Attachment No. 1 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Westchester County ATCT HVAC Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-22-R-00087
About this file
This document contains a pre-solicitation notice and past performance questionnaire for an HVAC replacement project at an air traffic control tower. The Federal Aviation Administration seeks qualified general or major mechanical contractors to remove and replace the boiler, pumps, hot water heater and DDC system at Westchester County Airport in New York. The project value is estimated between $250,000 and $500,000, with a 180-day period of performance. Interested contractors must submit three past performance questionnaires from FAA, TRACON or similar facility projects valued between $250,000-$500,000 completed within five years, scoring a minimum of 2 in all categories. Responses are due by December 17, 2021 to the contracting officer. This pre-solicitation sets aside the project for small businesses under NAICS 238220 with a size standard of $15M.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment No. 2 - Security Notice to Prospective Offerors.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
WESTCHESTER COUNTY AIRPORT
AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER
HVAC REPLACEMENT
Page | 1
To: (Point of Contact) (Company) (Phone) (Fax)
The Federal Aviation Administration is currently evaluating and you were listed you as a performance reference. It would be greatly appreciated if you would take 5 or 10 minutes to complete the following information and email to morgan.finley@faa.gov.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Ms. Morgan Finley Contract Specialist
Federal Aviation Administration Terminal Construction Branch, AAQ-550
10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76177
(817) 222-4367 – Direct Line morgan.finley@faa.gov
1. Contractor Name: 2. Contract Number:
3. Contractor Address: 4. Contract Type:
5. Your Company Name: 6. Your Company POC/Phone/Email:
7. Period of Performance: 8. Dollar Amount of Award: $ Total Dollar Value with Mods: $
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Type of Work:
Construction Service Support Service Supply Other
Attachment No. 1 mailto:morgan.finley@faa.gov mailto:morgan.finley@faa.gov mailto:morgan.finley@faa.gov mailto:morgan.finley@faa.gov
AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER
HVAC REPLACEMENT
Page | 2
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE :
1-Unsatisfactory 2-Marginal 3-Satisfactory 4-Good 5-Outstanding NA-Not Applicable Please provide additional comments below for ratings of 3 and below.
1. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
2. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
3. Did the contractor provided a product or service that conformed to standards of good workmanship?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
4. How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
5. To what extent did the contractor’s management system provide visibility into problems and risks?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
6. How responsive do you think the contractor was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
7. How effective has the contractor been in identifying user requirements?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
8. To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the contract?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
9. Did the contractor effectively managed his subcontractors?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Attachment No. 1
AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER
HVAC REPLACEMENT
Page | 3
10. Did the contractor efficiently coordinated work between different trades?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
11. Did the contractor maintain an effective quality control program?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
12. To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
13. Was the contractor able to implement successfully the site safety plan?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
14. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s management and support staff?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
15. To what extent was the contractor experienced with the use of suspended scaffolds?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
16. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
17. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
18. To what extent was the contractor’s maintenance and problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate and of appropriate content?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
19. To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
20. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s overall quality of service?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
21. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government staff?
AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER
HVAC REPLACEMENT
Page | 4
1 2 3 4 5 NA
22. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
23. To what extent were the contractor’s employees experienced and qualified?
1 2 3 4 5 NA
NOTE:
Respond Yes or No
24. Would you recommend award to this contractor?
Yes No
If Yes or No, please summarize.
25. Please provide other comments:
Signature: Date:
| Point of Contact: |
| Company: |
| Phone: |
| Fax: |
| Construction: Off |
| Service Support: Off |
| Service: Off |
| Supply: Off |
| Other: |
| the requirements and to successfully solve problems: Off |
| 2 To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical: Off |
| 3 Did the contractor provided a product or service that conformed to standards of good: Off |
| 4 How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments: Off |
| 5 To what extent did the contractors management system provide visibility into problems: Off |
| problems during the course of the contract: Off |
| 7 How effective has the contractor been in identifying user requirements: Off |
| 8 To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the: Off |
| 9 Did the contractor effectively managed his subcontractors: Off |
| 10 Did the contractor efficiently coordinated work between different trades: Off |
| 11 Did the contractor maintain an effective quality control program: Off |
| 12 To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence: Off |
| 13 Was the contractor able to implement successfully the site safety plan: Off |
| 14 What was your level of satisfaction with the contractors management and support: Off |
| 15 To what extent was the contractor experienced with the use of suspended scaffolds: Off |
| NA_10: Off |
| NA_11: Off |
| NA_12: Off |
| NA_13: Off |
| NA_14: Off |
| NA_15: Off |
| 16 To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely: Off |
| 17 To what extent were the contractors reports and documentation accurate and complete: Off |
| documentation timely accurate and of appropriate content: Off |
| 19 To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements: Off |
| 20 What was your level of satisfaction with the contractors overall quality of service: Off |
| SAN JUAN PUERTO RICO: Off |
| 22 What was your level of overall customer satisfaction: Off |
| 23 To what extent were the contractors employees experienced and qualified: Off |
| 24 Would you recommend award to this contractor: Off |
| If Yes or No please summarize: |
| 25 Please provide other comments: |
| undefined_4: |
| Date: |
| Contractor: |
| contractor name: |
| Contract Number: |
| Contractor Address: |
| Contract type: |
| Company Name: |
| POC/Phone/email: |
| POP: |
| Dollar Amount: |
| Total with Mods: |
| Title of Contract: |
| Description of Contract Service: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .