Evaluation.pdf

PDF 202 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair Services for the MILSTAR Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA825022Q0641
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair Services for the MILSTAR Program, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA825022Q0641_______0001.pdf PDF
CAVAF.docx DOCX document
FA825022Q0641.pdf PDF
RDL.pdf PDF
PWS.docx DOCX document
CDRL.pdf PDF
RQR.pdf PDF
Packaging.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
Instructions.pdf PDF
Transportation.pdf PDF
Item_Description.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. INTRODUCTION:

1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified “Approved Source” offeror(s) This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor

2. The government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEEDURES:

1. The government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below:

Factor 1- Price

The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The

Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price Reasonableness and

Balance.

Price Reasonableness: The proposed prices will be evaluated for Price

Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the

Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see

FAR 31.201-3.

Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINs) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.

Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated to be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal. The TEP calculation will be a summation of all Contract Line Item Pricing.

2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: In addition to meeting the identified factor above, Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and required delivery schedules.

Furthermore, all Offeror’s shall be listed as an approved source in the Government’s

Screening Analysis Worksheet Form 761 or 762 prior to contract award.

A qualification package request is attached to this solicitation for those contractors who are not already qualified; however, per FAR 9.202(e), the government reserves the right not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards.

3. The process for the evaluation of proposals is as follows:

a. This award will be made to the offeror that submitted the proposal with the lowest

Total Evaluated Price and is a qualified source.

b. Past performance record and history will be assessed as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104. Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .