Attachment 6. Past Performance Evaluation Matrix.pdf

PDF 70 KB Posted

Attached to
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-23-Q-0013
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS), newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 2_Wage Determination No 2015-4587.pdf PDF
W911KF-23-Q-0013.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_Evidence of Authority to Sign Offers (1).pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1-SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment 4_SIOAN Form 380-2 Personnel Data Questionnaire.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Adjectival Scale & Relevance Levels for Past Performance Factor

Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

RATING DESCRIPTION

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In performing the past performance factor evaluation, evaluators will use the following relevance levels to assess the relevance of the prior contract effort(s) of offerors.

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

RATING DEFINITION

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .