Attachment 3 - Technical Evaluation Rating.pdf

PDF 121 KB Posted

Attached to
On-site Language Interpretation DR4699-CA Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70FBR923R00000007
Issued by
Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 9

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to On-site Language Interpretation DR4699-CA, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 1 - Provisions Clauses.pdf PDF
Language Services PWS Attachment A.docx DOCX document
SOW (Mixtec) DR4699-CA.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Contractor Assurance Certification.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

The technical evaluation rating criteria are defined as follow:

Rating DESCRIPTION High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the requirements with little or no Government intervention.

Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the requirements and an approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards.

Proposal has significant strengths that will significantly benefit the Government. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Some Confidence The Government has some confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the requirements with some Government intervention.

Demonstrates an understanding of the requirement and an approach that meets performance or capability standards. Proposal presents an acceptable solution with few or no strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is moderate.

Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, or will be successful in performing the requirements even with Government intervention.

Demonstrates a shallow understanding of the requirement and an approach that only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance. The risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .