B08 Past Performance Questionnaire NPS App Support.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NPS MOBILE APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P2121R0011
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for evaluation of a consultant on a National Park Service mobile application support services project. The questionnaire requests information on the contract, including the consultant name, project type and dates, initial and final costs, and reasons for any cost differences. It also includes a section to rate the consultant's performance on technical aspects, management approach, and ability to manage subcontractors on a scale of outstanding to unacceptable. Additional comments can be provided on up to two pages.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the National Park Service for mobile application support services. The solicitation number and name provided are 140P2121R0011 for NPS MOBILE APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES. The opportunity type is listed as a solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P2121R0011_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| B09 App Support RFQ Questions (4)_0001.pdf | ||
| A06 Mobile Applications Support Services PWS 03232021.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08 Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140P2121R0011.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
When completed, this document is source selection sensitive and the Service will use it only for evaluation of this proposal and not share it outside of the evaluation team.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
Consultant Name (Enter the name of the company being evaluated in this questionnaire)
Project Type (Define if the project was standalone or part of an overall contract.)
Period of Project Performance
Initial Project Cost
Final Project Cost
Reason(s) for Differences Between Initial Project Cost and Final Project Cost Shown Above:
Scope of Work Performed or Description of Services Provided
Evaluator Information (Information pertaining to individual completing this questionnaire.)
Name
Title
Phone
Fax
Number of Months Worked on Contract
SECTION 2: QUALITY OF CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE
Use the following rating scale to indicate your satisfaction with the consultant’s performance in the specified areas by placing an “X” in the appropriate block.
RATING CODE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
| 5 |
| OUTSTANDING, |
| Performance meets project objectives and exceeds many objectives. The consultant completed the project with a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant were highly effective. |
| 4 |
| Good |
| Performance meets project objectives and exceeds some objectives. The consultant completed the project with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant were effective. |
| 3 |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets project objectives. The consultant’s completion of the project contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the consultant appear, or were satisfactory. |
| 2 |
| Marginal |
| Some system performance requirements are met; some system operational requirements are met; substantial customer intervention required |
| 1 |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance fails to meet one or more project objectives and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The performance of the consultant on the project contained serious problems for which the consultant’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective. |
| N |
| Neutral |
| Not Observed Under This Project / Unable to Provide a Rating |
Technical Performance
| O |
| G |
| A |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Ability to accomplish project technical requirements and implement high quality standards
Ability to meet project schedule
Quality/Integrity of technical data, reports and analyses provided for project
Management Approach
| O |
| G |
| A |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Effectiveness of overall project/program management (including ability to lead/manage/control the project effort)
Reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your personnel
Timeliness/effectiveness of project problem resolution
Understood/complied with your objectives and technical requirements
Ability to hire and provide a highly qualified workforce
Ability to retain quality personnel
Managed subcontractors effectively
Effectively performed quality control/quality check on subcontractor deliverables
Reasonable in evaluating the need for change orders
Adequately forecasted, managed, and controlled costs relative to the scope of the work
Management was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with contract issues.
You may provide more information on additional pages, not to exceed 2 pages.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .