TRD compliant and then receive a final payment upon delivery of hardware meeting the full contract requirement? Specifically, we would like to receive a milestone payment upon delivery of the initial hardware, which includes all requirements except the GPS Y/M code module, and then receive a final payment when upon delivery of the GPS Y/M code module.
Response 1): No, the Government has no use for the equipment without the Y/M code module and would prefer to not pay for it beforehand.
Question 2): Will the government accept alternate proposals for this requirement, i.e., one proposal for a system meeting the basic requirements and a separate proposal for a system that meets the basic requirements and includes some or all of the “contemplative” (C) or desired features contained in the TRD? If so, how will the evaluation be accomplished using the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach, since the offer with the enhanced capability would be more expensive than the basic offer? If alternate proposals are not permitted, how does the government plan to consider “contemplative” (C) or desired features or are they of no benefit in the evaluation?
Response 2): We will accept alternate/multiple quotes, but it is still LPTA and the bare minimum are the requirements and lowest priced will be awarded. The customer did not make the contemplatives an actual requirement because they thought it would make it a brand name requirement and wanted to keep competition open.
If your company can provide the contemplatives it would be more like market research for any future requirements unless it happens to be the lowest priced, technically acceptable option.
Question 3): Section 1 of the TRD states in part, “The integrating company shall be: a United States (US) owned company, pre-approved by the GPS directorate (SMC), an active participant with the GPS Satellite Simulation Working Group (SSWG), and shall adhere to the latest technical requirements documentation for implementing Y-code on GPS simulators as directed by the GPS directorate.” Do the requirements to be pre-approved by the GPS directorate and to be an active participant with the SSWG apply pre-award or only post-award once the contract is awarded?
Response 3): Vendors need to be active and participants pre-award
Question 4): Does the government require the contractor to provide a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) to support system calibration or does the government plan to use an existing government-owned VNA to perform calibration?
Response 4): This is up to the vendor. Some allow for auto-calibration while others don’t so we don’t want to stipulate that a VNA is required when some units have it built in. Short answer, we will need a means to calibrate the simulator and instructions on how to do so. So whether the vendor uses the auto-cal option, or supplies us with a VNA as part of the purchase, or just provides instructions on how to calibrate and expects us to get a VNA on our own is acceptable.
Question 5): What are the specific spoofing signal requirements in Section 24 of the TRD?
Response 5): Can’t go into specifics here without broaching sensitive information, however if they can handle multipath then it will meet our needs.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .