Attachment 2- PP Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT) Program Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT001425R0004
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity. The National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE) at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is conducting a full and open competition for a requirement for 1 FTE Lead Animal Assisted Therapist and 3 FTEs Service Animal Training Instructors at the NICoE in Bethesda, MD (Solicitation Number HT001425R0004). The Offeror has identified the Respondent as a reference to validate the Offeror's past performance. The Questionnaire requests the Respondent to assess the Offeror's performance in areas such as fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate, using a rating scale of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. The Respondent is also asked whether they would award the Offeror another contract and if the prior contract was terminated for default or cause.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HT001425R0004.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- Past Performance Summary (PPS).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is conducting a Full and Open Competition for a new requirement. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation Number, HT001425R0004 is for nonpersonal services of 1 FTE - Lead Animal Assisted Therapist and 3 FTEs - Service Animal Training Instructors at the NICoE at 8901 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20889.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than January 2, 2025 to Dr Miriam Railey at miriam.t.railey.civ@health.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MARKET SEGMENT
| Ancillary Services |
| Dental Services |
| Nursing Services |
| Physician Services |
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Number of Credentialed FTEs:
Number of Privileged FTEs:
Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified HCW’s IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .