Attachment 1 Addendums for Solicitation.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cisco Business Critical Services for Network Optimization at PHNSY&IMF Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HC101923R0010
- Issued by
- Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
This document provides instructions for submitting proposals in response to solicitation number HC101923R0010 from the Defense Information Systems Agency for Cisco Business Critical Services for Network Optimization at PHNSY&IMF. Offerors must submit proposals in three volumes: a technical/management approach volume of up to seven pages describing the approach to meeting requirements; a price proposal in Microsoft Excel format with fixed pricing for the base period and all option periods; and a contract documentation volume including completed forms and authorizations. Proposals are due to the contracting officer and contract specialist at their provided email addresses. The technical factor will be rated acceptable or unacceptable based on addressing all requirements. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and completeness. Award will be made using lowest price technically acceptable to the responsible offeror providing the best value to the government based on these factors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 PHNSYIMF OPSEC Contract Requirements 03-21-22.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6 QA Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HC1019-23-R-0010 7SEP2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Solicitation DD 254 Cisco Network Optimization.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 QASP MSSD-5339.docx | DOCX document | |
| JA23-087 JA Cisco Network Optimization Services Final_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1
Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Submission of Offers is tailored as follows:
(b) Submission of offers:
(12) Other Instructions
(i) General Information
(A) Points of Contact: The contracting officer (KO) and contract specialist (CS) are the sole points of contact for this procurement. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the KO/CS. Written requests for clarification must be sent to the KO/CS at gwendolyn.m.rapoza.civ@mail.mil and katherine.a.jackson23.civ@mail.mil.
(B) Discrepancies: If the offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the KO in writing with supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.
(ii) The Offeror is requested to submit a written technical proposal and a price proposal in response to the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). The Offeror must complete Blocks 6 and 7 of the DD Form 254 with the appropriate information for their companies and any subcontractors (when applicable). The completed DD Form 254 must be submitted with your proposal. Information on submission of technical and price proposals is provided below. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of statements asserted in the proposal. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. The Offeror shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and capabilities and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by the RFP and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The proposal should sufficiently address the requirements as stated in the PWS.
(iii) Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the information to offerors paragraph as noted in the table below. To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a standalone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. Each volume may contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing may be used to identify sections.
Additionally, each volume may contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
Table 1 Proposal Organization
| VOLUME |
| 52.212-1 Paragraph |
Number
| VOLUME TITLE |
| COPIES |
| PAGE LIMIT |
| I |
| (b)(12)(v)(A) |
| Technical/Management |
| 1 electronic |
| 7 |
| II |
| (b)(12)(v)(B) |
| Price |
| 1 electronic |
| No page limit |
| III |
| (b)(12)(v)(C) |
| Contract Documentation |
| 1 electronic |
| No page limit |
(iv) Electronic Offers. The offeror shall submit volumes I through III in electronic format via email and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104” in the Subject line. Each volume shall be a separate file. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. Proposals shall be submitted to the KO/CS identified below:
Katherine Jackson (Contract Specialist) – katherine.a.jackson23.civ@mail.mil Gwendolyn Rapoza (KO) – gwendolyn.m.rapoza.civ@mail.mil
(v) Proposal Organization:
(A) Volume I – Technical/Management. The technical/management volume should be specific and complete, and will be evaluated against the technical/management factor defined in FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1-inch margin using no smaller than an 11-point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text to include any text contained in a table. The file size of each document shall not exceed 2MB. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying the factor.
In the Technical/Management volume, address your proposed approach to meeting or exceeding the minimum performance or capability requirements of all aspects of the PWS, as well as any risks in your proposed approach in terms of technical/performance, price, and/or schedule. Address any technical/management risk by identifying those aspects of the proposal you consider to have the potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, poor performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Describe the impact of each identified risk in terms of its potential to interfere with or prevent the successful accomplishment of other contract requirements (e.g., PWS/SOW or specification requirements). Propose a realistic "workaround" or risk mitigation for identified risks that will eliminate or reduce risk to an acceptable level. Identify any new risks introduced by such risk mitigation.
(B) Volume II – Price. The price proposal will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR Part 15.404 in order to determine if they are reasonable and complete. Reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For a price/cost proposal/quotation to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated, and prices/costs presented in in a clear and useful format. You shall submit pricing for the base period and all option periods, including option pricing for an additional 6-month period that may be authorized IAW FAR 52.217-8. See FAR 52.217-8 which authorizes the Government to require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. The CLIN Pricing Worksheet should include a separate line item for the additional 6-month period IAW FAR 52.217-8. These prices shall be identical to the proposed pricing in the 6 months prior to expiration of the base period, or the final option period, if option periods are present. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the base period, all option periods, the option pricing for the additional 6-month period, and surge pricing as requested below. The price proposal spreadsheet shall be submitted in MSExcel 2007 format or newer. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The file size of each document shall not exceed 20MB. Information beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your price. All information relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price Volume. The Offeror shall propose a fixed price payment plan as a separate document commensurate with the value of the deliverables and/or significant milestones in the PWS for this requirement. A firm fixed price payment plan with the total dollar amount divided into equal monthly payments will not be accepted unless the offeror provides justification for this plan that the Government subsequently deems adequate. The awardee will be authorized to invoice monthly for all approved travel costs incurred and approved by the COR.
Price submissions should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness. Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, materials, etc.). Data other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support the price reasonableness of your proposal in accordance with FAR 15.403.
FAR 12.504(a) The following laws are not applicable to subcontracts at any tier for the acquisition of commercial items or commercial components at any tier:
(7) 41 U.S.C. 4706(d) and 10 U.S.C. 2313(c),Examination of Records of Contractor, when a subcontractor is not required to provide certified cost or pricing data (see 15.209(b)), unless using funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5).
(C) Volume III - Contract Documentation. The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file.
1. You must complete blocks 30 a, b, and c of the SF Form 1449 and return this form with your proposal. Signature by the offeror on the SF1449 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.
2. You must provide completed pricing information in your pricing spreadsheet.
3. You must provide FAR 52.212-3 Alt I (completed representations, certifications, acknowledgments, and statements).
4. Complete Block 6 and 7 of the DD Form 254 and return with your proposal.
5. Authorized Offeror Personnel. Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. Contractor Point of Contract information will be used for the clause at G1, Points of Contact.
6. Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations. Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; Unique Entity Identification; TIN; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other locations. List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.
(End of provision revisions) ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2(a) Addendum to 52.212-2(a), Evaluation-Commercial Items is tailored as follows:
a. Basis for Contract Award Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government using a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) process. The technical proposal should include all information the offeror wants the Government to consider and evaluate regarding its ability to perform all required tasks and conform to all required terms and conditions. To be eligible for award, the offeror’s proposal must sufficiently address all aspects of the PWS.
With regard to the best value analysis for the award decision, the below evaluation factor will be used to determine technical acceptability. Section 508 Accessibility Standards apply to this requirement.
b. Evaluation Factors
(1) The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate the Offeror’s proposal:
Factor 1: Technical/Management
(a) Quotations must be from authorized resellers of the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) quoted.
For the purposes of this procurement only, an authorized reseller is defined as an entity authorized by the OEM to sell their products to the Federal Government and to provide support for the OEM items, including new releases, version upgrades, revisions, corrections of reported errors, enhancements (to include instructions for implementation and operation for all software support levels and product versions), technical support, contractor resolutions to problems or failures, and the most current commercial release or version of the software.
Quotations shall be from an authorized reseller. The reseller must include a letter or email authored by a representative of the OEM confirming that the vendor is authorized to be a reseller, as defined above, by the quotation due date. The authorization documentation from the OEM shall not be older than 90 days from the date quotations are due.
(b)The Offeror’s technical proposal will be evaluated and rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be rated Acceptable, the offeror’s technical/management approach shall address all aspects of the PWS and demonstrate the offeror’s ability to meet or exceed the requirements of the PWS.
The Cisco point of contact is:
Angela Eberhardt, Regional Manager, ankim@cisco.com 1-808-540-1714/808-291-5815
Factor 2: Price
(a). The Offeror’s firm-fixed price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes based upon the total evaluated price which consists of the offeror’s proposed prices for the period of performance. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine if it is reasonable and complete. Normally, price reasonableness is established through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For a price to be complete, all solicitation requirements must be priced, figures correctly calculated and prices presented in in a clear and useful format. The Government reserves the right, but is not obligated, to conduct a realism analysis.
(2) Relative Importance of Factors. The relative importance of each factor is as follows: The Technical/Management Approach Factor is equal to the Price Factor.
c. Ratings
(1) The technical/management factor will receive one of the ratings described in Table 1.
The Technical/Management factors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable.
Technical Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
(End of provision revisions)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .