Road16 PastPerf DataSheet.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Recovery-Road 16 Aggregate Surfacing Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-0489-S-10-0467
About this file
Contractor Past Performance Data Sheet
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Road16 Drawings.pdf | ||
| Road16 Wage Rates.doc | DOC document | |
| Road16 Specs List.pdf | ||
| Road16 ARRA Sign Details.pdf | ||
| Road16 SF1442 Sol'n.pdf | ||
| Road16 FireSptRqts.pdf | ||
| Road16 RFP Pkg.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET
(Complete one Form for each Reference)
| Solicitation Number: |
| AG-0489-S-10-0467 |
Contractor Name:
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Contract Number:
Date Completed:
| Contract Type: |
| FFP___ Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Specify) ___________ |
Brief Item/Service Description (See Quality (1) below to provide additional detail):
Project Location
Project Size/Period of Performance:
Customer Name:
Customer POC (Person who can verify data):
Address:
Telephone:
FAX:
QUALITY
| YES |
| NO |
| 1 |
| Were supplies/services similar in nature to this solicitation’s work description? |
| 2 |
| Was/is any part of this contract terminated for default and/or in litigation? |
| 3 |
| Was consideration or payment withheld for non-conforming supplies/services? |
| * |
| 4 |
| Was any warranty work completed on delivered items or rework of services? |
| * |
| 5 |
| Did you receive any quality awards in the past three years? |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| 6 |
| Were the customers completely satisfaction with the completed products & services? |
TIMELINESS
| 7 |
| Were all items (including products, services, reports, etc.) delivered within the original contract schedule? |
| 8 |
| Were liquidated damages or consideration assessed for late delivery |
| * |
BUSINESS RELATIONS
| 9 |
| Did subcontractor get effectively managed where subcontracts were necessary? |
| 10 |
| Was an environment of reasonableness and cooperation nurtured whereby flexibility existed and solutions were recommended? |
| 11 |
| Was there a good working relationship with the Contracting Officer and COR? |
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
| 12 |
| Describe any corrective action(s) initiated to solve any of the above-described problems/deficiencies on this contract. Discuss the success of the corrective action(s) taken.* |
NOTES:
(1) Answers in columns containing an asterisk (*) require an explanatory narrative attached to this form. Other answers may include narrative response at the offerors election. Provide additional sheets as necessary.
(2) The information provided will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance in meeting cost, price, technical, and performance objectives. The results may be used in the overall comparative evaluation of the offeror(s) in accordance with Evaluation Factors for Award provisions. Price is equal to past performance and relevant experience.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .