Attachment (c) 52.212-2 Evaluation.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USS Emory S. Land Stackable Steel Test Weights Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6824624Q0111
About this file
This document is the Evaluation provision (Attachment (c) 52.212-2) for a Request for Quote (RFQ) solicitation for the procurement of a set of four (4) steel stackable test weights for the USS Emory S. Land. The evaluation will use the tradeoff process, with technical capability and price as the evaluation factors. Technical capability will be evaluated using an adjectival rating system. The acquisition is set aside for small businesses under NAICS code 332999 with a 750-employee size standard. The required delivery date is September 15, 2024, and the contract type is firm-fixed price. Various FAR clauses are applicable, including clauses related to commercial items, small business, and cybersecurity requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment Question and Answers.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment (1)a Stackable Test Weights Diagram.pdf | ||
| Attachment (1) Stackable Test Weights SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment (a) Quotation Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment (b) Addendum 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (c) 52.212-2
RFQ: N6824624Q0111
Title: USS Emory S. Land Steel Stackable Test Weights
52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) Quotations will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 Evaluation of quotations or offers; the tradeoff process as described in FAR 15.101-1 will be utilized.
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Factor 1 – Technical Capability Factor 2 – Price
All evaluation factors other than price are approximately equal. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
Technical Capability adjectival rating will be provided using the following table:
Adjectival Rating Description Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.
Proposal is un-awardable.
(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of a quote, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful quoter within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the quoter’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .