B08_SOL_Attachment_4__PPQ_CGC_JAMES_(WMSL-754)_DS_(1).docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCGC JAMES (WMSL 754) DOCKSIDE REPAIRS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140D0423Q0052
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors providing dockside repair services to the USCGC JAMES (WMSL 754). The template collects information on the contractor's performance on contracts with the Department of the Interior including the contract title, number, type, award date, completion date, value, period of performance, contractor's role as prime or subcontractor, and government point of contact. Respondents are asked to evaluate the contractor's performance on quality, program management, timeliness, cost control, and other factors using a standardized rating scale. Space is also provided for a narrative summary of additional comments. The related federal contract opportunity is for dockside repairs to the USCGC JAMES (WMSL 754) issued by the Department of the Interior Departmental Offices Interior Business Center.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08_SOL_Attachment_5_Class_Brand_Name_Justification_USCG_Redacted_(2).pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_3__NDA_CGC_JAMES_(WMSL-754)_DS_(1).pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Solicitation_140D0423Q0052_CGC_JAMES_(WMSL-754)_DS_FINAL_(1).pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_1__Specification_CGC_JAMES_(WMSL-_754)_DS_(1).pdf | ||
| B08_SOL_Attachment_2__Price_Schedule__CGC_JAMES_(WMSL-754)__DS_(1).xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140D0423Q0052.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation 140D0423Q0052
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Offeror:___________________________________________________________________
B. Agency/Customer:___________________________________________________________
C. Contract Title:______________________________________________________________
D. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________
E. Contract type: _______________________________________________________________
F. Award Date: ________________________________________________________________
G. Completion Date: ____________________________________________________________
H. Contract Value:
| Initial: _____________________________________________ |
| Final: ______________________________________________ |
I. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________
J. Offeror Role (Prime or Sub): __________________________________________________
K. Government Point of Contact:
| Name:________________________________________________________ |
| Email Address:_________________________________________________ |
| Telephone Number:_____________________________________________ |
L. Project Description
SECTION 2: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| O |
| OUTSTANDING - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example to others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”. |
| E |
| EXCELLENT – The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements. |
| G |
| GOOD – There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| F |
| FAIR – Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| P |
| POOR – Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| U |
| UNSATISFACTORY – Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| N |
| NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score |
| Quality of Product or Service |
| O |
| E |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| U |
| N |
Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements
Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program
Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
| Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations |
| O |
| E |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| U |
| N |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations
Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
| Transition/Phase-in & Employee Retention/Attraction |
| O |
| E |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| U |
| N |
Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
| Cost Control |
| O |
| E |
| G |
| F |
| P |
| U |
| N |
Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 3: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this form to the contractor that has submitted for evaluation, they will provide with their proposal submission.
If uncomfortable with providing directly to the contractor, please submit a copy to:
Shavonda Jamison, shavonda_jamison@ibc.doi.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .