Evaluation Factors and Criteria.pdf

Evaluation Criteria and Evaluation Factors

CHR/CHW Distance Learning Web-Based Training

The contractor will be evaluated for suitability for this contract based upon the following evaluation factors.

Technical Capability

Relevant Past Performance

Price

A. Technical Capability

Information shall be precise, factual, detailed, and complete. Offerors should not assume that the evaluation team is aware of company abilities, capabilities, plans, facilities, organization, or any other pertinent fact that is important to accomplishment of work. Technical acceptability will be determined by review of information submitted acceptable offeror which must provide a description in sufficient detail to show that product offered meets the Government’s requirement in accordance with (IAW) the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The offeror shall propose its plan/methodology to accomplish the following tasks:

1. Provide a comprehensive training package for IHS CHWs/CHRs with unlimited usage;

2. Develop a set of core skills, competencies, and scope of practice for CHWs/CHRs that are recognized per Community Health Worker Core Consensus C3 Project;

3. Develop an appropriate CHW/CHR curriculum that includes legal and ethical responsibilities,;

4. Available training formats for the courses (60% course availability at award date and

100% course availability after 30 days from award date)

5. Demonstrate/Prove the availability to provide the courses

The submission of Technical Capability Factor shall indicate the offeror’s quality and capability of the work to be performed. The government will evaluate the offeror’s overall understanding and approach to accomplish the requirements of the PWS.

This submission shall be limited to 5 pages

B. Relevant Past Performance

Offeror will be evaluated on performance under existing contracts and performance on prior contracts. Offeror should note the difference between past performance and past experience. Past performance relates to quality and how well a Contractor performed, while past experience is about the type and amount of work previously performed by a Contractor. The Government may supplement the information offeror provide with performance information it may obtain from any source including its own experience with the offeror.

Element 1. The Offeror’s relevant past performance information -- The Offeror will be evaluated to assess the demonstrated quality of performance on similar work, to include the ability to control the quality and cost of work, timeliness of performance, and effectiveness at accomplishing the goals of previous work. Offeror is required to provide the evidences and corporate resume of two (2) contracts performed during the past seven years or currently in process for the relevant services to what is being solicited under this solicitation. Relevant contracts are those contracts that are of similar scope, magnitude, nature, and work. A representative of IHS may contact the offeror’s previous customer(s) for a phone interview to help rate the offeror’s performance.

The submission under Element 1 shall include the following information for each contract:

1. Points of contact (Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative and any other pertinent officials that can verify performance) - name, agency/company, address, phone number and email address

2. Contract title & number (and task order number(s) when applicable)

3. Relevancy to the PWS for the subject solicitation in terms of project description and magnitude of the work performed. The relevancy information must be delineated to the level that allows the evaluating officials to make a proper relevancy determination.

4. Total original, present and/or final contract dollar value

5. Explanation of problems, delays, cost overruns and corrective actions taken

6. Contract holder status (prime or sub-contractor)

Element 2. All Concerns shall submit a short narrative that describes their experience in working with communities and organizations that represent a broad range of American Indian and Alaska

Native People. In addition, offeror shall demonstrate their understanding of IHS mission, goals and customers.

Element 3. The Federal Government uses the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS) to document contractor performance information that is required by Federal

Regulations. Past performance information entered to CPARS is available to federal agencies through a separate system called the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) for source selection purposes. Contracting Officer will assess the offeror’s PPIRS records as part of the evaluation of this factor.

This submission shall be limited to 5 pages

C. Price

Element 1. Offeror shall complete the attached Price/Cost Schedule Table.

For evaluation purpose, the following equation will be used to arrive at the offeror’s total overall price.

Total Price of Base Period + Total Prices of All Option Periods = Total Evaluation Price