Evaluation_Form-_Attachment_B.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Strategic Planning using Appreciative Inquiry Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTMA9117R00012
About this file
Attachment B- Evaluation Form
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Responses_Summary.pdf | ||
| USMMA_Strategic_Planning-SOW_.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_DTMA9117R00012.pdf | ||
| USMMA_Strategic_Planning-SOW_3-16-17.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
(Check appropriate box)
| Performance Elements |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Poor |
| Unacceptable |
Quality of Services/ Work
Timeliness of Performance
Cost Control
Business Relations
Customer Satisfaction
1. Name & Title of Evaluator:
2. Signature of Evaluator:
3. Name of Organization:
4. Telephone Number of Evaluator:_
5. State type of service received:
6. State Contract Number, Amount and period of Performance
7. Remarks on Excellent Performance: Provide data supporting this observation. Continue on separate sheet if needed)
8. Remarks on unacceptable performance: Provide data supporting this observation. (Continue on separate sheet if needed)
DTMA9117R00012
ATTACHMENT B
RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unacceptable), 1 (Poor), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Good), 4(Excellent), or ++ (Plus). Use the following instructions a guidance in making these evaluations.
Quality
| Timeless |
| Business |
| Product/Service |
| Cost Control |
| of Performance |
| Relations |
| -Compliance with contract requirements |
| -Within budget (over/ under target costs) |
| -Meet Interim milestones |
-Reliable -Effective management -Businesslike correspondence
-Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of
| -Current, accurate, and complete billings |
| -Responsive to technical directions |
| -Responsive to contract requirements |
personnel -Technical excellence -Relationship of negated costs to actual -Cost efficiencies -Completed on time, including wrap-up and -contract administration -Prompt notification of contract problems -Reasonable/cooperative
| -Change order issue |
| -No liquidated damages assessed |
| -Flexible |
-Pro-active -effective contractor recommended solutions -Effective snail/small disadvantaged business Subcontracting program
| 0. Zero |
| Nonconformances are comprises the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of |
| Cost issues are comprising performance of contract requirements. |
| Delays are comprising |
the achievement of contract requirements, Despite use Response to inquiries, technical/ service/administrative issues is not effective and responsive.
Agency resources of Agency resources.
| 1, Unacceptable |
| Nonconformances require major |
| Cost issues require major |
| Delays require major |
| response to inquiries, technical/ |
| Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| service/administrative issues is marginally effective and responsive. |
| 2. Poor |
| Nonconformances require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract |
| Costs issues require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract |
| Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/administrative issues is somewhat effective and |
| requirements. |
| requirements. |
| requirements. |
| responsive. |
| 3. Acceptable |
| Nonconformances do not impact |
| Cost issues do not impact |
| Delays do not impact |
| Responses to inquires, technical/ |
| achievement of contract requirements. |
| achievement of contract requirements. |
| achievement of contract requirements. |
| service/administrative issues is usually effective and responsive. |
| 4. Good |
| There are no quality problems. |
| There are no cost issues. |
| There are not delays. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/ service/administrative issues is effective and responsive, |
5. Excellent The contractor has demonstrated an exceptional performance level in some or all of the above categories.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .