B08 Attachment 3 - Draft Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.docx

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Version 1 (29 June 2021)

Strategic planning and campaign plan development and implementation Contract Number: < upon award, enter contract number> Contract Description: Strategic Planning Capability Contractor’s Name: < upon award, enter name of contractor > (hereafter referred to as the contractor).

1. Vision. Create a Strategic Planning Office to integrate the core funded programs with the reimbursable programs managed and executed by the Direct Reporting Units (DRUs), to create and maintain a Command level understanding of the Command’s current scope of work, capacities, and capabilities to validate USAMRDC is aligned to and supportive of stakeholders current and future needs. The Strategic Planning Office mission is to will be tasked with proactively identifying areas of misalignment, developing corrective actions/initiatives, managing those actions/initiatives and assessing outcomes to confirm the Command has achieved the needed results.

2. Mission Inform and enhance USAMRDC’s executive decision-making by ensuring an overarching Command level perspective in the validation and prioritization of organizational requirements and capabilities.

3. Purpose

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan is a government-developed document used to determine if the contractor’s performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the detailed process for a continuous oversight process:

· What will be monitored

· How monitoring will take place

· Who will conduct the monitoring

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented

The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its Quality Control Plan. The QASP provides the structure for the government’s surveillance of the contractor’s performance and their Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) actions to assure they meet contract standards. It is the government’s responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.

The QASP is not part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor’s quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance.

The government may provide a copy of the QASP to the contractor to facilitate open communication. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.

Bottom line, the QASP should ensure early identification and resolution of performance issues to minimize impact on mission performance.

4. Authority

Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Inspection of Services clauses, which provides for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the service called for in the contract or order. This acceptance is to be executed by the contracting officer or a duly authorized representative.

5. Roles and Responsibilities

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

Program/Project Manager (PM) or Functional Services Manager (FSM) – The PM/FSM provides primary program oversight, nominates the COR, ensures the COR is trained before performing any COR duties and supports the COR’s performance assessment activities. While the PM/FSM may serve as a direct conduit to provide Government guidance and feedback to the Contractor on technical matters, they are not empowered to make any contractual commitments or any contract changes on the government’s behalf.

Contact information will be provided after award.

Contracting Officer (KO) – The KO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned KO: Ms. Terrie L. Bloom Organization or Agency: USAMRAA, Fort Detrick Maryland Telephone: 301-619-7354 Email: terrie.l.bloom.civ@health.mil

Other Key Government Personnel

Name: Contract Specialist, Mr. Matthew Gembe Title: Contract Specialist Telephone: 301-619-1350 Email: matthew.w.gembe.civ@health.mil

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for surveillance of the contractor’s quality program and help the COR to document contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf.

Other Key Government Personnel – Will be provided after award.

Contractor Representatives

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Task Manager for this contract. (Complete this section after the contract award)

Contractor Program Manager - <upon award, enter name> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>

Contractor Task Manager - <upon award, enter name> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>

Other Key Contractor Personnel - <upon award, enter name or delete these lines if not applicable> Title: <enter title> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>

6. Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance

6.1. Contract Surveillance

The goal of the QASP is to ensure that contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR’s contribution is their professional, non-adversarial relationships with the KO, PM and the contractor, which enables positive, open and timely communications. The foundation of this relationship is built upon objective, fair, and consistent COR evaluations of contractor performance against contract requirements. The COR uses the methods contained in this QASP to ensure the contractor is in compliance with contract requirements. The COR function is responsible for a wide range of surveillance requirements that effectively measure and evaluate the contractor’s performance. Additionally, this QASP is based on the premise that the contractor, not the government, is responsible for management and QC/QA actions to successfully meet the terms of the contract.

6.2. Surveillance Matrix

The Surveillance Matrix (see sample at Attachment 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance and frequency the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.

DFARS 222.17 mandates including surveillance for ensuring compliance with Combatting Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) in the QASP. Use the CTIP sample checklist from PGI 222.17. See the DoD CTIP website.

Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performs surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) should be used to form the foundation of the COR’s inspection checklist.

6.3. Performance Rating Definitions

The performance ratings below reflect definitions at FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1. The COR will use these rating to evaluate the quality of contractor’s performance. [If your organization requires that you use a different rating mechanism, insert it here.]

Performance Rating Definition

Note 1: Plus or minus signs may be used to indicate an improving (+) or worsening (-) trend insufficient to change the evaluation status.

Note 2: N/A (not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.

7. Performance Reporting

7.1. Corrective Action Report (CAR)

Describes how discrepancies are reported and resolved (see sample CAR below).

7.2. Customer Complaint Form

(See sample customer complaint form below)

7.3. Performance Assessment Report (PAR) (See sample customer PAR below)

Appendix 1 - Surveillance Matrix

Initial/Final assessment of MRDCs Strategic Position.

Deliverable 5 Briefings and reports submitted no later than the due dates. Briefings are accurate and contain substantive information demonstrating that PWS requirements have been met. Reports do not require resubmission due to errors or inaccuracies.

AQL: 95%

Direct observation and 100% inspection; review of reports by COR and KO

Draft/Final Campaign Plan and Updates

Deliverables 6, 8, and 10 Briefings and reports submitted no later than the due dates. Briefings are accurate and contain substantive information demonstrating that PWS requirements have been met. Reports do not require resubmission due to errors or inaccuracies.

Direct observation and 100% inspection; review of reports by COR and KO

Ongoing Strategic Reviews/Implementation Effort Reports

Deliverable 7 and 9 Briefings provided no later than the due dates. Briefings are accurate and contain substantive information demonstrating that PWS requirements have been met.

Direct observation and 100% inspection; review of reports by COR and KO

Provide executive consultant services and recommendations to USAMRDC Senior Leaders

Key Task 2-7

a) Consultation and recommendations are based on industry accepted studies, models and methods b.) Contractor operates at the Expert level

AQL: 100%

Direct observation

Provide guidance and advice on organizational transformation, organizational transition, strategic planning, workforce management, organizational process and integration with DoD and DA level processes at the strategic level.

Key Task 3

a) Guidance and advice is based on industry accepted studies, models and methods b.) Contractor operates at the Expert level

AQL: 100%

Direct observation

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

1. CONTRACTOR

2. CONTRACT NUMBER

3. TYPE OF SERVICES

4. FUNCTIONAL AREA

5. SUSPENSE DATE

6. CONTROL NUMBER

7. DEFICIENCY |_| MAJOR |_| MINOR

FINDING:

FINDING IMPACT:

Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.

8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

9. ISSUING AUTHORITY

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

11. COR DETERMINATION

|_| ACCEPTED |_| REJECTED

12. CLOSE DATE

CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD

DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT

SOURCE OF COMPLAINT

ORGANIZATION

BUILDING NUMBER

INDIVIDUAL

PHONE NUMBER

NATURE OF COMPLAINT

CONTRACT REFERENCE

VALIDATION

DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT

ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR

RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE

I. PERFORMANCE

7. |_| DEFICIENCY (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY)

|_| NEW

|_| REPEAT

|_| NO DEFICIENCY NOTED

8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM REVIEWED

II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION

11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR

12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE

13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY

III. ACTION CORRECTED

14. |_| CONCUR |_| NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE

15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)

6. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS