ATTACHMENT_II.pdf
PDF 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USING DATA MATCHING IN THE SCHOOL MEALS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-3198-S-15-0085
About this file
ATTACHMENT II PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment0001-signed.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_I.pdf | ||
| RFP_AG-3198-S-15-0085.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT II
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SOLICITATION NUMBER: AG-3198-S-15-0085
THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TO
AND SUBMITTAL BY THE VENDORS REFERENCES
Our company is being considered in a Source Selection by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Contract Management Division. It would be appreciated if you would provide comments regarding our past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about a Vendors past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, respectfully request that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.
This form shall be sent via e-mailed to:
Ashley Owens at Ashley.Owens@fns.usda.gov and Thu Vo at Thu.Vo@fns.usda.gov.
Subject Line: AG-3198-S-15-0085: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERNECE FOR
[INSERT VENDOR NAME]
Past Project Information:
1. Contractor name and address:
2. Project Title and/or Contract Number:
Evaluator (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential.)
1. Name of Evaluator: ______________________________ Date:_____________
2. Phone Number: _____________________ Fax Number:___________________
3. Address: _________________________________________________________
4. Position held or function in relation to the project: _______________________ mailto:Ashley.Owens@fns.usda.gov mailto:Thu.Vo@fns.usda.gov
RATINGS:
Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:
(E) Exceptional The contractor’s performance greatly exceeded the stated requirements.
(HA) Highly Acceptable The contractor’s performance exceeded the stated requirements.
(A) Acceptable The contractor’s performance met the stated requirements.
(M) Marginal The contractor’s performance met the stated requirements, but with difficulty.
(U) Unacceptable The contractor’s performance did not meet the stated requirements.
Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following: (Use additional sheets as necessary)
1. The relationship between the contractor and the customer’s contract team.
2. The contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors.
3. The contractor’s overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct.
4. The contractor provided competent program/project manager, supervisor, and workers
5. The contractor’s quality control.
6. The contractor’s ability to meet the performance schedule.
7. The contractor took measures to improve his schedule problems, if any?
8. The contractor’s ability to provide the required work at a reasonable price.
9. The contractor’s compliance with laws, regulations, and policies, if applicable.
10. The contractor rectified identified problems in a timely fashion without further incident of the same.
11. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice; show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
12. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please explain.
13. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?
14. Was the contractor provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings?
If so, what were the results?
15. The contractor maintained a professional working relationship with Government personnel.
16. The contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints.
17. OVERALL RATING: ____________
Please provide any additional comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .