Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 464 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Magnetic particle wet bench used for Nondestructive Testing Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC24881891Q
About this file
This document contains Questions and Answers related to a Request for Quote (RFQ) for a Magnetic particle wet bench used for Nondestructive Testing.
The key details are:
- The Statement of Work (SOW) appears incomplete, as it does not specify the maximum outside dimensions of the required equipment.
- AC decaying demagnetization is acceptable as an alternative to Reversing DC demagnetization, as long as the decay is controlled by the unit.
- The RFQ does not specify a brand name requirement, but Magnaflux and Gould Bass are provided as acceptable examples that meet the requirements.
The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 80NSSC24881891Q, issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Shared Services Center, a civilian agency. The closing date and award date are not provided.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ques ons & Answers
1. Your SOW looks incomplete in this statement: Outside dimensions shall not exceed?
90 x 50 is the max
2. Is AC decaying demagne za on acceptable instead of Reversing DC demagne za on?
DC Step Down is preferred.
AC decaying magne sm is acceptable if the decay is controlled by the unit and not simply an AC withdrawal through the coil
3. Also is there a Brand name they are looking for?
Magnaflux and Gould Bass are both good in my experience. I like the Magnaflux AD-2045. As long as it meets requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .