SF-30 Amendment 0015.pdf
PDF 224 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 3. 9 Asset Manager Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 86544A19R00003
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
3. 9 Asset Manager has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
86544A19R00003 x x
1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT
THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
ATLANTA GA 30303-2806
14TH FLOOR
HUD-NFSA
40 MARIETTA STREET
OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PROCUREMENT
US DEPARTMENT OF HUD
06/25/20200015
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
06/17/2019
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
3.9 Asset Management Solicitation 86544A19R00003 Conformed Copy
A. This is Amendment 0015 for the 3.9 Asset Management Solicitation 86544A19R00003.
B. This Amendment contains, Summary of Changes, Questions and Answers(Q&A's), revised attachments, and a conformed copy of the Solicitation.
C. The Summary of Changes to this solicitation are listed as continuation(pages 2 through
13) of this SF-30.
D. See attachment titled 3.9 AM Solicitation 86544A19R00003 Amendment 0015 Question &
Answers (40 pages).
E. See revised Attachment A4: Allowable Pass-Through Expenses (1 page).
F. See revised Attachment A6: Elimination of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in HUD-Owned, FHA-Insured Single Family Properties Built Before 1978 (7 pages).
Continued ...
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
Charles W. Hoyle Jr.
06/25/2020
H46340 cwh
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR
2 14
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
86544A19R00003/0015
G. See revised Attachment A7: Lead Based Paint
Disclosure (9 pages).
H. See revised Attachment A13 List of
Clients/Past Performance Information (1 page).
I. See revised Attachment A15 3.9 AM Pricing
Spreadsheet
J. See the Conformed Copy of Solicitation
86544A19R00003 (pages 1 through 178)
K. The solicitation closing date has changed from
June 29, 2020 at 2:00pm Eastern Time to June 30, 2020 at 2:00pm Eastern Time.
L. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAINED
UNCHANGED.
NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)
Sponsored by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.110
Summary of Changes Amendment 0015
1. Changed From:
B.2 SERVICES
The services required in this RFP are being solicited on a 100% Total Small Business Set-aside basis for eleven areas: 1D,2D, 4D/5D, 3S/5S, 4S/6S, 1P/4P, 3P, 5P, 3A/4A, 5A/8A, and 6A/7A. The NAICS code is 531390, Other Activities Related to Real Estate, with an established Small Business size standard of $7.5M in average annual revenues. (see Section K).
Changed To:
B.2 SERVICES
The services required in this RFP are being solicited on a 100% Total Small Business Set-aside basis for eleven areas: 1D,2D, 4D/5D, 3S/5S, 4S/6S, 1P/4P, 3P, 5P, 3A/4A, 5A/8A, and 6A/7A. The NAICS code is 531390, Other Activities Related to Real Estate, with an established Small Business size standard of $8.0M in average annual revenues. (see Section K).
2. Changed From:
K.3 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2018)
(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 531390.
(2) The small business size standard is $7.5 million.
Changed To:
K.3 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications (MAR 2020)
(a) (1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 531390.
(2) The small business size standard is $8.0 million .
3. Changed From:
1.8 HOURS OF OPERATION
The Contractor shall maintain regular office hours (between 8:00 am- 4:00 pm) consistent with the awarded HOC jurisdiction time zone
Changed To:
1.8 HOURS OF OPERATION
The Contractor shall maintain regular office hours (between 8:00 am- 4:30 pm) consistent with the awarded HOC jurisdiction time zone, 8 hours a day during the standard work week, and include on-call emergency response.
4. Changed From:
(2) Performance Confidence Assessment. In evaluating Past Performance, the government will address four components – recency, relevancy, value, quality, and sufficiency. This factor’s primary emphasis is to assess the past performance of the proposed prime contractor (or in the case of joint ventures or some other teaming arrangement, the primary member of the team). However, if significant (20%) subcontracting/use of other teaming arrangements is anticipated, the past performance history of the proposed subcontractors/other team members must also be evaluated.
• All references will be first assessed for recency and HUD will consider only references performed within the three years immediately prior to submission of the proposal;
Of those determined to be recent, HUD will assess the degree of similarity in scope, value and magnitude the past performance efforts submitted have to the solicitation requirements to determine relevancy. For this solicitation, magnitude is defined as volume of monthly property assignments and will be evaluated in accordance with the monthly property assignment ranges set forth in Section L;
HUD will then assess relevant past performance efforts for quality;
HUD’s overall assessment of each area will be based on HUD’s confidence of successful performance as set forth in the rating description.
Changed To:
(2) Performance Confidence Assessment. In evaluating Past Performance, the government will address three components – recency, relevancy (scope value, magnitude), and quality. This factor’s primary emphasis is to assess the past performance of the proposed prime contractor (or in the case of joint ventures or some other teaming arrangement, the primary member of the team). However, if significant (20%) subcontracting/use of other teaming arrangements is anticipated, the past performance history of the proposed subcontractors/other team members must also be evaluated.
• All references will be first assessed for recency and HUD will consider only references performed within the four years immediately prior to submission of the proposal;
Of those determined to be recent, HUD will assess the degree of similarity in scope, value and magnitude the past performance efforts submitted have to the solicitation requirements to determine relevancy. For this solicitation, magnitude is defined as monthly inventory (which includes new inventory assigned during that month as well as inventory carried over from previous months), and will be evaluated in accordance with the monthly property assignment ranges set forth in Section L;
HUD will then assess relevant past performance efforts for quality;
HUD’s overall assessment of each area will be based on HUD’s confidence of successful performance as set forth in the rating description.
5. Changed From:
VOLUME II PAST PERFORMANCE
The offeror shall submit the following information/documents:
A completed chart providing the information required by the Past Performance Information chart in Attachment 13. The chart shall reflect all relevant past performance performed in the three-year period immediately preceding submission of the proposal and all work currently being performed.
Changed To:
VOLUME II PAST PERFORMANCE
The offeror shall submit the following information/documents:
A completed chart providing the information required by the Past Performance Information chart in Attachment 13. The chart shall reflect all relevant past performance performed in the four-year period immediately preceding submission of the proposal and all work currently being performed.
6. Changed From: L.8 Line(s) of Credit, L.9 QUESTIONS
Changed To: L.9 Line(s) of Credit , L.10 QUESTIONS,
7. Revised: Attachment A4 (Allowable Pass-Through Expenses).
8. Changed From:
1.3.28 TERMITES AND WOOD DESTROYING ORGANISMS
The Contractor shall complete a work order in P260 within two (2) business days from contract ratification requesting that the FSM Contractor order a Termite and Wood Destroying Organism (WDO) inspection from a pest control officer for properties that meet the following conditions:
A. Properties where WDO inspections are mandated by the state or local jurisdiction; or
B. The property is under contract with FHA mortgage insurance and the property is located in a FHA designated Termite Probability Zones (TPZ). TPZ areas are listed by State at http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/ref/sfh1-23a.cfm; or
C. COR approval is granted to perform the inspection as a customary seller concession.
Changed To:
1.3.28 TERMITES AND WOOD DESTROYING ORGANISMS
The Contractor shall complete a work order in P260 within two (2) business days from contract ratification requesting that the FSM Contractor order a Termite and Wood Destroying Organism (WDO) inspection from a pest control officer for properties that meet any of the following conditions:
A. Properties where WDO inspections are mandated by the state or local jurisdiction
B. Customary to the Area or property is not located in HUD’s Termite Treatment Exception Area located at https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/SFH_POLI_TERMITE.PDF , if applicable; or
C. Evidence of Active Infestation - Appraisers identifies evidence of infestation; If any active infestation is identified NPMA-33 must be submitted; or
D. Lender’s Discretion – Lender requires appraiser to report evidence of infestation. If any active infestation is identified NPMA-33 must be submitted; or
E. COR approval is granted to perform the inspection as a customary seller concession.
9. Changed From:
1.3.27.2 Properties built prior to 1978
Properties built prior to 1978 and being sold with an FHA insured mortgage, the Contractor shall generate a lead based paint inspection work order in P260. Upon receipt of an inspection work order from the Contractor, the FSM Contractor shall order an inspection and necessary stabilization, if the cost of the stabilization does not exceed $4,000. Within one (1) day of receipt of the inspection and stabilization report, the FSM Contractor shall upload the information in P260 for use by the Contractor to prepare and have the necessary disclosures updated and signed. When the cost of the stabilization exceeds $4,000, the FSM Contractor shall notify the AM Contractor via P260. For stabilization costs exceeding $4,000, the Contractor shall only proceed with ordering the stabilization if directed by the COR.
A. Disclosure Requirements
The Contractor shall, using credible means, verify the year of construction is entered in P260. For all properties constructed prior to 1978 the Contractor shall comply with the disclosure requirements of the Lead Disclosure Rule (24 CFR 35, subpart A) as described in Attachment A7. The Contractor shall not execute a sales contract for any HUD-owned property constructed prior to 1978 for which the required Lead-Based Paint disclosure has not been provided.
Purchasers of HUD-owned properties built before 1978 and being sold with HUD insured mortgages shall also sign a lead based paint addendum with the sales contract.
Changed To:
1.3.27.2 Properties built prior to 1978
Properties built prior to 1978 and being sold with an FHA insured mortgage, the Contractor shall generate a lead based paint inspection work order in P260. Upon completion, the inspection report must be provided to the purchaser and a determination made if the purchaser wants to proceed. If the purchaser wants to proceed and the estimated stabilization costs are equal to or less than $4,000, the Contractor shall generate a lead based paint stabilization work order in P260.
If the purchaser wants to proceed and the estimated stabilization costs exceed $4,000, the Contractor shall coordinate with the COR to determine the next steps. Attempts will be made to either 1) convert the sale to 203(k) financing and fund the escrow with $4,000 from seller proceeds, 2) on a 203 (b) transaction only, approval may be given to exceed the $4,000 costs, 3) allow the purchaser to change contract to conventional financing or cash with no credit, or 4) the contract will be cancelled and earnest money refunded.
A. Disclosure Requirements
The Contractor shall, using credible means, verify the year of construction is entered in P260. For all properties constructed prior to 1978 the Contractor shall comply with the disclosure requirements of the Lead Disclosure Rule (24 CFR 35, subpart A) as described in Attachment A7. The Contractor shall not execute a sales contract for any HUD-owned property constructed prior to 1978 for which the required Lead-Based Paint disclosure has not been provided.
Purchasers of HUD-owned properties built before 1978 shall sign a lead based paint addendum with the sales contract.
10. Changed From:
1.3.25.3.1 Exclusive Listing Period
C. Winning Bid - The Contractor shall accept the bid that is equal to or greater than the minimum acceptable bid and, subject to the exception in 24 CFR 291.205(i), results in the greatest net return for HUD. The net offer shall be calculated by subtracting from the bid price the dollar amounts for the financing and loan closing costs and real estate sales commissions to be paid by HUD (24 CFR 291.205 (b) (1)). The Contractor shall treat multiple bids from the same bidder as prescribed in 24 CFR 291.205 (i). The Contractor shall treat identical net offers submitted by different bidders as prescribed in 24 CFR
291.205 (j). If all bids received are unacceptable, the Contractor shall (i) request COR concurrence to accept a bid that is less than the minimum acceptable bid and document in P260 the rationale why acceptance of such a bid would be in HUDs best interest; (ii) counteroffer in accordance with 24 CFR 291.205(l), or (iii) reject all bids and list the property under the extended listing period. If the Contractor elects to counteroffer, it shall provide an identical counteroffer to all bidders and identify the bid period for resubmitting bids.
The Contractor shall post on P260 the counteroffer and period for resubmitting bids. If the Contractor elects to provide a counteroffer, pursuant to 291.205(l), the highest acceptable net bid received within the specified time period shall be accepted.
Prior to contract ratification, the Contractor shall verify the following and notify the COR of any discrepancies:
(i) That only the Broker of Record (or designee) signs the Sales Contract HUD 9548 and Owner Occupant Certification when applicable.
(ii) That the selling broker’s license is active
Changed To:
1.3.25.3.1 Exclusive Listing Period
C. Winning Bid - The Contractor shall accept the bid that is equal to or greater than the minimum acceptable bid and, subject to the exception in 24 CFR 291.205(i), results in the greatest net return for HUD. The net offer shall be calculated by subtracting from the bid price the dollar amounts for the financing and loan closing costs and real estate sales commissions to be paid by HUD (24 CFR 291.205 (b) (1)). The Contractor shall treat multiple bids from the same bidder as prescribed in 24 CFR 291.205 (i). The Contractor shall treat identical net offers submitted by different bidders as prescribed in 24 CFR
291.205 (a)(2) and (j).
If a property is listed as insurable with or without escrow, the Asset Manager should select an individual owner occupant buyer’s offer over a bid from a Government Entity, a HUD -approved nonprofit, or investor, when the net bid is the same for these entities.
If a property is listed as uninsurable, the Asset Manager should select a Government Entity or a HUD-approved Nonprofit buyer’s offer over a bid from an individual owner occupant or investor, when the net bid is the same for these entities.
If all bids received are unacceptable, the Contractor shall (i) request COR concurrence to accept a bid that is less than the minimum acceptable bid and document in P260 the rationale why acceptance of such a bid would be in HUDs best interest; (ii) counteroffer in accordance with 24 CFR 291.205(l), or (iii) reject all bids and list the property under the extended listing period. If the Contractor elects to counteroffer, it shall provide an identical counteroffer to all bidders and identify the bid period for resubmitting bids.
The Contractor shall post on P260 the counteroffer and period for resubmitting bids. If the Contractor elects to provide a counteroffer, pursuant to 291.205(l), the highest acceptable net bid received within the specified time period shall be accepted.
Prior to contract ratification, the Contractor shall verify the following and notify the COR of any discrepancies:
(i) That only the Broker of Record (or designee) signs the Sales Contract HUD 9548 and Owner Occupant Certification when applicable.
(ii) That the selling broker’s license is active
11. Removed:
B.4 PRICING
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Directed Inspections
COR Directed Inspections are defined as COR directed inspections and fees for conducting the special inspections requested by COR.
This fee does not include the selected AM Offeror’s required marketing inspections: 1) Initial, 2) Prior to List, and 3) Ready to Close. These required marketing inspections are included in the marketing percentage fee. The COR Directed Inspections CLIN covers inspections beyond those required to market the property and are specifically directed by the COR.
12. Changed From:
TECHNICAL APPROACH (Shall not exceed 20 pages)
The offeror shall submit a Technical Approach that demonstrates logical and feasible methods for meeting the requirements described in the following Performance Work Statement Tasks: 5.1
Transition In; 5.2 Marketing And Sales; 5.2.1 Quality Assurance
Reviews; 5.2.1.1 Asset Management Scorecard; 5.2.2 Comprehensive
Marketing Plan; 5.2.3 Contingency Plan; 5.3 Inspections; 5.3.1
Initial Inspection; 5.3.2 Prior To List; 5.3.3 Ready To Close;
5.3.4 Cor Directed Inspections; 5.3.5 Appraisal; 5.3.5.1 New
Appraisals And Report; 5.4 Data Updates; 5.4.1 Daily Posting Of
Records; 5.4.2 Work Order Notifications; 5.4.3 Imaging; 5.4.4
Date Stamps; 5.4.5 Physical File Maintenance And Retention; 5.4.6
Delivery Of Files Upon Request; 5.4.7 Communications Log; 5.5
Customer Service; 5.5.1 Response Time; 5.5.2 Toll Free Phone
Number; 5.5.3 Government Inquiries; 5.5.4 Other Correspondence;
5.5.5 Meetings; 5.6 Required Reports; 5.6.1 Quality Control
Review Report; 5.6.2 Asset Control Area (Aca) Status Report;
5.6.3 Annual Audited Financial Statements; 5.6.4 Information To
Satisfy Program Inquiries; 5.7 Training; 5.8 Transition Out.
Changed To:
TECHNICAL APPROACH (Shall not exceed 20 pages)
The offeror shall submit a Technical Approach that demonstrates logical and feasible methods for meeting the requirements described in the following Performance Work Statement Tasks: 5.1
Transition In; 5.2 Marketing And Sales; 5.2.1 Quality Assurance
Reviews; 5.2.1.1 Asset Management Scorecard; 5.2.2 Comprehensive
Marketing Plan; 5.2.3 Contingency Plan; 5.3 Inspections; 5.3.1
Initial Inspection; 5.3.2 Prior To List; 5.3.3 Ready To Close;
5.3.5 Appraisal; 5.3.5.1 New Appraisals And Report; 5.4 Data
Updates; 5.4.1 Daily Posting Of Records; 5.4.2 Work Order
Notifications; 5.4.3 Imaging; 5.4.4 Date Stamps; 5.4.5 Physical
File Maintenance And Retention; 5.4.6 Delivery Of Files Upon
Request; 5.4.7 Communications Log; 5.5 Customer Service; 5.5.1
Response Time; 5.5.2 Toll Free Phone Number; 5.5.3 Government
Inquiries; 5.5.4 Other Correspondence; 5.5.5 Meetings; 5.6
Required Reports; 5.6.1 Quality Control Review Report; 5.6.2
Asset Control Area (Aca) Status Report; 5.6.3 Annual Audited
Financial Statements; 5.6.4 Information To Satisfy Program
Inquiries; 5.7 Training; 5.8 Transition Out.
13. Removed:
5.3.4 COR DIRECTED INSPECTIONS
The Contractor, at the direction of the COR, shall perform an inspection to assess and verify various property conditions. Such conditions may include vandalism, natural disasters, hazards and other type conditions.
14. Changed From:
MINIMAL TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY
(1)Technical Approach
The government will evaluate the following regarding the proposed Technical Approach:
Whether the proposal demonstrates logical and feasible methods for meeting the requirements described in Performance Work Statement Tasks 5.1 Transition In; 5.2 Marketing And Sales; 5.2.1 Quality Assurance Reviews; 5.2.1.1 Asset Management Scorecard;
5.2.2 Comprehensive Marketing Plan; 5.2.3 Contingency Plan; 5.3 Inspections; 5.3.1 Initial Inspection; 5.3.2 Prior To List; 5.3.3 Ready To Close; 5.3.4 Cor Directed Inspections; 5.3.5 Appraisal;
5.3.5.1 New Appraisals And Report; 5.4 Data Updates; 5.4.1 Daily Posting Of Records; 5.4.2 Work Order Notifications; 5.4.3 Imaging;
5.4.4 Date Stamps; 5.4.5 Physical File Maintenance And Retention;
5.4.6 Delivery Of Files Upon Request; 5.4.7 Communications Log; 5.5 Customer Service; 5.5.1 Response Time; 5.5.2 Toll Free Phone Number; 5.5.3 Government Inquiries; 5.5.4 Other Correspondence;
5.5.5 Meetings; 5.6 Required Reports; 5.6.1 Quality Control Review Report; 5.6.2 Asset Control Area (Aca) Status Report; 5.6.3 Annual Audited Financial Statements; 5.6.4 Information To Satisfy Program Inquiries; 5.7 Training; 5.8 Transition Out
Changed To:
MINIMAL TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY
(1)Technical Approach
The government will evaluate the following regarding the proposed Technical Approach:
Whether the proposal demonstrates logical and feasible methods for meeting the requirements described in Performance Work Statement Tasks 5.1 Transition In; 5.2 Marketing And Sales; 5.2.1 Quality Assurance Reviews; 5.2.1.1 Asset Management Scorecard; 5.2.2 Comprehensive Marketing Plan; 5.2.3 Contingency Plan; 5.3 Inspections;
5.3.1 Initial Inspection; 5.3.2 Prior To List; 5.3.3 Ready To Close;
5.3.5 Appraisal; 5.3.5.1 New Appraisals And Report; 5.4 Data Updates;
5.4.1 Daily Posting Of Records; 5.4.2 Work Order Notifications; 5.4.3 Imaging; 5.4.4 Date Stamps; 5.4.5 Physical File Maintenance And Retention; 5.4.6 Delivery Of Files Upon Request; 5.4.7 Communications Log; 5.5 Customer Service; 5.5.1 Response Time; 5.5.2 Toll Free Phone Number; 5.5.3 Government Inquiries; 5.5.4 Other Correspondence; 5.5.5 Meetings; 5.6 Required Reports; 5.6.1 Quality Control Review Report;
5.6.2 Asset Control Area (Aca) Status Report; 5.6.3 Annual Audited Financial Statements; 5.6.4 Information To Satisfy Program Inquiries;
5.7 Training; 5.8 Transition Out
15. Deleted:
B.5 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS:
Contract Line Item (CLIN)
SERVICE
REQUIREMENT
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
UNIT
OF
ISSUE
FIXED
UNIT
RATE
TOTAL
ESTIMATED
ANNUAL
PRICE
CLIN xx11 COR Directed Inspections – Base Year
Each
CLIN xx12 COR Directed Inspections – Option Year 1
Each
COR Directed
CLIN xx13 Inspections – Option Year 2
Each
CLIN xx14 COR Directed Inspections – Option Year 3
Each
CLIN xx15 COR Directed Inspections – Option Year 4
Each
Total Estimated Price $
16. Changed from:
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
This is a competitive best value acquisition utilizing Performance Price Trade-Off (PPT). All evaluation factors other than past performance when combined are equal to price. The Government will evaluate offerors’ Technical Proposals on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Past Performance will be evaluated on a qualitative basis. For those offerors, whose proposals are determined to be technically acceptable, and have a fair and reasonable price, tradeoffs will be made between Past Performance and price. All individual technical factors must be rated "Acceptable" to be considered Technically Acceptable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. The failure of a proposal to meet any or all of the individual technical factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award in the absence of discussions.
Changed To:
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
This is a competitive best value acquisition utilizing Performance Price Trade-Off (PPT). Past/Present Performance is considered to be approximately equal to Price. However, as proposals become more equal in merit for the past performance factor, the importance of price to the evaluation decision will increase. Technical Factors will be evaluated for technical acceptability on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. Past Performance will be evaluated on a qualitative basis. For those offerors, whose proposals are determined to be technically acceptable, and have a fair and reasonable price, tradeoffs will be made between Past Performance and price. All individual technical factors must be rated "Acceptable" to be considered Technically Acceptable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. The failure of a proposal to meet any or all of the individual technical factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award in the absence of discussions.
17. Revised: Attachment A15 3.9 AM Pricing Spreadsheet
18. Revised: Attachment A13 Past Performance Information
19. Revised: Attachment A6 Elimination of Lead Based Paint Hazards
20. Revised: Attachment A7 Lead Based Paint Disclosure
21. Deleted:
BEST VALUE AWARD
All evaluation factors other than past performance when combined are equal to price. However, as the offerors become more equal in merit for non-price factors, the importance of price to the evaluation decision will increase.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .