B08_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_Attachment_4.doc

DOC document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Buffalo National River is requesting a licensed se Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P6221R0018
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Region

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Buffalo National River is requesting a licensed se, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P6221R0018_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
A02_-_Septic_Pumping_Location_Frequency_-_Attachment_7_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P6221R0018_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
CertificationVaccinationPRAv7_Contractors_0001.pdf PDF
B13_-_Vaccination_Certification_Notification_to_DOI_Contractors_Template_082321_FINALCO_Signed_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P6221R0018_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B04_-_Technical_Questionnaire_-_Attachment_3.pdf PDF
Sol_140P6221R0018.pdf PDF
A04_-_Revised_-_Septic_Pumping_SOW.docx DOCX document
B03_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Date____________________ Contractor Name _____________________________ Project Title/Description: ____________________________ Contract Type [ ] RFP [ ] Sealed Bid [ ] Fixed Price [ ] Negotiated

Contract Period ________________________ Cost Original _______________Current/Final Cost ________________

1. Was the project completed within the allotted time? [ ] Yes [ ] No

2. How effective was the contractor with establishment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A and execution of the schedule?

3. Contractor’s adherence to plans and specifications

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

4. Submission of documents and reports (submittals)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

5. Standards of workmanship/quality

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

6. Completion of final punch-list

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

7. Supervision

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

8. Communication, coordination and cooperation (CO, COTR, etc.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A

9. Was the contractor fair/reasonable regarding equitable

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A adjustments and cost proposals in response to changed work requirements?

OTHER COMMENTS

Interviewed by:__________________________________________

Email:

Phone:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .